« first day (2928 days earlier)      last day (1980 days later) » 

12:55 AM
10
A: What, if anything should one do if a user's "about me" profile section contains extremely inflammatory terms (racist, etc.)

Jeff AtwoodOh, this user, whose name rhymes with "bosshog", definitely knows better. Our general approach has been to take a hands-off approach to the user page -- it's for you to place whatever you want there, within reason. Obviously racism, hate speech, any sort of overt evil will not be tolerated. But ...

What offensive word rhymes with bosshog?
The closest sounding word I can think of is a-hole, in uncensored form, but the first syllable of that compound does not rhyme with bog.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:12 AM
@RegDwigнt Hmm, feels like it's missing the funky modulation section, but that's only off the top of my head.
 
 
1 hour later…
3:35 AM
6 Lies My English Teacher Told Me. We've covered much of this ground here, but it's nice to see other counties heard from.
 
3:57 AM
@Robusto Thanks for sharing the article; I bookmarked it, but I will never use literally to mean figuratively. And someone here hates that useage of hopefully; I can't remember who.
 
@Robusto I disagree with most of that, but w'evs!
@Gigili OK, what about?
I'd rather not talk about the past.
 
@Cerberus I held out for a long time on the singular they, but I caved; I don't care about it sometimes.
 
@KannE Hold on just a little bit longer!
Just until it disappears.
 
4:33 AM
@Cerberus Generally, I cave on FB and the like, where people don't know or care that the -body and -one pronouns are singular. I use them a lot.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:35 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title (490): amazonhealthstore.com/healthy-life-garcinia-fr/ by charlerfield on english.SE
 
 
1 hour later…
7:58 AM
@Tonepoet He might be thinking of "fuck off". That kind of rhymes with "boss hog" for some accents.
 
8:19 AM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I just sent you an email. =)
 
 
6 hours later…
2:40 PM
@KannE Understandable...
 
3:08 PM
@Robusto That article is misleading. All it's section headers are the rules themselves, which is what anyone reading that will remember, rather than that some of those aren't actual rules anymore.
@KannE you don't have to hold out because singular they has always been used.
@KannE re 'literally': that is one item in that list that is sorely mistaken
just because it is in the dictionary doesn't mean it is accepted practice. The dictionary is recording what people sometimes do, not whether it makes sense. If you use 'literally' when there's a possibility that the utterance could be literal but you intend it only as an intensifier, then you're being ambiguous which is poor style.
in all fairness, there was one passage in that article which was hilarious:
> like the family of a spiteful, yet wealthy patriarch on his death bed, we'll all be better off once it finally slips off into oblivion.
 
3:24 PM
Can I ask a question? Is it "he had already left", "he already had left" or "he had left already"?
A friend of mine asked me for that. Thinking better, should it be "he had already left", or even more "he have already left"
 
@Mitch But it has always been a minor thing, possibly a soloecism.
@EnderLook He had already left is fine.
He had left already is possible.
 
Thanks
 
He already had left is probably not possible, except in special situations.
He have is not possible.
 
@Cerberus Oh, I thought it was possible
@Cerberus special situtations?
 
It's complicated. In situations where you need special emphasis on a single word.
 
3:36 PM
Ah, ok
Thanks
 
But at your current level, I wouldn't worry about that. I would just not use He already has left.
@EnderLook Why did you think that?
You know the paradigm of the verb to have?
> I have
you have
he has
we have
you have
they have
 
@Cerberus ohh, silly of me!
 
If you don't know this yet, you might consider getting a beginner's book on English grammar and going through all the theory and exercises about the parts that you don't fully understand yet.
 
@Cerberus Oh, I'm just got distracted. I was doing something when a friend asked me though discord this so I didn't think much about it. But you have right, 2nd grammar person use has not have, I learn that on primary school!
 
Exactly!
 
4:29 PM
@Cerberus How is it a solecism?
(where 'solecism' is euphemism for 'error'
like the lack of a closing paren)
Whereas 'literally' used as an intensifier is surely a solecism.
 
@Mitch What an odd question.
"Paren" is at best informal, at worst a soloecism.
 
 
1 hour later…
5:54 PM
@Cerberus How is "How is "singular they" a solecism?" an odd question?
(seriously)
Because universal 'he' is a constructed rule in English
 
Seems that everyone is talking about singular they in every chat room.
 
@Mitch Did you go take a look in person at the new Macbook Air?
 
Math?
@WillHunting No. Mine is fine for now.
 
