« first day (2859 days earlier)      last day (1095 days later) » 

Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
4:46 AM
I see that it was suggested here:
If included, it seems worth creating a new meta question & answer which contains the same information but which is not specific to Math.SE. (But it could say "For example, if you post a question on Math Stack Exchange and want to post it again on Mathoverflow,.."). I don't think it's a big problem but making a new meta post and linking to it seems pretty easy to do. — Will Sawin 7 hours ago
Maybe it is worth considering adding faq-porposed or faq? (IIRC the latter can only be added by a moderator.)
And maybe this post might be included in the tag-info for cross-posting?
 
 
1 hour later…
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
6:15 AM
Thank you for informing me. Now I will look what is new on Lviv Scottish Book. — Taras Banakh 11 hours ago
 
 
1 hour later…
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
7:19 AM
2
Q: Is the algorithm which reviews questions when one clicks "review your question" customizable on a per-site basis?

Tim CampionSince at least a few years ago (I cannot locate the announcement of this feature's introduction) most SE sites require at least two clicks to post a question -- first, one clicks the "Review your question" button, and then it turns into "Post your question", and it can be clicked for publication....

discussion feature-request questions asking-questions new-users
I guess that the announcement that there now exists the "review your question" part of the process was made here: The new ask page is now live on the network! (March 2020) — Martin 2 hours ago
I hope that somebody who knows the details will write a bit in the answer to your question.
I'll just mention that the linked question lists among the customizable stuff:
> The warning text shown in the "Review your question" sidebar, regex-based (seen with the default text in screenshot 4, and with custom text on screenshot 5).
 
Catija
Catija
Several sites have stuff that will trigger warnings, so we can add them but I'm not sure what sorts of things we can check for.
 
 
1 hour later…
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
8:58 AM
Alexander Gruber considered some project to automatically detect potentially problematic questions on Mathematics. This is somewhat different from what is needed here, but maybe of the suggestions given there might serve as an inspiration: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/107936/2020/5/13
in REHAB, May 13 '20 at 7:38, by Alexander Gruber
room topic changed to REHAB: Help Alex write regex to autoflag questions. Seeking multiple examples of common duplicates, and phrases that appear in crank questions and PSQs (no tags)
@Catija I saw in the above screenshot that some warning was shown on Code Review, but I am not sure what was it based on.
Are there some discussions on per-site-metas where this was customized, so that interested users can see what it was about?
Are that similar regex expressions as mentioned in Which are blacklisted tags and blacklisted phrases? on Mathematics Meta and Forbid (or rewrite) proxy links in answers on Meta MathOverflow?
Unrelated to the above: Congrats to Tim Campion on the bronze discussion badge. (At the moment, there are 13 users with that badge.)
Maybe the regexes used on Code Review are taken from here: Code Review Clippy?
27
Q: Code Review Clippy

Shog9A while back, y'all asked for some warnings for folks asking questions here: What would Clippy say? After thorough review (mostly by animuson & JNat), we've determined that the following warnings can be implemented, based on question title matches: \b((do(ing)?\s+this)|(this\s+(\w+\s)? code)|me...

discussion asking-questions low-quality-posts
 
 
6 hours later…
Tim Campion
Tim Campion
2:44 PM
@MartinSleziak Thanks, Martin. Could you please suggest these steps as a comment / answer on the meta question itself? I'm starting to lose track of some of the great suggestions you've made in this chat lately. If you don't want these suggestions to be visible on the meta question as part of the "permanent record", you can always delete them after everything has been finalized.
 

« first day (2859 days earlier)      last day (1095 days later) »