« first day (2323 days earlier)      last day (2597 days later) » 

12:00 AM
the first and the third states?
 
yep, and what if the system started in state 01
 
the second and third states?
 
exactly, so if we started in some state: a|00> + b|01> .... how many of the state vector coefficients will be effected by a hadamard gate on the first qubit?
oops, wait: the last one should have been 01 --> mix of 01 and 11
 
ah, right, that makes sense
how many of the state vector coefficients - well two, right?
 
quantum mechanics is linear, so if 00 --> mix of 00 and 10, and 01 --> mix of 01 and 11 ... then starting in something like a|00> + b|01> ---> mix of ??
 
12:10 AM
wait, 00 is a mix of 00 and 10?
 
no, I meant "--->" to imply applying your hadamard gate on the first qubit
 
oh, I see.
00, 01, 10, and 11?
all four...
 
yep!
 
huh.
 
we can't consider the states of the qubits separately. we need to consider the state of the system
 
12:15 AM
that makes sense, but how do you actually mathematically calculate the state of the system? like if I applied a Hadamard gate to the whole system, what would the calculation look like?
(assuming the system is two qubits, starting in some state a|00>+b|01>+...)
 
since everything in linear, you can just pretend it is a series of transformations
mix up |00> and |10>, then mix up |01> and |11>
 
I'm afraid I don't follow.
 
Let's try it this way. If the state was just |00> what would be the result of the Hadamard gate?
 
what do you mean if the state were just |00>?
 
yeah, if the system started in state |00> and you applied a Hadamard gate to the first qubit, what would the resulting state be?
 
12:30 AM
oh... uh, I think 1/sqrt(2)|00>+0|01>-1/sqrt(2)|10>+0|11>?
or in vector form, 1/sqrt(2)[0,1,0,1]+-1/sqrt(2)[1,0,0,1], I think.
 
I don't remember the sign conventions, but that looks reasonable
that constant with sqrt(2) is going to come up a lot. Let's just define k = 1/sqrt(2)
okay, so we had system vector [1,0,0,0] ----apply-hadamard---> [k,0,-k,0]
Now, while the state [a,0,0,0] may not be normalized, let's just consider it for a bit.
Since QM is linear, [a,0,0,0] = a [1,0,0,0] ----apply-hadamard---> a [k,0,-k,0] = [ak,0,-ak,0]
Using "H" to be the first qubit Hadamard operation, we could write that as: H [a,0,0,0] = [ak,0,-ak,0]
Does that notation seem reasonable for now?
 
I think I follow.
yeah, it does.
 
Okay, now because QM is linear H [a,b,c,d] = H[a,0,0,0] + H[0,b,0,0] + H[0,0,c,0] + H[0,0,0,d]
 
okay, so that'd be [ak, 0, -ak, 0] +
[0, ak, 0, -ak] (?) +
geesh, this is hard to think about.
so if you have 10 that affects 11 and 10 (I think) so that'd be [0, 0, ak, -ak]
+ [ak, 0, 0, -ak] (again, I think)
er, wait, that's not right
I lost track of variables
it'd be [ak,0,-ak,0]+[0,bk,0,-bk]+[0,0,ck,-ck]+[dk,0,0,-dk]
 
12:46 AM
Since you can work it out for each basis state, in your program, you could just build up a matrix for H.
 
or [ak+dk,bk+ck,-ak+bk,-ak+ck,-bk+-ck+-dk] - did I do that right?
@BuddyJohn so I just do this for each matrix I want to implement and then plug in each value?
 
each one should only have two coefficients
 
i must've done something wrong before adding...
 
yeah, but it looks like you have the idea now
 
okay
this is making a lot more sense.
hmm, so if I do this, can I apply the cNOT matrix to the state vector?
 
12:50 AM
yep, just matrix multiply and you are all set
 
and for each single qubit gate, I have to work it out like I did above for the Hadamard? or no?
(sorry, I just am trying to make sure I'm not missing something)
 
Since you know how the hadamard gate works on each basis state, you can construct the matrix for the gate on your state vector.
 
okay.
 
If you did that for each possible hadamard gate at the start of your program, then whenever you need it, you could just matrix multiply and be done.
 
this is a bit hard for me to think about, I will probably be rereading this conversation and trying to digest it.
thank you for your help!
 
12:54 AM
np
 
I will try to rewrite my program the right way now =) hopefully it won't take as long as with the last attempt.
 
Just noticed this doesn't look right:
"it'd be [ak,0,-ak,0]+[0,bk,0,-bk]+[0,0,ck,-ck]+[dk,0,0,-dk]"
I'm not sure what the usual sign convention is, but they can't all be +k , -k
and the c and d ones did not mix the right basis states
Alright, using the conventions here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
With our notation I think that would be:
H[1,0,0,0] = [k,0,k,0],
H[0,1,0,0] = [0,k,0,-k],
H[0,0,1,0] = [k,0,-k,0],
oops.
H[1,0,0,0] = [k,0,k,0],
H[0,1,0,0] = [0,k,0,k],
H[0,0,1,0] = [k,0,-k,0],
H[0,0,0,1] = [0,k,0,-k]
Worth, double checking as maybe I still made a mistake.
 