@Mitch Just a bit in the ELL room and in the IPS room. I like to overexaggerate.
@Mitch Does yours have a 720p camera?
I guess they all do, except the 12 inch Macbook which only has a 480p camera.
Maybe that has got to do with the size. Maybe they can't squeeze a better camera into such a small laptop.
480p videos are OK, but they look quite blur on youtube. I think 720p should be the minimum that is good.
 
6:07 PM
@WillHunting over-exaggerating is over-exaggerating exaggerating
@WillHunting I don't know. I covered it up.
 
@Mitch You must be scared to face cameras, lol.
 
because I was told to
 
Why cover the camera? You can just not use it.
Maybe it is for aesthetics. Maybe you want to make the laptop look better.
 
because supposedly people can take control of your camera without the light going on and record you making funny faces when you type stuff
like I'm doin now.
the face I'm making is kinda weird
 
Oh, some settings should do the job. Otherwise, I think it's just paranoia.
 
6:11 PM
like someone stepped on my toe with fuzzy slippers
because it might have hurt bad but it only felt nice sort of.
 
Yes, the big toe is very vulnerable.
 
so my face is half in horrible pain and half in ohh that's nice
 
There is this new laptop called the Dell Inspiron 5480. I think it is pretty good.
 
@WillHunting yeah paranoia that someone will take your dancing like nobody is watching and then have absolutely everybody on youtube be watching
 
I just watched this video about it. It is in Chinese though.
 
6:14 PM
and make money off your excellence
 
I clicked on it mostly because I thought the girl looked sweet, lol.
 
@Mitch It is the standard in all Indo-European languages I know, with exceptions of course (just as singular they used to be the exception).
 
@WillHunting I used a half-ripped post-it note to cover it so no it doesn't look better
 
And the reason is obvious: it violates basic rules of grammar shared by all those languages.
 
@Mitch That is terrible!
 
6:15 PM
@WillHunting that's the cause of all evil in the world: "But I thought that cute girl would be impressed"
 
But, frankly, I don't think this debate would be very fruitful.
So I'll stop.
 
Hi @Cerberus I was talking to Mr Shiny and New just now and he said you are very taaaaaaall, lol.
 
Not really!
A few cm above average.
 
Well, maybe all Dutch guys are tall. I wish I were tall too. I am only 1.67 metres.
That's a nice number though because 1.67 is like 5/3.
 
@Cerberus How does it violate the rules of any language? 1) it just is and 2) it actually uses existing rules. Just like German uses 3rd person singular for 2nd person singular formal and Spanish 3rd person for formal
 
6:19 PM
@Mitch Interesting, Germ and Span are both mathematical terms.
 
I don't think anyone would benefit from repeating this discussion.
 
@Cerberus You said you read Fowler before right? What do you think of the book?
 
@WillHunting 'Germ'?
 
In mathematics, the notion of a germ of an object in/on a topological space is an equivalence class of that object and others of the same kind which captures their shared local properties. In particular, the objects in question are mostly functions (or maps) and subsets. In specific implementations of this idea, the sets or maps in question will have some property, such as being analytic or smooth, but in general this is not needed (the maps or functions in question need not even be continuous); it is however necessary that the space on/in which the object is defined is a topological space, in...
 
@WillHunting The second edition is great, though in some regards out of date.
 
6:21 PM
@WillHunting oh
 
The third edition is somewhat less helpful but still good.
 
@Cerberus I see. Do you have a favourite usage guide you would recommend unreservedly?
 
One should always reserve one's own judgement and not follow any guide blindly.
 
Wise.
 
But I think Fowler is good.
 
6:23 PM
@WillHunting I mentioned before that I just don't get topology. It feels like a bunch of random disjointed facts
 
I would like to talk about the countable noun youth.
Will you use it to describe a female, or will you reserve it only for a male?
In all small dictionaries, the countable noun is defined as a young man and cannot be a woman.
But in big dictionaries, they define it as a young person, especially male.
A small distinction there.
 
I don't think of it as gendered. Youth just means young to me.
 
