« first day (1712 days earlier)      last day (3203 days later) » 

12:00 AM
Rindler isn't a bad alternative for SR
Probably Schutz for GR (though I've not been using that for my own studies)
 
@0celo7 Can you give me a concrete book (or books) reference ?
 
what the fuck why is morrowind 4:3
I broke a game without even playing it
 
@Hippalectryon Here's John Baez's set of book recommendations for SR/GR: math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/…
 
@KyleKanos Thanks a lot !
It's mostly GR books though
Do you have the same for SR ? @KyleKanos
 
12:17 AM
@Hippalectryon Scroll up on that page ;)
 
ooh :P
 
Fascinating...UAC forces the game into 4:3
 
 
2 hours later…
2:11 AM
@ACuriousMind Holy crap...Neloth is in this game!? Is he has hilarious as in Skyrim? If yes, I'll have to join House Telvanni.
I can't handle all these choices and consequences!
I don't know which factions to join...
 
I thought you can join all the factions in Morrowind?
 
In Oblivion and Skyrim you can.
You have to choose which Great House you join.
It also seems that if you join one faction, members of certain other factions will dislike you and gain entry.
There are ways of raising speech high enough to overcome this, it seems.
 
2:53 AM
lol...gotta love it when someone downvotes your post & leaves a wholly incorrect comment as to why they did it
 
@alarge I've been booting and rebooting quite a bit for this Morrowind mod installer. From the moment the screen went black from the shut down to a 1080p YouTube video playing: 28 seconds.
 
^ 1 Month from now, Ocelot will be telling us it's taking 4 minutes to do the same thing
 
@KyleKanos I do have to turn off UAC for this to work, so probably.
I think I'll wipe the game, start fresh and do everything in 4:3 so I don't have to fuss with UAC.
It seems I'm getting 8:5 squished to 4:3, not native 4:3.
 
Ouch
 
Everything looks skinny.
 
2:59 AM
I can believe it
I guess TES3 came out when CRT monitors were still the kings of the market?
 
Of course, since 8:5 works poorly with UAC on, 4:3 will probably melt the SSD with UAC on.
@KyleKanos '02 I think.
 
Sounds about right
I don't think I had WS until 07-ish
 
One of the features of this mod pack is to extend the game to widescreen.
It doesn't work correctly when I have UAC on.
 
Honestly, I'd play it at 4:3 on a 16:9 screen with the black side-bars
Might suck not getting the full width, but it's the way the game was designed
 
UAC disabled again.
I need to make sure the hypothesis is repeatable.
Yup, confirmed.
Scientific method applied to modding: A-OK
@KyleKanos I'll probably get better performance, too!
I could do more AA.
Well, I'm tired and have to work tomorrow.
 
3:04 AM
I was going to make an alcohol-based joke, but I think you're too young for that
 
Hopefully the gov't found their copy of MTW over the weekend.
@KyleKanos I have (a) glass(es) of whiskey on the weekends.
 
That's illegal. I'm calling up your Senator boss
 
Not really.
In VA, it's legal if the minor is on the parent's property and has consent.
@KyleKanos You do know I'd be the one to take the call, right?
 
I'll shoot him an email, he answers those, right?
Or is it letters from non-constituents that he answers?
 
For the record, my cat is currently typing.
It depends how much money you have.
If you have a lot, you get a paid staffer.
 
3:07 AM
If Bernie has his way, I won't have to pay anything
 
If you're some everyday shmuck, you get an intern.
The academic in me wants to see him get elected just to see what happens.
Anyway, I have to go now.
Bye.
 
Adieu
 
 
3 hours later…
6:06 AM
@0celo7 Telvanni are the best, Hlaalu are funny, Redoran are boring.
@0celo7 Not for the houses, although in the unpatched game there is a way to join Redoran and Hlaalu through a faulty dialogue tree, I think.
 
 
3 hours later…
8:50 AM
2
Q: Temperature modelling

Michael HooremanI have to find a mathematical model for the temperature vs. time to study the temperature of the environment next to a lamp. The lamp is very powerful, so heating a lot When the lamp is started, a cooling starts with increasing efficiency and stabilisation after a short amount of time When the ...

On topic for us or not?
 
9:40 AM
4
Q: What state the wave function collapses into after an inaccurate measurement?

Lajos NagyI'm watching MIT online lectures Quantum Physics I (roughly from one hour mark in the video). The lecturer explains wave functions that describe "Stationary States" that consist of a single energy eigenfunction then he points out that no such thing exists in real life. At some point a student ask...

↑ what do you guys/gals think about this question. I'd argue that the prof goofed a bit.
 
