« first day (2312 days earlier)      last day (2608 days later) » 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

1:40 AM
@BalarkaSen I talked to my advisor about Hsu's work, and he said that there's a well-known classical correspondence between solutions of certain PDE and Brownian motion. So it's conceivable that Brownian motion on a manifold can give you analytic information about the manifold. Furthermore, we know that the path space can give significant topological information about the manifold (think Morse theory). So it's not too crazy to imagine that Brownian motion can probe the path space, and ...
... you get topological information from it. The real surprise is that the program works out, because the details are very hard.
He doesn't think it's "worth it" because you have to develop so much machinery.
 
 
2 hours later…
3:43 AM
What kind of answer does this admit?
 
[Random, dream inspired] Can we have a gas mixture that spontaneously compress itself until some equilibrium is reached? It seems unlikely given that increase in pressure usually proportional to decrease in entropy
 
 
3 hours later…
6:49 AM
@Mystic Done
 
 
1 hour later…
7:54 AM
1
A: Implications of achieving absolute zero

WhatRoughBeastReal, true, honest-to-God absolute zero would destroy modern physics. With zero temperature comes zero velocity of the particles involved, and hence zero momentum. If the particles are contained an a known volume (which seems to be implied in the question), then the Heisenburg Uncertainty princip...

@HDE226868 are you saying such heat sink will be one where objects can transfer heat to it but can never raise its temperature, thus the equlibrium of the combined system will be at absolute zero instead of some temperature in between?
 
@Secret A star's plasma collapses gravitationally when the core's thermonuclear reactions halt. If certain conditions are met, it will stay in equilibrium and won't eject mass.
 
Ah nice
 
 
1 hour later…
9:21 AM
Hi, I'm looking to understand why one of my questions is considered "not mainstream physics". As I'm a software engineer rather than physicist, I am starting from the assumption that the moderated who tagged it as such is correct — but at the same time, I don't know why they are, so I can't fix the question: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/316161/…
 
Op amp feedback has decided that op amps don't do anything.
@BenRW I've been around here for a while and i don't really understand what that tag is for.
 
Hi Ben. Extending GR to allow complex tensors isn't going to correspond to anything real, so it's just having fun with mathematics. I would guess that's why your question has been closed.
 
I disagree with that closure. It was modhammered and I think Qmechanic was in error.
 
The idea has been mentioned on the site before. Try searching for complex relativity or some variant of that.
 
@JohnRennie A lot of the mathy questions on the site are "just having fun with mathematics".
The question wasn't closed for being fun with math. It was closed because a single user had the power to close it and acted too quickly, IMHO.
 
9:28 AM
Yes, I wouldn't have closed the question myself. But equally I don't find myself outraged that it was closed.
 
I'm not outraged, but I'm annoyed.
This site isn't a zero sum game. We didn't gain anything by that question being closed.
The closure is obviously inconsistent with other activities on this site, i.e. other mathy questions are not closed.
Voted to reopen.
 
"complex relativity" — that's a great keyword. Thanks!
(My knowledge is not enough to have known that's the right way to look for the idea)
I was slightly annoyed by the lack of detail in the reason, but "it's maths, go to math.stackexchange.com" isn't a problem for me. :)
(Well, perhaps my own quote there isn't right, but I get the sentiment is the point)
 
user228700
9:50 AM
@JohnR: Morning :-)
 
Hi :-)
 
user228700
How's it going?
 
I'm currently sat in my brothers kitchen in London.
In a bit we're going off to a butterfly centre to look at butterflies.
 
user228700
Ah, with family. OK, enjoy yourself :-)
 
Not that I'm that fussed about butterflies, but my niece and a friend want to go.
 
user228700
9:51 AM
Did u give ur niece that drive?
 
Yes. And a new battery for her laptop.
 
user228700
Cool :-) I also used to have two excellent uncles but they both changed quite a bit after marriage.
 
In return she spent several hours (it felt like hours) forcing me to watch her favourite YouTube videos :-)
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Haha, OK :-) It sounds nice anyway.
 
user228700
Were the videos Science-y videos? I'm a bit intrigued as to what she showed u :-P
 
9:54 AM
It's always nice visiting family. Well, for a short time it is :-)
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I can vouch for the second part of ur sentence :-P
 
@Kaumudi.H TED talks by James Veitch about spam e-mail. They were funny :-)
 
user228700
Omg yes, they really are x'D
 
Then videos of cats doing silly things. That wasn't so entertaining.
 
user228700
Lolol, OK x'D
 
user228700
9:56 AM
Have fun at the butterfly centre, then :-) We don't have one of those over here.
 
