« first day (256 days earlier)      last day (4651 days later) » 

11:00 PM
Those who want it to be Coca-Cola at all times are not native speakers of Russian. Heck, they are not speakers of Russian, period.
 
user19161
I missed that one...
 
So...
 
They have that brand-book lying in Seattle that says "our holy name is X".
 
Well, do you find that so odd?
 
11:01 PM
And even if native speakers adapt the name to the rules of their language, screw them. That is prescriptivism.
 
@rumtscho GBS?
 
It must be the titty effect... Mention breasts, boobies, bresticles, whatever, and everyone suddenly pays attention.
 
@Cerberus I don't find it odd, but I find it moronic to hold onto that after it's been explained to you that not all languages work the same way.
 
@JasperLoy Depends on your definition of gay.
 
@Cerberus George Bernard Shaw. (sorry, too lazy to type).
 
user19161
11:02 PM
Here a lot of people frown on homosexuality, but that is changing. The law that prohibits gay sex is still in force though it is not enforced.
 
@brachomonacho Should I star this for you?
 
@brachomonacho Yeah, that's what I thought; so for one moment I thought you were a girl again. The suspense is killing!
 
Did someone say 'titty'?
 
Hullo!
Ah, that GBS!
 
user19161
@z7sg Hello, we have been talking about gays...
 
11:03 PM
You come to China to sell your sugar water, you better know how Chinese language works.
 
@rumtscho If you like, I don't think I've ever been starred before.
 
Hmm. And Jeff insists there is no @all mechanism in chat. Obviously, we have now found where it's hidden.
 
@RegDwight Wait, what do you mean? Foreign companies force Russian people?
 
And the funny thing is, in China they have adapted their brand name, or so I'm told.
 
Oop ain't oops
 
user19161
11:04 PM
@rumtscho It's hidden in the boobs. That's why we call them boobie traps.
 
"Oops" would indicate an error or mistake.
 
@Cerberus Well, just for the record, I am a girl. Always have been, always will be.
 
Today has been ... GBS? Today has been the busiest day I have ever seen on ELU chat... we have all kinds of animal as usual so I guess it must be because the topic of the day is titty.
 
@Cerberus Yes. They bombard people with ungrammatical billboards and TV commercials.
 
@brachomonacho Well, if it nobody stars it, it's almost like the theory was wrong---
 
11:05 PM
They actually say things such as "Пей Кока-Кола!"
 
@z7sg All kinds? We only had narwhals and bieber so far.
 
Even a toddler knows that that is wrong.
 
@brachomonacho Ah! Well, that is clear enough!
 
Clear answers always make things so much easier.
 
No native speaker would ever use a nominative where accusative is in order.
 
11:05 PM
Wrong case?
Ah.
That would seem pretty terrible.
 
And it is.
It grates on the ears.
Everyone is either cringing or laughing.
 
@rumtscho Narwhals aren't real. They don't exist.
 
Or both.
 
But prescriptivism means telling other people what to do. Disliking things others write is the basis of prescriptivism. With which, I firmly believe, there is nothing wrong.
 
It's like the sea creatures saw a unicorn one day and fantasized that there was a marine equivalent!
Complete nonsense of course.
 
11:07 PM
It's like I stepped back in time, except instead of actual history it's a repetition of events with different actors.
 
@brachomonacho I highly recommend Lise Eliot's *Pink Brain, Blue Brain" or Cordelia Fine's Delusions of Gender. Really made me think about how much of this stuff is socially constructed. Before, I would think "I'm a tomboy, I'm not a normal girl" and I didn't even notice I was implicitly saying that being a girl was bad.
 
user19161
@z7sg They do. Ubuntu 11.04 is the Natty Narwhal.
 
@GraceNote It is like a fractal with subtly changing colours.
 
What time is it there? I should be in bed already!
 
@JasperLoy Argh, don't remind me of that.
 
