last day (377 days later) » 

7:00 PM
We need a bot in here to keep time and validate patterns
I might fork Shiro later
 
I think the time might need to be decreased a bit
maybe 3 min.
 
Rule: ^...*q.*$
 
liquidated (10)
liquidations (12)
 
inquisitions (11)
dang
 
reaquisitions (13)
 
7:05 PM
Is there a dictionary we use to check what words are valid?
 
Wouldn't that be "reacquisitions?
 
@Pavel you mean lens
Also yeah we really need a standard dictionary
 
Preferably one with an API or downloadable word list, if we're going to make a bot that checks words...
 
But... IMO that should be something the bot handles. Otherwise it's too easy to cheat
@GentlePurpleRain yeah. Of course it will be one that's downloadable
Plenty of those out there
 
acquisitiveness (15)
 
7:08 PM
kafkaesqueness (14)
 
acquisitivenessless (19) (is it a word?:D)
 
Don't think that's a word...
What would it mean?
 
@flawr :| no it isn't, according to google
 
2 minutes remaining
 
On the other hand, we like obscure words that don't always pop up in dictionaries
 
7:10 PM
Also yeah I've seen .+lessness before but not .+nessless
 
ventriloquizing (15)
 
@ASCII-only witnessless?
 
and... Time is up.
 
@flawr :| ok well I haven't seen it as a suffix
 
quartata wins
I was thinking of sesquipedalian.
 
7:13 PM
hmmm
 
@quartata is this the regex? :)
 
Rule: .*ni.*ne.*
 
asinine 7
 
garf hunter you lazy cat
7
 
7:16 PM
nine-trillion?
 
@Pavel :|
 
nicotine (8)
 
unsanctimoniousness (19)
 
seriously
 
Actually can I just stack increasing power 10 indicators
 
7:17 PM
I forfeit. :P
 
wtf
 
ness makes this pretty easy.
 
nine-hundred-ninety-nine-thousand-nine-hundred-ninety-nine
 
@PostLeftGarfHunter after looking up what this even means, can you really append a ness?
 
ninehundred-ninetynine-trilllion-ninehundred-billion...
 
7:18 PM
You can add ness to any word to make a new word.
 
nicotine was one of the ones i had in mind btw
 
Are hyphens allowed everywhere in numbers
 
ness is a functor on the category of words
 
@ASCII-only No. Hence the un-boldness.
 
whatever that means
 
7:19 PM
(?!ness)
 
@PostLeftGarfHunter not all words...
 
@Cowsquack No lookaheads
Which is a lame rule imo
 
@flawr tbh I'm not sure if it is a word. But it seems like it would be
 
Youness canness addness nessness toness anyness wordness toness makeness aness newness wordness.
 
I know, ^^^
 
7:20 PM
@GentlePurpleRain hopelessnessness?
 
Can I add "ness" to that word to make a new word? :P
 
you have three ss on the last ness
 
hopelessnessnessness
 
... hopeless
 
ok WW go
 
7:21 PM
@PostLeftGarfHunter both un- and -ness exist, so I'm guessing both is valid too
 
(can I use german words? would make things a little bit easier for me)
 
unsanctimonious is def a word
 
@GentlePurpleRain WordPress?
@flawr no pls
 
unwordpressness
 
@ASCII-only okay
 
7:22 PM
No German infinite length words thank you very much
 
i did mention id be curious to see how this played in german but we need multiple speakers for it
 
finland has joined the chat
 
in case it is not a word uninteruptableness (18)
 
@quartata adj. The property of being a not-crappy website.
 
oh lol, that meme again:)
 
7:23 PM
no its a word i checked
 
Baro Ki'teer + ness = baroness clearly
 
@PostLeftGarfHunter This should have two Rs: uninterruptableness (19)
 
@PostLeftGarfHunter -ability not -ableness, invalid
 
are chemical names allowed?
 
@ASCII-only Oh yeah
 
7:24 PM
@Cowsquack pls no
 
No pls
 
no proteins
 
Suffers from the same problem as German does
 
Who's up for giving the next rule?
 
smaller stuff is ok
 
7:24 PM
Except so much worse
 
I'm not entirely sure german is not just chemicals
@GentlePurpleRain I can
 
oh hey GPR actually added this to the meta post
 
I can try to post some german non-competitive answers in the next round (If I find any:)
 
im honored
 
Rule: ^(.)..(.).\1\2.*$
 
7:26 PM
I'm just here to spectate, I haven't memorized 95% of the English dictionary like it seems most people here have
 
i have a name for these rules: dot mush
 
@ASCII-only I haven't even memorized 0.1%
@quartata ascii-boobs
 
@PostLeftGarfHunter You're hurting my brain
 
yeah pretty much
 
Hm should I do a different one?
 
7:28 PM
No, lets try this!
 
starts with any two characters separated by two characters, followed by any character and those two characters again
 
bonobos 7 wait bork
 
Nice
 
Doesn't match.
 
