« first day (145 days earlier)      last day (4763 days later) » 

2:00 PM
@Kosmonaut No. I mean the original Game Boy Tetris.
 
Welltris is different from Tetris, not a knock-off.
 
Well, it's 3D, innit.
 
@Tom: You might want to be careful: I'd cringe at seeing "stagnation" used for decrease in nominal values, but it is often so used by the ehm... by some people.
It is the same as in Dutch.
 
Tom
@Cerberus yeah, that's why I have added the definition in a footnote
 
People don't know what the word came from and start using it in new ways, which may cause confusion.
Oh, I see. Well, stagnation is hardly jargon.
 
2:02 PM
Hm. @Alain Pannetier is well on his way to getting the Outspoken badge for one single post alone.
 
Tom
@Cerberus I named it a "stagnating economy", and added a description to the combined term
not just stagnation
 
Can't you simply not explain it at all, then subtly exclude the wrong sense in a following sentence, as in: "economic growth was barely above zero in those years" or something?
 
Tom
Hmm.. could do that too, just that the sentence is already on the lengthy side. But I will see, thanks
 
Yeah it doesn't matter much, do what strikes your fancy.
(I think I'd not explain such basic terms, but...)
 
Tom
I see your point
 
2:06 PM
Well, sometimes things do depend on what the meaning of the word is is.
 
@Reg: How deep!
 
Tom
@Cerberus I'd have paid you to check my essay when it's finished if I were wealthier than I really am =)
 
@Cerberus That's not deep, that's Clinton. Get some television, dude. Seriously.
 
And a time machine.
 
Time machines will be supplied for free in this very chat.
 
2:08 PM
@Tom: Hehe, well, you might be disappointed... I find proofreading English written by Dutchmen the hardest, because they might make the same kind of mistakes I'd make.
 
Fsck everything about the Kenneth Starr investigation. Shame on you for linking to a video.
 
@Reg: Much obliged... I am not planning to buy a television set any time soon, but I will gladly watch your videos.
 
Tom
@Cerberus I'm sure you'd do fine ;)
 
The opinions are divided.
I'm a dividorrrrr!
 
Hah, well, Clinton sounds just as bad as his wife sometimes does.
 
2:09 PM
@Kosmonaut Kenneth Starr likes Fahrenheit.
 
EVIL
 
Everyone who is truly familiar with Fahrenheit likes it. Means nothing.
 
How dare you disturb the peace and quiet of this chat room by bringing up the evil Anglo-Saxon weirdness stuff.
 
@Kosmonaut You misspelled "that it" as "it.".
 
Haha.
 
2:12 PM
@RegDwight You are eaten by an S-block.
 
@Reg: Now you must be glad you are using British punctuation, not American.
 
@Kosmonaut Go draw me one first.
 
What are there S-blocks...
 
S?
S, as in s?
 
2:12 PM
Я
 
Ya.
 
 
Tetris doesn't eat players.
 
RPG Tetris does.
 
Greek iota subscriptum block attaching itself to your behinds.
 
2:13 PM
Kosmo has no idea what he's talking about. Much like when he talks about bagles or Fahrenheits.
 
Especially Fahrenheits, uhuh nods.
Hey does anyone have any idea what the highest number of accents is that can be used on a single letter simultaneously in a real language?
 
@Cerberus Ask the Viet Namese.
 
Greek could have 5 in theory.
Oh, do they have lots of accents...?
 
Well, I don't think they actually use more than two.
Me's joking, as usual. Robusto's not laughing, again.
 
Oh. Greek uses 3 quite regularly, and 4 wouldn't surprise me at all.
 
2:16 PM
@Cerberus In any language?
 
Oh, I didn't know he was Vietnamese. Though that would explain his weird non-nativeness.
@Kos: Any natural, spoken language...
 
We don't use accents in spoken language.
 
Literary variants are OK, of course.
I mean, a language that is actually spoken.
 
The answer is 1 million, on every Vietnamese letter.
 
Lạy Cha chúng con ở trên trời,
chúng con nguyện danh Cha cả sáng, nước Cha trị đến,
ý Cha thể hiện dưới đất cũng như trên trời.
Xin Cha cho chúng con hôm nay lương thực hằng ngày,
và tha nợ chúng con như chúng con cũng tha kẻ có nợ chúng con.
Xin chớ để chúng con sa chước cám dỗ,
nhưng cứu chúng con cho khỏi sự dữ.
That's Our Father in Vietnamese.
 
2:18 PM
One million exactly? Or 1M and one?
 
Exactly 1 million.
 
Oh I see some nice double accents. Sweet.
 
There are three on the second ل in Allah.
 