I plan to spend my time observing the wildlife - that's my niece and her friend :-)
 
user228700
:-)
 
user228700
Are u going to have a fancy lunch today, BTW?
 
My brother is a very good cook so I assume he'll be organising something
 
user228700
Oh, cool!
 
user228700
9:59 AM
Ah, it's only 10 AM over there.
 
Last night he made a pasta with a meat sauce. A simple meal but absolutely delicios.
 
user228700
I can't imagine what that would've tasted like but I'll take ur word for it :-)
 
My brother's family tend not to have a large lunch like me. Instead they have a dinner around 8 p.m.
 
user228700
Ah, ur brother's family is "normal" :-)
 
10:12 AM
Describing them as normal might be going too far :-)
 
user228700
Hehe.
 
user228700
I'm frustrated that ur comment about girlies liking soppy songs has garnered three stars >.<
 
Bing!
 
user228700
What? Nice! :-D Thank you.
 
To be fair, the girly girl stereotype exists for a reason.
That doesn't mean all women fall into that category.
 
user228700
10:21 AM
Well, yes, most stereotypes do exist for a reason but it's not particularly applicable to all women.
 
Agreed
 
user228700
And it's unfair that some people over here starred it, especially because most of them tend to assume the gender of new users over here ;-)
 
user228700
If neurology finds out that an affinity for subjects such as Physics does indeed have something to do with gender, gals like me and Heather-of all girls-would certainly not count as "girly" :-)
 
It was intended to be a throwaway comment, but attracted more attention that I expected or wanted. Sometimes that happens.
It's dangerously easy to drop in comments that maybe one wouldn't have posted had one been thinking about it.
 
user228700
Right. I understand.
 
10:26 AM
Someone on the SF Stack Exchange has asked about a short story they remember reading years ago, and I remember the story very clearly but cannot remember the title or author. That's soooooooooooooo frustrating!
 
user228700
Dyou know what's even more frustrating? I read three SF books that belong to a series but can't remember a single word from the title.
 
Didn't we talk about this a while back?
 
user228700
Nope, not this one.
 
What were they about? Can you remember anything that might jog my memory like character names?
 
user228700
Hmm, alright, so this is going to sound more vague than anything u've heard before but I'll give it a go--I think the story revolves around 4-5 children who have magical powers to control the elements (fire, water, earth)
 
user228700
10:31 AM
And no, no names or anything, all I can remember is this ^
 
There's a series about children being held captive in a boarding school like organisation. It turns out they are the children of gods and are being held hostage. The children have various god style powers.
 
user228700
Hmm, OK..? What is the name of this book/series?
 
Ah, now you're asking ...
 
user228700
Huh?
 
Children of Chaos? Something like that.
 
user228700
10:34 AM
Sigh, I don't think it's possible for me to even connect the dots if given the name of the book now. I only remember that it was gripping and beautiful. I borrowed them from the library so I may be able to check with them to find out which book series this was but again, this was like, 6 years ago and besides, I don't think my library maintains those kind of records.
 
Orphans of Chaos!
Orphans of Chaos is a 2005 science fiction, fantasy novel by John C. Wright. It is the first volume of the Orphans of Chaos trilogy that continues with the novels Fugitives of Chaos (2006) and Titans of Chaos (2007). == Plot synopsis == Five orphans - Victor, Amelia, Vanity, Colin, and Quentin (see Names and identities below)- who have spent their lives in a luxurious but strict and secretive British boarding school (Saint Dymphna's School and College for Destitute Children) begin to discover that they are different from the other children that they so rarely see. Unlike the village children, the...
 
user228700
::Googling images of cover of book::--I remember the cover :-P
 
Bing! :-)
 
user228700
What? No, I meant that I remember the cover of the book I have in mind but I'm googling to check if they match.
 
