« first day (1990 days earlier)      last day (2923 days later) » 

5:06 PM
post & posting, list & listing, end & ending, place & placing, ...
Is there a word for these pairs of nouns which roughly mean the same thing?
Could anyone expand the list?
 
5:25 PM
walk & walking, sit & sitting, run & running?
 
Mhm. Maybe.
 
crl
sing & singing & singinging
 
ping & pinging & pinginging
ring & ringing & ringinging
wing & winging & winginging
 
thing & ...
 
swing $ swinging
 
5:39 PM
I wanted to know what makes those pairs similar in meaning, while there are many other pairs who aren't synonymous.
Maybe there's no answer but: this is the way they are; maybe there's more to it; I don't know.
Maybe I'll ask on the main site after realizing what exactly I'm looking for.
 
Context gives meaning.
 
Anonymous
Well, derivational morphology isn't very regular. Deriving a noun from the -ing form of a verb is rather productive, but there are lots of other ways to form deverbal nouns, and some verbs are derived from homphonous nouns to begin with. So you have all sorts of competing noun forms related to verbs, and the relationships between them aren't going to be regular or predictable.
 
I see.
 
Anonymous
In some cases using the noun derived from the -ing form will be less natural when another related noun exists, but both will be possible. In other cases, both will be fine but have different meanings. And so on. Case by case.
 
Perhaps the first requirement for a pair to make it through my list is for there to be a word that can be a noun and a verb (without changing).
 
Anonymous
5:45 PM
Sure. You don't want to consider other kinds of derived nouns, like establishment versus establishing?
 
Right.
Oh. It's not as exciting as I expected it to be.
But thanks for your explanation @snailboat . :)
 
6:13 PM
@Færd what other pairs? Knowing those might help set a boundary
 
scrabbles around to find an answer
sing and singing?
Not very good though, 'cause 'singing' is not a noun.
Okay: warm and warming (both as nouns)
 
Anonymous
Well, you can derive one, but it's probably not the most natural choice most of the time. Sing seems like a bigger problem there.
 
Anonymous
Sing is rarely used as a noun.
 
Maybe most of the pairs that have the first requirement I mentioned above can have similar meanings.
I guess that's all there is to it.
X (noun) and Xing (noun) are probably close in their meanings, if X (verb) and Xing (noun) exist.
@Mitch I failed to find many other pairs. I must take that back.
Now it boils down to this:
For what verbs the present participle can be a noun? Is there a pattern for that?
 
6:41 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: What is another way of saying "less premium?" by 678 on english.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
7:47 PM
@Færd all? The present participle is also the gerund form
Are you looking for ... There's the idea of a 'root' form and its derived forms via suffixes prefixes, sound changes whatever. And the derived forms can have all sorts of POS.
Pure adj, purely adv, purify verb, purification noun.
Establish establishment disestablishment disestablishment antidisestablishment antidisestablishmentarian antidisestablishmentarianism
Stable
 
 
2 hours later…
10:17 PM
RTFA = read the fucking article.
 

« first day (1990 days earlier)      last day (2923 days later) »