« first day (2904 days earlier)      last day (1760 days later) » 

3:43 AM
@MaartenBodewes I don't think that's true. In information theory, you can have fractions of a bit. In that case, it's measuring a probability.
Er, in physics, I mean. In information theory, a fractional bit is a measure of information that doesn't fit into an even number of bits. Sure, 7-bit ASCII encodes 7 bits for a single character, but if you're truly encoding only alphanumeric characters, you don't need 7 bits. You need log2(26*2+10) bits.
It's just that, in computers, you can't really have a fraction of a bit, so you round it up.
So I would say that a bit is absolutely not the smallest quantum of information.
 
 
4 hours later…
7:52 AM
@forest No, a computer bit is something that cannot be divided as singular piece of information. How we calculate things is something different, math is a human invention after all, we can do what it what we want. I'm about to deliver -4 grapes to the supermarket, for instance.
 
 
3 hours later…
11:16 AM
The term "bit" in computing came from the term in information theory.
 
 
5 hours later…
4:25 PM
2
Q: Static Diffie-Hellman in TLS

blabla_traceStatic Diffie-Hellman (cipher suites with DH in their name but neither DHE or DH_anon - requires that the server owns a certificate with a DH public key in it. When static DH key exchange is used, the server provides a certificate containing fixed Diffie-Hellman parameters signed by the certific...

 
 
4 hours later…
8:08 PM
3
Q: Verifiable delay functions vs Proof of Sequential Work

BartolinioI've read recent papers about verifiable delay functions (Boneh et al 2018) and proof of sequential works (Cohen et al. 2018). I understand that the core difference between the definitions is that a VDF output is required to be unique (while in PoSW constructions - many commitments can prove know...

 

« first day (2904 days earlier)      last day (1760 days later) »