A mod edited one of my questions I've made today (For the curious: Class Object to create objects of type Object, in a dynamic way, with magic methods).
The changes are so minimal that I have no idea how and why the edit was accepted (maybe because he is a mod and his edits don't wait in the poo...
He started eating like 10 minutes before I went to kitchen. Since then, I put away dishes from dishwasher, reloaded dishwasher and started it, heated up my dinner, and completely ate it, and came back here again.
Is this guy seriously offended that his post was edited?
So the idea is simple enough, execute a predefined script on a remote host, and somehow retrieve variable values without affecting STDOUT and STDERR.
My idea was to encode the data in JSON, write it to a file, then read the data in a separate request.
The cons of this method are that:
I would...
Yeah... We finally had to set a time limit. If she's not done by time everybody else has cleaned their plates off, we take her plate. It's provided a bit of motivation.
If this kid had his plate taken away from him when everyone else was done eating, he wouldn't eat anything.
And we'd have to make another plate for him later when he's starving an hour past bedtime.
Actually, the biggest problem is that he's been away from our house a lot recently. By Friday, he'll be better about eating and minding and such, just a generally better attitude. But when he's been with his dad or with his grandparents, he's not well-behaved at all after that.
By the way, @RubberDuck, this has limited applicability to Code Review, but part of the reason I think that .net has some value is because of this: meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/289230/…
Before Swift, everything about OS X or iOS development was, by default, tagged objective-c. Some of that is inappropriate objective-c tagging though, as it has to do with the framework or the interface builder or whatever.
> It is tagged with swift, but it has nothing to do with Swift. It is marked as a duplicate of another question. The other question is tagged with objective-c, but it has nothing to do with Objective-C.
@IsmaelMiguel I think it was pretty minor edit as well, and the question would still be fine without it. It just reads a little better with the edits in.
@nhgrif It doesn't offend me. I don't mind the icon showing there. But come on... It looks like he is trying to extract every single bit he can, trying to get every single edit. That is annoying. But we aren't discussing my annoyance, we are here to discuss the edit.
So the edit did: - Remove bullet points, which are designed for lists, but were used for complete sentences; - Removed "The code:" because it was obvious it was the code (since it's in a code block); - Fixed a grammatical error.
@IsmaelMiguel Perhaps you should read that blog and come back to chat if you still have any questions?
And if you're going to come back talking about "too minor", then expect to be asked to define what you think is the minimum threshold for significant enough.
Let's get one thing straight:
There's no such thing as 'too minor' edit anymore.
When approving or rejecting edits, there used to be a "too minor" reason for rejection. This reason does not exist anymore.
Additionally, 1k+ users does not need to have their edits approved.
I'm learning F# and functional programming, from a background in C# and imperative/OOP. I've ported a small, one-off console app from C# to F#. The port worked (the app behaves the same way), but I'd love to get some feedback on writing more stylistic F# and thinking about code in a functional wa...
@IsmaelMiguel Ok. I can understand your feelings on this. But, I still think it did not do anything that did not improve your question or hurt it in any way
@nhgrif The minimum threshold should be something that actually does improve the question. A single spelling mistake or to remove a line are really too minor.
@IsmaelMiguel Fixing spelling actually does improve the question. Fixing one spelling error means the question now has one less spelling error. How is this not an improvement?
@IsmaelMiguel You may have, but you'd be in the extreme minority there. And with only 200-something site rep, you've not established a reputation of having an eye for improvement on posts.
@IsmaelMiguel Your meta post would probably be more interesting if you actually had a well thought out defensible "line" you wished to propose as what counts as "too minor".
If I fix 1 grammatical or spelling mistake, the post now has one less grammatical or spelling mistake, and the post is now one grammatical or spelling mistake better than it was before my edit, is it not?
So the idea is simple enough, execute a predefined script on a remote host, and somehow retrieve variable values without affecting STDOUT and STDERR.
My idea was to encode the data in JSON, write it to a file, then read the data in a separate request.
The cons of this method are that:
I would...
Let's get one thing straight:
There's no such thing as 'too minor' edit anymore.
When approving or rejecting edits, there used to be a "too minor" reason for rejection. This reason does not exist anymore.
Additionally, 1k+ users does not need to have their edits approved.
