« first day (1590 days earlier)      last day (3318 days later) » 

12:00 AM
Oh, really?
 
The [ʁ] thing again started in Lisbon.
 
Only in the Algarve?
 
And yes.
 
I see.
 
Well, not only in the Algarve, but that was the easiest place to cite.
 
12:00 AM
At any rate, Portuguese initial r sounds more like French than like Spanish or Italian to me.
 
Sigh.
The Lisbon one, yes.
 
I hear the Algarve is nice.
 
It is.
 
Right.
I have been listening to this Lisbonian (?) telenovela too much.
Lisbonese?
(Or should we say, in Algarve?)
 
Lisboeta or Alfacinha for the gentilic.
 
12:03 AM
Alfacinha?
 
I knew you would ask that.
 
Gentilic?
 
I know you don’t know Arabic, but gentilic, really?
Meanwhile, back in the throat:
> 4 A consoante designada doravante por /ʁ/ tem uma variedade de realizações, dependendo do dialeto. No Brasil, este som pode ser velar, uvular, alveolar ou glotal, e pode ser surdo a menos que esteja colocado entre consoantes sonoras,3 embora seja costumeiramente pronunciado como uma fricativa velar surda ([x]), uma fricativa glotal surda ([h]), uma fricativa uvular surda ([χ]) ou uma vibrante múltipla alveolar ([r]). Na Europa, suas mais frequentes realizações são a fricativa uvular sonora ([ʁ]), a vibrante múltipla uvular ([ʀ]) e o vibrante múltipla alveolar ([r]).6 Ver também R gutural.
 
Gens can mean many things.
 
A gentilic is a demonym.
 
12:04 AM
In English?
 
I believe English we speaking were.
Adjective: gentilic (not comparable)
  1. Tribal or national.
Noun: gentilic (plural gentilics)
  1. A personal name derived from a place name.
  2. A demonym.
 
> †a. Heathen, pagan (obs.). b. Tribal, national.
This is all the OED has.
A recent word?
 
Oh well. It is a normal word. Ask JBJ.
@Cerberus Don’t think so.
A origem do termo alfacinha para designar os naturais de Lisboa não está clara etimologicamente. A sua primeira referência clara surge em meado do século XIX, na obra "Viagens na Minha Terra" (1846): "Pois ficareis alfacinhas para sempre, cuidando que todas as praças deste mundo são como a do Terreiro do Paço…" Mesmo assim os naturais de Lisboa também são conhecidos como "Saloios". Segundo uma explicação, o termo advém do facto de na região da cidade de Lisboa a alface ser uma planta abundante, e dada a origem árabe da palavra, ter sido cultivada em larga escala durante o período muçulmano. Esta...
Adjective: gentilīciō
  1. dative masculine singular of gentilīcius
Noun: gentilicio m (plural gentilicios)
  1. demonym
El adjetivo gentilicio, también llamado a veces demónimo, es aquel que «denota la procedencia geográfica de las personas», ya sea por barrio, pueblo, ciudad, región, entidad política, provincia, país o cualquier otro lugar. El adjetivo gentilicio se puede sustantivar, es decir, se puede referir a una persona mencionándola únicamente por su gentilicio y así se puede decir correctamente el bruneano (en lugar de decir: el individuo bruneano), la francesa, etc. Los gentilicios ordinarios del idioma castellano o español se forman con una variedad de sufijos: -a, -aco, -aíno, -án, -ano, -ar, -ario, ...
Hm.
In any event, it is an old word, old as the Capitol.
 
Right, so in Latin it is just "of a gens".
 
A demonym /ˈdɛmənɪm/ is a name given to natives or residents of a place. Traditionally, the term used was gentilic, though this term is now not widely used. A demonym is usually, but not always, derived from the name of a place. For example, the demonym for the people of Canada is Canadian; the demonym for the people of Finland is Finn; the demonym for the people of Germany is German; the demonym for the people of Switzerland is Swiss; the demonym for the people of the Netherlands is Dutch. Some locations have double forms; for example, the demonym for the people of Britain can be either British...
 