Nice.
And aesthetically pleasing.
Greek accents aren't terribly impressive in daily usage:
 
Arabic orthography definitely knows how to make things look visually interesting.
 
2:22 PM
ἄνδρα μοι ἔννεπε, μοῦσα, πολύτροπον, ὃς μάλα πολλὰ
πλάγχθη, ἐπεὶ Τροίης ἱερὸν πτολίεθρον ἔπερσεν:
πολλῶν δ᾽ ἀνθρώπων ἴδεν ἄστεα καὶ νόον ἔγνω,
πολλὰ δ᾽ ὅ γ᾽ ἐν πόντῳ πάθεν ἄλγεα ὃν κατὰ θυμόν,
5ἀρνύμενος ἥν τε ψυχὴν καὶ νόστον ἑταίρων.
 
Well, they are not allowed to draw, so they draw with letters.
 
Yeah.
Islamic art is good.
Their geometric figures, animals, and plants are also quite pleasing.
Who wants to play a game?
 
We are playing already.
Kosmonaut still tries to put that L next to that |.
 
I am thinking of a person, and you have to guess who it is by asking questions, which I may only answer yes or no to.
No Googling allowed. Interested?
 
Tom
2:28 PM
Does one deposit on a savings account or depost in a savings account?
 
Yes.
 
In?
I'd say in.
 
ok
 
You are not playing by the rules.
It's yes or no.
 
Oh dear.
 
2:29 PM
Yes.
@Tom You are thinking of Alan Greenspan. I win.
 
(But who's asking the questions...)
No.
 
Tom
I didn't know I was participating :p
 
Kiamlaluno, come out from behind that cardboard cut-out of a @Cerberus!
 
Hehe.
 
Are you thinking of Cher?
 
2:30 PM
Nope.
The idea is that more general questions get you to the answer faster... just a suggestion...
 
Are you thinking of pizza? Preferably with pepperoni.
I'll take a slice.
 
Are you thinking of Peter Nöone?
 
Pizza is a woman so doesn't count.
 
Noöne!!!
Spell it right!
 
Wait what was that about again...
 
2:31 PM
I get to spell my stuff the way I spell my stuff, or else.
 
I still give you guys a hint: this person is a tragic figure.
 
Cher!
Is it Cher?
 
Another tragic figure.
 
Another Cher?
I only know one.
 
No, it is still not Cher.
Ask again in 5 minutes.
 
2:32 PM
Then think of Cher!
 
I will think of Cher next time.
 
Cher is a tragic figure. I'm pretty sure it is Cher.
 
Yes.
 
The person I have in mind is or was often seen in military dress, but not quite military.
 
I'm still not quite clear about the rules, but it's fun!
Demi Moore?
 
2:34 PM
Appearances in Playboy and the like do not count.
 
No. Soldier Jane.
That one tanked big time.
 
Fail
 
So it was tragic, and military dress, and but not quite miliatry.
 
Another hint: @Reg has more affinity with this person than others here.
 
Tom
 
2:35 PM
Jinx!
 
@Kos: Fail?
What are these people up to...
 
You owe me cokes! Allovya!
 
That was what I was trying to do.
 
That's not Demi Moore.
 
Haha wtf...
 
2:35 PM
That's Cher!
 
That's Cher.
Jinx
 
Cher Guevarra
 
Another tragic figure!
 
It will be Cher in Military Dress next time, okay?
 
@Cerberus You're going to do the same person twice in a row?
 
2:36 PM
@Kos: Oh, is that against the rules?
 
OMG. Sexual-preference questions are off-topic here.
 
@Kosmonaut Ow! THWACK!
 
Oh come on, this isn't Salt Lake City or Palinville.
 
OMGWTF
 
And, thank you Martha!
 
2:37 PM
Wer zweimal mit derselben pennt, gehört schon zum Establishment!
 
Pennen?
 
Sleep.
 
Is that anything I want to know?
Ah.
 
Have we established whether this person is male or female?
 
He who does the same person twice in a row is part of the establishment.
 
2:38 PM
Is that a 70s socialist maxim?
Yeah I got that.
 
@Martha So far we've only established that it's Cher in military dress. Gender is still unclear.
 
@Martha: Not yet.
 
@Cerberus Ok, so is the person male?
 
Yes!
 
@Cerberus A maxim of the 68ies.
 
2:39 PM
+1 For Martha.
 
@Martha I find that very difficult to answer.
 
@Reg: Ah was that Woodstock or something?
 
@Cerberus Does he speak English?
 
@Cerberus More like Kommune 1.
 
@Martha: No (watch our for n/a).
(That was the exclamation mark card from Bridge.)
 
2:40 PM
Is he alive?
 
No.
 
Why?
 
(Is someone half plastic alive?)
 