Yeah, could be... I've understood the E-t uncertainty principle to be more of a heuristic saying that measuring energy to a certain precision requires a certain amount of time in which the system is coupled to the measuring device.
I'm quite surprised to see this highly upvoted on MO
 
user54412
@DavidZ Sure I guess it's on topic. I mean, it is modeling a physical system.
 
user54412
Of course, I don't know why such a simple task is being described in such an enormously complicated way. Is this what "data science" is?
 
@DavidZ E-t uncertainty should be treated very carefully IMO. I think profs doesn't stress that enough+
 
9:57 AM
@ChrisWhite I'm not sure anyone really knows what data science is :-P but seriously though: it appears to be focused on the extraction of patterns from data sets which can in general be very large. It's like the applied math version of phenomenology. And I think that's the focus of the question as it's currently written.
There's some physics in there, sure, but it seems to be buried.
@gonenc no argument there
> Big data is like teenage sex: everyone talks about it, nobody really knows how to do it, everyone thinks everyone else is doing it, so everyone claims they are doing it.
6
The question's been edited now, anyway
 
10:12 AM
@DavidZ FWIW I would consider the Temperature modeling question off-topic for the Data Science SE. It's mostly physics, with some stats. Yeah, who knows what DS is, but based on my read of how people use the Data Science SE, you wouldn't get a good answer to this there.
 
@DavidZ where did that come from :D
 
user54412
Hmm, so tomorrow's chat session will be shortly after the New Horizons closest approach.
 
user54412
(+/- some hours -- no one's particularly clear on whether they're using physicist clocks-and-rulers-throughout-spacetime perspective or astronomer past-light-cone perspective)
 
Do we have someone here, who can speak Korean?
 
Quick question : I've just started reading on SR, and was wondering : in 3D geometry, if we know all the pairwise distances between all the points of a set then we know how they are organized, modulo any rotation of the whole set around the origin. If likewise we know all the pairwise spacetime intervals between events of a set, they will be determined modulo ... ?
Asked another way, what is the practical equivalent of the rotation of an event in spacetime ?
 
10:51 AM
@ACuriousMind Is Telvanni better than the Mages Guild?
 
Thieves guild ftw
 
@gonenc the internet
or actually, I first saw it posted on the wall of the nuclear theory lounge at Berkeley Lab, but it's pretty famous.
@SeanOwen cool, thanks. In the current version I definitely agree. It was the earlier version I wasn't sure about.
 
11:34 AM
@0celo7 They don't exclude each other, iirc.
Is there a way to access one's favourite questions from mobile?
We have this "canonical" question on the energy - time uncertainty I'd like to link to @gonenc /on that question, but I can't access it easily.
 
@ACuriousMind Do you mean this ↓ question
16
Q: What is $\Delta t$ in the time-energy uncertainty principle?

HoboIn non-relativistic QM, the $\Delta E$ in the time-energy uncertainty principle is the limiting standard deviation of the set of energy measurements of $n$ identically prepared systems as $n$ goes to infinity. What does the $\Delta t$ mean, since $t$ is not even an observable?

 
Yes
Managed to get to it and comment it there, but it was a bit of a hassle to get there.
 
@ACuriousMind the mobile app is a bit irritating imo too
 
It definitely is
I usually don't use it much,but since my last lecture had a grand total of 3 participants, I don't have anything else to do right now
 
11:49 AM
@ACuriousMind Do you give lectures in Heidelberg?
 
@gonenc no
I'm just a lowly MSc student
 
"my last lecture had a grand total of 3 participants" then what does ← this mean
 
@gonenc the last lecture I attended
 
@ACuriousMind I see :D though if you were the lecturer and visited phySE whilst lecturing, it would be way cooler :D
@ACuriousMind I guess you have tutored right?
 
@gonenc not a full lecture, I've only been a tutor in the Vorkurs for mathematicians
 
11:56 AM
@ACuriousMind I've heard that tutoring doesn't pay you enough to compensate your efforts.
 
@gonenc well, it's a job that fits well into your schedule as a student, at least
 
@ACuriousMind According to the UESP chart, people in the Mages Guild will hate you for joining the Telvanni.
Also there is a Mages Guild quest which has you kill all the Telvanni councillors.
I don't want Neloth to die :/
 
@0celo7 ah, right... I think if you first become boss of Telvanni and then do the mages guild, it could work, but I'm not sure
 
Too much hassle.
 
@gonenc also, you get more money if you already have a BSc than if you don't
 
12:00 PM
What is the best class to pick? I feel like I'm doing everything wrong.
Star?
I've heard this game is really hard and I'm a complete noob.
 