12:11 AM
And gens is vague.
 
> Traditionally, the term used was gentilic, though this term is now not widely used.
 
I know demonym.
 
You knew demonym.
Now you know gentilic.
It is traditional.
 
@tchrist Then why doesn't the OED know it?
 
I knew you would appreciate that.
@Cerberus ¡Yo qué sé?
 
12:12 AM
It doesn't mention a noun gentilic.
 
@Cerberus Write them.
And yes, both ¡...? and ¿...! are permissible.
 
Noted.
It appears from the question about the ions that the existing words are at best inconsistent.
Sedenion, but Trigintaduonion?
 
Shocking.
Ick.
 
What is that supposed to be?
 
Ni puta idea.
 
12:16 AM
The Romans would never invent such overlong words.
 
People are silly.
I shall be seeking out the bubos this evening.
As that is easier to say than strigisomething.
 
Good luck.
0
A: What comes after the ducentiquinquagintasexions?

CerberusI'm afraid the words you mention were already formed incorrectly and inconsistently. I see some were formed from distributive numbers + an unknown suffix -ion (like quaternion). Others were formed from cardinal numbers + -nion (like trigintaduonions) Others again were formed from something tha...

Am I too harsh?
 
12:41 AM
Nope.
 
Well, well, well.
Looks like the LSE is/was occupied as well.
And we got statements of support from Lincoln, Jena.
I also heard something about an occupation in Oxford?
And something in Toronto?
All respectable places.
Noam Chomsky already pledged his support weeks ago, of course.
 
1:21 AM
@Cerberus LSE?
This is like asking "Which is better to say, knife or fork?" Both are exactly the right word, depending on what you mean to say. — Robusto 13 secs ago
They say these things because they mean to say "Go down this road" or "Go down this corridor." — Robusto 8 secs ago
My new zero-tolerance policy.
 
1:45 AM
The London School of Economics.
Have you reached 100K?
Now you're all snarky with people? Oh, wait...
You have!
Nice number.
Looks good on ya.
 
 
3 hours later…
4:38 AM
Luscus is the Latin word for a one-eyed person. There is no English word. — John Lawler 25 mins ago
 
 
5 hours later…
9:20 AM
@Cerberus Thank ye.
 
 
2 hours later…
11:00 AM
@Cerberus and in today's issue of Russia beats America:
Yo dawg.
 
 
2 hours later…
12:38 PM
@Europeans - did you see the eclipse? how was it?
 
I saw it. It was meh.
The last one was better. It was actually dark, you know.
Today, you barely noticed anything until someone told you, hey yo, teh sun's half gone.
The thing is so friggin bright, it can be nine tenths gone and you still go blind.
 
1:02 PM
Logarithmic response doesn’t help there.
 
Instead I recommend logarithm and blues. Or L&B for short.
 
I have no oomph to answer the latest question on our meta. Who’s going to tell him it’s because most of the questions, including his, are crap?
L*a*b is a color space.
Big L.
 
If you put a mat in your lab, you get a matlab.
If you put a big MAT in your LAB, you get MATLAB.
 
I had the impression that @MattE.Эллен was normal sized at most. Where do I get a big Mat from?
 
@tchrist MatDonald's
 
1:17 PM
@tchrist be my guest.
I don't know that we can reliably, or even speculatively, answer this. All votes are private, so you will have to ask every user individually. There's only one person we know of that goes around downvoting a lot. (And even for him, the focus lies on answers, not questions.) So at the end of the day we can only establish this: 1) the hive mind finds the average question on ELU more crap than the average question on Biology and 2) not that there's anything wrong with that. For starters, I don't know how many people on Biology can spell "biology", but not many people here can spell "English". — RegDwigнt ♦ 16 secs ago
 
Most of my recent downvoting has been kicking off the roomba.
It doesn’t apply to this guy.
I cannot speak for Kris. :)
I did find the fellow’s referenced question hard to read.
And pointless.
 
