Yes, that's what's missing from #1: the agent (people). Maybe the reason why people don't find it jarring in "He must be punished by excluding him from the team." is that there's an implicit agent: we, or his teammates. It's more specific than generic people, anyway.
And I think @tchrist 's sentence, "I can most easily be reached in real time by pinging me in the ELU chatroom.", is alright too: the agent is you, which is clearly understood from the context.
And why should you dislike them? They have their use. As for Tom's 'about me' section, most sentences there have I as their subject, which acceptably excuses the inversion of You can reach me to I can be reached so that the text is homogeneous and all sentences are of uniform construction.
I don't hate it, I just think that people who hold on to tradition for tradition's sake are deliberately trying to hold back progress for progress' sake
@Cerberus I think part of the problem is when people are simply ignorant of the way reality is, and they blindly cling to failing traditions and lash out at people who try to improve them.
For example, our right-wing populist party has lots of support in the south, where few foreigners dwell. But also in the worse neighbourhoods of Amsterdam, where there are plenty of foreigners.
@Robusto It's my understanding that the best way to eliminate xenophobia/racism is for people to get more involved with different people. Familiarity tends to reduce conflict.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yes, to some degree; but at other times the result is the opposite: people feel threatened by how their neighbourhoods are taken over, and by the young foreigners hanging around squares and stuff.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 They should pick issues that are substantial, and that almost everyone agrees on, e.g. how it's much harder to get a job if you have a name that sounds like the Near East.
@Cerberus "Populism is a political doctrine that proposes that the common people are exploited by a privileged elite, and which seeks to resolve this." That is not to say it can't be used cynically and hypocritically, and as a weapon in the elite's arsenal, as Trump does.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 That's not really true: there is lots of contact, at least in the streets, shops, etc. But they find the young foreigners intimidating.
@Cerberus Part of the problem why it's harder to find work if you're female is the "male default" bias that is built into society - and that's evident in how the French language treats gender.
At any rate, even if I were wrong, it would be better to tackle more serious, substantial, uncontroversial issues first. Otherwise you risk alienating many people, amongst which the political centre / the average person.
@Cerberus 52% of the people who voted, voted brexit. they did so because they're xenophobic for the most part. if we get a tory majority in June that will also be the reason.
not within a language, but perhaps when you're conquered (by the romans, then saxons and the vikings, then the normans) perhaps you're forced to simplify things?
Hi, quick meta-question: I posted a single-word-request. Am I allowed to edit my question to discuss the various answers and why I accepted one in particular?
@ValentinAslanyan I think putting the discussion in the question would be a distraction from the question. It could be helpful to future people with the same question if you want to leave a comment under the answers
@MetaEd Oh, so those aren't your bulking biceps! It's hard to tell when everything is so... flat. =P Still, I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse. I've never seen another diamond tie before. Surely it must be rare.