« first day (4300 days earlier)      last day (615 days later) » 

12:00 AM
Do non-interacting particles never become entangled?
 
 
4 hours later…
3:48 AM
A ground track or ground trace is the path on the surface of a planet directly below an aircraft's or satellite's trajectory. In the case of satellites, it is also known as a suborbital track, and is the vertical projection of the satellite's orbit onto the surface of the Earth (or whatever body the satellite is orbiting).A satellite ground track may be thought of as a path along the Earth's surface that traces the movement of an imaginary line between the satellite and the center of the Earth. In other words, the ground track is the set of points at which the satellite will pass directly overhead...
 
 
10 hours later…
1:19 PM
Is there any reason to buy cryptocurrency other than to sell it higher for a profit?
I mean I don't think exchanging cryptocurrency for a pizza for example is very widespread
I like the technology behind cryptocurrency and it's an interesting idea and stuff but I don't find it very useful or practical (besides the profit part) to own a cryptocurrency
I mean the whole purpose of a currency is to be able to exchange it for stuff you actually want, and cryptocurrency can't do that yet?
@ACuriousMind Sup, whatchu think about cryptocurrency?
 
@JingleBells Buying drugs
 
You mean "What do you think about Ponzi schemes?"
 
@Slereah Is that actually legit? I can see why drug dealers would prefer this way of payment
 
That is certainly a common usage of bitcoins
 
1:35 PM
Is there any way the government can track the drug dealers thru the blockchain technology?
 
They have before, yes
 
@Slereah Nice
 
1:52 PM
Have you ever heard of money laundering?
 
@JingleBells Here's some modern jazz funk for you. OK, it's a bit removed from the James Brown style, but I hope you can appreciate it. Lalah Hathaway Something.
 
Ponzi schemes are a great way to take a lot of dirty money through the scheme and come out with clean funds; although, the losers far out number the winners...@loong
 
A fundamental ingedient of funk is soul. Here are the amazing Doley brothers from Australia on keyboards, with Karen Lee Andrews (who's also a great guitarist) on vocals, doing an old Soul classic, Get It While You Can
 
Take the money and run.
 
2:02 PM
Exactly what happens in ponzi schemes.
 
@JingleBells most are scams; the ones that are not are still bad because the decentralization they promise does not happen in practice. This is an excellent overview.
 
@PM2Ring Sounds good but her singing not very good :P
@ACuriousMind Damn that's long
 
2 hours and 18 minutes could save you your life savings.
 
@ACuriousMind Yeah it's a bit too comprehensive but generally what bugs me about crypto is that I can't trade it for a pizza, like why is it even a currency then XDD
@user726941 What life savings? ;(
 
Oh I see you're talking about astrology
 
2:11 PM
Ok, your future life savings
 
@user726941 :D
 
@PM2Ring YESS!!!!
holy it's so good
 
Classic
 
@PM2Ring I got goosebumps bet ong fr fax
 
2:15 PM
@JingleBells go through this diagram and calculate how much the money grows at each level.
Set up a chart.
 
@JingleBells Her dad was a famous soul singer. Her voice isn't as strong as his, but you can hear the family style.
@JingleBells Yeah, it's pretty amazing. :) Listen on headphones, if you can.
 
@PM2Ring I'm listening on headphones, I was just going to check out the video but ended up listening to the whole thing
you can feel the blues, jazz, and soul so much
 
Oh good. :)
Lachy has a crazy clavinet with a "whammy" (tremolo) bar that sounds like a guitar. Stevie Wonder used the clav a fair bit, eg Superstition, but not with a whammy. Let me get you an example...
 
What I'm thinking is, during a recession or a depression, what exactly has gone wrong when all the resources, people, and organization are there, the same as it was before the recession/depression?
Like if money is what causes the recession/depression and not an inability to produce, why can't everything be "reset" somehow so everyone is back to producing and stuff?
 
It's a bit intense... Voodoo Chile
 
2:26 PM
@PM2Ring that's one big pitch bender XD
 
They say the economic strain that the pandemic put on the world's medical system may trigger a global recession...
 
@user726941 My point is, if all the resources, people, and organization is there ready to function like it did before, surely it can all be "reset" somehow, no?
 
Not to mention the so called reverse Robinhood effects
"resetting" takes time
Politics has changed, a war has started, etc etc
 
2:42 PM
 
Speaking of war, these ladies had to leave Ukraine. Fortunately, they're all safe, but the drummer's house got smashed. The Sixsters (Ukrainian All-Girl-Band) Психоделіка
@Slereah I guess he wouldn't be very happy with $2^{100}!$, then.
 
@PM2Ring He may take a little while to answer
 
2:58 PM
GRUUUUUUUUUUU
 
Some funky Southern Rock from TTB, Gravity
 
3:18 PM
Gold standard good or bad, I read so much and still don't know
 
Good.
 
Mad
Good day dear friends, how did he derive the relationship 3.144?say what initial equation he took to reach this result
This from Griffiths,intro to quantum mechanics, chapter 3.
 
@Mad the quote explicitly refers to eq.(3.28), where presumably you'll find the definition of $\lvert f\rangle$ and $\lvert g\rangle$ he then plugged $x$ and $p$ into
presumably they are the same as here; there isn't really a lot else going on there
 
Mad
3:35 PM
No
He derived the equation 3.143 using the inequality of shcwarz and the inequality for the value of a complex number.
 
yes, and then he plugged the definitions of $\lvert f\rangle$ and $\lvert g\rangle$ in to get 3.144
 
Mad
I am thinking, the position momentum uncertainity principle is in this case minimal so $ \sigma_p \sigma_x = \hbar/2$
Yes, he plugged them into what? the equation i wrote?
 
in to 3.143
 
Mad
Oh
God bless
but he chose g to be the impuls one, and f the place one
Does it matter if i switch?
so f is then = $(\OperatorX-<x>) \Psi$
 
well, you get an equation that looks very similar to 3.144 - they essentially differ by something like $a\mapsto -a^{-1}$
 
Mad
3:41 PM
i am not sure how to write in Latex the operator sign.
 
\hat{X} is $\hat{X}$
 
Mad
Oh, cute hat.
Okay, so its just a factor difference, no biggy
Also, deriving the eigenfunctions of the position operator, we had somehting in the lines of xg(x) = y g(x) and he concluded this must be diracs delta, since everywhere it must be zero, and at y it is okay, if y is a scalar.
But to me, any function wtih any value at g(y) = something is also valid, i was wondering why he chose diracs delta?
Here
 
@Mad Any normal function $f$ that is just non-zero at $y$ and zero everywhere else has $\int f = 0$
 
Mad
you mean = 1
 
and in particular also $\int f^\ast x f = 0$, so the expectation value of $x$ in that state would always be zero
@Mad no, I don't
A function that's only non-zero on a set of measure zero, i.e. a point in this case, has zero integral, that's how integrals work
 
Mad
3:48 PM
Okay.
And then how do you conclude diracs delta?
 
well, the $\delta$ isn't really a function, but to a physicist it has $\int \delta =1$, so it's fine
 
Mad
Sorry what is a normal function? i thought normalizabl functions have integrals equal to one.
 
@Mad I mean that $\delta$ isn't a function
it's a distribution
 
Mad
Yes i reliaze, and ?
 
so by "normal function" I mean any $f(x)$ that's actually a function!
 
Mad
3:50 PM
Alright i am following so far...
 
the "normal" there isn't a technical term, I used it in contrast to "abnormal" "functions" like $\delta$
 
Mad
Oh
So.. regular functions, i get your drift.
Yea i know that.
So if it is not Diracs delta, expectation will be zero
bummer. right?
Thus it must by necissicty be diracs delta, since the particle is somewhere? am i getting this correctly
 
well, there's a problem where you can't actually compute $\int x \delta^2$ either because the square of distributions doesn't really exist, but physics texts usually carefully avoid talking about that :P
 
Mad
Yes , but he avoids the problem, by introducing two values to delta, then he can multiply them.
 
you shouldn't think too hard about this because it's not rigorous anyway: The $\delta$ is a "good eigenfunction" because it has $\int \delta = 1$ and $x\delta(x-x_0) = x_0\delta(x - x_0)$ (at least inside of integrals), there isn't anything more going on
 
Mad
3:59 PM
Alright thanks
 
Average Gigachad
 
who, me?
nothing wrong with being average, pal
 
4:41 PM
@user726941 That's what normal gigachads say
 
Lately I am experiencing a lot of people telling me that there is basically nothing left to research in classical GR and then when I tell them what I am reading about they have no idea what it is
 
@Slereah who are these people?
 
Various people
 
@Slereah academics or chatroom bumpkins :P?
 
Who can say
 
4:50 PM
@Slereah you?
I just wrote a nice PSE question and by the time I was done I had the answer facepalm
 
GR has come a long way since 1919
 
Hey everybody, I hope you all having a nice weekend. I'm here to have some recommendations about book or blog, but I prefer a good blog at the moment.
I'm looking for a blog about history and philosophy of science, physics, biology, geography and maybe a little bit about technology and ongoing researches etc.
Is there any blog that you follow regularly and would recommend?
 