Also, it was only earlier today that I came across a blatantly off-topic question that was not even a question but a rant, and it had 3 upvotes. So perhaps the solution is for people to post more rants. — RegDwigнt ♦ 24 secs ago
 
I voted 70 times yesterday. I’ll leave it to your algebraic skills to figure how many of those have to have been downvotes. :)
Where yesterday=yesterGMTday
 
OVER 9000?
 
Good guess.
 
1:23 PM
It was educated. blushes
 
Nadie dijo nunca que fueses maleducado.
Ni jamás. :)
 
Jamás? The terrorist one?
 
That is how they spell it, IIRC.
 
Jilárious.
 
Tells you something about how soon they’ll achieve their goals.
 
1:26 PM
Jarjar.
 
Nominative determinism.
I just remembered that the answer to Mari-Lou’s question is tuerto.
Close ally of tortuous, but with completely different meaning.
 
Tuerto rico.
The tuerto is a lie.
 
@tchrist @RegDwigнt I know that user from biology.se where his contributions are excellent. I'm posting an answer explaining i) our site's scope and how it differs from ell and ii) the general dislike of single word requests.
 
@terdon ah that's very good. Thank you.
Personally, I am not sure why people take a single (a single!) downvote so personally.
 
And Italian has torto, but there it has the expected meaning of twisted. Spanish tuerto is one-eyed only to my knowledge. Cattivi amici.
 
1:31 PM
After all, this is a question-and-answer site, not a question-and-upvote site.
People, supposedly, come here for answers worth something, not imaginary internet points worth nothing.
 
They don’t imagine internet points worth nothing. They imagine them worth a chest to pin them on.
 
In fact it would seem to me that the people that are downvoted the most actually care the least. They do not care if their question is sitting at -1000, or as closed as off-topic, as long as someone answers it.
And of course the people that get a ton of upvotes for nothing don't complain either.
So there's really only this gray area in the middle, where someone gets a single downvote (or just a single upvote rather than six), and it's the end of the world for them.
 
@terdon What is the connection between cojo and cojonudo? :)
 
@RegDwigнt I've never been impressed by eclipses (thwy never line up just right, so whenever I'm checking it out at the place I am it's always partial or cloudy or near dawn or over in 5 seconds.
 
@tchrist One is naked, the other one could or couldn't be dressed. I will leave it as an excercise to you to find out which is which.
 
1:36 PM
That’s amusing.
 
@Mitch I will impress you by an eclipse in just a sec.
Hold on just a sec.
 
What would impress me if I could have a button that no one else has, that I can flick on and off. Like whenever anyone says the unknown code word, flick it off or on. That would be impressive.
Stupid eclipses
 
Aja! Cojo is unrelated to cojón after all!
 
@RegDwigнt That guy looks like he needs some sun.
 
Cojo < L. coxus but cojónes < L. coleus. I never knew the plants had balls.
Lame.
 
1:38 PM
@Mitch which is not unusual in the circumstances of a total eclipse.
So if inflammable is flammable, is desnudo nudo?
Latin really never cared for making sense now, did it.
 
@RegDwigнt He travels from country to country experiencing everyone's eclipses.
 
Someone's gotta do it.
 
It's self-serving. He does it to preserve his youthful by deathly complexion.
 
@tchrist Pues, es que alguien le cojió el cojon. Obvio.
 
En Barcelona hay una fábrica de coches.
 
1:43 PM
I was waiting for a lame pun.
 
O bien que lo que le dejo cojo fue un golpe pero muy fuerte.
@tchrist That was a lame pun! I even used the other meaning of cojo!
 
I knew I wouldn’t have to wait long.
 
En Barcelona hay un chiste cojo.
 
@terdon Yes, exactly. It was what they call in standup a straight line.
Well, or burlesque.
 
So. Back on-topic: are cojo and coche related now or what.
 