11:08 PM
@z7sg now if you're going to tell us that you are @brachomonacho 's ex, please wait. I want to get some popcorn first, before the scene starts unraveling before my eyes.
 
My comment doesn't count, though, because it isn't structured in such a way that you would look at it and say "wtf?" if you weren't aware of the context.
We would need to goad Kit into another booby comment to verify the theory.
 
@z7sg If you live in the Atlantic ocean or east of it, then probably yes.
 
I live... very far east of the Atlantic...
 
@JasperLoy How many damn release cycles I gotta wait before we get to Ultramagical Unicorn?
 
Look. A Russian company comes to the Netherlands and insists that henceforth your country is called Gollandiya. Not in Russian, in Dutch. That is the correct name for your country in your language they say. Everything else is wrong. And then the Dutch people collectively laugh at them and ignore them. Who is the prescriptivist -- the company or the Dutch?
 
user19161
11:10 PM
From talking to my various gay friends, I would say it is probably in the genes...
 
@z7sg I knowww!
 
@JasperLoy Homosexuality, you mean?
 
@rumtscho The Atlantic ocean is about 200 miles to the West I believe.
 
@GraceNote Then you should have been in bed... very long ago before now (like 3/4 day)
 
user19161
@GraceNote Yes, indeed.
 
11:11 PM
@RegDwight In as much as they tell me to use their version, they are prescriptivist. In as much as I see them use it and comment on their usage, I am prescriptivist.
 
@rumtscho @brachomonacho is a girl then right? it's a little confusing with the LGBT stuff flying around right now
 
@Cerberus But then every commentator is a prescriptivist. By definition.
In which case there's no need for the term "prescriptivist".
 
user19161
@z7sg I am very confused too. I would need to study this transcript in detail to dissect it later!
 
If they just use their version but do not pressure me at all, they don't exhibit much prescriptivism. It may still be there, but they don't really exert it on me.
 
8 mins ago, by bracho monacho
@Cerberus Well, just for the record, I am a girl. Always have been, always will be.
 
11:13 PM
@JasperLoy You mean, you only get a little homosexual when a homosexual reproduces? This sounds like a convergent sequence.
 
@Cerberus Of course you would say that, not having a TV set.
 
Woo! I just did a RegDwight!
 
I just popped back on here to see 500 new msgs!
 
(Wasn't sure if that would work.)
 
@brachomonacho you did well padawan
 
11:13 PM
@RegDwight Absolutely, IF he expresses certain preferences, and, technically, if he pressures or advises others based on this preference.
 
But anyhow, I dunno why you always drag me into discussions I am not after.
 
halo
 
I couldn't care less who's descriptivist and who's not and whatever.
You just asked me about the situation in Russia, I answered.
 
user19161
@brachomonacho I took a while to understand that. That sentence is ambiguous!
 
ah, but I need to ask SciFi.SE what a female padawan is called, or if there is a gender-specific term at all
 
11:14 PM
You could say there is a certain prescriptivist aspect to broadcasting unusual spelling, even if not directed at anyone specifically and not worded as such.
Then we are agreed.
 
user19161
It should be made compulsory to fill in the fields sex, orientation. Any lies would result in the computer exploding.
 
@z7sg If there is, it is certainly politically incorrect to use it. Nevertheless, I'd go with padawanessa, because it sounds so grand.
 
user19161
@z7sg Padawani sounds nice.
 
@JasperLoy You want half the catholic clergy to die from exploding computers?
 
11:16 PM
@rumtscho Haha, I don't mind narwhal non-believers that much... It's not as annoying as having to spend an hour explaining to someone why it isn't impossible to melt an aluminium can inside a campfire, or turn a beer bottle into a puddle of glass.
 
@rumtscho Are gender-specific terms not allowed any more? Not even if the person concerned wishes to refer to themselves as an actress or whatever?
 
@RegDwight International corporate services, something like that... is that all with the wrong cases and such?
 
@Cerberus Nah, there's more to it. The article addresses several different issues.
 
@RegDwight I believe you in all respects, and I would be infuriated to the same extent.
 