Note we are referring specifically to the countable noun. For example, that youth.
 
yes
 
I would use it for a young man only. In plural, though, it can perhaps also include women?
> 6. a. A young person; esp. a young man between boyhood and mature age; sometimes, esp. in earlier use, more widely (see quots.).
Formerly sometimes (and still in dialect or vulgar speech) pleonastically qualified by young.
c1250 Gen. & Ex. 2665 Bi ðat time ðat he was Šuð, Wið faiŠered and strengthe kuð. a1400 Pistill of Susan 230 He lift vp þe lach and leop ouer þe lake, Þat Šouthe. ?1580 W. Hergest (title) The Right Rule of Christian Chastitie; profitable to bee read of all godly and vertuous Youthes of both sexe. 1583 T. Stocker Civ. Warres Lowe C. i. 32b, Accompanied with a multitud
 
6:29 PM
I would say my conclusion after checking many dictionaries and usage guides and even posting an answer on ELU long ago about it is that it usually refers to a young man but can also refer to a young woman as well, though this is not common nowadays.
 
all the other uses tend to be gender neutral, so that that falls over for me to 'the youth'
 
Yes, it is apparently old fashioned to use it for girls as well.
 
so it is newer to use it only for boys?
 
@Cerberus Yes, that last quotation there I did note. It's a woman.
"Before she was twenty she wrote verses like other youths."
 
@Mitch I believe so. See also the OED definition and quotations above.
 
6:33 PM
These days, it is usually used in the newspapers to refer to young men doing bad things.
 
I like 'hooligans' for that
 
"He was attacked by a gang of youths."
 
sounds like a suburban family restaurant and bar
 
That's not exactly my impression.
 
I wonder why people don't use it for a female these days. What reason could it be?
 
6:36 PM
Because you know how women are
What was the thing Sarkozy said that people got so upset at?
 
I don't know.
 
When talking about 'manifestations' in the 'banlieues'?
checking spelling
 
I read theguardian.com, and almost every day they talk about Trump and Brexit, LOL.
 
'racailles' is what he used
translated as 'rabble'
 
@Mitch It's on the tip of my tongue
 
6:38 PM
I find manoeuvre very hard to spell.
 
I have no idea of the connotations of 'racailles'
@WillHunting how about 'hors d'ouevres'?
 
@Gigili The only thing on my tongue now is my saliva, lol.
 
or 'maintainance'
haha. I have trouble.
 
@Mitch Oh I don't even want to use that word.
@Mitch I have no trouble with that because I always say maintenance like an Englishman.
 
@WillHunting you can just use 'canapé'
@WillHunting Rule Britannia!
Something something the Duke of York
Jolly holiday!
 
6:41 PM
What happened to Britannica?
 
guvnah!
 
It stopped printing encyclopedias.
 
@WillHunting because wikipedia
 
And yet it acquired Merriam-Webster, weird.
 
@Gigili 'racailles'
 
6:42 PM
Notice that MW also doesn't publish much these days, only oooooold editions.
 
People thought it was anti-something
anti-islamic or anti-arabe or something
 
I hope someone takes over MW or Britannica and start publishing more things again.
 
I don't think you need that to be insulted. I think it was just denigrating.
Like calling poor people 'lazy'
@WillHunting paper is so last century
 
@Mitch I am old-fashioned.
But other publishers do publish encyclopedias still, just less volumes, but just big enough.
 
@WillHunting I'm sure I've mentioned this before, but can't take the trouble to search for it, but Britannica sells a three-volume 'first' edition, a 'reprint' os the 1777 very first edition.
 
6:44 PM
@Mitch Yes, and it's like a very expensive photocopy.
 
It has all sorts of stuff in it like how to do ventilation and elevators for mineshafts
very practical things in addition to science and history and stuff
I think it is around $150 dollars (or maybe a bit more)
 
Hello @Gigili are you still translating things these days for work?
 
Yeah, I read that somewhere, on several sites probably. Did Shakespeare say it? I can't remember...if he used *they* at all.
But I imagine...400 years from now, maybe 5, they will say...
The plural useage of the pronoun "Fred" dates back to the time before the Great Almost Apocalypse when the great shit poet Un'Kani (*Unkanne*) said, to a group of people (at least three persons), "Shit the bed, Fred." According to Legend, the pronoun was derived from the poet's father-name (*Fredric*), but a Coloring Book recovered from a shiny metal subterfuge has revealed that "Fred" actually dates back t
 
@KannE You need more returns in your messages so I can respond to the correct part. Otherwise it is hard to makes sense of a conversation
But, to your first point, yes, Shakespeare used the singular they (but then Shakespeare is not necessarily a standard of English, spoken now certainly not, but even then he took liberties).
@KannE haha about Fred and shit
 
@Mitch There are no correct parts.
 
6:49 PM
What does your avatar say... 'Live life' backwards? in a mirror?
 