Ah - damn :-)
 
user228700
10:38 AM
Never mind >.< This isn't it but I don't care so much anyway. I've read a few books I have no recollection of. There was another creepy af book about a household which had a well in the garden, in which were seen faces of babies...and then those babies were born to their mums or something.
 
user228700
I used to be pretty sure that it's called "Faces in the well" or something but nope, that's another book.
 
user228700
OMG!!!
 
user228700
Riiight, spoiler alert but those three girls were killed.
 
user228700
But YES, omg, I found the book!! :-D
 
10:41 AM
Cool :-) A comment on female infanticide?
 
user228700
Yep.
 
If you can remember anything about that book series let me know and I'll have a grub through the junkyard I laughingly refer to as my memory.
 
user228700
x'D I don't think there's anything I'm going to remember. This was 6-7 years ago and I've read a lot of books in these past years, even though it's nothing compared to how much u read.
 
user228700
Well, no, not in the immediately past years, I've read only like, 10 books in the past three years but before that.
 
user228700
I'm starving and there's nothing to eat :'-(
 
10:48 AM
You're starving? I have to wait until 8p.m. for the main meal. I could e dead by then! My emaciated corpse left slumped over my laptop!
 
user228700
There's always coffee and biscuits and money to buy whatever refreshments they allow at that butterfly centre, no?!
 
I could nibble a few butterflies I suppose.
Birds eat them, so they must have some nutritional value.
 
user228700
Am I psychopath or does that imagery sound beautiful not nasty for some reason? :-P
 
You're a psychopath :-)
 
user228700
:-P U have money, man!! I'm broke.
 
10:51 AM
Butterfly's bodies are kind of squishy and disgusting.
 
user228700
Yeah, I've killed a couple in my childhood after attempting to catch 'em.
 
user228700
Their colors sort of bleed into ur fingers.
 
I bet your immediate reaction wasn't "mm that looks tasty" :-)
 
user228700
What? NO, I don't wanna eat BUTTERFLIES!! I was only saying that using the words "nibbling" and "butterflies" together made sense and was kinda beautiful :-P
 
Ah, OK, in that case I retract the psychopath comment.
 
user228700
10:53 AM
Thanks very much :-P Can't believe u thought I wanna eat butterflies.
 
You're not a psychopath, just weird :-)
 
user228700
Says the man who buys two laptops a month :-P
 
When did I ever claim to be a normal, well adjusted person? I'm a physicist for heaven's sake!
 
user228700
:-P
 
user228700
OK, turns out that I'm not that broke, I have like Rs. 120 in my purse. I might as well go buy something, my kitchen is empty.
 
10:55 AM
Enough for a butterfly sandwich?
 
user228700
Have fun at the butterfly centre! :-)
 
Thanks. Enjoy whatever lunch turns out to be ...
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Great, this is a thing now -_-
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I've already had lunch. It's 4:30 PM here.
 
Ah, OK, afternoon tea then.
 
user228700
10:56 AM
Evening tea :-) Byebye!
 
Bye
 
11
Q: Why were well-known, valid solutions of the GR "off-topic" or "non-mainstream"? (suggestion)

peterhI've found multiple times the closing of questions about the topic of general relativity/solutions of the einstein field equations. Examples are here and here. These judgement was: "not mainstream". High reputated physicists on the list seem to agree with my opinion (see for example John Rennie'...

0
Q: Complex valued spacetime curvature

BenRWI've just been reading about tachyons and tachyonic fields, and although they probably don't exist/are wildly unstable, I'm curious: What does imaginary mass do to spacetime curvature? Does ‘complex valued curvature’ even have a single plausible meaning the way real-valued curvature does?

Dear Community, may I ask a correction?
The second post is now closed.
 
11:21 AM
@YashasSamaga Almost cried by reading this :(
 
@JohnRennie @DanielSank @BenRW I believe this question was not closed for being "fun with mathematics" but for the exact non-mainstream reason stated: "complex-valued curvature" is not a mainstream concept, neither in physics nor in mathematics. Pseudo-Riemannian geometry simply does not allow one to speak of such a thing
The part about the tachyon is perfectly on-topic, if suitably rephrased: Asking what effects on curvature a (classical) tachyon would have is certainly a mainstream question about general relativity, although clearly hypothetical.
2
 
@ACuriousMind What if also the coordinates of the spacetime can be complex ones? It would essentially double the dimensions, and it would make the definition of the Gauss-curveture tricky, but it doesn't seem unimaginable to me.
@ACuriousMind The question was closed, because GR calculations have very often a said or unsaid sci-fi/worldbuilding/magic direction, at it leaded to the appearance of a closebutton-clicking reflex. But sometimes it is not okay, in my opinion this question is one of them, I think simply explaining what you wrote here would be an acceptable answer.
 
