The h Bar

0celo7

12:01 AM

I have to say, this is quite annoying

These things might not even be smooth

Helka Homba

@dmckee Thanks for bringing him up actually. His merit definitely goes unnoticed more than it should.

0celo7

it appears things are smooth

@yuggib Under what assumptions do parabolic equations evolve smooth initial data smoothly (for small time)?

I can't understand the jargon in the PDE literature

0celo7

2:44 AM

@ACuriousMind Ćech cohomology is pretty amazing

@dmckee (removed)

wonder what you said

dmckee

I said "latex boxes". Because I meant to type that in the search bar.

0celo7

latex boxes?

dmckee

Now you have to decide if I am typesetting a document or into something really kinky.

0celo7

is that some kink thing

:)

Secret

3:17 AM

Probably just $\box$

Btw

scontent-syd1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/…

For cells I always think either as a biologist or as a physicist (if the cell content does not matter). Also I use bacterial cells more

0celo7

3:37 AM

What's up with people using $\phi$ for $\emptyset$

DanielSank

3:57 AM

@dmckee ಠ_ಠ

John Rennie

4:59 AM

@dmckee it's not the usual way of doing things outside the kindergarten, but physics and maths has traditionally attracted people whose emotional maturity is questionable. I should know - I'm one of them :-)

@dmckee the guy from the Kinks? :-)

John Rennie

5:34 AM

Hi CodeRatchet :-)

CodeRatchet

Hey John

How are you?

John Rennie

@CodeRatchet Sleepy, it's 06:35 in the UK :-)

CodeRatchet

ha ha, it's 3:35pm here in Melbourne

in regards to what we just discussed on the thread, is it safe for me to post such question here?

John Rennie

Yes, anything goes in the chat room.

CodeRatchet

ok

Let me just get the question

Good Morning / Afternoon,

I'm looking at a question which has been given to me and I'm trying to find out what the answer / formula would be to it.

The question is as follows:

A student has been asked to move a box of mass 15 kg onto a shelf that is at a height 2 m above the ground level and 10.85 m from where the box was originally kept. The student is moving with the box at a steady speed of 0.123 m/s. As the student approaches the shelf, he notices another student is opening the door adjacent to the shelf area. i. If the student is able to apply sufficient force to stop in 1.2 s, will…

John Rennie

5:36 AM

If I understand the question correctly you need to find out how far the box travels in the 1.2 seconds it takes to stop. Yes?

CodeRatchet

That's correct

As mentioned I've emailed my tutor however this is rattling my brain

John Rennie

These types of problems are described by a set of quations often called the SUVAT equations because they link distance s, initial velocity u, final velocity v, acceleration a and time t.

If you Google suvat equations you'll find lots of articles about them.

In this case we have to link the distance travelled by the box to the acceleration (actually deceleration) of the box.

And the equation we need is:

s = ut + 0.5at^2

where u is the initial velocity 0.123m/s and a is the deceleration. a will be negative because acceleration is positive and deceleration is negative. Does this make sense so far?

CodeRatchet

@JohnRennie Ok, I'll be reading up on suvat equations soon.

Thanks for the equation, can you tell me how come up with that equation

It does yes

John Rennie

The SUVAT equations are derived from Newton's laws of motion using calculus, but until you learn calculus you just have to memorise them.

But there are only three of them that matter and if you do physics they'll quickly become routine.

Anyhow, we need to know the acceleration a so we can use it in the equation for the distance, and the way to find a is using another SUVAT equation:

v = u + at

where v is the initial velocity, 0.123m/s, u is the final velocity, zero, and t is the time.

CodeRatchet

Ok

John Rennie

5:45 AM

We're told the student takes 1.2 secs to stop the box from an initial velocity v = 0.123m/s to a final velocity u = 0 so we get:

0 = 0.123 + 1.2 a

or:

a = -0.123/1.2

So now we can use our equation:

s = ut + 0.5at^2

to get:

s = 0.123*1.2 + 0.5*(-0.123/1.2)*(1.2)^2

CodeRatchet

Ok so will the student avoid a collision if the opening door is 0.8 m ahead of the box?

John Rennie

Well from the above I get s = 0.0738m i.e. 7.38cm

CodeRatchet

avoids collision by 7.38cm

Thank you John

John Rennie

7.38cm is the distance the box travels while the student is stopping it, and obviously that's a lot smaller than the 0.8m or 80cm distance to the door.