@0celo7 don't pick a class, choose everything yourself
 
@ACuriousMind are you going to tutor this semester?
 
Also I had to remove the larger text mod. The "bigger menu boxes" patch isn't working right and some text lines are distorted.
 
And yes, your first few characters will probably fail epically
 
:(
But I like the dark elf Chiral
 
12:02 PM
@gonenc probably not
 
What's the best race for a battlemage?
Is battlemage even a reasonable character to play?
 
@0celo7 high elf or breton
 
But high elf is weak to everything...
 
I've started a textbook about diff-forms and even after 30 pages, I think that teaching vector calculus is somewhat unnecessary
 
Star sign atronach, but you need to know what you're doing for that
 
12:04 PM
Oh god, I need to regen magicka
 
@gonenc lol, prepare for physicists generally not using forms at all
 
@ACuriousMind READ STRAUMANN
(and do all the exercises and provide complete solutions, pretty please)
 
@ACuriousMind they are scary at first glance but things got a lot easier when you start to work with them
 
@0celo7 not if you brew enough potions
@gonenc I know, I love forms
 
I suck at alchemy in Skyrim, how the heck do I do it in Morrowind?
 
12:07 PM
@0celo7 trial and error and exploiting the system :D
 
@ACuriousMind How do high elves justify their weaknesses?
 
@ACuriousMind do you have any particularly good way of learning them, this book that I have starts the deal with vector calculus and advances therefrom
 
Sorry, didn't mean to create that room
 
@gonenc Nakahara does a good job on that topic
 
@ACuriousMind I was just going to ask why you created that room :D
 
12:08 PM
This mobile UI ducks :D
 
@ACuriousMind did you mean sucks or was that a pun that I didn't get :D
 
Idk how to create a room on mobile
 
@0celo7 Me neither
 
@gonenc I, uh, picked them up along the way, I didn't learn them systematically
 
@gonenc In a suit. The worst thing about dressing nice is you have to shave unless you're a Viking and can grow a beard over the weekend.
I barely get a shadow over the weekend :(
 
12:10 PM
Well, I accidentally clicked on gonenc's icon and then there was "create a room with this user" directly under my finger :/
 
@0celo7 you can always wear sth else until you have a long enough beard, and then start wearing suits again
 
@ACuriousMind Forget German tech support, I need German Morrowind support!
 
@ACuriousMind there isn't any specific app for chat is there?
 
@gonenc autocorrect that I didn't correct
 
@gonenc One of my conditions for employment is full business attire Mon-Thu
 
12:11 PM
@gonenc there sorta is, it's called ChatSEy
It at least let's me reply to posts and star things
 
@0celo7 got to do group theory homework later on, but when I finish it, I might be available
 
@0celo7 oh lawyer stuff
 
@ACuriousMind Oh, not today. Although I might pick your brain on what skills, etc. to pick.
 
Ugh I'm having a weird problem with spacetime intervals : if some spaceship travels from a point A to a point B at the speed of light, then in the frame of reference of A the spacetime interval would be $0$, but from the ship's interval it would be non zero since the time interval is non zero and the distance is zero...
 
12:14 PM
Wat
It can't be at the speed of light
 
Why not ?
 
It has mass?
 
Anyhow, g2g
 
Say 99.9999999% of the speed of light then
Take the limit
Or take a massless ship, doesn't matter
 
@ACuriousMind ciao
 
12:15 PM
Why is the distance 0?
It it's at the speed of light surely it has spatial displacement
@gonenc So are we all clear on 3.6?
 
@0celo7 perfectly clear
@0celo7 just take a look at a factor of 2 that I think you should be missing
 
@0celo7 From the ship's point of view the two events 'being at A' and 'being at B' occur at the same place
 
ie there shouldn't be any in your equation
 
I'll look at it during breakfast.
I need to figure out TeX on my work PC
 
yes you have a factor of 2 that I don't have
 
12:18 PM
I got the 2 from the 2pi in the period.
 
I have $$\Delta \tau = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{R_1^3}{GM}-\frac{R_1^2}{c^2}} $$
 
Remember that the angle goes from 0 to 2pi
Oh
 
@0celo7 not that kind of a factor of 2 :D
 
I'll look at that.
I don't have my work with me now :(
 
@0celo7 What's the problem in my reasoning ?
 
12:21 PM
@Hippalectryon I'll get back to you when I'm at an actual computer
 
@0celo7 It is not that important anyhow, I always make algebraic errors, especially factors of stuff and $\pm$ errors.
 
