« first day (1845 days earlier)      last day (3062 days later) » 

12:06 AM
@tchrist good idea
 
12:47 AM
Today on ELU we learned that porn begets even more porn.
 
I'm tempted to delete that answer as a dupe.
 
The even-more-porn one?
I didn't check timestamps.
Oh right.
In honesty, I was expecting an -ing answer.
 
It's "reclining". I looked at the picture and thought "reclining" before I even read the question.
"Recumbent" is a kind of bike, not a pose.
 
That's exactly the word I was expecting.
 
1:04 AM
The future seems bright.
 
Saddens me.
 
@tchrist Why?
 
Phone obsession. It's horrid.
 
@tchrist What is this about phones?
 
The more battery handies have, the more people will immerse themselves in the unreal.
Basically, I'm tired of rudeness.
 
1:12 AM
This isn't about phones.
Yes, phones can use batteries, but so can electric cars, solar cells, and the power grid in general.
> “Using conservative assumptions and no incentives, our model indicates that the incremental cost of storage will decrease from ~14c/kWh today to ~2c/kWh within the next five years,” the report says. “When overall system cost decreases are considered, we believe solar + batteries will be a clear financial choice in mature solar markets in the future.”
> ...
One such project that was recently announced is a recent announcement by Swiss energy storage start-up Alevo Group that they will be entering into partnership with Customized Energy Solutions (CES) to deploy 200 MW of its lithium-ion-based battery systems in an undisclosed wholesale energy market in the United States.

The distributed storage projects are aimed at providing frequency regulation services through CES, which works with eight independent systems operators in North America. The battery storage projects will help the unnamed grid operator integrate renewable energy resource
 
Solar is good.
 
That's why I posted the decreasing cost of solar energy and of storing energy.
Some day, generating and storing solar power will beat fossil fuels.
When that say is, we do not know; but the graphs point into the right direction for all factors involved.
 
@KitZ.Fox Holy Crap! When will they be in the stores?
 
1:27 AM
@Mitch Very likely never.
First draft for the first two, the third is in revision. Fourth isn't finished.
You can read the first two on my blog if you want. But seriously. They are first drafts.
 
@tchrist Soon we'll be walking around, or rather recumbenting, in our VR helmets
@KitZ.Fox As long as it's out there at some point.
I heard that a few years ago (early 90s?) that WIlliam Gibson wrote a novel taht he put on a single 5 1/2 in floppy disk so that it would very soon become obsolete and unreadbale.
 
Sounds like a great plan.
 
I have an unreachable world on magtapes.
 
I have masterpieces I've written that are on inaccessible decommissioned servers.
When I say masterpieces, I mean copies of other people's.
Like project gutenberg
@tchrist I read that as 'unreachable word' and wondered which one.
 
 
2 hours later…
3:27 AM
Does 'OK' as opposed to 'Okay' appear rude?
It seems like just saying "OK." is ruder than saying "Okay."
 
@I'mmostlyjustanidiot OK is the "correct" version.
"Okay" is an alternate spelling.
I can't remember if it's an urban legend, though. I believe OK was an acronym for "Oll Korrect".
We have a question about it on main.
50
Q: Where did the term "OK/Okay" come from?

Daniel LeCheminantI've heard lots of varying histories of the term "OK". Is there any evidence of the true origin of the term?

You might be interested in this one:
17
Q: Difference between "OK" and "okay"

Xander LamkinsWhile typing a post on SO, I noticed that the word "ok" (when used in the sentence "I'm still learning so it is ok") was marked as misspelled (got to love spellcheck!) The first suggestion, however, confused me. The suggestion was "OK" (as opposed to "ok"). Then I thought, what about "okay"? So,...

 
Thanks @KitZ.Fox.
 
Sure thing.
There are quite a few questions about OK. It's a surprisingly rich subject.
 
@KitZ.Fox Is "Ha ha." Correct aswell, regardless that's a pretty funny thing to say :D.
 
Yes, you can say "ha ha" or "haha". Both are OK.
^ see what I did there?
 
3:41 AM
OK :).
I definitely did Ha Ha.
The user @Mitch caused the latter question: chat.stackexchange.com/….
 
Yes, he prefers to type his laughs rather than use "lol".
Which is rather charming and old-fashioned.
I prefer typing my laughs as well.
 
I prefer 'haha' to Ha Ha, which sounds sarcastic to me.
Although my Ha Ha above wasn't intended to be sarcastic.
I was just trying to get a feel for it :D.
 