1:48 PM
@RegDwigнt I don't think so. According to RAE, coche comes from the Hungarian (of all things) kocsi while cojo from the Latin coxus.
 
coucher
couchette
 
That wasn't a sirius black question, but thanks nonetheless.
 
courgettes
 
@tchrist voulez-vous cojer avec moi ce soir.
 
zukes
GADZOOKS!
 
2:30 PM
The word is author. And Armen said so in the very first comment. Why is everyone after him falling over themselves trying to reinvent the bicycle? It is author. "Please provide the author of the quote." Not sayer, not orator, not speaker. It is author. And nobody at all will take that to mean "please provide a URL". So simple. Come on. — RegDwigнt ♦ 2 mins ago
 
 
1 hour later…
3:42 PM
@RegDwigнt Brilliant!
But isn't Marriott American?
 
I'd probably use source of the quote if the quote was spoken but author is indeed the simplest.
 
@terdon ngrams for "* of the quote" shows both source and author as possibilities.
source being more common.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yeah but we can't break that down and separate utterances from written quotes.
And Kris suggested utterer? Seriously?
 
An utterer is a distributor of counterfeit currency.
 
I strongly dislike the use of utter (and its other forms) to refer to writing.
> In summary, the word author cannot mean "the originator of an utterance," although it does not exclude such an instance.
What is Kris saying here?
Is it saying "A cannot be X, although it does not exclude X"?
 
3:54 PM
Yes. He's saying that author isn't right, but it might be.
 
so... it cannot be right, but it might be right.
 
That's helpful.
As usual.
 
1
Q: Something that is impossible but has happened

Mineking116I would like to know if anyone knows the word for something that should be impossible but has happened. An example is the Big Bang Theory. It shouldn't have been possible but something happened for us to exist.

Much the same.
 
What's wrong with unlikely? Or, in a pinch, very unlikely?
 
Feel free to write an answer :-)
 
4:05 PM
I was watching a TV show about a time-traveller from the future stuck in the present. She is acting as a cop and provides future memories of details of the case to her non-time-traveller partner. He accuses her of being in league with the bad guys or of doing illegal things to gain intel or of keeping secrets from him. So she says "I confess. I'm a time traveller." He storms off ("Do you think I'm stupid?") but later forgives her: "When you rule out the impossible, whatever remains must be true"
It was such a facepalm moment. He ruled out "in league with bad guys" as impossible but "time traveller" was just "not likely".
 
"one is against the laws of physics, the other requires you to be able to convince me a of a lie."
I know which one I'd pick! always root ( or is that route?) for the underdog :D
 
@AndrewLeach Fair enough, done.
@tchrist if you have a second, is there any reason to explicitly close a file handle opened with open(my $fh, "<","file.txt); while (<$fh>){ stuff...}? I think there is but I'm not sure what.
 
4:29 PM
@terdon I'm going to say that it's a good practice to close things when you're done using them, in case your code ends up as part of a larger thing that expects to do more than you expected. E.g. your function might end up as part of a larger app that reads many fields and you could run out of file handles.
But the perl interpreter closes file handles when the script ends, from what I can see.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Point, but theoretically, the new(ish) open function in Perl deals with these things automoagically. It's supposed to close things as soon as they go out of scope.
 
@terdon Ah. dunno about that. I'm just annoyed with past devs who worked on the code I maintain, who relied on automatic db cleanup code to handle closing their statements and whatnot. It means their resources were kept around too long, which was fine in normal use but terrible if you ever called the commands in a loop in a single db transaction.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 And I just found this at the very end of Perl's open documentation so there goes my argument:
> WARNING: The previous example has a bug because the automatic
close that happens when the refcount on "handle" reaches zero
does not properly detect and report failures. Always close the
handle yourself and inspect the return value.
 
ugh.
why not fix the automatic close thing?
either thing thing can be closed, in which case, close it automatically. or it can't be closed, in which case... what is checking the return value going to do?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Kinda goes over my head. I think they figure it's OK for simple things but not for more complex ones.
 