@Cerberus I am not sure I would tie the idea of prescriptivism to whether or not it's broadcast.
 
11:19 PM
@RegDwight Yeah, that isn't a clear case.
 
I mean, if I write right here right now "10 items or less is ungrammatical, it must be 10 items or fewer", then IMHO it's prescriptivism whether or not anybody ever sees it at all.
 
@z7sg Depends on the language and the person I think. In fact, in German it is rather the other way round - just try to write "Liebe Kollegen" to your co-workers. All your Kolleginnen will feel slighted. On the other hand, I think that in Italia, a female student would hate to be referred to as "studentessa". And thinking of padawanessa, I probably implicitely assumed the second case.
 
@RegDwight Er, that seems like it should be obviously true. Did I miss something?
 
@RegDwight Yes, because "must" implies that someone else than you yourself must abide this rule of yours.
 
@Cerberus See, but corporate brand-books are all about must.
By definition.
They must be all about must.
 
11:23 PM
But if you just say "I will write it thus and so", it isn't as clearly prescriptivist; but you could say it still is, because, if you lay out a rule for yourself, you will probably like it if others do so too. I suppose.
 
A descriptivist brand-book is a contradiction in termini.
@Cerberus Yes, but you wouldn't write that in a brandbook.
 
@rumtscho You have to write Liebe Kollegen/-innen IIRC. It can be a problem if I don't know the person's preference. And so often the alternative words are just... horrid.
 
You wouldn't say, "I like our logo red, and if others like it that way, then it's awesome".
Instead, you will define the hell out of those CMYKs.
 
@RegDwight Right, and in that respect they are certainly prescriptivist. But what if they never really tell people to follow their rules? That makes it weaker.
@RegDwight Ouch! And, yes.
 
Time for me to go to work...
 
11:26 PM
@Cerberus If you work for Coca-Cola or Apple or Sony or whatever, and ignore their brandbook, you're fired.
 
Bye everyone!
 
I dunno what lala-world you are living in. :)))
 
user19161
@brachomonacho Bye
 
@brachomonacho poor antopod girl. Bye.
 
@RegDwight I'm not sure I follow the subtleties of this argument... if you prescribe what your logo should look like internally, that isn't really prescriptivist towards people outside the company, though, yes, it certainly is towards your own employees.
 
11:27 PM
It is past time for me to go to bed here, so I am also going offline.
 
@brachomonacho @rumtscho see you!
 
user19161
@rumtscho Bye
 
@RegDwight Right, then that brandbook is absolutely prescriptivist towards their own employees.
 
@Cerberus You don't "prescribe what your logo should look like internally".
There is no such thing as internal logo.
Logo is all about external.
 
How does Philips prescibe their logo to me?
 
11:29 PM
It does not.
 
I don't really feel prescribed.
OK.
 
I dunno what that has to do with the discussion at hand.
 
I don't get what your point about this logo was, I think.
 
Haha, yes, that's what I'm thinking, too.
 
Then we have reached agreement once again! Bravi!
 
11:31 PM
My point is that there's no point in reaching it. Just tell me that I'm right. That's so much simpler.
I prescribe that.
 
I'm just saying that a Nohat or Colin Fine in the extreme would be saying, "oh, look, their logo is thus and so, how very interesting", without commenting at all about the desirability of it.
@RegDwight I let only Fowler do that to me.
 
Well, I had a whole counter to the "genetics" point based on the whole heriditary thing, but after getting dragged away it seems that'd already been done.
 
@Cerberus I don't think so.
They only take native speakers into account.
 
But that is descriptivism: just describing it.
 
Obviously, if I along come start and talk like this, they will tell me, nope, that's not English.
 
11:33 PM
@RegDwight Yes, that is why they aren't extreme.
 
user19161
@GraceNote Huh? I don't understand your difficult sentence.
 
@JasperLoy Simply put, "I had something to say but then I got pulled aside by someone and so someone else in the room already said it, roughly"
 
I think Nohat is extreme enough for the Internet. One step at a time.
 
@RegDwight An extreme descriptivist would say, "oh, how very interesting that foreigners use language differently from native speakers; let's research that".
 
@Cerberus And he would never get anything done. Because every non-native speaker uses the language differently.
 
11:35 PM
The term "grammatical" has prescriptivist aspects. That is one of the reasons I find anti-prescriptivism hypocritical.
 
user19161
Oh I see. Actually all I meant to say is that it seems natural and not willed by the individual, whatever that means.
 
If anything, he would end up with a description of how vgv8 uses English. Which no one would ever read.
 
@RegDwight Not quite. Based on the subtrate language, various patterns could be described.
 
user19161
Anyway, genetics seems complicated. Too many factor, too many assumptions...
 
@RegDwight Yes, but who reads their stuff anyway?
 
11:36 PM
Life is complicated, maaaan.
 
Descriptivists, obviously.
 
Do they, really?
 
user19161
@Mana Ya, that is deep Mana!
 
You just told me that.
 
Did I?
I see no quote.
 
11:37 PM
2 mins ago, by Cerberus
@RegDwight An extreme descriptivist would say, "oh, how very interesting that foreigners use language differently from native speakers; let's research that".
 
I said write, not read.
 
What can I say? I'm a very deep person.
 
Ah, I see.
I misread you.
 
I figure there are two separate brain ideals that can be branded as masculine versus feminine, but I figure it's also completely independent of your being XX or XY.
 
Well, that was a joke in any case.
 
11:38 PM
@Cerberus I don't really see what researching something has to do with that something being called English.
 
I thought you meant "but who reads [vgv8's] stuff anyway?"
 
Oh!
No.
We did!
 
@MrHen A++ would read again.
 
At least, we read the first two or three lines, before we voted to close.
 
Whoops, must hurry out to get bus. I will expect a full analysis of gender and sexuality and the movie Go Fish upon my return. Also, solve world hunger while you're at it. Ta!
 
11:39 PM
Later, @aedia
 
I am a guy and I like girls. Boom, analysis complete.
shoots flames from fingertips
 
user19161
@Mana Thanks for your honesty. You are just like me; I have disclosed everything...
 
@Mana Maybe you just haven't met the right guy yet!
 
@MrHen What is and what isn't English is a continuum. One one end, you have toddlers and barely intelligible foreigners; on the other, Oxford deans, or the Queen—or some American guy: there isn't even consensus about the ends. In fact, the continuum might be multi-dimensional.
 
user19161
@z7sg Haha. Trying to convert dear Mana?
 
user19161
11:41 PM
BTW, do watch Summer Storm. It's a movie about gays, but it's a really good and meaningful movie. In German, with Eng subtitles.
 
Bye Aedia!
 
@z7sg Sometimes the right guy is just the one who introduces you to the right girl, though, neh?
 
Or the right mother-in-law!
Wait, that sounded wrong.
 
It'd only be wrong if you followed it up with "But that'd still be the right girl"
 
Right! Thanks.
 
11:43 PM
77 messages moved from War Metal Tyrant
 
user19161
In Summer Storm this really cute gay tries to convert someone too.
 
Did a whole bunch of stuff just get dumped in here?
Aye, a whole bunch of stuff did.
 
@RegDwight Nooo what have you done! These poor people... their descriptivist eyes couldn't bear this discussion!
 
@RegDwight You know, I was thinking there were too few threads going on here at once. Thanks for fixing that.
 
51 messages moved from War Metal Tyrant
 
11:45 PM
@RegDwight The transcript wasn't confused enough for a while then, but you fixed it!
3
 
@Cerberus I still don't even know what descriptivism vs. prescriptivism even is.
 
@GraceNote Then let me explain!
 
Oh no.
 
user19161
@Cerberus Please do!
 
Can you do it in the form of a musical number?
 
user19161
11:46 PM
@Mana This is too shallow for Mana.
 