Wait why is the distance 0 if they are spatially distinct events?
@gonenc I'd like to rule out the case that I might be wrong ;)
 
@0celo7 we'll see :D
 
@0celo7 In the frame of the ship, both events occur on the ship
 
@Hippalectryon That's nonsense.
 
12:27 PM
?
 
You can't go into the frame of something at the speed of light.
Lorentz boosts to light speed are ill-defined.
 
Oh ok. I just started, so I might say weird stuff :P
 
@Hippalectryon There's more wrong with that
 
Like what ?
 
I need an actual keyboard to tell you what
 
12:36 PM
@0celo7 are you at work?
Is there a some kind of product rule for $*(fg)$, where $f$ is a 1-form and $g$ is a 0-form.
 
12:52 PM
@gonenc Yes, going for breakfast in a bit
Not at a desk tho
 
@0celo7 what time is there?
 
At a desk.
8:56
@gonenc I'm pretty sure $g$ just factors out.
@Hippalectryon Let's assume (for correctness) that the ship is not at $c$.
 
ok (btw I came to that question after doing i.imgur.com/eZahWp7.png)
 
You're not calculating the spacetime interval of the ship but rather of a person on the ship wrt. the ship.
 
@0celo7 yup that seems to be the case, computed directly :)
 
12:58 PM
You're not calculating a spacetime interval.
@gonenc Note that $\star$ only acts on the basis forms and on $1$.
$\star 1$ is just the volume form.
@Hippalectryon You need to use a coordinate system in spacetime.
 
@0celo7 I didn't need a coord system do to the exercise above though
 
What is the exercise?
 
@0celo7 I wonder now if there exist any general rule for $*(fg)$ in terms of $*f$ and $*g$, $f$ being a n-form an $g$ being a m-form
 
@gonenc Let me look.
@Hippalectryon Let me rephrase.
@Hippalectryon <-- is wrong.
Unless, of course, you tell me what time you're measuring.
Then we might get somewhere.
@gonenc $\alpha\wedge \star\beta=\beta\wedge\star\alpha$
I don't see anything...
You might try deriving one yourself.
Ah
Let $\alpha$ be a $p$-form and $X$ a vector. Then $\star(\alpha\wedge X^\flat)=\iota_X\star\alpha$.
There might be a generalization of that...
 
1:07 PM
@0celo7 I don't understand half of the symbols there :D
eg $\flat \iota$
 
In mathematics, the musical isomorphism (or canonical isomorphism) is an isomorphism between the tangent bundle TM and the cotangent bundle T∗M of a Riemannian manifold given by its metric. There are similar isomorphisms on symplectic manifolds. The term musical refers to the use of the symbols ♭ and ♯. It is also known as raising and lowering indices. == Discussion == Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. Suppose {∂i} is a local frame for the tangent bundle TM with dual coframe {dxi}. Then, locally, we may express the Riemannian metric (which is a 2-covariant tensor field which is symmetric and...
In mathematics, the interior product or interior derivative is a degree −1 antiderivation on the exterior algebra of differential forms on a smooth manifold. The interior product, named in opposition to the exterior product, is also called interior or inner multiplication, or the inner derivative or derivation, but should not be confused with an inner product. The interior product ιXω is sometimes written as X ⨼ ω. == Definition == The interior product is defined to be the contraction of a differential form with a vector field. Thus if X is a vector field on the manifold M, then is the map which...
 
@0celo7 at least the name is consistent :D
 
Ok basically to do the exercise above to first get the spacetime interval in the Earth frame we get the measured time between the two events $\Delta t_T=\frac{100}{95}c$, the measure distance between the two events in light years $\Delta l_T=4.3$ and that gives us a squared interval of $I^2=4.3^2(\frac{100^2}{95^2}-1)$ light years. Now if we do that from the ship's frame we'l just get $I_t^2=I_s^2=\Delta t_s^2>>0$. Then I wondered why we still had $I_s^2>>0$ but $I_t\to0$ when
the speed was tending to the speed of light. ($T$ is for earth, $s$ is for ship)
 
@Hippalectryon You're using the wrong time!
Google proper time.
Time to eat now.
 
@ChrisWhite That's not what I'd call data science (going to the original question) because he's not looking through actual data sets to find relationships, he's simply modeling a physical scenario and using statistical techniques.
 
1:11 PM
@0celo7 the space and time interval confused me at first glance too. Instead space-time interval would be a better choice of words.
 
Hey everyone. Here's a great viXra paper that made me laugh so hard this morning. vixra.org/pdf/1506.0148v2.pdf
 
@0celo7 me too just, note however that I'll have lunch now.
 