I understand.
I'm off to bed. Good night to you.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in body: I wonder comment on the 3 things left by Peter Bardsley on english.stackexchange.com
 
@I'mmostlyjustanidiot it's barely an interjection, you can write it however you feel.
There's no good onomatopoia for crying however. If there were I'd use it a lot more.
Please add to the following:
5
Q: Latin words borrowed from Roman occupation?

MitchEnglish has a lot of words borrowed from Latin. The great majority were borrowed in the 14- and 1500's from Church/Medieval Latin, a huge influx via educated neologism. I'd like to know if there are any more words that were borrowed into English directly via Vulgar Latin and not through Old Fren...

 
3:58 AM
@Mitch Wow, I had never though about that.
@KitZ.Fox Good night to you too.(Is the second with double 'o' correct?)
 
Mar 24 '13 at 18:57, by Mitch
ha ha ha. he says humorlessly
@I'mmostlyjustanidiot sobs uncontrollably in hands
that's how I do it.
@I'mmostlyjustanidiot also good night
 
@Mitch sobs uncontrollably at the fact that @Mitch is leaving
Good night to you my good sir. @Mitch
 
 
4 hours later…
8:33 AM
Question 1: Why do we say 'ear infection', rather than 'infection ear'? Why does putting ear at the end change it to 'infected ear'?
 
 
2 hours later…
user174558
10:27 AM
@I'mmostlyjustanidiot Because that is the way English is.
 
@JasperLoy That's unsatisfying. Hey, you are blue now?
@JasperLoy I don't like this blue sorry.
 
11:07 AM
@I'mmostlyjustanidiot infected is a past participle, which can be used as an adjective. In English adjectives are put in front of the thing they are describing. In "ear infection" ear is used as an attributive noun, which is a type of adjective, so it goes ahead of the thing it's describing (the infection). In that instance ear is the sort of infection, like "cow milk" vs "goat milk". "Infection ear" would be a type of ear, but seems semantically odd.
 
 
2 hours later…
1:25 PM
@Mitch wah wah wah
 
1:50 PM
@MattE.Эллен Oh, you were cutting onion and hot peppers? I see that you have Oprah on.
@MattE.Эллен That would work except it also sounds too much like how Charlie Brown's teacher and other adults talk.
 
It's relatively common though. I would certainly understand it as crying.
 
@terdon but would you say it sounds like crying?
@Mitch sort of but I think it misses the nasality of peanut's adults
@Mitch free tears for everyone!
 
user174558
@MattE.Эллен Like I said, that's the way English is. =)
 
And you are the way Jasper Loy is :-p
 
user174558
Tomorrow is the first of December, yay! Christmas is coming!
 
1:54 PM
@MattE.Эллен Not really, no more than "cock-a-doodle-do" sounds like a cock crowing.
 
@MattE.Эллен um... that's what I thought I was talking about. but to play your game,I guess that should be wanh wanh wanh
 
@Mitch I thought you were looking for a good onomatopoeia for crying?
 
@terdon that's not how roosters crow. It's how they speak. Please, they have standards.
@MattE.Эллен I was and am and may very well use 'wa wa'
 
There's also boo-hoo. As in oh, boo-hoo!
 
hm yes, but that's usually used...2nd order?
 
user174558
2:00 PM
Interesting that chat tells us to be nice and yet ignoring another is not nice.
 
as in 'oh, you're acting all sad but I step on you, you cockroach'
 
@terdon I never did understand how "boo-hoo" sounds like crying.
 
I feel like I heard something about ignoring. Oh well. How about them apples?
 
user174558
Therefore, I propose that the ignore feature be abolished.
 
@MattE.Эллен This from a native speaker of a language that seems to believe that pigs go oink.
 
2:01 PM
@MattE.Эллен you should say the same thing about cockadoodledoo then, because all the roosters I know just have a high pitched cough.
@terdon again, from all the pigs I know and converse with on a daily basis, that is more high register, when speaking with the farmer. in the pig pen slopping around sure we... I mean they say much more informal things.
 
user174558
FF is about to reach 100k.
 
@Mitch Get yor snout out o me grub you fooker!
That sort of thing?
 
@Mitch crying from babies somewhat resembles "wah wah". Crying for non-babies is more of a slobbering "uhuh huh huh" deep breath in "uhuh huh huh". I can't figure where the boo or hoo come from. A cock crow has the parts of "cock a doodle do", like "awk a yewka awk"
 
user174558
LOL. Rathony edited his profile and it still has errors.
 
@terdon yes, with more grunting. Also, that's not my snout.
 
2:08 PM
@terdon hornk and oink aren't so different...
 
user174558
If English is his best language, then the rest must be really bad.
 
@JasperLoy infectioneer. makes it sound so much more ... pleasant
 
or maybe that should be hrornk
 
who says hrornk, or what ever that's supposed to be?
 