4:38 PM
@Cerberus that's the whole point, innit. Mariott may be American, but only in Sochi will they get this... um... thing.
 
"Here is a feature which does things for you. Here is code which relies on that feature. Warning: the code has a bug because the feature is broken. Always manually do the automatic thing, even though you can't really do any better yourself." starts loading shells into the shotgun
 
But I must be commuting.
 
@RegDwigнt Got an elves set yesterday. It's got great new part/colour combos!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Nah, not quite as bad as that :)
 
@terdon where did you find this text? The doc I found words it much more gently, saying just "it's better" to manually close.
 
4:51 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 At the bottom of perldoc -f open
 
yeah. So those 5.17 docs make me want to load a shotgun. They are saying that you should never use the feature they've provided, yet don't adequately explain why not. If you go to the close() page, you don't find a good description of the possible errors or what you should do about them.
"sometimes it doesn't work" is what they're essentially saying.
Anyway from what I can see in the docs, the automatic close should be fine, assuming it works as well as they imply. The fact that close() can fail seems unimportant for input files; what are you going to do about it anyway?
 
log it and tell a sysadmin
 
5:15 PM
@terdon So you know whether you had an I/O error on the read, including a lost network connection.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 This is being addressed.
Maybe.
 
@RegDwigнt Russia and America had a baby, and it looks like this.
 
Sarah Palin.
 
Haha.
She should go live in Sochi!
I have added duceniquinquagenisexions to my answer because the OP wanted them so badly...
 
5:38 PM
I prefer spaces. :(
du ceni quinqua genisex ions :)
 
Hah.
Meanie!
 
I prefer a bag of letters. That way I can make up my own words. Down with the Author!
Up with Scrabble!
I hate it when people hear what they expect to hear rather than what you're saying.
I'm just sayin!
There's gotta be a Schopenauer quote about that
 
5:57 PM
I note that duceniquinquagenisexions scores 53 in Scrabble not counting double- or triple-whatever squares. Which, actually, is going to be hard to do. :)
 
6:17 PM
it's tricky to make a word longer than 15 letters on a typical board :p
 
Oh, we always play with wrap-around-the-edges rules. :)
 
@tchrist Ah, good point, thanks.
 
I guess the CMs are not friendly this week. :(
7
Q: Request for aggregate data regarding deleted questions with subjects containing CORRECT, GRAMMA, or RIGHT

tchristThis support request will require the assistance of a Stack Exchange employee, probably a kindly Community Manager. As shown at the bottom of this answer, I present some SEDE results on just how many non-deleted questions’ titles contain any of “correct”, “gramma”, or “right”. I used queries lik...

If anyone hasn’t upvoted the request for data, purdy please?
(Actually, I know they are busy.)
Not unfriendly or unkind.
But it’s funnier the other way.
I also updated my list of crapola.
5
A: "Are these sentences correct?"—Is a title like this enough reason to close a question?

tchristSummary After looking into this in some detail, I now strongly believe in the following proposition Resolved: The words “correct” and “grammatical” should both be forbidden in question titles. Actually, just the strings correct and gramma would be better, not full words. They are almost a...

I’ve been watching the Roomba purgings and adding the ones that apply.
Now, I don’t know for sure we ought to do that.
It might not be a good idea.
But without aggregate info on what's been deleted, we really can't ponder it from an evidence-supported vantage point.
I am just such a purple square.
 
7:06 PM
> Note also that in Latin some words have two alternative forms, like triceni/trigeni "thirty each"; I have used the commonest alternative in each case.
@Cerb Ahem. :)
Or more common.
Not *most.
 
Jez
methinks kit is on holiday
or has left stackexchange
shame
 
Please don’t be silly.
Thrice over.
 
Jez
well where is she
 
If she were on holiday, I certainly hope she wouldn’t be attending to her volunteer duties as a moderatrix, whose attentions she has not forgone.
Where she is is her business.
But she is not not here.
 