11:37 AM
@peterh General relativity has no reason to look at complex manifolds. And curvature in the pseudo-Riemannian sense would still be real-valued. Complex geometry has other objects that can be complex-valued, but pseudo-Riemannian geometry does not care whether the manifold has a complex structure or not.
 
@Mostafa They get jailed when someone finds out.
 
11:59 AM
That would certainly be *a* valid answer to the question from my perspective. I was asking 'does this even make sense?'.

Some of the earlier comments on this chat seem to be saying "yes" even though you're saying "no", and I lack the mathematical training to tell why you might be disagreeing with each other. My only guess at this point is that *because* I lack the training, I have phrased my question ambiguously without realising it.
Huh, I was expecting those asterisks to turn into italic text.
(UK A-levels in Maths and Further Maths give me calculus and matrices, but I don't recognise half the operators and notations used in GR)
 
@BenRW Linebreaks break formatting in chat, it's a known and annoying bug
 
Ah, noted.
 
@BenRW Yeah, I get that you were just asking that, and there's nothing inherently wrong with such a question - but the non-mainstream policy essentially says that asking whether something makes sense where it doesn't from the viewpoint of mainstream physics is off-topic.
That's because while I believe you that you've asked it out of honest curiosity, there are those who ask such questions in bad faith to promote their own non-mainstream theories, and you can't tell from the question itself which type it is.
 
12:19 PM
so, in $d=1+3$ the axial anomaly reads $$\partial\cdot j_A=\frac{1}{8\pi^2}\tilde F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}$$
is it meaningful to try to extend this to arbitrary $d$?
what does $\tilde F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}$ become in, say, $d=1+1$ or $d=1+5$?
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yes. The so-called anomaly polynomials are a rich and intriguing subject. Look for "Wess Zumino descent equations"
 
sweet, thanks!
"Gravitational contribution to the chiral anomaly"
damn
"Thus the anomaly is a BRST-closed functional of ghost number one."
interesting...
so its basically $$\partial \cdot j_A=\frac{2}{(d/2)!(4\pi)^{d/2}}F\wedge F\wedge\cdots\wedge F$$
 
@JohnRennie That's a fantastic postmodernist Gothic poetry idea.
 
Feb 22 at 14:28, by ACuriousMind
@AccidentalFourierTransform I don't think you can. For even dimensions, the generalization is $A\wedge\dots\wedge A$ d/2-times, but I don't see one for odd dimensions
so yeah, he was right, as usual :-P
 
"Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
I pickled the butterflies."
 
12:32 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform For anomalies, the interesting consequence is that many anomalies cannot occur in odd dimensions, or at least that their appearence is different from the treatment in even dimensions
I think for the $d=2,3,4$ case, there's a rather explicit derivation in Nakahara
 
anomalies are cool
 
They are, and their necessary cancellation in gauge theories is a powerful constraint
 
and the fact that 1loop calculations are exact is certainly very convenient :-P
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform It reflects the fact that anomalies are fundamentally not a perturbative phenomenon
 
4
Q: Ring to infinite plate capacitance calculation

ArashI don't know how to calculate the capacitance between a conductive ring and a conductive infinite plate. The ring has internal radius R1 and external radius R2 and is placed on a parallel plane with distance D from the infinite plate. I would appreciate if anyone can help me in this matter.

is that question solvable?
how can someone calculate capacitance for that system when the charge on the infinite plate is infinity
 
12:40 PM
something something topology
 
ok, that question is ruled out
I completely forgotten that entanglement swapping is a type of quantum teleportation, thus you need the classical channel to communicate the measurement result
This means:
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Well, yeah, but the non-perturbativeness is actually not very sophisticated once you understand the objects involved, see physics.stackexchange.com/a/27003/50583. All that happens is that you find that the dependence on the coupling constant must be both smooth and discrete, hence is constant, and only 1-loop terms are independent of the coupling.
The "topology" part is noting that the $F\wedge F$ integral is an integer, but that can be seen on the physics level of rigor by simply writing it as the divergence of the Chern-Simons current, so it's a boundary term at infinity and the fields at infinity are not dynamical, so it's a constant from the viewpoint of dynamics.
 