@0celo7 @gonenc Where am I using the "wrong" time ?
 
@Hippalectryon the space-time separation means "proper distance".
I'll explain it after I've eaten sth
 
Ok thanks
 
1:14 PM
@JimsBond Did you find the fault in it?
Not gonna read
 
@0celo7 Yeah, the basic math is terrible
They forgot the object is moving in the observer's frame
 
"*Reassert the twin paradox in a new light, leading to the conclusion
that the theory of relativity is inconsistent with the physical reality*" ← sign of a big big bs
 
All you have to do is read the last paragraph of the intro and you will laugh
 
"The theory of Newtonian Gravity is inconsistent with physical reality" <-- sign of a big big bs (1900 physicist)
 
@0celo7 at least in some part that statement is correct
@Hippalectryon what you have to find is the proper time between two events
I should've said proper time above too
which is in flat space defined by
 
1:27 PM
@gonenc Isn't the proper time the time in the ship's frame ?
 
@Hippalectryon proper time is independent of someone's frame, ie everyone measures it to be the same
 
wait, did I walk into a SR discussion and post an SR viXra paper?
 
@gonenc Then, what is the proper time here ? How do I measure it ?
(remember, I just started SR)
 
@Hippalectryon proper time denoted by $\tau$ is given by $d\tau^2 = -dt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2$
 
(in c=1 units)
 
1:29 PM
for $c=1$
 
Ok, but in this very exercise how do I find it ?
We don't have coordinates here, just distances
 
@KyleKanos do I have the correct sign?
sh*t
no I don't
sorry $d\tau^2 = $ to $-$ what I've written above
 
I'm okay with the diag(-1,+1) metric, but it should be $-d\tau^2$
 
Mostly plus is the best signature
 
$$\int d\tau = \int \sqrt{1-\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2} dt$$
you have the speed, which is $dx/dt$ and you have the time that it takes this guy to go to where every he wants.
note that I set $c=1$, when $c\neq 1$ you have the integrand $1-(dx/dt)^2/c^2$
@Hippalectryon if you want I can show the steps one by one
 
1:37 PM
@gonenc That would be very cool :D
So far in the book we've never used coordinates
 
@Hippalectryon what book are you reading?
 
Btw that's the proposed answer (and what I did myself) i.imgur.com/zsJp5sO.png
@gonenc Spacetime Physics by Wheeler and Taylor
Pages 24-25 (2nd ed)
 
We never use that in the exercise though O_o
 
@Hippalectryon that is basically what is happening in the background
you can show that $d\tau^2$ is independent of any lorentz transformation.
 
1:50 PM
Ok, but how does it help for my problem above ?
What you call $d\tau$ is basically the spacetime interval isn't it ?
 
ok. you have the light-speed = $\dot x$ 0.95
@Hippalectryon yes
 
and $t_0 = 4.3/0.95$ years
plug these numbers out comes 1.41334 years
as the measure of proper time
 
Yeah I got that too but that doesn't solve my initial problem when the speed tends to c
 
@Hippalectryon what was the original question? sorry
 
1:54 PM
@gonenc o.O
 
@0celo7 what?
 
$(d\tau)^2$ is very poor notation
It implies the line element is something that was squared.
 
@gonenc Basically when the speed tends to $c$ we have $\tau\to0$ if we look from the earth's frame. However, if we look at the ship's frame, since $\dot{x}=0$, shouldn't we have $t=\tau\to0$ ? (that sounds very false to me)
 
@0celo7 it is but damn it, it gets the point across.
 
@gonenc why u sacrifice da accuracy
 
1:56 PM
but yeah $d\tau^2$ should've been better
 
Time to look at this Carroll problem!
 
@0celo7 Because we're physicists and not mathematicians?
 
^this is indeed
 
@KyleKanos insert quote about mathematical physics and pedantry
 
@Hippalectryon that sounds very correct to me
 
1:57 PM
@gonenc How can $t\to0$ ? Does that mean that inside the spaceship you perceive that you arrive instantly ?
 
@0celo7 Mathematical physicist == applied mathematician
 
it doesn't sound strange to you that a guy spends 1.4 years while another one spends 4 years
 
Well, it doesn't seem too strange :P
 
@Hippalectryon well if you stretch it too much you get somewhere to $t\approx 0$
 
1:59 PM
Hm ok
 
that shouldn't surprise you
 
Thanks for everything :D
 
@KyleKanos Iwata is dead :'(
 

« first day (1712 days earlier)      last day (3203 days later) »