7:05 PM
@WillHunting Hi. Not quite as much, I'm more into baking these days.
Why?
 
@Mitch Yes, "live live..." (you know how I love ellipsis). It's a selfie. Aren't they always flipped? I dunno. I'm not a big fan of selfies, but I took this one in my Fight Durty hoodie.
 
@KannE I thought the Bedrock Era began in 2011.
 
@MetaEd Hmm...2011? According to Wiki, the Flintstones ran from Sep 1960 to Apr 1966.
 
7:27 PM
@KannE A selfie taken from a mirror is flipped. a selfie taken by holding your hand out as far as you can is not flipped.
 
@Gigili No reason why. Just making small talk.
 
@KannE Ohh... that's your neck at the top? Avatars are so small, you can't ever tell what's going on
@Gigili mmm... baking. What kinds of things? Bread or cake?
 
@MetaEd Oh, Minecraft...my friend's grandson could've told me that. I've been saying "Mindcraft" all this time, and he didn't corrected me once, ha-ha. Which reminds me, his birthday party is today. I gotta go...buy him a present...not Minecraft again. Well, I'm going shopping and then roller skating. Have a fun-filled day. Don't break a hip though.
 
Baking is great, but I'm more into eating.
 
My favourite cake is tiramisu.
 
7:30 PM
that's a good one.
but it's pretty rich
there's also...
is it Boston Cream pie?
that is really rich too. can barely eat a slice
they call it pie but it's more of a short cake.
 
@Mitch Yes, I had to practically look at the ceiling to make my neck look that smooth. I almost look young in that selfie, ha-ha.
 
but not shortcake, which is more like biscotti
wait...I'm confusing that with shortbread which is like halfway between biscotti and cookie. a stale cookie
@KannE haha. necks. the last frontier. There's hair dye, and makeup,...
oh, how about turtle neck? or a scarf?
scarves are pretty trendy these days
even looking close I can't tell anything about age from that picture.
Your subtle hints about breaking hips... are an exaggeration.
 
8:19 PM
@Robusto well yes, that's what the text says. Not just on the side, but in the video proper. Nobody reads my shit!
Maybe that's a good idea for a song.
A dark and dreary Russian romance about the hopelessness, pointlessness, and general futility of the Russian alphabet.
I will give it to Taylor Swift and make billions.
Billions!
 
8:35 PM
@RegDwigнt I do read your shit, but because I cannot focus these days, I may misread it.
@RegDwigнt Tell Taylor about me too so I can make some money too.
 
@WillHunting I've been trying to avoid Taylor. She's kind of a handful if you know what I mean.
What I mean is, it's all gotta be about her.
"Where do you wanna go eat?" "I heard about this place..." "We're going to Mickey D's!"
Did I mention she has the taste of a ten year old?
I mean MD has it's place n all
@RegDwigнt oh! An alphabet romance? Like Mamma Mia 2 but with more fonts?
I love it!!
 
9:08 PM
@Mitch I don't really do makeup. Tinted moisturizer is nice, makes it seem like you go outside sometimes. And clear mascara tinted with bareMinerals doesn't make my eyes swell shut, so that's good. And if women could put on lipstick while the Titanic was sinking, I can surely travel with a Burt's Bees lip balm, but that's about it.
 
@RegDwigнt Haha, I truly didn't read that at all. I just listened to the music.
 
@Mitch Yeah, hair dye was overdue. But it's Christmassy--like brass candlesticks.
 
 
1 hour later…
10:14 PM
I already have a 'turtle neck'... You wouldn't believe how many adults told me, when I was a child, that I would make a great ballerina because I had such a long neck and limbs (like a Degas, but lankier with a bobble head).
So, I decided to check it out--The World Book Encyclopedia (lots of nice pictures; I miss them)--and mastered all the positions in the first day, expect the last one where your feet are placed completely backwards; that one took longer, a week or two.
The doctor told my parents not to worry, so it became boring and I quit after a month...still longer than my career at B
*except the last one
@Mitch The skating party was postponed due to a flat tire. :-( I'll have to wait till tomorrow to break my hip (or crack my tailbone) now. Wait...what emoji goes here?
 
10:35 PM
@Robusto Instagram has a hard limit of 60 seconds per post. Which is sort of stupid for a variety of reasons, but sort of really good for a variety of others.
Limitations foster creativity, but ideally you should impose those limitations on yourself rather than have them dictated by others.
 