2:09 PM
pigs. they would.
so piggy
 
with their piggy little eyes
 
and piggy little nose
 
and piggy little tails
 
ooh. that too
 
user174558
My desktop is very nice, but the speakers are spoilt. I need to use the laptop for sound.
 
2:10 PM
sounds nothing like 'oink'
 
Precisely.
 
"boohoo" is apparently a Scottish invention
 
That's racist
 
Says the multicoloured abstract pattern
 
wa wa
@JasperLoy He says he's not a native speaker of English. Cut him some slack on that. About his attitude, that you can totally not cut him some slack.
Oh. Right. He says English is his best. Well, there's no accounting for reality
 
user174558
2:20 PM
@Mitch I suppose he is Japanese then.
 
2:55 PM
Good morning.
The best part about my husband being home is that he brings me breakfast while I'm working.
And makes me coffee.
Well.
 
3:10 PM
Morning @JohnB
 
Hey Kit and all
 
How are things going for GD? Has it settled down at all?
 
I think so, for the most part.
 
Good, glad to hear it. I read some of the Meta fallout. Looks like it got worked through at least. I mean, I was clear on the expectation by the time I got done.
Hopefully everyone else was as well.
 
user174558
Hello @KitZ.Fox! It's Dec tmr!
 
3:15 PM
Good evening to you, @Jasper.
 
user174558
3:41 PM
The most silly questions are found on Academia SE, LOL. It seems those people have no common sense to deal with students and professors.
 
students and professors have no common sense way to deal with each other
hi @Kit :D
 
user174558
I laugh when I look at some questions there. It is so funny.
 
Morning @Matt.
 
4:09 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive body detected, offensive title detected: Origin of Fag in British English by Obsidian Phoenix on english.stackexchange.com
 
 
2 hours later…
user174558
5:40 PM
I just watched Wrong Turn 2. Now for 3,4,5,6.
 
There are really that many?
 
user174558
Yes, all from the same site, LOL.
 
user174558
Someone takes a wrong turn in the road, meets some deformed people who eat humans.
 
user174558
Most people die, but there are one or two who escape.
 
user174558
Rather violent, not for children.
 
6:26 PM
hi
 
Hi.
 
is my reputation stops me from posting here ?
 
On EL&U, but you have enough reps on SO, I didn't realize when I commented on your post.
 
ok , anyway , thank you for helping me :D
 
Oh sure. You can ask that kind of thing in here anytime.
 
6:32 PM
thnks , BTW , can you rate my english ? good , bad? for non-natives of course
 
There is also an English Language Learners site and chat room, if you would feel more comfortable there.
 
Great (Y)
 
@AhmedKamal I haven't seen much of it. I would guess you are intermediate level.
Ooooh. Didn't realize it would do that.
The chat room is here: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/22937/ells-cabin ... I think. There was something with two rooms for ELL, and I think that's the main chat.
 
thanks a lot
 
 
2 hours later…
8:10 PM
Any mods in?
@Matt E. Эллен not sure if its my browser/computer, but I can no longer use the @user function in comments? Is this a privilege and can it be taken away?
@Mitch can you help me please?
 
8:30 PM
@Christopher What do you mean?
It is not a privilege.
And what do you mean you can no longer “use” it
 
every time I write @user in a comment it saves my comment without the @user
 
Are you answering the post author?
 
Example I write "@user, an excellent quest...blah...", the comment that is displayed is ", an excellent quest...blah..." weird?
yes....
but he has written a comment..
 
If he is the only one who would be notified, the @-mention is removed.
 
ah....Op's are notified when a comment is written so no point in @user?
 
8:35 PM
Yes.
 
@tchrist That seems silly, to remove it from the text.
 
ahhhh...I understand now, sorry to have bothered you, thank you.
 
Not a bother.
 
8:54 PM
@tchrist Do you have edit comment privilege?
 
9:20 PM
I think only mods of this site have that privilege and tchrist is a mod elsewhere.
 
ok.. thanks, not important anyway.
 
 
1 hour later…
10:24 PM
@MattE.Эллен As for example "attorney general". :-)
 
10:44 PM
@MετάEd the weirding of law language is joint and several
 
10:59 PM
@MattE.Эллен As is the law of weirding language.
 
Anonymous
@MετάEd Yep! One of the four basic functions of adjectives in English.
 
Anonymous
Postpositive function is relatively limited, though, so it makes sense to teach learners that attributive and predicative function are more basic.
 
Anonymous
Wikipedia has a nice list of fixed phrases with postpositive adjectives: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postpositive_adjective#Set_phrases
 

« first day (1845 days earlier)      last day (3062 days later) »