@Zan700: No need to be snarky. Our primary purpose here is not to tackle "confusion in language" (which is too broad a topic for any site, or even any field of study). We also are ill-equipped to handle questions about the legal meanings of language that have been argued by legal and Constitutional scholars ad infinitum. Look in the Help Center for the kind of questions we are geared to answer here. — Robusto 1 min ago

This question should be on topic, if only for consistency: How do the rules of English inform understanding of one of our language's most disputed sentences? Everyone: don't be so close-happy! This question is interesting and valid: the part that isn't about legal precedent is answerable enough for our site. — Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica 1 min ago