In order for quantum mechanics to give rise to psionic looking phenomenon by having the state of some live neuron cells to couple with some far away object via a series of molecules that are arranged in a way so that they form some quantum computing circuit (say a chain of entanglement swapping, and we have not get to the issue on how to first establish those entanglement by bringing them close enough to interact), that is some ridiculous amount of particles to be manipulated in some very high precision, I don't think any laws of physics will allow such thing to happen with any appreciable
So, that concludes, if a fictional work involves psionics, it simply cannot be explained by quantum mechanics
now continue to write the story...
 
12:59 PM
...
 
Now in case anyone ask why I try to model this question: I am trying to draw a stronger line between magic and science and modelling such will help me to improve my settings for magic in my scifi and fantasy work by ruling out irrelevant cases

Always remember, nearly everything I do in my life eventually feed back to my scifi
 
Morning.
Do I smell GR in the air?
@ACuriousMind There are many books about GR on complex manifolds...
 
2
Q: Accelerated ion beam current

heatherIf an electron gun creates a $10\space mA$ electron beam and each electron collides with a gas atom and creates an ion through impact ionization, can the ions then be accelerated with a separate negative voltage grid that is powered by a lower current capacity source but still maintains a $10\spa...

I can't make sense out of it
How can someone decide how much current is going to appear in the second electrode?
It should depend on the electron beam, right?
 
I think it also depends on how frequent the ions collide with the other electrode. The electron beam only controls how many ions were produced each time it is fired
 
yea that too
I am having a hard time understanding the circuit on the left side
what is the potential difference though which the electrons are being acclerated?
that is probably irrelevant to the question but that is giving me a headache
@heather
 
1:06 PM
Migraine?
 
@skullpetrol try to understand how the model works
 
I think the potential difference between the plates controls how fast the ions will be accelerated. How that voltage depends on the current applied to the plate I forgot
 
^
@Secret How are you going to calculate the potential difference through which the electrons are being accelerated in that diagram?
 
Force experienced by a charged particle is given by F=qV, where q is the charge and V is the potential difference. Therefore the acceleration is given by a=qV/m where m is the ion's mass

Now if we can somehow find an expression that relates the rate of ions hitting the other electrode (hence the current) with this acceleration, it should be possible to calculate the potential difference required for some target current

(using some extra constants to take account of the geometry of the electric field, if the plates have different shapes)
 
The potential of the electrode just before the gas bubble is 0V
what is the potential of the coil?
it has one value at the start and another at the end
take average?
In a discharge tube, the entire cathode is at one potential.
I think the cell on the left most circuit is redundant and complicates the circuit.
 
1:14 PM
I am not very familar with the workings of cathode ray tubes, but yeah, I think that circuit can be simplified by just drawing the coil and label it with a voltag
 
Is this grade 8 chemistry :P
 
Well, other than the ions hit the charged plate that accelerates it instead of some other plate that detects the ions, the whole set up reminds of an electron impact mass spectrometer
I had a feeling the calculation will be quite messy since every ion that hit that charged plate will perturb the current slightly
 
@skullpetrol phd year 8 maybe
 
If you have 100% efficiency (every electron produces a positively charged ion with charge +1), then the ion current must be equal to the current going to the ground in the second electrode.
if that doesn't happen, there would be a charge build up on the right electrode
 
1:30 PM
 
Hi @heather
 
@skullpetrol, hello
 
How are you?
 
pretty good - just woke up
how about you?
 
Fine thanks.
 
1:35 PM
@skillpatrol what?
 
dis"integrating" lol
 
^
Got it now? @0celo7
 
no
 
1:39 PM
$$\Huge{\Theta \omega \Theta}$$
 
Feb 28 at 16:41, by Slereah
$$\Huge{\Theta \omega \Theta}$$
It's supposed to be a goat
 
2:00 PM
0
Q: Kinetic energy confusion?

