We shall say that an n-digit number is pandigital if it makes use of
all the digits 1 to n exactly once; for example, the 5-digit number,
15234, is 1 through 5 pandigital.
The product 7254 is unusual, as the identity, 39 × 186 = 7254,
containing multiplicand, multiplier, and product...
Some recursive code is part of a particularly slow path of a project. Out of curiousity I was playing around with reimplementing the code using stack context iteration instead of recursion. Below are snippets reduced to just the iteration patterns of tree elements using a DOM structure for simpli...
Oh, we have fun here too. Today has perhaps been a more serious day than ordinary, but I blame that on @Mat'sMug for working too much and @Malachi for not star-ing enough.
Well, it normally, and I believe, in this case, it does mean, that @NiallSzalkai is asking how everyone is doing, hopefully expecting the word 'yes' in response. It is a common thing to ask in Code Review's 2nd Monitor....
@JeroenVannevel Feel free to discuss our treatment of incomplete code. I decided to let the AlarmClock question slide, since we're helping a beginner. The code that exists, while incomplete, isn't completely broken either. We should be able to steer the OP in the right direction before wasting too much time with a flawed approach.
@200_success oh I don't really mind either way. The major thought behind the question was to get a review so if we can show a few errors while we're at it, that's an added plus. I was just making sure the establishes rules weren't violated
This code is simply incorrect. It is even not a stack (because it lacks
pop operation and it is impossible to implement it in a type-safe way).
Here is an example:
runStack $ do
newStackRef (5:: Int)
newStackRef False
newStackRef 'x'
according to the definition of the newStackRef it just...
I am the half-robot side of syb0rg that will be posting the recent answers of Code Review to the CR Answers chatroom. Here is the list of review suggestions I would like, in order of preference:
Efficiency (with API requests, speed of login and posting answers, etc.)
Security issues
Best pract...
I think of the shortest and clearest way to implement that excerise:
Let's say that we have as input:
total 1
drwxr----x 1 user2 workers 1024 May 26 22:22 dir
-rwx-wxrw- 2 user2 workers 1024 May 26 22:22 file.txt
our output should be:
741 dir
736 file.txt
This code is simply incorrect. It is even not a stack (because it lacks
pop operation and it is impossible to implement it in a type-safe way).
Here is an example:
runStack $ do
newStackRef (5:: Int)
newStackRef False
newStackRef 'x'
according to the definition of the newStackRef it just...
I am the half-robot side of syb0rg that will be posting the recent answers of Code Review to the CR Answers chatroom. Here is the list of review suggestions I would like, in order of preference:
Efficiency (with API requests, speed of login and posting answers, etc.)
Security issues
Best pract...
I think of the shortest and clearest way to implement that excerise:
Let's say that we have as input:
total 1
drwxr----x 1 user2 workers 1024 May 26 22:22 dir
-rwx-wxrw- 2 user2 workers 1024 May 26 22:22 file.txt
our output should be:
741 dir
736 file.txt