Jez
wow
(doge style)
being a mod on here is a bit like being a supreme court justice, isn't it? you're one for life
 
7:23 PM
@Matt or @Reg or @AndrewLeach: OP wants to delete own question.
 
@Jez She doesn't chat much anymore.
 
@tchrist Yes, I added two later, but some numbers have more than one alternative.
"Twenty-eight each" could be duodetrigeni, duodetriceni, deni octoni...
I will make it "two or more", then.
P.S. I try to use commoner and commonest whenever I think of it.
 
7:46 PM
@Robusto Done (no votes to consider).
 
8:00 PM
I think there's a minimum time limt before self-deletion can occur.
 
8:20 PM
@AndrewLeach I wasn't sure if it was a dupe or not, but apparently the OP thought it was.
 
Jez
9:02 PM
Hmm.
I'm wanting to join a Critters (critique.org) workshop, but I'm stuck at a relatively early hurdle: I'm not sure how to classify my story!
SF/Fantasy/Horror?
Mainstream and literary fiction?
Mystery, Thriller, and Adventure writing?
 
Probably all of those.
Will there be any interesting future technologies in your story?
 
Jez
did you read the first chapter?
i haven't decided yet. maybe.
 
Just classify what's being critiqued so far. Is it thrilling? mysterious? Fantastic? etc.
 
Jez
9:19 PM
all of the above
lol
 
then try to figure out what surprises the audience least. Will mystery readers be annoyed by magic? if you think so, choose fantasy over mystery. etc.
 
@Robusto No idea. Actually, the OP could have deleted it if he registered his account. So I advised him to do that for his second flagged request.
 
Jez
9:37 PM
actually, looking at that Critters website, it's pretty ramshackle
reminds me of something from 1995
the forums are broken, broken links, out-of-date information, dodgy design, no HTTPS for password,s creaky .cgi forms mixed with PHP, e-mail, newsgroups, forums
quelle bordel
 
@Jez I did. The setting was decidedly futuristic, so SF, but I don't remember seeing any actually new technologies yet.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Wise.
@Jez Hey, don't be too critical of their infrastructure: it's the content that counts.
 
@Cerberus We need a directed graph for what genres allow other genres.
 
Jez
@Cerberus that's not so impressive either. the forums have cobwebs and the email i got sent was a total mess and hard to read
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Haha that would be fun.
 
Jez
@Cerberus see I'd have said it was a mystery, given that the plan is to have a bit of a surprise moment at the end
but it has sci-fi, adventure (probably), and fantasy
so it doesnt really fit into these narrow classifications
 
9:41 PM
@Jez from my experience, a "mystery" is usually a whodunnit
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 As a fantasy reader, I am very tolerant, except that I really wouldn't touch with a pole fantasy with elements from modern, Western life in it.
 
Jez
well then i guess it's not a fantasy
 
I know.
 
Jez
it's not really anything
 
@Jez Then I would pick SF.
 
9:42 PM
@Cerberus So, a magical world where the first three books feature sword fights, but the fourth book takes place 300 years later and involves guns as well, would be off-limits?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I have nothing at all against guns. I like guns.
 
@Cerberus so what are "modern, Western life"?
 
As long as they're not typical guns from the 20th or 21st century.
I want no AK47s.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I'm not sure where the boundary lies.
 
So I guess Harry Potter is off-limits
 
Most certainly.
 
9:44 PM
Many sci-fi readers hate anything with "magic" in it.
 
Reading Narnia, I wished for the closet to but shut forever and the outside world to disappear. I hated the ordinary part sof it.
 
BUT they make exceptions for things like Star Wars
 
Jez
i wonder whether people like J K Rowling wrote for the fun of it, or with a view to selling and making money
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I think you're right. For me, it depends on how hardcore the SF is.
 
@Jez both, probably.
 
