« first day (2472 days earlier)      last day (2448 days later) » 

12:13 AM
@AccidentalFourierTransform =P
 
12:37 AM
@KyleKanos why do you keep accusing me of trolling?
I am doing nothing that resembles trolling.
 
@heather link?
 
What do you consider to be trolling?
 
@heather the fact that you 'forgot' your answer and ignore the upvotes in that comment still makes me think you're trolling me — Kyle Kanos 26 mins ago
(except, of course, I didn't forget my answer or ignore the upvotes on the comment.)
or
@heather can't tell if you're trolling me or you are serious and can't follow simple logic. — Kyle Kanos 3 hours ago
here, again, this isn't "simple logic", i really cannot tell the point he is trying to put across.
Read the discussions if you wish. I have been perfectly civil throughout and have not trolled once. I'm trying to have a useful discussion!
 
Impartial observation, I can't believe either of you are trolling types
 
@heather wait for Kyle to explain here in the chat room :-)
Looks like miscommunication to me.
 
12:44 AM
@skullpatrol exactly why I pinged him
hopefully so, yes.
 
@heather, if it helps, I don't think this was constructive discussioning
@heather I'd argue that anything more than one is overkill and anything over two is being plain ridiculous. Dupes are dupes, if you can't see that, you should not be reviewing, plain and simple. — Kyle Kanos 24 hours ago
 
yes, i kind of felt he was being a bit rude. i attempted to ignore that and merely address the actual points.
 
rob
@heather I always think that your profile image is a candle. It is disorienting when I realize that it is a rocket launching. More disorienting when I vaguely recall having had that realization in the past.
 
@rob ditto
 
@rob i cannot tell you how many people have thought that
 
12:47 AM
except for the disorientation part
 
i keep it now because it's kind of funny how many people don't realize it's a rocket.
(and i don't really mind it being a candle.)
 
@rob please don't mention rocket launches,
 
rob
Why is that, @Countfrom10?
 
Also this was incredibly rude, @KyleKanos. I hope it was simply the result of a bad day and that you can come back with fresh eyes tomorrow.
2
 
@rob some people are triggered by tax money going down the drain
 
12:51 AM
Two lunatics with nuclear missiles is not good, even if it's only sabre rattling
 
rob
@0celóñe7 Surely you mean "up in smoke"? A rocket launch is literally the opposite of "down the drain."
 
@rob That is, if rockets actually go up...
 
rob
Unless you're thinking of ocean disposal of non-reusable boosters?
 
@0celóñe7 ^ much tax dollars
 
And does SpaceX have absolutely zero subsidies?
 
:39359578 I don't follow. How is a private company launching private satellites on private money offensive to people that are concerned about tax dollars?
 
He not usually active now @heather
 
@EmilioPisanty Tesla is not a private company, are you sure that Musk's other projects are?
 
well, i'll wait and see what he says, i suppose. i'll have to leave soon myself, anyway.
 
12:53 AM
Well, it's the first time I have heard of one side telling the other exactly what time to expect the bang. May
 
@0celóñe7 I'm rather happy to have a constructive discussion about the pros and cons of fixed-cost vs cost-plus contracts in the funding of aerospace technologies. Are you?
 
I can't imagine you would find it constructive.
 
> ::shots fired::
:P
 
final comment is where i am
 
@heather 's pic, I agree, doesn't look like a rocket until you look closer. Looks like hands holding a 'diya' to me
 
1:05 AM
anyone here knowledgeable about such matters and able to convo?
It is a random thing I want to know a bit about
 
@heather Because any point I make, you swerved to a new topic to complain about. and conveniently forget what was done previously
@EmilioPisanty Perhaps somewhat rude, but when someone's changing topic with every response, it's hard to have a competent & civil discussion
 
1:23 AM
@skullpatrol I think someone else posted that a few days ago
 
Perhaps.
 
@KyleKanos To be frank, I find all of your comments to heather under your answer to be extremely abrasive, in a way that's completely unwarranted. I do not at all think that heather managed her end of the conversation in the ways that you charge her with, but even if she did, you're better than that - there is simply no need to respond with snark and abrasion.
I say this because this is untypical of you. This is a friendly request: please take some time out and come back in the morning; the internet will keep overnight. You may well come back to find things in a rather different light. If you don't, then fair enough.
 
