@FedericoPoloni I have edited into your post the relevant part of the MO-SE agreement.

I did this for two reasons.

One is that if the issue related to the agreement is being discussed, then it might be useful that the users see the relevant part. (It's easier for other users to read this in the question rather than clicking on the link.)

Moreover, the link might die at some point. You probably remember that François G. Dorais♦ edited that post after the original link stopped working.

As it is your post, it goes without saying that if you prefer not to have this in the post, you should feel free to remove it. (Or - in the other direction - if you think that some other part of the agreement which is relevant to the issue, perhaps it might be edited into the question.)

As a side note, I'll mention that if you add discussion tag (in addition to feature-request) to your question, it might get into the community bulletin.

Possibly, this might get your post a bit more attention and increase the likelihood of getting some feedback from the MO community. (The experience from the past is that MO mods and also MO users in general are not that active on meta and often posts on MathOverflow Meta end up without getting much response.)

I have mentioned this also in another chatroom (belonging to Jon Ericson, a community moderator who sometimes posts also here on MO): chat.meta.stackexchange.com/rooms/738/conversation/…

Thanks, the change is appreciated

I'll add the discussion tag, thanks for the suggestion

I had no idea only "discussion" posts could appear there

Since we are at it, the only one of your changes that I don't approve of is altering the capitalization of Mathoverflow

I'm not going to make another edit just for that, but I prefer sticking to the standard English capitalization rules. I think spelling "Mathoverflow" is perfectly legitimate and shouldn't be changed (like colour/color shouldn't be changed gratuitously).

The composition of community bulletin is described in detail here: What criteria are used to select the links that appear in the community bulletin sidebar block?

The third bullet point is:

> On sites other than Stack Overflow, if there are still under 4 items, the rest of the space is filled with hot discussion questions not marked status-completed, scoring at least 3 and posted within the past two weeks. These are picked semi-randomly.

> (Note that the timing, score and tags can be adjusted per-site to suit the needs of each community).

@FedericoPoloni As far as I know, MathOverflow with the uppercase O (and no space) is the official name so I assumed that to be simply a typo/oversight.

You can notice that it is spelled this way in the migration agreement that you refer to.

This spelling is also used in the Notices article by Anton Geraschenko, Scott Morisson, Ravi Vakil. ams.org/notices/201006/rtx100600701p.pdf

There is also this post on meta, but it seems that here the OP asks mainly about the difference that MathOverflow doesn't have a space - unlike Stack Overflow: Why is “MathOverflow” spelled without a space when “Stack Overflow” is spelled with a space?

Anyway, let's wait and see - it takes some time until the community bulletin gets update, but I suppose that now that it has the (discussion) tag (and it has score $\ge3$), it should appear in the CB relatively soon.

The Wikipedia article on MathOverflow uses the same spelling. That article survived AfD nomination not too long ago - so it seems that MO is notable, at least by Wikipedia's standards.

Although at the moment, Wikipedia seems to respond very slowly (and sometimes not at all) for me. (And from what I read, in several other countries as well.)

Anyway, the difference between MathOverflow/Mathoverflow spelling is probably not that important. I will try to keep in mind in the future that you prefer the "unofficial" spelling.

BTW the post is already in the community bulletin:

I disagree on your idea that someone can decide the capitalization of their own name. See for instance the take of this of this Washington Post copy editor: theslot.com/webnames.html

I'm going to stick with my capitalization, which I consider correct. I think it is a matter of writing style (like many commas, or color/colour), and it should not be changed.

In this case, it's not really my idea - it's the idea of MathOverflow as the organization.

(Yes, I had trouble with Wikipedia today, too)