You could say something about language (or anything else, for that matter). You could either say "oh, look, it is like this, let me describe it", or "oh, it should be like this, let me explain how I'd like it to be".
 
user19161
@Cerberus That sounds really bad.
 
@z7sg Trust me, you don't want that.
@JasperLoy Indeed!
 
@z7sg I'm sorry that I used some linguistic discussion to intersperse your exchange about "really cute gays" with.
 
That's basically the difference between describing and prescribing.
 
11:48 PM
@Cerberus I see
 
Each has its proper domain and shouldn't be let out: then things get messy.
 
@RegDwight Hmm, on the basis of that comment I am recommending you for the next LGBT awareness training weekend. I'm sure it will be a lot of fun!
 
Awareness...
Physical awareness?
 
That's the most moronic word ever invented.
 
@z7sg It seems odd that you support LGBT awareness yet do not believe in Narwhals. That contradicts our theory of you being the old flame.
 
11:50 PM
@RegDwight Yay, prescriptivism!
 
@Cerberus No, descriptivism.
I see the most moronic word ever, I describe it as such.
 
Nope!
 
Yup!
 
@JasperLoy Prescriptivism sounds like a nice idea, but it quickly ties you in horrible knots.
 
(Someone post that Wikipedia link quick, I'm tired.)
 
11:51 PM
But you judge its desirability: that is the core of prescriptivism as it is defined in philosophy, linguistics, etc. etc.
 
user19161
@z7sg I was referring to the mother-in-law thing!
 
@Cerberus WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH
 
Well, we had a you in here earlier but that you vanished and then you came along so I guess you'll have to untire yourself.
 
@RegDwight That... is neither!
 
user19161
I am now beginning to think that almost everyone here is a unicorn in disguise. My mind is playing tricks on me...
 
11:52 PM
I certainly am not! covers purple fur
 
@JasperLoy Who has been cornifying the chat again??
 
@Cerberus I'm sorry, did you just point out that "whoosh" is neither philosophy nor linguistics?
I'm not sure I can handle such revelations.
 
@JasperLoy Uhm, I don't want to know about those fantasies. :)
 
@RegDwight Perhaps some PAT is in order? You know, Prescriptivism Awareness Training. Don't you like the wonderfully pleasant noun adjectives? pats you
 
@GraceNote I have no affiliation with Narwhals, and I have never met monaco bronaco!
 
11:54 PM
in War Metal Tyrant, Jul 20 at 19:17, by RegDwight
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7137611@N05/4868354314/
 
@z7sg I'd look up that point where I totally saw you deny their existence and yet I cannot because of the slew of linguisophistivism.
 
user19161
@GraceNote You just made up that word!
 
@Cerberus How about some Awareness Awareness Training? You know, the basics first and all.
 
49 mins ago, by z7sg
@rumtscho Narwhals aren't real. They don't exist.
 
@JasperLoy I do that a lot, as it were. To wit, it's kinda my thing.
 
11:57 PM
@z7sg I'm sorry, but I have proof to the contrary.
 
I've evidently been talking nonsense for over an hour now.. must bid you all goodnight!
 
user19161
Besides Summer Storm, La Mala Educacion is good too. It's Spanish, with Eng subtitles.
 
@RegDwight Oh. Not. That.
 
user19161
@z7sg Bye
 
@z7sg Take that as my lullaby.
 
11:58 PM
@RegDwight Ah, an excellent idea! Meta-Trainings are always the most productive ones. Perhaps we should hold a meeting or two about it first, though.
@z7sg Night!
 
@Cerberus I would like to fetch some ideas about setting up a brainstorming for figuring out some dates when we could come together to talk about holding your meeting.
 
Can we practice that a bit, first? Make sure we are prepared to get the hang of that?
 
@RegDwight That would seem an excellent distribution of tasks. I will make a nice sandwich with egg, salmon, and tomato.
And mayonaise.
 

« first day (256 days earlier)      last day (4651 days later) »