(Okay, that's meant as humor there)
I'm probably done with that thread anyway
Not worth my time and effort. I'm okay with the community disagreeing with me, but I think it's the wrong decision.
 
There is a "maturity" difference here to consider.
Middle school vs graduate.
 
@skullpatrol I graduated 2 years ago. I'm a working stiff now
 
1:34 AM
@KyleKanos no, that's good, if my other half saw that, she would identify me immediately
 
@KyleKanos precisely ;-)
 
She's in grade 9, I think.
 
Had the internet been a popular thing when I was in 9th grade, I'd have been the worst troll ever
I was a pretty big one when I had it in like 11th grade
 
@KyleKanos I'll provide a couple of comments under your answer, since you explicitly asked for them. I do not require a response unless you absolutely want to (and I do not intend to enter into a polemic there; I've said I disagree, I'll explain some reasons why, and that's a perfectly reasonable place to leave things).
 
@EmilioPisanty ten-four.
 
1:37 AM
@KyleKanos say again?
 
Ten-codes, officially known as ten signals, are brevity codes used to represent common phrases in voice communication, particularly by law enforcement and in Citizens Band (CB) radio transmissions. The codes, developed in 1937 and expanded in 1974 by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International (APCO), allow brevity and standardization of message traffic. They have historically been widely used by law enforcement officers in North America, but, due to the lack of standardization, in 2006 the U.S. federal government recommended they be discontinued in favor of everyday...
 
@KyleKanos a'ight
 
10-4 (or ten-four) means "Understood"
 
@skullpatrol that's a pretty patronising comment. Please don't judge users by their age, but by their words and actions.
 
I guess in all my The Wire re-watches I never paid attention to the actual numbers they were babbling on
 
1:38 AM
My dad is former military and said things like that all the time
@ACuriousMind Eesh, I probably look horrible to people
 
@skullpatrol so? She has a long track record of participation on main, meta and hbar. That's plenty to form an informed opinion of her "maturity level" (if that's what you were burning for) without making blanket assumptions based on her age.
oooooh, @ACuriousMind is here?
 
@@EmilioPisanty no, smokey and the bandit is the movie I vol
 
guess who's only two rep-cap days away from the Epic badge?
 
I think I've had like 2 total rep-cap days
Am I able to donate those?
 
@KyleKanos don't think so, no
but bounties do count, if what you wanted was to skew that race
 
1:40 AM
But I just broke 20k! If I did that, I'd lose that mark
 
that cone-angle-surface-seeing answer blew up completely out of proportion. four rep-cap days out of it.
 
I think my rocket answer was one of the 2 rep cap days
 
@KyleKanos probably both =P
 
Possibly, I really don't remember
 
@KyleKanos SEDE does, if you don't and you care
but it's better for your mental health not to do the latter
 
1:44 AM
At some point I realized that I was never going to be as good an answerer as some/most people, but I enjoyed answering nonetheless
 
@EmilioPisanty wow, you really might get that one before me.
 
So I think most of those rep-based badges just became non-competitions for me
 
@ACuriousMind =P
@KyleKanos well, things change
 
I'm out of the business though ;)
Tough to remember all those derivations from Goldstein and whatnot when you spend your day watching the market
 
@KyleKanos (true, that)
 
1:46 AM
When was Physics.SE started? 2011? 2012?
 
that's a graph of my rep-cap days over time
@ACuriousMind's is rather different
 
'11
 
@EmilioPisanty well, which HNQ isn't blown out of proportion? ;P
 
Apparently I've had five rep-cap days
 
@ACuriousMind yeah, that's by definition
but still
 
1:48 AM
2013-10-09,2013-11-28,2014-07-30,2014-08-14,2014-12-16
 
mine strikes me with the clustering
 
@EmilioPisanty Query link?
 
often at the beginning of term
try user id 1325
 
@KyleKanos ?
 
1:50 AM
Lame
It didn't save the image
There
Mine's pretty epic
 
@KyleKanos well, it looks like the beginning of mine ;-)
 
Yeah, ACM's is definitely looking differently than yours
 
@JohnRennie should have a look at his, though =P
 
Now that^ is epic.
 
Is legendary one that's given each time you break the next 200?
 
1:54 AM
@skullpatrol you might even call it legendary
2
@KyleKanos no, AFAIR it's only given once, at 150
 
Okay
 
there was talk of multi-awards but if if it's still on the books it hasn't been implemented
not that it would impact anyone other than JR & Lubos
 
Floris hit 150 in June
 
Oops
 
@KyleKanos s/he did
 
1:58 AM
Pretty sure Brandon & I are the only ones with 6 steward badges :)
 
his/her progress graph looks pretty linear; naive linear extrapolation puts him/her earning his/her second legendary badge at some point in 2020
@KyleKanos yeah, I kinda gave up on reviewing
I was the second (non-mod) steward badge on closevotes, by a hair, and then I gave up
 
Brandon & I had a good race to get the Late Answers one, but I figured out the trick before he did & eked out the victory
 
@KyleKanos there's a trick?
 
For Late Answers, sorta
When you notice a 1-rep user answer a question, it takes about 20 minutes to pop up in the Late Answers queue (if it satisfies the other criteria)
 
How long were you gone for? @KyleKanos
 
2:01 AM
So if you pay attention to the main page & watch for 1-rep users posting answers (tab was always open at school) you can judge when it's going to come and get the review in
@skullpatrol I gave up working on the site for a few months, but I mostly comment & review. Answers are few and far between (this weekend was an exception since the wife was away & I got bored a lot)
 
@KyleKanos pfffffff
much too much work
 
@EmilioPisanty But when you're in a race to get all 6 review steward badges, it's worth it
 
@KyleKanos yeah, I guess different people gamify differently
-3
A: What is the significance of negative frequency in Fourier transform?

Sean Robert MeaneyNegative frequency light is purely from our perspective. It is in fact light of a deeper frequency of which ours is a subharmonic terminating in a node of zero hertz.

↑ that guy, for instance, gamifies by... posting bizarre stuff?
 
Three months is a good break :-)
 
@EmilioPisanty Gamifying posting answers that make people confused and/or laugh?
 
2:05 AM
@KyleKanos yeah, I guess
 
A lot of good people burn out here.
 
I gamify most rep given away on bounties, for instance
 
@EmilioPisanty Interesting: I found a badge I got before you: outspoken
 
my current project is making total-rep-I've-given-away get a spot on the first page of all-time rep
 
Still have no clue who this Wolpertinger person is: physics.stackexchange.com/users/101770/wolpertinger
But somehow they've managed almost 11k votes
 
2:08 AM
@KyleKanos used to go by Numrok iirc
 
oooooo, I remember that guy
 
@Numrok Thanks. It is the action for a black hole spacetime. — user11128 Jan 25 '16 at 20:12
 
That was fast...
 
He's a master sniper.
 
2:10 AM
the google caches of close statements seal it, though
 
Ah, makes sense
 
I like that username: "master sniper"
 
Well I've got a long day tomorrow, so i'm going to go to bed now
 
@KyleKanos 'night
 
@EmilioPisanty Goodnight
(and to everyone else)
 
2:16 AM
cya
 
[The Jonathen curse]
Often when I talk to somebody named Jonathen and is an organic chemist, it is hard to keep up with them because they think faster than I am
I already have two examples of that
 
Organic chemistry requires quick thinking.
Take a chunk of coal and synthesis a diamond in as few steps as possible.
 
2:44 AM
While in biochem your end product must be a hormone :-)
 
 
5 hours later…
7:23 AM
@KyleKanos one of my friends from undergrad :)
(Actually the person that got me using SE in the first place)
 
 
1 hour later…
8:33 AM
Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM, Leonard Susskind
> It is said that general relativity and quantum mechanics are separate subjects that
don’t fit together comfortably. There is a tension, even a contradiction between them—or
so one often hears. I take exception to this view. I think that exactly the opposite is
true. It may be too strong to say that gravity and quantum mechanics are exactly the
same thing, but those of us who are paying attention, may already sense that the two are inseparable, and that neither makes sense without the other.
craaaaaaackpot
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform lol
@AccidentalFourierTransform Saw that. I don't really understand what he's saying except "AdS/CFT is real", but I don't know what that's supposed to have to do with his much stronger statement that quantum mechanics is inextricably linked with gravity
Listening to him, one might think that the only systems that exist are AdS/CFT dual engineered shells of matter :P
 
Susskind will always be a misunderstood soul
that, or he is a crackpot
lets ask him
u tehre @LeonardSusskind
 
I take it you agree with my summary then? Or have you completely given up on actual discussion in favour of jokes? :P
 
I dont understand a word he says in that article, so any attempt at discussion is entirely futile on my end
 
I see. I'm not really following his train of thought there, either.
 
8:56 AM
To be fair to Prof Susskind he's reached that point where he can think crazy thoughts without jeopardising his career - a luxury not available to younger academics. The chances of the crazy thoughts being directly useful are slim, but in the process of others criticising, maybe deriding, his comments some useful progress might be made.
 
"a luxury not available to younger academics" excuse me, I can think of crazy thoughts too: I have no career to jeopardise
 
I can (and do) think crazy thoughts without jeopardising my career. The difference between me and Susskind is that no-one is interested in my crazy thoughts :-)
2
(except possibly the FBI)
 
@JohnRennie Not sure whether that's a reflection on the FBI or on you ;)
Also, shouldn't you have said MI5?
 
9:13 AM
Aren't MI5 the equivalent of the CIA rather than the FBI?
 
@JohnRennie I thought that was MI6
 
I can see some extensive Googling is required. And I was going to work this morning. Damn! :-)
 
The situation may be confusing because the FBI is both an intelligence service and a more federal law enforcement agency
Whereas in most other countries, these two things are split
 
Who did 007 work for?
 
Or, well, I dunno about most, but at least in Germany and the UK
@TheRaidersofLasVegas MI6
 
9:17 AM
Her Majesties Secret Service?
 
That most reliable of sources, the Internet, tells me the British equivalent of the FBI is the National Crime Agency.
 
What's the KGB equivalent?
 
@JohnRennie I guess the question is now whether your thoughts are more likely to interest the NCA or the MI5 :P
I.e. are you just a criminal or do you have higher aspirations?
(I'm totally not a secret agent, by the way)
 
9:21 AM
>.>
<.<
> ::checks VPN::
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform You can trust me.
 
@ACuriousMind some of my cooking probably counts as acts of terrorism ...
Maybe even crimes against humanity :-)
 
@JohnRennie Not any that you've posted here! Unless raising the incidence of heart disease counts...
 
...weapons of mass destruction!
btw, not everything that counts, can be counted :P
 
True, water is an uncountable noun and still pretty important.
 
9:28 AM
Jun 7 at 17:03, by AccidentalFourierTransform
 
thnx for using the censored version
 
It's pretty sad that the "count" pun doesn't work in other languages
He just gets a random nobility title
 
He's a Graf in German
 
9:38 AM
$\{(x,f(x))\}$, thats typically uncountable...
 
...does that count?
 
there has to be some pun with the c-word
can we use the c-word here?
in the UK sense at least
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform I'd prefer you don't
 
Coincidentally, I need to learn about the c-map!
 
> Dyckmanns
what is a CASK manifold?
 
even the internet hasn't heard of a CASK manifold.
 
 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
11:55 AM
I'm looking for a detailed description of the construction of Peltier tiles. None of the websites I visited are detailed enough. Please let me know if any of you know any article or website which describes the construction of Peltier tiles.
 
12:35 PM
@ACuriousMind I woke up to the sound of the dog throwing up on me
2
that's why I prefer the cat
 
1:15 PM
@BalarkaSen you here?
 
@0celóñe7 heh
 
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
2:39 PM
@ACuriousMind I have a QM question =P Under what conditions can the wave function (in Schrodinger's eqn.) $\psi(x,t)$ be written as $\psi(x)\phi(t)$ ? In my book they just took it as an assumption :/
 
Anonymous
I mean under what conditions can we separate the position dependent part and the time dependent part
 
Anonymous
It seems JR is not around.....:P
 
@Blue That is a common technique for solving partial differential equations
Which would be clear to you if you learned this stuff in the right order...
But you may always write that if the initial data is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian.
 
@Blue If and only if it is an energy eigenstate aka "stationary state"
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind Okay, but why? Do you know any book or article which explains this?
 
2:48 PM
@Blue Prove it yourself
 
@Blue Why what, exactly?
 
@ACuriousMind Why did it take the walkers 5.8 seasons to do anything at all and why is this now a zombie movie?
 
@0celóñe7 Well, they were...walking.
 
@Blue If you need a book, look up "Applied Partial Differential Equations" by Haberman
@ACuriousMind the walkers have horses and the dead can run at break neck speed
do we get any character development on the walkers at all?
 
@0celóñe7 You don't need a differential equations book to do QM with the Schrödinger equation :P
 
Anonymous
2:55 PM
@ACuriousMind Why can we separate the position dependent and time dependent parts iff it is an energy eigenfunction ?
 
@0celóñe7 So far, I'm not sure they have anything that qualifies as "character"
 
@ACuriousMind anything that explain who they are/where they came from/motivations/etc.?
 
@Blue Well, what does it mean to be an energy eigenstate?
 
Preferably from the guy with the crown
 
@0celóñe7 nope
 
2:59 PM
Is this the walking dead or something? Cause I'm seeing the words 'walkers' and 'slow' which is basically a plot summary.
 
No, game of thrones
 
oh right
think i'm on season 5 but mehh.
glad to know the walkers have a function
 
@ACuriousMind Are you sure what you said is true for time-dependent Hamiltonians?
 
@0celóñe7 No, time-dependent Hamiltonians are a plague to be avoided :P
 
Ah, well.
@Blue Did you download the book I suggested
 
3:03 PM
Morning
 
What ACM and I are telling you to do is called "separation of variables" and you won't dream it up on your own.
 
good website that explains seperation of variaables :webpages.ursinus.edu/lriley/courses/p212/lectures/node35.html
with schro-schros equation
 
@0celóñe7 Actually, I didn't want to tell him about separation of variables :P
The question wasn't why we do separation of variables or why it works, but which sort of state the separated states are
 
And to prove that a separated state is stationary you need to apply the technique of separation of variables.
$H\psi/\psi=C_1$ and $\phi_t/\phi=C_2$
 
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind Say we've got $\hat{H}\psi=E\psi$ then for certain values of $E$ we get a legit value of $\psi$. The $E$ the energy eigenvalue...I hope I'm speaking sense...
 
3:07 PM
What
 
That's a valid definition of an eigenfunction, yeah.
 
@0celóñe7 Huh? $U(t)\psi(x,0) = \psi(x,t) = f(t)\psi(x,0)$ (if my initial condition is at $t=0$) directly implies a separated state is an eigenstate of time evolution and hence of energy.
 
@CRDrost How is "legit value of $\psi$" a valid anything?
 
Take the sentence as self-contained; "for most values of E that equation is garbage because it's unsolvable, but for some special values of E we can legitimately assign a value to psi."
 
Anonymous
@0celóñe7 I found the pdf. Can't read it right away. It'll take time. I'm trying to understand it now if possible. Or else I'll keep it in store for later when I complete PDEs
 
3:11 PM
@CRDrost I legitmately do not understand what assigning value to $\psi$ is supposed to mean
 
Anonymous
We solve for $\psi$....as it is a differential equation....
 
@Blue: So getting the positions out of this... a function is very much like a vector, in that a vector takes an index n and assigns a component v_n. Now if you wanted to solve the equation dv/dt = M . v where M is a matrix, the easiest way to solve this is to diagonalize M. Then for these certain directions specified by the "eigenvectors", this equation is just dv/dt = \lambda v.
So you can now solve that very easily, v(t) = e^{\lambda t}~v(0).
 
@ACuriousMind Blue does not know what $U(t)$ is. Do you not see my argument?
It's basic separation of variables. I know I'm a PDE guy, but c'mon.
 
@Blue That could be phrased better, but it will do. So now look at what I wrote above: $\exp(\mathrm{i}Ht)\psi = \psi(t) = \phi(t)\psi$ by assumption (I dropped the $x$ dependency because it doesn't matter), so $\psi$ is an eigenstate of the time evolution operator $\exp(\mathrm{i}Ht)$ for all $t$ with eigenvalue $\phi(t)$, and therefore also of $H$ itself.
 
@Blue Then the general solution requires a superposition of these, you start with v = \sum_i c_i v_i where v_i is an eigenvector with eigenvalue \lambda_i, this must evolve according to v = \sum_i c_i e^{\lambda_i t} v_i.
 
3:14 PM
@0celóñe7 Oh dear, are we doing Schrödinger equation before QM postulates here?
 
@ACuriousMind I'm 99% sure we are.
 