The urge to grep rises
 
7:30 PM
great gatsby 11
 
Is this legal?
 
I don't believe so
 
pachycephalosauridae 20 bork again
 
Also doesn't match.
 
that's why that was unbolded
why can't I see clearly
 
7:32 PM
Has it been 5 minutes
 
Let's do something else
 
I was thinking of statistically and carunculated
 
> and
 
also hypochondriac
 
7:33 PM
I was thinking of something with S and T, but didn't find statistically. :(
 
How did you get three words
Without cheating
 
Anyone that want's can go.
@ASCII-only Well I started with 1, that's how I made the regex.
 
@PostLeftGarfHunter how did one person get three when everyone else got 0 in total though
 
I think I had a better understanding of the regex? idk I thought it was easier than it was
 
8 mins ago, by Pavel
@PostLeftGarfHunter You're hurting my brain
 
7:36 PM
yeah so if no one gets one then whoever wants to can go
 
Oh hey contact
 
let's do an easy one
 
Oh man I did a grep. boilable, epithet
 
Can I suggest one?
 
yeah anyone can go
 
7:38 PM
^(..)..\1.+$
 
Caracaras (9)
 
@PostLeftGarfHunter every time :D
 
@Cowsquack your word works here :P
 
we need to make anti-caracara regexes
 
0																												'
I've got one for whenever I next win one
 
7:40 PM
redirecting (11)
 
@flawr ^(..)(..)\1(?!\2).+$
 
redirectable (12)
 
@ASCII-only is that a word?
 
redirectability?
 
0																												'
redirectableness?
 
7:42 PM
@flawr it's an anti-caracara regex
 
oh
 
I was going to start adding suffices to 'reference'
referentially (13)
 
0																												'
I don't think lookaheads or lookbehinds are allowed
 
Nope
 
Although... The easy way to do it is a negative lookahead at the start damn it
clearly we just need to do it with a FSM
@0 ' :|
 
0																												'
7:45 PM
Isn't -ness a functor on the category of English words?
 
semi-serendipitousness (21)
 
that only matches if you remove the hyphen
 
Oh, I assumed hyphens were ignored.
 
@0 ' well if we're being serious here it's only adjectives, some of which have irregular forms. "Able" being over of them
 
I don't actually know
 
7:46 PM
I think the best bet here is a four-letter prefix like "semi" or "anti".
 
Well last five hyphens weren't ignited, IIRC
 
@ASCII-only If its on edjectievs then its not an endofunctor just a functor
 
Well last five hyphens weren't ignored, IIRC
 
Were the last five hyphens ignored? :P
 
ive got a rule to suggest if anyone needs inspiration before i go
 
7:48 PM
@PostLeftGarfHunter oh I see
 
(.*)\1
 
oh that's a fun one
 
Caracara (8)
 
hotshots (8)
 
"hotshots" was gonna be mine
 
7:48 PM
couscous (8)
 
also couscous, but "hot
dammit
 
Haha
 
suddenly a wild Puzzling clique appeared
 
(this seems like a fun game, by the way! might lead to some stretching of what counts as a word though)
 
7:50 PM
@quartata what is this, Pokemon?
 
There has already been some discussion about picking a standard dictionary to use.
 
this is basically Deusovi's Contact Clues: The Game so id imagine youll enjoy it
 
pretty sure antiantitoxins (14) works for the current(?) one
 
yeah looks like it
 
I remember reading that a while ago (singular) and I think it can be pluralized?
 
7:50 PM
I think a "$" is implied at the end...
 
> An [spoiler but too late to redact] that inhibits or counteracts the effects of an antitoxin.
O_o it's an actual thing
 
oh yes apologizes
it is assumed to be anchored
 
@Deusovi Works for flawr's clue though
 
ah that was the one I was referring to
 
oh oops
 
7:52 PM
thought the rule was "winner suggests next one", so (.*)\1 wasn't technically the "current" clue
 
yeah no i was just throwing it out there as a joke since it matches caracara
 
It looks like ManyPinkHats owes the next clue.
 
@quartata ^(.*a){4}$
 
@ASCII-only ^caracara$
 
interestingly they're both at the same bytecount
 
7:55 PM
An expected remark from a code golfer
 
^(c(a)r\1)\2$
 
Anyway, it's time for @ManyPinkHats to make a regex right
 
you mixed the 1 and 2
 
oh, one second
 
hm?
I got 14, no?
or was that timed out
 
7:57 PM
I think the time limit was well past by the time you posted antiantitoxins.
 
@Deusovi Was it times up>
 
fair enough
didn't know if there was a time limit
ah there it is, yep
 
5 minutes, plus one for each (longer) answer posted.
 
^.+(.)(.)(.)(.)\4?\3\2\1.+$
hopefully that's wellformed
intent is words that contain a palindrome of at least seven letters strictly inside
 
(that means a subpalindrome of at least 7 letters, correct?)
 

  last day (377 days later) »