CodeRatchet

So it's safe to say he / she did avoid collision then

John Rennie

5:51 AM

Even without doing the calculation you can get a rough idea. If the box is travelling at 0.123m/s then in 1.2 secs it can't travel farther than 0.123*1.2 = 0.1476m.

CodeRatchet

I see

Thanks for your help John, I will dive into suvat equations soon. Also thanks for the explanation and break down really do appreciate it.

John Rennie

This sort of calculation will rapidly become routine if you continue to do physics. It may seem a bit hard now, but it won't after you've done a few of them :-)

CodeRatchet

That's true. Thanks again

CuriousOne

Hello everyone.

John Rennie

@CuriousOne Morning

CuriousOne

5:54 AM

I've been watching the diphoton disappearance in the news. Sad...

John Rennie

What are you doing up at 7 a.m. on a Saturday? I have to work - what's your excuse? :-)

CuriousOne

I have to work, too, but don't know how to plot a crappy set of data for a client in such a way as to make it look less crappy.

John Rennie

log-log scales are the usual strategy

Anything gives a straight line on a log-log plot :-)

2

CuriousOne

Doesn't change the fact that the product doesn't measure up to the competition. :-(

It's not even bad... it's just not the "Italian Stallion" that the owner wishes it to be.

Anyway... that's not my question. LHC is on my mind...

John Rennie

@CuriousOne sounds like a Ray Charles song

CuriousOne

5:59 AM

Now that the diphoton is gone, is there any possibility for non-standard model physics left in the currently funded runs or do we have to wait and hope that the upgrade post 2018 (is it?) will return something?

John Rennie

It's not looking good for BSM evidence

The only hope is to do detailed measurements and look for differences between scattering probabilities and the SM predictions.

It doesn't seem likely that anything new and startling will be seen now

CuriousOne

I was never on the hopeful side... still disappointing.

dmckee

6:26 AM

Might be something interesting in the exotics (tetra- and penta-quark states and the like) spectrum, but that's not going to set the world on fire even if it leads somewhere eventually.

CuriousOne

To me that's still kind of SM physics, even if the details are not understood... probably because I don't understand the details... :-)

No chance in hell for SUSY anymore, right?

John Rennie

@CuriousOne Little chance of direct evidence, but all hope isn't quite lost.

CuriousOne

That's the nature of hope... it's never completely lost...

yuggib

10:12 AM

@0celo7 for linear equations, there may be some general theory; for nonlinear ones I doubt it

usually even local well-posedness is proved case-by-case in nonlinear PDEs

there are techniques, but not a general resulrt

Secret

12:18 PM

Attempt to modify the double slit experiment in order to have a cylinderical screen act as the measurement device, and the interference pattern being depend on the state prepared

If successful, one can use this in a high school or uni setting to demonstrate the electron's spin (and possibly some mathematical properties of spinors)

I have no idea how to direct the electron in this cylindrical fashion after it entered the tube, but my ideas are as follows (based on discussion abotu spin with h barers some weeks ago)

1. Have one electron always prepared in a spin up state. This then act as the 0 baseline of the spin. (i.e. we call this orientation of the spin vector "zero" and we define its phase here to be zero)
2. The spin state prepared in another electron is controlled by a dial, which the students can freely adjust it in the set up to rotate the spin vector prepared in that electron

Actually, .1 may not be that straightforward. While it is true that one can prepare an electron in a certain state, this is only up to some overall phase factor, which is unphysical until it started interfering with another electron (i.e. $i\lvert 1\rangle$ can give different interference pattern with antoher electron with some state $\lvert s\rangle$ compared to $\lvert 1\rangle$)

Secret

12:59 PM

(NB There's some conceptual error in the above post, this will be fixed after the bath)

peterh

@JohnRennie Ok, but the new LHC will work at least years long. What if the new particles need a lot of more data to improve their sigmas?

0celo7

1:32 PM

@yuggib It's "strictly parabolic", does that mean anything?

And yeah, it's horribly nonlinear

Secret

1:47 PM

0

Q: Creating black lights

The absence of black in the form of a black light does not mean that it does not exist, or it cannot be done. If it does not exist, then make one. I insist, make one for me. My views are simple, we can use the black light to create holograms that does not need ceilings to project, and make new c...

There is no way one can make a "darkness emitting source" (i.e. black colored light). The closest thing to that is the Coherent perfect absorber
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherent_perfect_absorber

John Rennie

@Floris: the question seemd silly to me. There was lots of info we didn't need e.g. the weight of the box. Maybe there's a subtlety I've missed, but it seemed pretty straightforward.

0celo7

average PSE user:

Floris

2:40 PM

@JohnRennie clarity vs obfuscation: teaching vs testing. I don't like this kind of question at the elementary level.

0celo7

@JohnRennie trivial algebra time

What is the $0$th de Rham group of $\Bbb N$

John Rennie

What's $\Bbb N$? The natural numbers?

0celo7

yeah

Viewed as a manifold

seems like it should be $\Bbb R^\infty$ or something weird

peterh

image not found

0celo7

what image

peterh

2:46 PM

@0celo7 this

0celo7

appears just fine for me

are you on a work computer?

David Z

@ACuriousMind @Qmechanic I think you should have a look at this. If the question in question is still unclear, I'd like to see an explanation of why.

John Rennie

Wow, Googling de Rham cohomology group leads you rapidly into a maze of twisty passages

0celo7

like what

Physics Meta

2

Q: Question with a lot of discussion in comments remains closed for being unclear

I would like to enquire about this post I have made on StackExchange Physics- Conformal group in 2D being a subgroup of Diff x Weyl - Polchinksi's 'String Theory' This post was closed very quickly after being posted, for being unclear, though one of those who voted to close it left an answer in ...

discussion closed-questions

vzn

3:45 PM

@0celo7 lol sure its not a self portrait? :P

Sanya

@vzn I heartily agree with the question

0celo7

> A presheaf is simply a contravariant functor from $\mathsf{Open}(X)$ to $\mathsf{Ab}$, and a presheaf morphism is a natural transformation of functors.

@Slereah seems obvious now

@vzn what?

@Sanya don't know what I ever did to you

Sanya

@0celo7 actually, nothing at all - I am just a mean person by nature and I apologise if you are taking me seriously (if I'd prefer you wouldn't in chat)

0celo7

I think people who are admittedly mean by nature should remove themselves from society. But that's just me.

2

vzn

4:19 PM

@0celo7 or maybe its einsteins alter ego :P

Secret

[Scifi] The mathematics of Newtonian Temporal Mechanics

(Too much algebra with rational functions, gonna continue tmr)

John Duffield

4:37 PM

I went down the beach today. I swam in the sea.

2

That picture wasn't from today, and it was sunnier than that. But it gives you the idea.

0celo7

Good for you?

Secret

(Newtonian means we temporily ignore the bottleneck we identified earlier, including the explanation on how to change the topology of space$\textit{time}$)

Will see how it goes...

0celo7

tmr?

are you speaking line vzn now

Secret

tmr=tomorrow abbreivated

PS I hate algebra expansion involving fractions

I already made 7 times careless mistakes already and have redone the calculcation 7 times

John Duffield

@0celo7 : what's nice is that I have an 8-year-old son. I can play sand castles. He swam too. The wife just sat on a towel pulling a face.

0celo7

4:45 PM

There's a Duffield Jr.?

John Duffield

Yep.

0celo7

I guess it's too early to ask if he's interested in physics

John Duffield

He is. Without being pushed by me. Though he's too young to think of it as physics. It's just science for him.

0celo7

@JohnRennie New 2 Chainz mixtape!

John Duffield

I have a few "toys" like an electric gyroscope and a super-strong magnet and a telescope etc. All good fun.

0celo7

4:52 PM

Cool

John Duffield

Re DavidZ's post above, I'm not a fan of Mtheory, but I think this question was closed in error. I voted to reopen it.

Does anybody do any drawing? I need to produce some illustrations, and I'm looking for recommendations.

Uhnnn, I have to go I'm afraid. The wife is calling. Sorry, bye.

Sanya

@Nk

damn, why are delete and enter so close together ...

@JohnDuffield depends a bit on the type of illustations you want to produce, but besides Inkscape and GIMP I've actually often found the publisher included in older versions of MS Office to be quite a useful tool

FrancescoS

5:13 PM

Hi guys. I computed the cross section for a 4-fermions scattering d d > d d (d is the d quark) with the exchanging of a spin 2 particles. The cross-section I computed is twice the cross-section simulated with MadGraph. I would love me to check my analytic formula. Do you know a place where to find the computation of a cross section with an exchanging of a spin2-particle?

The vertex is something like $\partial_\nu \bar{d} Gamma[mu] P_R d V_{\mu\nu}$ where P_R is the projector on the right-component of the dquark

*i would like to check

Slereah

5:28 PM

exchange of a spin 2 particle?

Are you doing gravitational interaction of quarks

One of Feynman's student did a thesis on graviton exchange between electrons, if that helps

0celo7

@Slereah what's the difference between a weakly and strongly parabolic PDE

Slereah

Not a clue

FrancescoS

Nono.. I'm working with Effective field theories . In order to do simulations with identical 4-fermions vertices, I have to split them using an equivalent ULTRAVIOLET theory... Then, I have to use a spin-2 particles for my purposes

@Slereah can you give me more references?

Slereah

Lemme see

thesis.library.caltech.edu/6592

That's the one

beware though

It's written with a typewriter

vzn

@CuriousOne "when you have a hammer everything looks like a nail". have long thought LHC/ particle accelerators while very impressive/ unmatched in many ways are "too many egg$ in one basket" & alternative approaches deserve funding esp computational simulations of matter/ energy, & maybe the community will slowly/ finally come to that widespread realization after total desperation (ala Churchillian philosophy quoted by Rennie)

Slereah

5:43 PM

FrancescoS

I will check there, thank you @Slereah

Slereah

Also the standard theory on spin 2 QFT is Pauli Fierz, if you wanna look into it

FrancescoS

I don't want to know about the theory (for the moment), I need just the expression of the cross section

Slereah

Well the vertex of the graviton is known, dunno if that generalizes to all spin 2 particles

General relativity is really a sausage fest

I can only think of one lady in all the papers and books I've ever read

0celo7

Yvonne

Slereah

5:55 PM

the very same

0celo7

My prof knows her

Her book is pretty hard core

Slereah

Well GR Cauchy problem is no easy task

0celo7

These Ricci flow calculations are getting to be lengthy

Computing the time derivative of the Riemann curvature is not fun

Slereah

that's what computers are for

CuriousOne

@vzn: There are no alternative approaches to the spectrum of the vacuum. You can't get this information any other way than with accelerators. As for cost... LHC is very cheap. The US can spend $13 billion before breakfast on total nonsense without even noticing when the politics lines up. HEP is just not one of those things for which the politics lines up well.

0celo7

5:59 PM

Just because it's relatively cheap does not excuse it

It's still a complete waste of money

CuriousOne

What is?

0celo7

HEP

We are talking about the LHC, right?

CuriousOne

Is it?

0celo7

how have we benefitted?

CuriousOne

You can make that argument about anything in science. We might as well still be living in the caves.

Yes, I have greatly benefited.

0celo7

6:00 PM

No, there is science with clear goals and applicability

Qmechanic

0

Q: Numerical Computation: Quantum Field Theory and General Relativity

Since I am only caught up in text book type problems and calculations, I rarely use a computer to help out with a computation. The one exception is to use Mathematica for mundane things that just help get to the answer (Integration, plotting graphs, and so on). But, I read that real-world probl...

quantum-field-theory general-relativity computational-physics

Too broad?

0celo7

The LHC has no near-term applicability

Unless I'm missing something

CuriousOne

Science only has one goal: to explain nature. What you are talking about is engineering.

0celo7

Then I guess science is a waste of money

Slereah

The LHC isn't all standard model and Higgs boson

CuriousOne

6:02 PM

So why are you here?

Slereah

There's also a lot of nuclear physics done there

0celo7

@CuriousOne I ask myself that all the time

CuriousOne

Nuclear physics? Not really.

Sounds more like someone is having a crisis. Do you need an intervention?

0celo7

No, I need physicists to stop spending tax money on their toy projects

Sanya

@Qn

@Qmechanic yep

CuriousOne

6:03 PM

Why do you need that?

0celo7

To increase military spending, of course.

CuriousOne

Are you a soldier?

0celo7

No

CuriousOne

So then you don't need better guns.

0celo7

Sure I do

Gotta prepare for the UN invasion

CuriousOne

6:05 PM

For what? Low self esteem?

0celo7

Nah

CuriousOne

Guns don't help with that.

LHC is a pretty good job creation program, by the way. Tons of metal fabrication.

0celo7

lol

CuriousOne

Very little of that has been outsourced to China. :-)

0celo7

Keynesian economics at its finest

CuriousOne

6:07 PM

Whatever works.

0celo7

Pump tax money into the economy and call it jobs

CuriousOne

Military spending is 100% Keynesian, by the way. That's why I am all for it.

The US couldn't do without. Too many unemployed...

Slereah

Well why not do it on something more pleasant

0celo7

🍔

Slereah

Maybe build pyramids instead

CuriousOne

6:08 PM

Pyramids are stupid.

Slereah

Tell that to Ramses

0celo7

Pyramids are African @Slereah

CuriousOne

The only true form is a cube.

Slereah

Tell that to the Aztecs

0celo7

@Slereah ok, Mexican

CuriousOne

6:09 PM

They were all losers.

0celo7

What's your point

@CuriousOne Low energy, too

Slereah

That will create jobs

CuriousOne

Everybody who has ever built pyramids is gone.

0celo7

Yup

Slereah

the jews are still there

0celo7

6:10 PM

You mean the lizards

CuriousOne

It's a good start to eternal looserdom... once you build a pyramid, you are finished.

Slereah

CuriousOne

The Jews didn't build the pyramids.

Slereah

Did they build the LHC, though

CuriousOne

That's much closer to the truth. :-)

I wouldn't mind a Titan colonization program.

Slereah

6:11 PM

Maybe start a bit smaller

CuriousOne

Don't know why everybody wants to go to Mars...

Slereah

Moon bases

Newt Gingrich wants moon bases

Vote for him

CuriousOne

Some are even hoping to find a pyramid there...

Slereah

Are the martians losers?

CuriousOne

Which would explain why the Martians are such losers, though.

Of course, they lost all their water and atmosphere.

Must have been the pyramid construction programs.

0celo7

6:13 PM

This guy gets it

Slereah

0

Q: Observational evidence for wormholes, or not?

The Wikipedia article on wormholes claims: Researchers have some observational evidence for wormholes, and the equations of the theory of general relativity have valid solutions that contain wormholes. But there doesn't seem to be any details on the 'observational evidence' in the artic...

general-relativity wormholes

0celo7

Pyramid schemes

Slereah

I tried to answer "we do not" but apparently that's too short an answer

CuriousOne

Ay!

ritwik sinha

Hi everybody :), i have a question about this site, may i ask ?

CuriousOne

6:14 PM

Shoot!

0celo7

HE HAS A GUN

CuriousOne

Virtual guns don't scare me.

Sanya

@ritwiksinha Welcome and ask :)

CuriousOne

If he had a computer virus...

ritwik sinha

Ok so is soft questions on-topic here ?

Slereah

6:15 PM

Sure

As long as it's not dumb

CuriousOne

Soft tofu? Fine with me.

Sanya

what is a soft question for you exactly?

Slereah

The common trap of soft questions is that there aren't that many of them

ritwik sinha

Questions like math.stackexchange.com/questions/1884398/…

Slereah

So people who ask soft questions tend to ask questions that have already been posted

ritwik sinha

6:18 PM

i cant find a good one but this one has 8 upvotes but closed :(

Sanya

debatable ... I'd bet that it will get closed as opinion-based here

ritwik sinha

1

Q: what does it actually take to become a mathematician

Does one have to be an amazing problem solver to become a mathematician or its the passion and dedication? Can every mathematician solve the IMO problems? What is required to solve IMO problems.

soft-question

Sanya

but it is certainly a most fitting subject for the chat here - though you might still want to give it a short to see whether it goes through

*give it a short

*shot

argh -.-

CuriousOne

A very special brain. If you have to ask, you most likely don't have it?

ritwik sinha

will this one be closed here ?

CuriousOne

6:20 PM

Yes.

Slereah

All you need is to find the Mathematician Stone

And lay your hands on it

0celo7

Anyone here know about Uhlenbeck's trick?

CuriousOne

Never heard of it. Tell me!

Sanya

@ritwiksinha the problem is that "the physicist" does not exist and that there are no obvious criteria to predict what a person can achieve

CuriousOne

Yes, there are.

0celo7

6:21 PM

@CuriousOne You put Ricci flow on a pullback bundle and the induced connected can be used to simplify equations

ritwik sinha

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1883563/is-being-good-at-mathematic-contests-necessary-to-pursue-a-career-in-mathematics

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1637562/can-a-mathematical-theorem-be-proved-in-infinite-ways

What about these ?

Sanya

@CuriousOne you are a wizard :o

0celo7

But they keep saying "without loss of generality, assume the vector fields are constant in time"

ritwik sinha

@Sanya i dont want to ask that question, i am just curious

0celo7

And I don't see why that's possible

CuriousOne

6:23 PM

@ritwiksinha: These kinds of questions are always nonsense. Either you want to do something and then you do it, or you don't.

Sanya

@ritwiksinha the second one is fine even though I'm not sure what the counterpart in physics would be, the first one is in my opinion off topic here ... In general, simple career advice and opion based stuff is frowned upon; you still need to consider however that in the end it is never one single person that closes a thread so opinions might differ

0celo7

Ah

Stuff cancels

That's a crappy way of putting it though

Maybe there's a better way of seeing it.

ritwik sinha

@CuriousOne i was just curious because there are many such things on MSE but not found single one here

CuriousOne

The question is just as nonsensical there as it is here.

0celo7

Ah, I bet any time varying vector field is a time constant one multiplied by a function of time

CuriousOne

6:29 PM

What somebody wants to do is a personal decision.

0celo7

By tensoriality, it works

ritwik sinha

@CuriousOne maybe those questions are nonsensical but they are generally well received there

0celo7

No

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: More importantly, many of these questions seem to be coming from Asians, particularly Indians. That's more an expression of culture than an honest interest in science/math.

0celo7

No, that's wrong

ritwik sinha

6:31 PM

@CuriousOne I can disagree there

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: That's your right. The data seems to suggest otherwise. A lot of these questions seem to come from students who are being pushed by parents and environment to do things they are not really interested in and that they are not really gifted for.

0celo7

Indians have a fascination with Olympiad stuff

It's really weird

ritwik sinha

@CuriousOne Maybe because people here don't consider many streams other than medical or engineering

0celo7

I'd never heard about it until mentioned by an Indian here

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: One should only consider stuff that one likes to do. I was constantly being pushed into medicine by my environment. If I had done that, I would have killed many people.

0celo7

6:34 PM

@CuriousOne I was wondering something

It seems like Indians are super zealous about math and physics education

But you rarely hear about Indian mathematicians or physicists

CuriousOne

@0celo7: Seems like it.

0celo7

Where is the disconnect?

ritwik sinha

@0celo7 ohh, you don't know how much those streams are popular , every second person would ask you what you want to pursue medi or engi

0celo7

The Japanese and Chinese are pretty prominent

CuriousOne

@0celo7: They do have great both, though, but physics requires state funding. If your country doesn't have it, you have to move.

ritwik sinha

6:36 PM

@CuriousOne actually i have talked to many Phd students, they get funding

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: Physics needs facilities. India doesn't have facilities.

ritwik sinha

@CuriousOne Of course not and everyone can't afford aboard education

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: That's a real problem, but you can't do physics without machines. That's just a fact.

ritwik sinha

@CuriousOne Don't know if it is only prominent here or not but teachers here will teach you how to do it not why it is done that way, especially in physics and chemistry.

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: Physics is a game for rich nations.

@ritwiksinha: Done what way?

ritwik sinha

6:40 PM

@CuriousOne i mean the derivation or procedure behind a result

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: There is a well known way how to teach and do physics, and either your teachers know it or don't. If they don't, you need to study it somewhere else.

ritwik sinha

@CuriousOne For eg : i have been told that we need to check dimensional homogeneity of argument inside trig function to know that of the whole equation, but did not told why to do it

0celo7

Oh, I think this was trivial :/

Slereah

there's plenty of well known indian physicists

CuriousOne

@ritwiksinha: You mean how people came up with the derivations? That's intuition. One can't teach that... either you have it or you don't.

Slereah

6:42 PM

Even just in GR

0celo7

@CuriousOne how?

@Slereah proof?

Slereah

Chandrasekar and Raychaudhuri, for one

vzn

@CuriousOne re "no alternative approaches" [citation needed] ... "absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence" ... am not as hard on LHC as 0celo7 (lol) but do detect some massive groupthink at work

ritwik sinha

@Slereah i haven't heard many

0celo7

Chandra worked in America

I think.

And they're old-school

Slereah

6:43 PM

How many new school GR guys do you know

0celo7

Sanchez

Visser