Then I might have been barking up the wrong tree. I just can't into doing "QM" that way
 
Which is why I gave my simple mathematical argument!
 
@Blue something similar happens as we generalize v_n to something like psi(x), in general one cannot separate psi(x, t) = psi(x) phi(t), but since the Hamiltonian is Hermitian it can be "diagonalized" in a basis of eigenfunctions, and in that basis the Schrodinger equation is very easy to solve.
 
If you accept the axiom of physics math
 
3:18 PM
@Blue the actual mathematical theorem that one can diagonalize the Hamiltonian is called the "Spectral theorem", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-adjoint_operator#Spectral_theorem for example.
As 0celóñe7 is telling you the more general case is that you have a linear homogeneous partial differential equation D f = 0, seeing that D (f + g) = D f + D g, one thinks "well, let's assume that f = A(a) B(b) C(c)... for all of the independent variables a,b,c that we're taking partial derivatives of, and trust that this summation will get us all of the other solutions: what relationship do we find between the functions A, B, C?".
Usually one gets a really slick solution when one looks at Df / f = 0
So e.g. for the 1D heat equation {\partial f \over \partial t} - k {\partial^2 f \over \partial x^2} = 0, one assumes f = X(x) T(t) with the trust that after summation one will get the other solutions, D f / f = 0 gives us T'(t) - k X''(x) = 0, and the argument is that the left hand side cannot vary with either t or x because the right hand side doesn't, so T'(t) = \alpha and X''(x) = \beta and we have \alpha - k \beta = 0. We now have two ordinary differential equations.
That's called "separation of variables".
Whoops, sorry. T'(t)/T(t) - k X''(x)/X(x) = 0, that's super important.
Result is T'(t) = \alpha T(t) and X''(x) = \beta X(x) with \alpha - k \beta = 0 still.
 
Anonymous
@CRDrost I think I get it. The Hamiltonian is Hermitian...that helps. physicsforums.com/threads/…
 
Anonymous
Ok, I'll try to look at 0celo's argument too
 
3:35 PM
@ACuriousMind Wait, what?
 
@0celóñe7 what wait?
@CRDrost FYI, you can use MathJax in chat as in posts on the site if you pick one of the ways to activate it for you first from the link in the room description in the upper right corner.
 
v cool
 
@ACuriousMind You need some form of Stone's theorem for your argument. How could it possibly be simpler than mine?
 
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!
 
What happened to "I eat veg during the week"
 
3:49 PM
There's onion in the muffins (along with ham and cheese :-). Onions are veg.
 
@JohnRennie Do onions have any nutritional value?
 
@0celóñe7 Actually I don't know. I would guess onions and garlic are pretty similar from a nutritional point of view. However they both taste good :-)
There aren't many calories in onion (or garlic) but I wouldn't advise making them the basis of a diet.
 
Anonymous
Onions and garlic taste good? whaaaaaaatttttttttttt!
 
Anonymous
I can't tolerate either
 
Heretic! Burn him!
 
3:53 PM
Yeah, wtf @Blue
@JohnRennie I had cheeseburgers last night and put a half onion on each
It's a good plant
 
Anonymous
Well, if people can hate mangoes then anyone can hate anything :P
 
@0celóñe7 Excellent! :-) Now that's a meal I wholeheartedly approve of!!!
@Blue who hates mangoes? Are they insane?
 
@JohnRennie I hate mangoes.
3
 
Anonymous
@JohnRennie ACM
 
Anonymous
lol
 
Anonymous
3:55 PM
"Insane" is not the right word for AIs though XD
 
I'm ... I'm ... gabberflasted
 
@ACuriousMind That's because German mangoes are crap
We've been over this
 
To be fair, if you've only eaten mangoes that have been shipped, unripe, on a container vessel then you haven't given mangoes a fair trial.
 
@JohnRennie I also hate mangoes
 
Heretic! Burn him!
 
3:57 PM
@JohnRennie I know all about burning people from game of thrones
 
@0celóñe7 How many episodes have you watched these last few days?
 
Anonymous
@0celóñe7 I know all about driving cars from fast and furious
 
@0celóñe7 some of my nutcase game of throne loving friends tell me the dragons finally did their thing in a fiery sort of way.
 
$\text{test}$
 

« first day (2472 days earlier)      last day (2448 days later) »