5:08 PM
@MuhammedÇağlarTUFAN one blog with all of this or many blogs?
 
@MoreAnonymous any blog that publishes posts related to any of these subjects would be fine.
 
@MuhammedÇağlarTUFAN I'm not sure what level of physics your after but Sabine has youtube channel for the general audience
 
5:28 PM
My uncle got heartattack day before at night.
I guess stents are much better alternatives to surgery.
He's much better now. It just took 15 min afterall.
to the valves.
Stents installed
Much cheaper, safer, permanent and faster than Open Heart Surgery
 
 
1 hour later…
6:43 PM
is there a one stop shop resource for understanding the dirac delta distribution?
 
@MoreAnonymous Did you tell the mods here that you flagged that question for migration?
 
@SillyGoose What do you mean by "one stop shop"? And most of all, how much detail do you need?
 
I flagged the question
Its pending I beleive
 
@SillyGoose You wanna understand it mathematically or just its applications for physics?
 
mathematically so that any manipulations done in physics can be followed and understood (like get a good hold of its important mathematical properties, and a sense of how to check properties myself)
 
6:54 PM
'Cause for the latter, there's a simple ad hoc explanation
 
Have you told the mods here, such as @ACuriousMind? An unexplained flag can be hard to approve, I would assume. But maybe you explained it well enough :)
 
@Feynman_00 kind of like a single book with all the information. i would like to be able to follow or prove any presented property of the dirac delta function
 
@NikeDattani Didn't directly ping him. I did mention when I flagged I wanted to migrate the question
to matter modelling
 
not all people are hims @MoreAnonymous
 
@MoreAnonymous I guess the problem might be that mods don't tend to migrate questions away unless they're sure that the destination site will be okay with it.
 
6:58 PM
@SillyGoose Well, we're talking about someone we know about, so what's the problem? :P
@SillyGoose You would need a book about distribution theory, I don't have specific suggestion. Well, I'm in the same boat with distributions, I just happen to know some pretty basic stuff. If your aim is just about understanding manipulations in Physics, I don't know if studying distributions is overkill
 
@NikeDattani Ah ... Should I just ping AQM?
@SillyGoose is this about the pronoun stuff?
 
@MoreAnonymous A quantum mind?
Here we go again with the potara fusion :P
 
@Feynman_00 Lol ... sounds like an insult. ACM my bad
 
No, that's the canon name for the fusion between ACM and Qmechanic
2
How do I quote old messages?
 
Why do you want to move it to MMSE by the way? It's only been on Physics.SE for 1 day. There's way more users on Physics.SE. Also, no one's really talked about the Maxwell distribution or Stosszahlansatz on MMSE.
 
7:04 PM
@MoreAnonymous Here
 
But people have talked about both on Physics.SE a fair bit.
 
@Feynman_00 Oh lol I forgot about that one
@NikeDattani I see maybe I should let it be then
 
My quote doesn't show the message :/
 
@NikeDattani I think MMSE entertains original ideas better whereas PSE is quite cautious (for good reason) of crackpottery
 
7:37 PM
@Feynman_00 You mean like > quote?
 
7:51 PM
@SirCumference I don't know. Sometimes ACM quotes old messages and they appear in a box
 
Can someone help me understand a paper in private?
 
8:06 PM
@DIRAC1930 a minute ago, I invited another SE user who wanted to speak to me about a paper in private, to chat with me on Discord. So if you want to do that too, this invite is valid for 7 days: discord.gg/fuuqxpGY (I'm not sure how to increase the default expiry date for invites).
 
 
2 hours later…
9:49 PM
@Feynman_00 Are you Italian? (for some reason I think so but cant remember). Is Ricci pronounced like Ritsi or Riki? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_curvature
 
10:07 PM
@ShikiRyougi I am. A double "c" before "i" is pronounced like "ch" in "cherry"
Or if you prefer, like rich-ee
 
Ohh oki. In greek we pronounce ''ch'' as ''ts'' so that's why I wrote it like that xD
Thank you
 
Don't ask me about Levi-Civita though :P
 
10:32 PM
:D
 
10:52 PM
@Feynman_00 Oh in that case you just paste the permalink
like this
Dec 1, 2015 at 16:41, by ACuriousMind
Always remember, we hate fun.
you can get the permalink by opening the dialog box on the left of the message
 
11:06 PM
Thanks!
 

« first day (4300 days earlier)      last day (615 days later) »