Jez
9:45 PM
i'm kind of in the middle; i'd like a decent number of people to read it
sucks to put a load of work in and very few to read it
 
If it's fairly hardcore and close to the 21st century, this SF, then I want no magic.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I haven't seen Star Wars, but it seems too much like a fairytale to me, too undeep.
 
@Cerberus and if it's not hardcore, then the tech is probably indistinguishable from magic anyway.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yes, quite possibly.
 
@Cerberus I can't talk to you anymore.
 
Haha aww.
Well, Star Wars is kind of for children, right?
Or isn't it?
Like Harry Potter?
 
9:47 PM
no, not in the same way
 
I'm sure I would like HP if I read it. But the part about where he is actually an ordinary kid yadda yadda puts me off.
Oh.
 
well, he's NOT an ordinary kid.
that's sorta the point.
 
Jez
so, does anyone in here write fiction?
 
Of course he seems like an ordinary kid in his 20th-century, bourgeois life, but in reality he is superman.
 
but HP is written in a childish way; from the start the tone and language are for young readers. But as the series progresses it gets less childish.
 
9:48 PM
So I heard.
@Jez No, but we all plan to.
 
Jez
hey, this place looks a bit like Critters, but with a site 100 billion times nicer: scribophile.com
 
@Cerberus The first chapters of the first book set up that he is more than a regular human; eventually he finds out just what, and the rest of the series is almost entirely set in the wizarding world.
@Jez I write fiction. Every tuesday at 5 UTC there is a writers chat where we do (usually) fiction exercises.
But I haven't written a novel. yet.
Kit and Matt both have, for NaNoWriMo
 
Jez
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 what fiction exercises?
 
we have 10-minute writing exercises on random topics.
 
@Jez Everything I write is based on fact.
Except fiction wouldn't be that interesting if it were totally made up.
 
9:57 PM
@Jez A nice site means superficiality...
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yeah, those first chapters I would hate.
 
@Cerberus I don't know why you'd hate them. Do you hate all stories set in the modern era? Does it help if I tell you that the story takes place in 1992? That's a long time ago.
 
Jez
10:13 PM
scribophile does seem like a very active site
hopefully it will be helpful when writing a story
it has a karma system so you're likely to get good critiques when you finally get the karma to post something for critique
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Hah. I hate stories that mix ordinary life with magic.
And I hate when ordinary people are secretly heroes, it's childish.
 
@Cerberus How do heroes become heroes if they don't start out ordinary? In any case, in the HP books HP doesn't succeed because he is some kind of superstar. Among wizards he's not any kind of amazing talent.
@Cerberus can you give me an example of a book with a hero that you liked, and one that you hated?
 
Not ordinary in that way.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Ordinary as in, someone living in a society that closely resembles our own.
If there is magic, I don't want it to be in my world.
For several reasons.
 
I'm not sure why that should be a show-stopper, but, whatever.
don't bother reading HP then
:p
 
Jez
OK question: since recently, is anyone else having the weird phenomenon that when they click away from this chatroom and then click back in, it briefly flashes black before becoming the normal colour?
 
10:28 PM
but Star Wars is definitely not our world
No, i haven't seen that.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I know.
@Jez Yes.
The editing box, when I was editing an answer, also had some weird kind of scrambling. It's not all the time, and it disappears when I resized the box. But it is new, just like the black flashes.
So this is some weird thing about Firefox + Stack Exchange?
 
time to go. cya later
 
Bye!
 
Jez
10:54 PM
this takeaway pizza with juicy lamb donner kebab meat and chilli sauce and salad on it is so delicious it should be illegal!
 
11:11 PM
Yay!
 
@Cerb I have no problem with commoners, only with duals. :)
 
11:44 PM
Hi all. I am looking for friends to chat and improve skills.
 
@tchrist I've finally figured out how to make Spanish pronunciation easier for me.
I drop my jaw and thrust it forward a bit, and everything falls into place.
 

« first day (1590 days earlier)      last day (3318 days later) »