When were you and the victim last seen together?
 
(That was referring to Cher.)
@Kos: No.
 
2:41 PM
Was he a politician?
 
Yes!
 
I think it's Cher. Is it Cher?
 
Non-American politician? How am I supposed to know that? I'm American!
 
If I could turn back time...
@Kos: Yes.
 
That's Cher!
 
2:42 PM
Gorbachev?
Wait he is alive.
 
@Kos: No.
 
He's not plastic, either.
 
OR IS HE?
 
I think they swapped him for an alien.
 
He recorded a CD with Clinton just the other day. Or year.
 
2:43 PM
Right, so did I.
Oh you mean Bill.
 
Gorbachev and Clinton invested jointly?
 
Nothing trumps Putin's half-naked body.
 
Except EVERYTHING
 
Was he born after 1900?
 
2:44 PM
No.
 
Was he born after 1800?
 
Was he born before 1900?
 
Mine is better
 
@Kos: Yes.
 
@Kosmonaut No.
 
2:45 PM
@Reg: Boo.
 
Did he die before 1900?
 
@Cerberus No.
 
@Martha: No.
Not even in italics.
 
Did he live in Europe?
 
Yes.
 
2:47 PM
Did he live in Moscow?
 
Yes.
 
Did he live in Stalin?
 
Uh
 
He was not the Spirit of Totalitarism.
 
I won't take uh for an answer.
 
2:48 PM
Is his corpse displayed for all to see?
 
@Martha: Don't know.
And WHAT!?
 
Haha. How diplomatic of you.
"I dunno if those crazy Russians display his corpse or not."
 
Some members of my family fled to escape the fate he met.
 
@Cerberus You know, like Lenin.
 
@Reg: Exactly.
@Martha: I had some faint idea that they had someone on display, but forgot who it was.
But the answer is most probably: no.
 
2:50 PM
Oh come on, you don't even need a TV set to know that.
 
I really think the answer is Cher Guevarra.
Everything seems to point towards that answer.
 
For example, this arrow: ↑
 
@Kos: If you want to provide an answer to a controversial subject, you need references. Preferably CGEL or some obscure linguistic article in Belarussian.
 
You see?
 
Except that they probably speak Russian there...
 
2:51 PM
@Cerberus Ugh. I don't even want to begin to know what kind of pervert gel that is.
 
It gets some people quite horny.
(You know who you are.)
 
In other news, it is absolutely pouring rain right now.
 
No way!
I don't see it.
 
Me neither.
 
And I didn't bring my umbrella. Actually, I can't find my umbrella.
 
2:52 PM
Those Hungarians and their Ministry of Disinformation.
 
Is the rain on display for all to see?
Hehe.
 
@Martha Your umbrella is dinky anyhow.
 
Do they still have that? I thought they had some new, crisp laws of censoring...?
 
Did this person famously say: "Cruel leaders are replaced only to have new leaders turn cruel! If I could turn back time — if I could find a way"
 
It was not! It was black with white polka dots! It was a very pretty umbrella!
 
Tom
2:53 PM
Q: When refering to the previous footnote one can use Ibid, but what if I want to refer to a certain footnote that is not the previous?
 
Mar 24 at 1:42, by Martha
What's up is that I really need to go home. Maybe the rain has let up enough to make that feasible. (Umbrella = dinky.)
@Tom Yes.
 
@Kos: What the... I can only imagine the weird drugs you must be taking.
 
Oh, that umbrella. That's my dad's umbrella that I stole after I couldn't find my lovely non-dinky polka-dotted umbrella.
 
@Cerberus He likes to call them bagles.
 
@Cerberus Okay, then maybe it isn't Cher Guevara.
 
2:54 PM
@Tom: Repeat title and author in short.
 
But I forgot to steal dad's dinky umbrella this morning.
 
@Martha: Please elaborate.
 
Tom
@Cerberus hmm alright
 
R. Eggy, 'On the Metabolism of Sperm Whales', in: Lunatic Ravings (Chatroom 2011), 55-66: 56.
Short:
 
@Kosmonaut This can't be true. It's always Cher Guevara. You must be out of your mind claiming it isn't.
 
2:56 PM
Eggy, 'Metabolism', 58.
 
@Cerberus Is that the solution? How were we supposed to think of that????
 
That's how I do it.
@Reg: You have no imagination.
 
@Cerberus I have two and a half, actually.
 
Besides, I didn't say that was the answer: the answer might be in that famous work of non-fiction.
 
The Bible?
 
2:58 PM
That one.
No wait.
I think some of the experts on EL&U said it was fiction...
So... now my world view is shattered.
Well you guys still suck at this game, no offence.
 

« first day (145 days earlier)      last day (4763 days later) »