Sarthak Sharma See if I am travelling horizontally, and suddenly a magnetic force acts on me and pushes me in wards ( at 90 degrees ), so I will follow a circular motion, but now if I take a point in the circle and draw tangent to it, it gives me velocity right. Now suppose that velocity is tilted from horiz...

help lol
 
@ACuriousMind Ah, I see! Well, I can totally sympathise with that. Even without a degree in physics, I've got enough knowledge to spot some types like that — EM drive etc.
 
@JaimeGallego more like goatse
The wiki page for goatse is very detailed
 
Still, I would like to know how to avoid falling into that trap, if there is any shortcut that short of a second degree.
 
@YashasSamaga Just a mistake understanding component vectors.
 
11
Q: Is quantum entanglement functionally equivalent to a measurement?

DavidI saw the following talk the other day: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc&feature=share In it, Dr. Ron Garret posits that entanglement isn't really that "special" of a property. He argues (and shows) that the mathematics behind it is analogous to the math behind measurement. Is this tr...

[what-if scenario]
 
2:33 PM
How will quantum mechanics be different if measurement does not only randomly project a state to only the eigenstates of an observable, but to many eigenstates of the observable at the same time (that is, if we have a detector that can click and not click at the same time)?
For example, consider a what if scenario where trying to measure an electron spin in the x direction, but it has nonzero probability to be projected to any direction on the bloch sphere?
(I am however, not sure if this question will be off topic in PSE (since what-if scenarios like these tend to be labelled as non mainstream) thus I have to post that in WSE instead)
 
@Secret Then you are, by definition, not "measuring" the electron spin in the x-direction.
There is a notion of "weak measurement" where you don't project into eigenstates, but measurement is defined by having the projection onto eigenstates as outcome.
 
I see
 
3:03 PM
The sun applies nearly 0.5N on every man due to gravitational forces?
WTH
I thought it was negligible.
 
vzn
3:19 PM
@Secret have been working on something along those lines conceptually for a long time. your question sounds related to hidden variable theories to me. think there is some math/ analysis that is applicable right on verge of being uncovered. dont have the time/ dedication/ resources to push it thru alone yet. :|
 
I don't think it is related to hidden variables, because the outcome is still random. What I ask is that the random outcome is not limited to eigenstates and eigenvalues, but that multiple eigenvalues can be obtained as the outcome at the same time
 
vzn
@Secret it has long seemed to me that QM might have some hidden variable wrt "not measured" ie hidden variables could prevent "clicks" in some scenarios. anyway you seem to be inquiring about some form of QM that does not exist.
 
hence that "what-if", I am actually thinking about potential worldbuilding scenarios by wondering what happens if some rules of quantum mechanics are modified.
and the possible outcomes that results from these variations of quantum mechanics
 
vzn
@Secret idea does remind me some of many worlds interpretation.
 
In fact, the next thing of this topic in the pipeline I will be googling or PSE searching is the following (which I do vaguely recall someone have played with this before in some arxiv paper)
in SecretLabs (SE Branch), 6 mins ago, by Secret
[To be investigated] Lp norm quantum mechanics i.e. $Probability = (\sum_i x_i^n)^{\frac{1}{n}}$
 
vzn
3:27 PM
@Secret re that, it seems to me that there are emergent properties in classical physics that highly mimic QM entanglement, if not exactly replicate it; this knowledge is very narrowly realized right now among physicists, but think that will slowly chg...
 
@ACuriousMind Do you know how I can make the parentheses here not go so high?
 
@0celo7 Hm, maybe try just \big or \bigg instead of \left,\right
 
@ACuriousMind Nah, those don't cover the bottom correctly
 
3:45 PM
Gleason's theorem (named after Andrew M. Gleason) is a mathematical result which is of particular importance for the field of quantum logic. It proves that the Born rule for the probability of obtaining specific results for a given measurement follows naturally from the structure formed by the lattice of events in a real or complex Hilbert space. The theorem states: Theorem. Suppose H is a separable Hilbert space of complex dimension at least 3. Then for any quantum probability measure on the lattice Q of self-adjoint projection operators on H there exists a unique trace class operator W such that...
Hmm, the hilbert space structure locks n=2
meanwhile, there's this weirdo which is still incomprehensible to me because I am so bad at p adics
p-adic quantum mechanics is a relatively recent approach to understanding the nature of fundamental physics. It is the application of p-adic analysis to quantum mechanics. The p-adic numbers are a counterintuitive arithmetic system that was discovered by the German mathematician Kurt Hensel in about 1899. The closely related adeles and ideles were introduced in the 1930s by Claude Chevalley and André Weil. Their study has now transformed into a major branch of mathematics. They were occasionally applied to the physical sciences, but it wasn't until a publication by the Russian mathematician Igor...
so that means, setting n to anything other than 2 changes the whole model completely, down to the logical structure
 
