This reminds me of a Home Improvement episode where one of the brothers says to the other, "Can you help me with my Civil War essay?" - "Sure, what you've got so far?" - "The Civil war was." He then adds, "And even that I've copied from an encyclopaedia."
If you want some random biographical bits, I'm the twin who minored in history; my sister is the one who minored in linguistics, and very little of said linguistics has rubbed off on me. (We both majored in math.) But I do have some copy-editing experience under my belt.
It's very strange to have another Martha around. I went through all 20-something years of school without ever having another Martha in any of my classes.
In physics, a wormhole is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that would be, fundamentally, a "shortcut" through spacetime. For a simple visual explanation of a wormhole, consider spacetime visualized as a two-dimensional (2D) surface. If this surface is folded along a third dimension, it allows one to picture a wormhole "bridge". (Please note, though, that this is merely a visualization displayed to convey an essentially unvisualisable structure existing in 4 or more dimensions. The parts of the wormhole could be higher-dimensional analogues for the parts of the curved 2D sur...
In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox (also known as Russell's antinomy), discovered by Bertrand Russell in 1901, showed that the naive set theory created by Georg Cantor leads to a contradiction. The same paradox had been discovered a year before by Ernst Zermelo but he did not publish the idea, which remained known only to Hilbert, Husserl and other members of the University of Göttingen.
Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If R qualifies as a member of itself, it would contradict its own definition as a set containing sets that are not member...
Yeah, I thought that was very funny. Alex Trebek is so into promoting Canada (though he lives in California), and here his big honking publicity wet kiss to IBM gets him a total diss of Canada!
See, @RegDwight can be self-referential and self-deferential at the same time. Amazing.
There's a long list of languages proposal on Area51, varying from an all encompassing language site to a focus one language site like the successful English Language & Usage.
When I say they vary, I do mean that.
As I just said, there's a site to contain all the languages question, whether...
So, now if you go to that "When to use passive voice", it says Exact Duplicate. Then you click on the original question, and it says "closed. too broad."
Is there any way you could have them point to each other as exact duplicates? Now that would be funny. And in keeping with your gravatar motto, @Kosmonaut.
I have found myself a new hobby. Whenever I hit the rep cap, I go through the list of the most godawful worthless posts and see if I've forgotten to downvote some.
I miss so many questions these days.
I'm kinda afraid what might be waiting for us ahead.
Do we have any practical uses of onomatopoeia in contemporary English? I can not claim to have read many materials, but I have to confess I have rarely seen it used a lot.
Sure, anything CAN be answered, but the distinction here is can the question be reasonably answered in its current form. An overly-broad question is an earmark of vagueness and lack of focus. If I were to ask, for example, "what makes a good game?", it's completely answerable. There's volumes of ...
@Kosmonaut There used to be a comment by kiamlaluno there, which got me thinking whether the OP might be asking about the use of the word onomatopoeia itself.
I mean that there are those books after reading which you can't help but think, OMFG now I know everything about everything ever. Foucault's Pendulum is like that. The Discovery of Heaven is like that. And Out of Control is like that, too.
@Robusto You talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded.