« first day (598 days earlier)      last day (301 days later) » 
01:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

Anonymous
1:58 AM
@fahdijbeli I can understand "I work 8x5", and it's clever of you to put it that way (because anyone would understand it right after talking about 24x7)
 
Anonymous
But if we hadn't been talking about 24x7 right beforehand, 8x5 might confuse people.
 
Anonymous
It's not a standard way of speaking. It comes across like wordplay in your earlier message.
 
Anonymous
So in general you can't use an arbitrary pair of numbers in that manner and expect to be understood.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I understand what you're saying, but "very children focus" is probably not quite the right wording
 
Anonymous
2:01 AM
I've never seen Blues Clues. I think that Sesame Street is designed to be fun for parents, too, though :-)
 
Anonymous
I never saw Sesame Street until I'd grown up.
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
R.I.P. Henson
 
7:09 AM
morning
@snailboat ah sorry I wasn't here, I mean by 8x5= 8 hours for 5 days
and 24/7 mean 24 hours for week=7 days
 
7:30 AM
@HostileFork Thanks for the corrections. I'm sure that wasn't the first time I misspelled bear as bare. My English late at night could easily be like that!
@snailboat I think very children-focused is the word I wanted, though not sure if that's the best phrase for such shows.
@fahdijbeli Morning!
"Let me go" is a simple phrase, but could be obscure for learners.
I think in Frozen, they chose to translate "Let It Go" as "let it come out", because translating it literally would not quite work. (Saying "let it go" in Thai would sound like "let it go away" in English. Well, sort of.)
I don't know but I think the meaning of "Let It Go" as "let it come out" is actually secondary.
 
@DamkerngT. the second answer is not enough ?
I understood by the second answer :)
 
I meant the song; it wasn't related to that question.
 
ah ;)
 
The question is about "Let me go" and "Let go of me", and it already has a few good answers. :)
 
8:25 AM
yes
especialy the second haha
 
 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
10:34 AM
@fahdijbeli Yes, as I explained, I understood just fine :-)
 
Anonymous
I was just letting you know for future reference that 24x7 is fine, but arbitrary pairs of numbers may not be understood
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. People might say very child-focused
 
Anonymous
Think of "twenty four seven" as a fixed expression
 
yes
 
 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
12:30 PM
Completive done in AAVE and Southern vernacular AmE is typically followed by a past participle. The A Handbook of Varieties of English says "This auxiliary done in a verb phrase may aspectually mark a completed action or event, and may also designate intensity." (p.235) and gives the following examples: "He done asked her to marry him" "I done told you to take your shoes off before walkin' on that carpet". — snailboat 7 mins ago
 
Anonymous
facepalm
 
Anonymous
"The A Handbook"
 
Anonymous
I should delete and re-leave the comments and fix my mistakes :-)
 
user116848
Hello!
 
Anonymous
But I'm too lazy.
 
Anonymous
12:32 PM
Hello
 
user116848
Where does the reputed users get the motivation to answer so many questions? There must be something that SE pay them, right?
 
user116848
Or they are just doing a 'good' man's' job?
 
Anonymous
No.
 
Anonymous
I like feeling like I'm helping people, though
 
Anonymous
I don't do a man's job.
 
user116848
12:33 PM
For free? That's a good thing I guess
 
user116848
I mean I answer questions sometimes because I think it helps me in learning and knowledge too
 
Anonymous
Yeah, participating helps us learn.
 
user116848
Definitely!
 
Anonymous
It's not like high-reputation users know everything, either.
 
Anonymous
Honestly, high reputation doesn't even indicate expertise, just a fair amount of participation.
 
user116848
12:36 PM
Especially for non native speakers like me, even going through all the recent questions everyday helps with new things a lot
 
Anonymous
Besides which, other people have helped me a lot with the languages I'm learning :-)
 
Anonymous
People need to help each other.
 
Anonymous
Things are better that way.
 
Hello!
 
user116848
Yes like language exchanges
 
user116848
12:38 PM
Hello!
 
I think it's about being good samaritans.
 
Anonymous
There are people who only help in exchange for help. That's okay.
 
Or noblesse oblige.
 
user116848
Oh, yes and that---->Good samaritans :-)
 
Anonymous
But that leaves some people out of the loop.
 
12:39 PM
That's where the points come in. :)
 
Anonymous
0
Q: Plural sign (s) return to which word in abbrivations?

TheGoodUserAssume that TSFI stands for TOE Security Function Interface. And TOE (The first word) stands for Target Of Evaluation. I want to know in the TSFIs the plural s returns to which of words?

 
I heard an interesting phrase on David Letterman's show: Sleep tight until your bed bugs bite!
 
user116848
@snailboat Very True. I agree, because I have tried other sites too, but there, only native English speakers who are willing to learn your language too, bother to help. Otherwise they say that it's not free.
 
Anonymous
Scary
 
user116848
So between US and here there is almost 'twelve hours' difference. Hehe
 
12:43 PM
I don't know "TOE Security Function Interface", but I guess the s should be at the Interface.
 
user116848
That's too much I guess :)
 
Anonymous
Yeah.
 
Anonymous
It's the head noun.
 
Anonymous
And the s is next to it.
 
user116848
So it's TOES?
 
12:45 PM
I hope it's not about missiles or something, or someone could say that we're running into a legal issue again. :)
The OP said TSFIs.
Oh, it's from Cygnacom.
I see. ISO/IEC 15408
 
Anonymous
As a general rule I think it applies to the final word, which would typically be the head noun
 
Anonymous
There are some exceptions with postmodification
 
Anonymous
Attorneys general is typically abbreviated to AGs, not AsG or the like :-)
 
Anonymous
So the question isn't necessarily as clear-cut as we'd like
 
Anonymous
To put it another way: attorney general is abbreviated to AG, which is then pluralized to AGs. This corresponds to the irregular plural attorneys general
 
12:50 PM
TSFIs should be expanded to either TOE Security Function Interfaces or Target of Evaluation Security Function Interfaces. It's almost always the case for a long noun phrase that the main noun (also known as the head word) is the last word in the phrase. — Damkerng T. 7 secs ago
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Relative clauses are an example of a productive postmodifier in noun phrase structure
 
Anonymous
I say "productive" because
 
Anonymous
"Attorneys general" is not an example of a productive rule. We can't produce new phrases with plurals like it (or can hardly do so)
 
Anonymous
But "Apples that I like" is an example of a productive rule
 
nods
 
Anonymous
12:52 PM
ATILs? :-)
 
AsTIL looks weird. :P
 
Anonymous
The alternative would be to consider it part of the abbreviation: ATIL
 
user116848
Now, you guys are talking difficult :p
 
Anonymous
"I'm going to go eat some ATIL." "ATIL?" "Apples That I Like!"
 
Anonymous
We can produce noun phrases that don't have the head at the end very easily using relative clauses.
 
user116848
12:54 PM
So who would understand you if you said ATIL? I wouldn't :-)
 
Oh, I don't know for sure how I should abbr. Requests for Change.
I bet it should be RFCs.
 
Anonymous
Ideally, don't
 
Anonymous
RFC is taken
 
Anonymous
But I'd say RFCs, yeah.
 
Anonymous
RFCs are Requests For Comments
 
Anonymous
12:55 PM
Here, the head noun takes a for-complement
 
Oh, I mixed up the terms once again. :)
 
Anonymous
Another example of a productive process giving us a head noun that is not linearly at the end of the phrase
 
Anonymous
So I think I have to object to "almost always"
 
That's fine with me. :)
 
Anonymous
However, the head noun is very commonly at the end.
 
user116848
12:57 PM
You guys are boring
 
Anonymous
And the head noun is typically what you would mark for number.
 
@Arrowfar Oh, no! :)
 
user116848
Just kidding
 
Maybe I should talk about David Letterman's show instead. :P
 
Anonymous
Yeah. Just kidding. Sure ;-)
 
user116848
12:59 PM
@DamkerngT. Nay it's okay. Sorry I disturbed you while asking
 
user116848
My apologies
 
Oh ya, well if you got nothing good to say...
 
user116848
hi skull :-)
 
user116848
pal
 
hi pal :-)
 
Anonymous
1:01 PM
@DamkerngT. I stole your example for a comment.
 
Anonymous
It is very common for the head noun to be the final word in a noun phrase, but "almost always" is too strong. Many nouns take complements as postmodifiers (RFCs = Requests for Comment), and there are a variety of other postmodifiers, for example relative clauses, which can follow the head noun. — snailboat 1 min ago
 
@Arrowfar Dontchaknow, like a character in Ghost Ship said, Navy boys take it up the a$$. -- Just kidding, too. -- Sorry for an inappropriate word. I was transcribing the movie, so it got stuck in my head a bit. :P
@snailboat Thank you very much!
Hi @IceBoy!
 
Anonymous
I know some gay marines. They would probably not object to your characterization, although it's erm, a bit out of the blue :-)
 
user116848
LOL. What does 'Navy boys take it up the a$$' mean??
 
@snailboat Eh? I think it's an idiom.
 
user116848
1:02 PM
Yes, Damk has many gay friends lol
 
Anonymous
Ehm. :-)
 
@Arrowfar I think it means, "don't take jokes".
 
Hi @DamkerngT. et al pals
 
user116848
@DamkerngT. Don't take jokes (seriously) you mean?
 
user116848
Or just 'Don't take jokes'?
 
1:04 PM
Hmm... In the context, it made me think that the person who was referred to didn't take jokes.
Because she was a bit of a serious person.
 
user116848
It would be fun if Cerbs were here lol
 
I could be wrong about this, though.
 
Anonymous
Et al pals! Those who share in the joy of abbreviating citations. Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik? Nah, just leave it to the Et Al Pals! We say Quirk et al!
 
@snailboat I prefer being one of your et al.
:D
 
Anonymous
Et Al Pals!
 
user116848
1:06 PM
What's et al pals?
 
I think this is ad hoc. :)
 
user116848
Now you guys are talking difficult again :-)
 
Anonymous
Ice Boy just invented them.
 
user116848
just?
 
user116848
1:08 PM
May be I should refrain from questioning everything. It looks annoying, right guys?
 
Anonymous
Oops, I left out an 's'! It should say Requests for Comments with an 's' at the end. But that would make my point less clear.
 
Nope.
 
Anonymous
And now it's too late to edit.
 
Anonymous
wrings hands
 
@Arrowfar Um... I assumed that you knew this just.
 
Anonymous
1:09 PM
Every comment I leave is doomed to contain errors.
 
Anonymous
Just = "a moment ago"
 
Anonymous
"I just got home" = "I got home a moment ago"
 
user116848
@DamkerngT. Yes I know. But I thought I should still ask hehe
 
Ah, I see. :)
 
user116848
But I was not messing
 
user116848
1:10 PM
:p
 
Definitely not, imo.
 
user116848
Messing and messing around is same, right? I mean they mean the same thing?
 
Anonymous
I suppose messing in that sense is some sort of slang. It's not part of my dialect, but I understand it okay.
 
I don't know. To me, they both mean pretty much the same, well, with one with around and the other without.
 
user116848
It's like saying: 'I am just having fun with you'
 
Anonymous
1:13 PM
Yeah, I understood it that way. I'd always add around, myself
 
Anonymous
Or messing with you or whatever you intend
 
user116848
Not to mention the cussing version :-)
 
However, messing around and fooling around could mean something else in another specific context.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, I had that problem in grade school, as my fellow students twisted my words
 
Anonymous
1:15 PM
And I quickly realized that every phrase with the more innocent meaning could also take on the something-else meaning
 
user116848
@DamkerngT. But 'fooling around' is almost always in the 'make out' sense imo
 
Hmm... I think it can still have its literal meaning.
 
Anonymous
It's not really a matter of opinion
 
user116848
then?
 
user116848
Always?
 
1:16 PM
They cover both senses, rather clearly.
 
Anonymous
If you make an assertion about what something means, you can often tell if it's right or wrong
 
Anonymous
By checking evidence.
 
Anonymous
It's not always clear-cut, of course.
 
Anonymous
But in this case it's a hypothesis, not an opinion
 
Anonymous
1:18 PM
Search for 'fooling around'
 
I think it's difficult to read "Mark admits he used to fool around in class." with the other meaning.
 
Anonymous
Quite an admission!
 
Hmm... Reading it again, I think I can read it both ways! Argh!
 
Anonymous
Hah
 
Anonymous
But one reading is likelier than the other :-)
 
user116848
1:20 PM
Yes but here in these examples the good meaning makes sense
 
user116848
But it's always apparent from the context.
 
I think almost every class would have a Mark. :)
I met a lot of Marks. They usually make the class fun.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, context usually makes it clear.
 
Anonymous
There can be ambiguity, of course.
 
Anonymous
People like to find ambiguity and play with it. Ambiguity is a toy.
 
Anonymous
1:23 PM
Nov 26 '13 at 4:05, by snailboat
I'm reminded of the joke: "Linguists love ambiguity more than most people."
 
user116848
Yes they do. And they love irony, which I never get most of the times
 
I concur!
 
user116848
I find it very tough to understand irony in a sentence
 
Anonymous
I never use irony.
 
user116848
Except when there are clear signs that the person is being ironic
 
user116848
1:26 PM
Yes I know. Guys in the ELU chat use irony every so often
 
Anonymous
They shouldn't do that.
 
user116848
I know it's like saying 'the opposite of what we mean' but still it's difficult to comprehend sometimes
 
user116848
And then there is 'sarcasm'
 
user116848
Which is like irony in a sense
 
Anonymous
Oh, no! Not sarcasm!
 
user116848
1:29 PM
But being sarcastic is fun sometimes
 
user116848
What, you hate 'sarcasm'?
 
A mild version of it could be fun. For example, Reindeers are better than people...
 
user116848
Yes, true
 
user116848
Oh, I think geeks seldom use irony or sarcasm
 
Oh, I couldn't find that scene on YouTube, but I got OST: youtube.com/watch?v=caYlllBWLaw
 
Anonymous
1:32 PM
That's right. Geeks never use irony or sarcasm.
 
user116848
But politicians type folks use it (irony and sarcasm)
 
user116848
@snailboat Starred it!
 
user116848
:-)
 
user116848
Good ol' geeks LOL
 
Anonymous
The apostrophe goes where something is left out, usually: ol'
 
user116848
1:35 PM
Oh, I see. Thanks for pointing!
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Now that I'm used to the Japanese version, I think I actually like it better :-) I wonder if it's a matter of familiarity breeding fondness
 
Hah! Umm... I haven't heard the Japanese version of this one.
 
user116848
@DamkerngT. So Damk you can speak three languages then (English, Thai and Japanese) :-)
 
Anonymous
It's called とびら開けて
 
user116848
I can speak only two (Urdu and English)
 
user116848
1:38 PM
But I can read Arabic perfectly too
 
I can't really speak Japanese. :)
 
user116848
But don't understand a work of it
 
Though I hope I will be able to soon.
 
user116848
@DamkerngT. I see
 
user116848
Damk can you speak any regional Thai languages too?
 
user116848
1:40 PM
Here there are many regional languages too, but most people don't know them like me
 
Thai dialects aren't that different from the others.
 
user116848
Oh, I see
 
One of our dialects is very close to Laotian. And I can understand Laotian (both written and spoken) effortlessly.
But that's just me. I lived in the south of Thailand until I was 5, and Wikipedia says Southern Thai is another language. :)
So, Southern Thai is my first language, Standard Thai is my second, according to them.
Which is rather strange for me. :)
 
user116848
But I don't get that in USA except English there is no other other language of theirs (I mean provincial languages). Their dialect differ only based on accent and some words (like Texas people have an accent). May be snailboat can answer this
 
I think people from different places in the US use different words to refer to the same thing.
It's not very clear-cut, though.
I think soda is a common example.
 
user116848
1:45 PM
Yes, soda and soft-drinks
 
And, pop.
 
Anonymous
@Arrowfar I don't know what you mean.
 
user116848
Or coke or pepsi
 
user116848
@snailboat I meant in USA are there aren't other national languages like most countries
 
Anonymous
1:46 PM
There aren't any national languages in the US.
 
Anonymous
Many languages are used, or historically have been used in the United States. The most commonly used language is English. There are also many languages indigenous to North America or to U.S. states or holdings in the Pacific region. Languages brought to the country by colonists or immigrants from Europe, Asia, or other parts of the world make up a large portion of the languages currently used; several languages, including creoles and sign languages, have also developed in the United States. Approximately 337 languages are spoken or signed by the population, of which 176 are indigenous to the area...
 
user116848
Yes English is for all. Which is a good thing I know. But I was just making an observation
 
Main languages: English 80%, Spanish 12.4%, other Indo-European 3.7%, Asian and Pacific island languages 3%, other languages 0.9% (2009 survey by the Census Bureau)
80% is less than I expected.
(I guessed 90%)
 
user116848
Like in China there is Mandarin and Cantonese. That's what I meant
 
user116848
Like in Spain there is Spanish and Catalan, for example
 
1:50 PM
China is different, I believe.
 
user116848
But Catalan is in minority I reckon
 
Anonymous
What makes Catalan in Spain different in your reckoning from Spanish in the US?
 
Anonymous
You haven't made it clear what attribute you're trying to single out
 
user116848
In the sense that it is Spain originating not US origin
 
Anonymous
Oh, so you think that the US has no indigenous languages?
 
user116848
1:53 PM
Yes
 
Anonymous
That is not the case
 
user116848
But don't mind that lol
 
Anonymous
 
Yawaho (or something sounds like that) came to mind.
Oh, it's Navajo.
 
Anonymous
Navajo is an important language
 
1:56 PM
I don't know much about it except that it was in a movie, and it's difficult to learn.
(Or so they say)
 
Anonymous
Navajo or Navaho (/ˈnɑːvəhoʊ/; Navajo: Diné bizaad IPA: [di˩ne˥bi˩zaː˩d] or Naabeehó bizaad) is a language of the Athabaskan branch of the Na-Dené family, by which it is related to languages spoken across the western areas of North America. Navajo is spoken primarily in the Southwestern United States, especially in the Navajo Nation political area. It is one of the most widely spoken Native American languages and is the most widely spoken north of the U.S.–Mexico border, with almost 170,000 Americans speaking Navajo at home as of 2011. The language has struggled to keep a healthy speaker base,...
 
Anonymous
@snailboat Do you have a pdf copy of that book? — Man_From_India 9 mins ago
 
Anonymous
@Man_From_India I suggest checking Google Books or a library. It's too expensive to reasonably suggest getting your own copy. — snailboat 1 min ago
 
Their keyboard is quite curious!
 
Anonymous
@snailboat yea :) — Man_From_India 1 min ago
 
Anonymous
2:04 PM
I guess they'd already come to that conclusion and wanted me to upload it for them?
 
It sounds pretty much so. :)
Oh, $790.39!
 
Anonymous
Just a bit excessive.
 
user116848
That much for a book!?
 
Almost 4 CGELs!
 
user116848
2:07 PM
So try the pirate sites :-)
 
Anonymous
Good luck with that!
 
I can't recall since when CGEL became a unit of expensive books for me. :)
 
user116848
@snailboat Do you have a hard copy of that book?
 
Anonymous
I do not.
 
user116848
Then on PC?
 
Anonymous
2:08 PM
I don't have an electronic copy of my own either.
 
user116848
I am not asking you to give it to me LOL. Just wanted to ask.
 
Anonymous
I have lots of books. Sadly, there are even more books I don't have. :-(
 
user116848
So you have only heard about the book?
 
user116848
@DamkerngT. Damk do you have CGEL in hard copy or only on PC?
 
user116848
I have it on PC
 
2:10 PM
No. I have PEU on my iPad.
 
user116848
I have CGEL Hooray!
 
I have some more grammar books, printed.
Oh, good for you. :)
> Every band has a shelf life; BB had finally expired. We always felt excluded in many ways never reaching.......
> BB finally expired. We had always felt excluded..
I think both versions are acceptable. It's more about context and focus.
 
2:34 PM
Sometimes I think more definitions for a word in dictionaries could create more problems than solving the obvious one.
According to, thefreedictionary.com/quite, Collins English Dictionary gave 6 definitions for the word quite, some marked as "not used in a negative".
Which could be true, because if I tried to negate those example sentences that they marked "not used in a negative", it would fall into another definition they gave.
 
Anonymous
According to collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/quite, Collins English Dictionary does just that :-)
 
It reminds me of meatie and some other users of ELL, who were struggling so much trying to understand words in terms of these different definitions.
I'd say it's better to lump those definitions up as one, or a few.
Or maybe, we should have a canon post, as StoneyB once suggested, about how to use dictionaries properly.
 
Anonymous
How would you lump them together?
 
Hmm... I'm not sure. But intuitively, I usually understand as with just a couple of senses.
I think I probably understand quite in maybe two main senses.
(rather) completely or very
 
Anonymous
Those are two different senses :-)
 
Anonymous
2:41 PM
You can group them together, sure.
 
But if we have 6 definitions, the users (of such a dictionary) would naturally try to understand the word as 6 senses.
 
Anonymous
The divisions in Collins seem sensible to me.
 
This one has five!
 
Anonymous
"fairly but not very" "very" "completely"
 
2:45 PM
I think it's the best to understand quite in only one sense, the sense of quite, if we can. :)
 
Anonymous
I think that's more akin to not really consciously thinking about the differences
 
Anonymous
Which is fine.
 
Anonymous
But the meaning does vary a fair bit.
 
I can't, I think I don't disagree to that.
 
Anonymous
Certainly I doubt most native speakers sit around categorizing the uses of quite :-)
 
2:47 PM
I think this is one main problem of language acquisition.
LOL
 
Anonymous
Although clearly some do.
 
It reminds me of the battle of CISC and RISC.
I think we could really go either way, but somehow RISC won.
(Around that time, I did think that CISC was a better idea.)
 
01:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (598 days earlier)      last day (301 days later) »