-1
A: Why aren't we more heavier at midnight than at noon on the earth's surface?

Yashas SamagaAn average man weighs around $70kg$. The force which the earth applies on the man is approximately $685\pm 15N$ $(mg)$. The force which the sun applies on the man can be calculated as follows: distance between the sun and the earth $= 1.5 \times 10^{11} m$ mass of the sun $= 2 \times 10^{30}k...

what's wrong?
 
@YashasSamaga isn't your argument kinda like tidal forces?
 
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/194999/born-interpretation-of-wave-function?rq=1

Yeah, I think Gleason theorem settles it on why n=2k where k=1 only
 
the person who downvoted said Earth is in freefall
I don't understand what he meant by that. I have accounted for the fact that the man is in freefall around the sun.
 
3:52 PM
@YashasSamaga wouldn't his argument also imply no tides? I don't see anything obviously wrong with your answer, which would have been more or less mine.
 
The OP asked if that would cause any change in the spring balance measurement.
I explained that the sun's force is used to provide the centripetal force.
But when you go to the other side of the earth, the change in sun's force is not exactly compensated for the centripetal force.
 
@YashasSamaga looks right to me but it's early and I haven't had enough coffee yet.
 
There is some extra or less force. This is tidal force.
but I avoided the complicated words.
 
@YashasSamaga I mean your argument looks right to me.
 
becaz that OP has been asking silly questions today.
0
Q: Why do we not feel weightless at equator but feel in satellite

AviA person living in his house at the equator goes in a circular orbit of radius equal to the radius of the earth. My question is, why does he/she not feel weightless as a satellite passenger does? If we compare a geostationary satellite with the earth's equatorial surface then we know they both r...

that was his another question
he definitely has no idea what tidal forces are
 
3:55 PM
@YashasSamaga let's not be judgemental. The OP could be a 10yr old kid trying to learn physics. You always have the choice of not answering questions you think are silly.
 
I did not mean to underestimate him/her. I just wanted to clarify why I used words such as tidal forces.
There is no point in answering and giving a super perfect answer if it does not help the OP.
 
@YashasSamaga 'could be a "her". but I'm with you; some answers are provided at a level that is well above the question.
@YashasSamaga It's not a big deal really. If the OP likes the second answer better than so be it; not much to do about that.
 
4:13 PM
@YashasSamaga There is - remember that you are not merely writing for the asker, but also for everyone else reading the question.
 
I did give a hint about tidal forces but I did not eloborate on it.
I just said it has negligible effect on a man's weight but has a significance when it comes to ocean waves.
:O that person removed his downvote
 
4:43 PM
Hii @YashasSamaga
 
5:21 PM
@JaimeGallego No clue, go try it, it's Open Source :D
 
@BernardoMeurer Unfortunately I am away from my PC right now, that's where I do all the development. But I will check it out ASAP.
 
5:40 PM
Another thing: you met Stallman and he didn't lecture you on the difference between open source and free software? He gets very mad because of this :D
They say that if you shout "GPL is open source" three times, in front of a mirror, then all your electronics get fried.
Such is the power of this man.
 