@RegDwigнt I think a minute a post is reasonable though and doesn't really limit anyone.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (347): Hex, curse, spell, jinx, charm by Valeria Benson on english.SE
 
@WillHunting Yeah if Beethoven wants to post his Sonata no. 8, he can post a whole five bars of the opening. That's not limiting at all.
 
@RegDwigнt Are you planning to post lots of videos next month?
 
Don't know about the exact timeline. Working on literally two dozen different things right now.
 
10:45 PM
Oh OK, take your time.
 
I like Bill Wurtz's approach. He just posts whatever he wants whenever he wants. Gets 300 million views on a video, then doesn't post anything for a year. Then posts five things in a week. Gets another 300 million views, disappears again for fuck knows how long.
 
What does Bill Wurtz do?
 
Oh that kind of thing.
 
No more like this kind of thing.
Or really any kind of thing he feels like doing. That's very much my point.
 
10:50 PM
Well, 300 million views is nothing, unless it translates into money for him. =)
 
300 million views translates into a whole load of money.
But he'd been doing this for like 10 years before it took off.
 
Yeah, if he monetizes the ads. I was more of thinking of getting 300 upvotes on SE, which translates into no money. But maybe you get some swag. =)
 
So that's my plan now. Do whatever shit I want to do for 10 years, then suddenly win an Oscar for sucking. Or something.
 
I think you can try to get in touch with some music company and sign a deal or something.
Maybe you can get 100,000 dollars for your first contract.
 
Fuck that.
 
10:55 PM
After you sign the contract, maybe you can tell them about me and maybe they will consider giving me a deal too. =)
 
How about you sign a contract and then tell me how that turns out for you.
You can't live off music. And if you are living off music, then two hundred other people are living off your music much better than yourself.
@Cerberus but that in itself is a guide. And my own judgement says not to follow it.
This is probably the most digestible of all of Bill's songs.
The rest are really quite special. Acid trips really.
 
So I don't know much about Russia.
I want to ask if the Russia on the left of the Ural Mountains is very different from that on the right.
In terms of the people and culture, not the land.
 
Russia is the same everywhere except for Moscow.
There's Moscow, and then there's the savage lands around it.
And yes they have all kinds of different cultures those savages.
 
I see. So Russia = Moscow + savage lands. QED.
 
But it's precisely because of that wide gamut of cultures that you can't possibly segregate it into something as arbitrary as "to the left of Ural, to the right of Ural".
 
11:01 PM
Wise.
 
To the right of Ural, that alone is like 1/10 of the Earth's entire landmass.
Just how homogenous do you think people can be on such a vast stretch of land.
 
I am now wondering whether there are Russians living inside the Ural mountains.
 
Well there's military bases and factories and diamond mines there and everything.
So there's probably more people literally living inside the mountains than in all of @Cerberus' make-belief lala-holland.
 
Well, I might try to learn some Russian, but so far I keep hearing something like priviet, lol.
So I figure that priviet must be a word, lol.
 
Well I'm not a dictionary :-P
That said, if you really kept hearing it, you'd know there's no I in there.
Privet.
Привет.
 
11:09 PM
LOL
 
I mean, no second I. Fuck.
There is an I.
 
No need to be so precise, lol.
 
Well no, but being less precise is even harder for me.
 
I try not to be too precise outside math, so that it doesn't interfere with my OCD.
But if one is naturally so precise then that is OK.
 
1 + 1 = 3 for sufficiently large values of 1. Or a sufficiently low value of 3.
 
11:11 PM
I know about that joke, but it is not funny to me. Maybe I don't get it.
How can anyone even think of that?
 
Like, that's the actual language of maths. They really do say stupid things like "sufficiently large". And call it an exact science. Hilarious.
 
Because 1 is 1 and 3 is 3.
 
Not in Unicode it is not.
Oct 27 at 23:49, by RegDwigнt
2 is 2 and 3 is 3 but 9 is 1 and 1 is i.
Oct 27 at 23:49, by RegDwigнt
user image
 
Oh yeah, sufficiently large is used, but I don't see why it is used in this joke which is why I don't get the joke.
Of course, in those cases where it is used seriously it does indeed make sense.
 
Well it's not a joke. It's the truth. Mathematically and otherwise.
 
11:13 PM
Oh OK I see what you mean now.
Still, it is just a very stupid joke.
However, stupid jokes actually are funny if they don't try to incorporate some smart thing.
But in this case, it tries to be a stupid joke which incorporates some smart thing, which is what makes it really stupid and not funny for me.
 

« first day (2928 days earlier)      last day (1980 days later) »