« first day (2712 days earlier)      last day (2209 days later) » 

10:00 PM
heh
@JakeRose (I'm afraid I probably don't have much that's useful to share on that one.)
 
How come? @EmilioPisanty
Does anybody know good places to apply for summer internship projects? (Im a first year uk Natsci student in cambridge btw)
 
@JakeRose it's been a significant time since I needed to revise for exams, and I never did feel like I needed to revise that much.
 
Ive applied a bunch but I dont think Ill get any of them (mostly meant for 2nd and 3rd years) or they just have a heavy bias on their own students
@EmilioPisanty Fair enough I can understand that
 
HEre is the project's current membership: alpha.web.cern.ch/people
 
@JakeRose you should ask staff at your institution
 
10:02 PM
And I know, at most one of those people to any significant degree.
@JakeRose I know a couple of good places near Joplin, Missouri, USA.
@JakeRose ::shakes head to clear the confusion always caused by the way other English speakers use 'revise':: The starting place is working problems.
Especially looking for problem which you should be able to do but can't seem to get right.
 
@JakeRose but it's much easier if you have at least some idea of the type of physics you want to do
 
Those expose weakness in either your conceptual understanding or your process.
 
Luckily my supervisor gave me worked solutions to all the previous tripos quesitons so revising is a ton easier
 
... which is a hard question indeed, but the hard questions in life don't get solved by not tackling them ;-)
 
Just had a look at the cockcroft institute
 
10:05 PM
@EmilioPisanty Hire me
 
A bus ride from my house
But, boom, only do internships for 2nd and 3rd years
 
@BernardoMeurer I'm a lowly postdoc
where would I get money to hire people?
 
@EmilioPisanty I thought postdocs could hire people?
@dmckee Hire me
 
@BernardoMeurer that's...
charmingly naive ;-)
2
 
@BernardoMeurer I'm on the market myself and officially out of the hiring look.
 
10:06 PM
@EmilioPisanty Tbh Im not sure what area I myself want to go into. My maths abilities arent good enough for a lot of the more mathematical stuff so I guess it would have to be something lab based for this year
 
@JakeRose it's a first-year internship
 
(I do love space related things and its likely what Ill work on in the future but Ive applied for the few there is)
 
you're not committing the entirety of your career
 
@EmilioPisanty Dammit :P
 
@EmilioPisanty Oh I agree
 
10:07 PM
@dmckee How's that going for you?
 
But Im trying to say I dont have any preference
 
I find plenty of open dev jobs often, if you're interested
 
Id like to just try something and see if I like it
 
... so choose something that sounds nice, and you'll find out whether it's your thing or not with plenty of time to switch tracks afterwards
 
@BernardoMeurer So-so. A few call backs. One telephone interveiw. A whole lot of nothing.
 
10:08 PM
@dmckee too much nothing?
 
@dmckee What kind of jobs are you looking for?
 
@BernardoMeurer I am interested in programming jobs, but I don't want the salary scale for a entry-level general programmer.
 
@EmilioPisanty The problem Im having isnt finding one I like its finding one at all
 
So my focus has been on scientific programming jobs.
 
10:08 PM
@dmckee I think I can help you, or at least try. What's your email?
 
Those are rarer but they pay something like my current salary and up.
 
If you don't want to post it here reach me at meurerbernardo at gmail dot com
 
@BernardoMeurer I am looking for someone to take up a couple of projects I don't have enough bandwidth for
 
mckee hyphen d at mssu dot edu
Until the end of summer, anyway.
 
particularly studying HHG within the SFA on an extension to a fully quantum-optical formalism
... if that's your cuppa tea
 
10:10 PM
@dmckee Noted :)
 
@dmckee ah ha
 
@EmilioPisanty I don't think I have the necessary knowledge to tackle that, even if I am interested in quantum
 
Does anybody have any links to universities they could politely ask if theyd like to talk to a peasant first year xxxxx
 
@dmckee is it, in fact, a Great Day to be a Lion?
@JakeRose 'fraid not
 
@EmilioPisanty I was actually pretty optimistic when I thought I had a career here. There is a commitment to being a real institution of higher learning and not many places to go but up.
But, of course, up is the only choice because we're starting from a pretty low place.
The physics majors are ... interesting.
 
10:12 PM
@dmckee "everything anyone says before the word 'but' is horseshit"
 
@dmckee Couldn't you go back to UCSB?
 
They are mostly woefully unprepared, but their potential is amazing. If only they would take their math seriously and learn how to work hard at this stuff.
 
Then you could dine me and wine me like Daniel
 
And could get by without working a 40 hour/week side job.
@BernardoMeurer more charming naivety.
 
@dmckee that sounds like a bigger killer than the first two
 
10:15 PM
@EmilioPisanty Yeah. The others would be solvable without that. It might take tongs and hot irons, but we could solve them.
 
Check that, a lot of opportunities
 
@dmckee ah, there's a picture on the staff page
interesting hairdo
 
@EmilioPisanty Link?
 
I'm open to a startup, but it has to be one that is paying a real salary and providing real benefits, so I would be coming in late in the cycle.
 
@BernardoMeurer I.... don't think so
it's easy enough to find
physical-science-faculty.php
 
10:17 PM
@EmilioPisanty Yeah. I've never cared much beyond "it doesn't stink, stays out of my face and doesn't get caught in machines."
 
lol, fair enough
the "sticking straight up" is an interesting solution to the "stays out of my face" requirement
 
Hey guys when deriving the impedance of a inductor from the voltage current relationship I keep gettin a minus sign?
 
@EmilioPisanty I can't seem to fin that? Nor do I find a page for the physics dpt
 
Ill type it up in latex one sec
 
@BernardoMeurer We are a department of chemical and physical sciences. Small school.
 
10:19 PM
@BernardoMeurer c'mon, you're supposed to be the internet whizz kid
 
Ah, found it
 
it's literally username institution acronym at search engine
 
@dmckee You are much younger than I expected!
 
@BernardoMeurer did you also expect him to be black & white in person?
 
@BernardoMeurer I just look younger. Fifty is the train at the end of the my tunnel these days.
 
10:20 PM
@EmilioPisanty Yeah
 
My father switched from "young" to "old" at about fifty-five.
 
$E=-L \frac{dI}{dt}$
$Given I is of the form I=I_0 e^{iwt}$
$E=-Liwe^{iwt}$
$Z=-iwL$
 
What's with the soul stare though? :P
 
@BernardoMeurer I mean, while we're on the 'charming naïveté' theme
 
I always fuck up the spaces
Where have I messed up with the -?
 
10:21 PM
@JakeRose that is... not very readable
 
@EmilioPisanty I'm glad you find me charming :P
 
One sec
 
@EmilioPisanty Am I charming enough that you'll hire me for the summer?
 
How do you write a derivative?
 
@BernardoMeurer are you charming enough that I would hire you for the summer if I had money to hire people?
 
10:22 PM
Damn Dr. Gilbert-Saunders is kind of cute
 
trick question, answer is both yes and no without incurring contradictions
 
::transfers to missu::
@EmilioPisanty Yes, yes I am
You could not resist my Brazilian voluptuousness
 
@JakeRose what, $\partial$ $\partial$?
 
And also, we have to stick together as the Latino axis of the h-bar
 
$E=-L \frac{dI}{dt}$
Given I is of the form $I=I_0 e^{iwt}$
$E=-Liwe^{iwt}$
$Z=-iwL$
 
10:23 PM
@ACuriousMind is an expert in being an Axis power
 
Thats better
 
@JakeRose that $I=I_0 e^{i\omega t}$ looks rather un-kosher
 
What do you mean?
 
you want either $e^{-i\omega t}$ or $e^{j\omega t}$
when dealing with phasors, sign conventions are quite important
 
@BernardoMeurer Lynell is a dinkum person. But you'd been competing with the memory of her rodeo cowboy late husband.
 
10:24 PM
physicists tend to use $i$ for $\sqrt{-1}$ and they denote oscillations in time as $e^{-i\omega t}$
engineers tend to use $j$ for $\sqrt{-1}$ and they denote oscillations in time as $e^{j\omega t}$
 
@dmckee I look good in a cowboy hat
 
mhm
 
And also, my condolences to her, I obviously just meant it as a compliment
 
the upshot is that you can just identify $j=-i$ to translate between engineer-speak and physics
 
@BernardoMeurer But how do you do distracting a 600 kg bull so the rider can get away?
 
10:25 PM
In our lectures we didnt bother with a negative sign
 
5
Q: How to quit physics.stackexchange.com completely?

pokrateI was wondering how to completely leave this community. Please guide me. I have gone through FAQ section but of no use. What should I do ?

 
Is there anything wrong with not using a negative sign?
 
@dmckee I grew up in a farm, so I think I can handle that?
 
@dmckee what on Earth is a "dinkum person"?
 
@EmilioPisanty Honest, genuine, authentic, true
 
10:26 PM
@BernardoMeurer huh
 
"Dinkum" is word from Australian. I picked it up reading The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
 
That's the definition of dinkum, I think
 
@JakeRose that's... kinda bad
 
What is the benefit of using the negative sign?
 
@JakeRose you get the physics right?
Lenz's law (pronounced ), named after the physicist Heinrich Friedrich Emil Lenz who formulated it in 1834, states that the direction of current induced in a conductor by a changing magnetic field due to induction is such that it creates a magnetic field that opposes the change that produced it. Lenz's law is shown by the negative sign in Faraday's law of induction: E = − ∂ Φ ∂ t ...
 
10:27 PM
Sure do
 
the sign on the inductance is important enough to be a named physical law
so, I'd say, pretty important
 
I included lenzs law in the initial expression?
 
@JakeRose When you put a complex number up there you get the dying amplitude solution.
Assuming the real part is positive. But that's the usually choice.
 
@JakeRose you're in that area.
the important thing with phasors is that quite often there aren't "wrong" signs
there's just incompatible sign conventions
so your sign isn't wrong until you state what result you're comparing with and what sign convention that work uses
 
Mhmm
Hes been consistent with his lecture notes
And so Ive never seen the more popular convention before
Every lecturer in cambridge has a thing for not using the rest of the worlds conventions I swear
 
10:30 PM
@JakeRose what do you mean by that?
it's pretty pointless to say which convention is "more popular"
there's almost certainly a whole ton more engineers using the $e^{j\omega t}$ convention than there are physicists using $e^{-i\omega t}$
 
Does this change in convention explain why the negative sign appears?
 
but that doesn't mean that the engineers are "right"
@JakeRose it might, or it might not
 
Fair enough
 
there's not enough context to tell
 
I personally dont think it does
$E=-L \frac{dI}{dt}$
 
10:32 PM
@JakeRose you haven't given enough information to tell so it really is impossible, and pointless, to speculate any further.
 
This equation is right and you understand it right?
 
@JakeRose that equation is meaningless without more context.
 
The voltage across a inductor
 
@JakeRose you're seriously using $E$ for voltage?
 
$\epsilon$
 
10:33 PM
Perhaps $\mathcal{E}$ for the EMF.
 
Yeah thats what I was looking for thanks @dmckee
 
@JakeRose I guess it does have enough information, given that you specify which way you're measuring the voltage and the current
I don't remember the sign conventions by memory
 
Which is (a) not a force, (b) denominated in volts but (c) shouldn't be called a potential.
 
the thing to check for is whether your predict states that the EMF goes 90° out of phase ahead of or behind the current
 
^ That.
 
10:36 PM
that is the objective physical standard you should be holding yourself (and your maths) to
and which does not depend on the particulars of the sign convention in use
1
Q: What does $\pi^2$ represent in real life?

Michael SohnenI am in physics 2 and learning about induction and inductance, as well as LC and RLC circuits, I am encountering the value $\pi^2$ a lot. I wanted to know what $\pi^2$ represents, either geometrically or physically. For example, I know that $\pi$ is the ratio of circle's circumference to its diam...

is that quite on topic?
this is a vaguely similar recent question but the posters appear unrelated?
 
Hm... my instinct is to say not on topic, but I'm not sure about that. I can't really pin down a clear reason for it not to be on topic.
 
I always wonder what people expect the answer to those questions to be.
 
@dmckee well, here is a sample
don't know if 'elephant in the room' is quite the right description though
 
@EricSilva can u spread the word to invade here
 
i actually dont comprehend what happened
 
10:43 PM
My plan to turn the math chat into the new Mos Eisley is proceeding nicely.
 
I go away and the math chat has gone Hoth
wtf
 
It's Balarka's fault lol
 
Does N_c make 40 degrees with the vertical? i.imgur.com/gmCp8hZ.png
 
i was doing my physics homework and wasnt paying attention and it just escalated but looking back at it i dont understand what exactly the problem was
 
Me neither.
He froze the room because of some stuff Balarka did 30 minutes ago
 
10:45 PM
was it the goat cuck thing
 
More evidence that a number of the moderators are incompetent
Not anyone in this room of course
 
@0celo7 how fast could i read wald if i were insane and didnt socialize for a while
 
Maybe a month? I dunno
You know a lot more than me when I read it
But it took me a while
 
how much physics does it demand i know because i literally have only done the intro sequence at this point
 
Not much
Just read it and if you get confused I know it backwards and forwards
I can tell you where to look
 
10:49 PM
mmk, i think im gonna pick it up once i take the GRE this week
 
Zee
Wtf? The room got frozen? Wow ,
It’s like North Korea
 
@Zee I'm surprised you like physics
@EricSilva Do you have time for GMT
right now
 
not atm
 
Zee
I don’t , it’s just the closest thing to the math chat
 
k
 
10:53 PM
doing all my hw for this upcoming week so i can focus on GRE prep so i can be done with that
 
Zee
Ya, we know
Probably looks away from the mirror when he brushes his teeth
 
He froze it for no apparent reason
 
@Zee and
 
Zee
No, he froze it couse he has no power in real life so now he has a little bit of power on this fantasy land we call chat , and suddenly he feels hes
 
@Zee Here's a hint: calling moderators names for moderation actions and stating or implying that they are acting like totalitarians is not a great plan.
 
Zee
10:58 PM
I call it the way I see it
 
@dmckee Frankly, the moderation action in this case is unnecessary. The guy froze the room for something someone did 30 minutes ago.
 
Zee
Collective punishment is THE sign of a totalitarian rule
 
The rest of us were peacefully chatting and he just froze it. I don't get it.
 
i think comparing an internet chat to a political regime is a little weird
 
@0celo7 This is a perfectly fine way to express that opinion. Name calling (even by implication) is "Not nice." within the meaning of the rule.
 
Zee
11:00 PM
People are people , controlling a chat or a country
You didn’t roll over for the party, here, you get 30 days in jail
Same exact concept
@dmckee are you a teacher ?
 
Were you kicked or something?
 
It was I.
 
Zee
I don’t think so , although that happens often
This isn’t about you anymore @BalarkaSen
 
wtf, Zee, didn't know you were such a Freedom lover
 
@Zee I think the moderators overreacted, because other than me none said anything that was controversial, or flag-worthy, or flag-fought with others. But I think your conspiracy theory is a little ridiculous lol
 
11:05 PM
We can be friends after all
@BalarkaSen The mods will come for our guns next
@dmckee do SE members have a bill of rights
 
@BalarkaSen i think some of the notation stuff was controversial enough to bury the room forever tbh
 
Zee
It’s not a conspiracy theory , it’s basic human nature , you let people take an inch and they will demand a mile
@0celo7 we are all men of principle here , it’s just a matter of having the guts
 
@0celo7 Why would they?
 
@EricSilva Hah
 
@dmckee to prevent a war!
 
11:08 PM
Hey is a cone minus its vertex an extendible manifold (i.e. an open subset of some larger connected manifold)
 
Cone on manifold, I hope.
 
I already said no, because you'd have issues with distances near the vertex.
 
No like a literal 2d cone
 
Oh.
 
wtf, why is maths frozen?
 
11:09 PM
Right but how would we prove that @0celo7
 
@Secret @Balarka did it
 
Sorry.
 
Zee
Stop blaming Sen
This isn’t his fault , it’s quid
 
I didn't realize it would cause a full-room freeze. Just wanted to make some hilarious commentary on the moderation/flagging policy.
 
@AkivaWeinberger Suppose the open cone $C$ is isometrically embedded in the complete space $M$
 
11:11 PM
Well the last message before that was me saying "Oh my god that sounds like a religion"
so it could have been that
 
We can talk about the tip of the cone as being a boundary in $M$
I claim that it's a point
But it should be $(n-1)$-dimensional, contradiction (?)
 
@Zee It does seem like you are on yellow bugpowder
 
Guys, I'm going to nap.
 
@Zee it's an internet chatroom and no one got hurt, stop acting like someones inalienable human rights were violated
 
Room's about to melt
 
11:13 PM
I think it makes perfect sense. The notion of extendiblity means you're missing a boundary
 
G'night
 
Here the boundary can be shown to be 1-dimensional, which contradicts it being embeddable
 
@0celo7 Nah I meant the bugpowder
 
o
0-dimensional, sorry
 
11:52 PM
Aside.
Paid some bills. Doing laundry. Then have to plan for a date
Will do some qed latter tonight live
 

« first day (2712 days earlier)      last day (2209 days later) »