 
1 hour later…
6:47 PM
@Slereah help
I started to answer a PSE question and I'm using 8 indices
I want to stop but I can't
Transformations of 4-tensors, never again
 
Anonymous
@YashasSamaga Tis' interesting (noticed while reading transcript). Did you try finding the electric field between the ring and the infinite charged sheet assuming the same (opposite in sign) charge density between them ? I guess that'll do the job. Also remember the electric field will originate perpendicular to the ring (as it equipotential). So you can just carve out a ring of similar 2D dimensions from the infinite sheet for your calculations. Simply use $$C_{eq}=\frac{\sigma_o A}{V_+ - V_-}$$.
 
sigma * A?
A = infinite
 
Anonymous
No don't take A as infinite
 
I'd be expecting A to cancel out somewhere later
 
Anonymous
sigma is charge density
 
Anonymous
6:51 PM
The A will cancel out at the end
 
but by definition capacitance is the amount of charge you can store for a given potential
the infinite plate, however small the sigma maybe, it is going to have infintie charge
 
Anonymous
@YashasSamaga You need to consider a local element. The whole infinite plate won't take part in the capacitor system
 
also you are going to have different amount of charges on the plate and the ring
 
Anonymous
@YashasSamaga That's why I said take a charge density sigma
 
Anonymous
And carve out an equivalent 2D ring from the sheet
 
Anonymous
6:54 PM
For you capacitor system
 
did you solve it?
till the end
I tried for 2 hours
I calculated the field
the equation was horrible
 
Anonymous
No I am busy but I have seen similar problems
 
Anonymous
The equation should be quite easy
 
and I also assumed that the charges are uniform
and I ended up with a contradiction
1min
let me search
 
Anonymous
EF due to sheet charge + EF due to ring charge (just like in parallel plate capacitors)
 
Anonymous
6:55 PM
Transfer sigma charge per unit area from plate to ring to find capacitance
 
@JaimeGallego You're going to school me on software licensing dude?
If you go look at my project you will see there is no license yet
Even though I normally use GPL or MIT
GPL 3.0
 
Are we talking about the Collatz program?
 
Anonymous
@YashasSamaga My guess is you can approximate off axis electric field due to ring as on axis electric field. Otherwise the equations will get lengthy indeed. (student.ndhu.edu.tw/~d9914102/Teaching/EM/Paper/data/…)
 
Anonymous
However, the concept of the problem is quite simple.
 
Well, the concept is $$C = \frac{q}{\int E.dx}$$
that idea makes the problem awfully complicated
 
Anonymous
7:02 PM
@YashasSamaga Well, isn't that the same as what I said?
 
firstly becaz I have to assume that they have equal charges
and carry a mysterious A around
@Mystic yup but that doesn't work for this problem for me
 
Anonymous
@YashasSamaga Why ? You take equal charge densities and not equal charges
 
@JaimeGallego Wat, I shouldn't have licensed that :(
 
Anonymous
Like in parallel plate capacitors
 
What is the charge on the capacitor then?
 
7:03 PM
don't drink and make legal decisions
 
In paralle plates, the charges are equal and the density is also equal
CV = q
so what is that q going to be?
if you take same density but different charge
 
Anonymous
@YashasSamaga I think you missed the point that the whole of infinite plate doesn't take part in the capacitor system.
 
do I need to take two rings?
instead of a plate and a ring?
 
Anonymous
Yes
 
that should be easy then
 
Anonymous
7:05 PM
Why did you think otherwise? In all capacitor systems the same assumption is made (neglecting fringe effects)
 
Anonymous
Fringe effects won't change the answer much anyway
 
I am confused now.
Fringe effects are ignored ofc
but I used to consider the entire piece of conductor while calculating capacitances
 
Anonymous
@YashasSamaga Haw ?
 
Anonymous
Let me find an example for you
 
Hmm, most of the problems have identical shapes or it is a sphere and a finite plate (but assumed to be large), etc.
 
Anonymous
 
I take charges to be equal on both the conductors.
 
Anonymous
The key is to take equal charge densities which automatically guarantees equal charge (after some petty assumptions)
 
I'll see tmrow. got to sleep
it is 1AM
haven't slept for last three days
 
Anonymous
Sure =)
 
Anonymous
Goodnight
 
7:11 PM
@0celo7 rip
 
7:32 PM
Can't say that I care for the use of color in physics.stackexchange.com/q/316362. It doesn't seem to serve any purpose. Opinions?
 
Can somebody please help me with this - According to Kirchhoff's law the emmisive power = absorptibe power but that is at equilibrium. Before it absorptibe power can be greater. So does that mean that emmisive power is function of time or not
*adsorptive
Absorptive
 
7:55 PM
@BalarkaSen Yes, RIP
Not sure if this even gives me what I want.
 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (2312 days earlier)      last day (2608 days later) »