1:49 AM
@heather you're going to find this soon
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by ⊗, is an operation on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication, which is an entirely different operation. The Kronecker product is named after Leopold Kronecker, even though there is little evidence that he was the first to define and use it. Indeed, in the...
 
 
1 hour later…
OBE
2:50 AM
@Skyler look at tong's notes on electromagnetim and poisson's notes on electrodynamics as supplement
 
@OBE just got home a bit ago, is this supplementing anything you've already said btw?
and thanks
btw is this "Eric Poisson - University of Guelph Physics" what you had in mind
 
OBE
yes
 
I want to try scientology
 
OBE
@Skyler I don't know what you mean by this.
@0celo7 go for it
 
I don't have money!
 
2:53 AM
@OBE since i posted that like what, 10 hrs ago i was wondering if i should try scrolling higher up for more responses by you or if this was your first one
 
OBE
@Skyler first one. I said use tong's notes on theoretical physics (electromagnetism one) for your main text and supplement that with poisson's notes.
 
@OBE cool thanks
 
OBE
np that's what I'm reading now and so far so good. lots of insight in those notes
better than griffiths and jackson for me at least
a lot clearer
and also geared toward moving on to other theoretical physics
@0celo7 wait why do you want to try scientology?
 
I'm watching an interview with Leah Remini and it seems really cool
 
@0celo7 oh oh i saw a video i saved in my watch later for you
since you bring up scientology
you can tell me what you think of it
 
3:22 AM
Hi
 
 
1 hour later…
4:36 AM
0
Q: Relativistic Time in Entangled Systems

frogeyedpeasWarning, this is a very contrived experiment, and i'm trying to distill its essence to something simpler but haven't been able to so far: Suppose I had a computer $C$ that computes a result to some computation and broadcasts this signal, a detector $D$ that can retrieve the broadcasted signal, ...

That's almost QG stuff?
 
 
2 hours later…
6:12 AM
Feb 27 at 10:28, by Balarka Sen
@Kenshin do a bankrobbery. what's the big deal?
 
 
1 hour later…
7:26 AM
Penrose is finally shipped
Hurray
 
7:38 AM
@0celo7 the net contribution of the UK to the EU is about £8bn/year. That sounds a lot, but it isn't in state budget terms. For example our foreign aid budget is £12bn/year. The total government spend is around £700bn/year.
So the EU contribution is about 1% of the total budget.
I'm really looking forward to being 1% better off in two years time.
 
7:58 AM
Other facts that some may consider relevant:
- The UK EU contribution works out at around £130/person/year. For that we get all the benefits EU membership brings, mostly in trade arrangements.
- Norway isn't in the EU but pays contributions to it in return for access to the single market. The contributions Norway has to pay amount to about £100/person/year.
If we want access to the single market we're likely to end up with a deal much like Norway's. So we'll have saved £30 per person per year by leaving the EU. So we'll only be around £2bn/year better off or about 0.25% of the total budget.
 
@Slereah Hip, Hip :-)
Interesting @JohnRennie TIL
 
@skillpatrol did you star my post? I ask because I'm going to remove the star. I don't think we should have politics on the star board.
 
Yes, I did.
My apologies :-)
 
@skillpatrol it's no problem. I just didn't want you to feel annoyed when you saw your star suddenly disappear! :-)
 
np
:-)
 
8:43 AM
@JohnRennie If we know the cohesive and adhesive forces and it is given that the liquid is in a cylindrical container can we calculate the angle of contact of the liquid meniscus? (Assuming the meniscus is a part of a hypothetical sphere) Or the angle of contact cannot be calculated theoretically ?
 
@2017 the contact angle is normally calculated from the three surface tensions - liquid/air, solid/air and solid/liquid. Are you familiar with this calculation?
 
@JohnRennie No, I am not familiar...can you explain in short or give some links?
btw what is solid-air surface tension? :O (won't that be negligible?)
 
The contact angle is the angle, conventionally measured through the liquid, where a liquid–vapor interface meets a solid surface. It quantifies the wettability of a solid surface by a liquid via the Young equation. A given system of solid, liquid, and vapor at a given temperature and pressure has a unique equilibrium contact angle. However, in practice contact angle hysteresis is observed, ranging from the so-called advancing (maximal) contact angle to the receding (minimal) contact angle. The equilibrium contact is within those values, and can be calculated from them. The equilibrium contact angle...
At equilibrium the horizontal components of the three forces must be equal so $\gamma_{sl} + \gamma_{lg}\cos\theta = \gamma_{sg}$
 
@JohnRennie One second, normally when they say surface tension in problems, do they mean solid-liquid surface tension only?
Because I haven't been taught them separately
My books just mentions "surface tension"
 
The phrase surface tension normally means the liquid-air surface tension, but all interfaces have a surface tension.
The surface tension is simply related to the surface energy.
 
8:59 AM
@JohnRennie Ok, that was a bit confusing at first. I am reading through the Wiki link now :) (Will get back if I don't understand something!)
 
The surface tension is a force per unit length. So if we take a unit length line and move it by a distance $dx$ then the work done is $W = \gamma dx$. The new area of surface created is $dx$ so the new interfacial energy is $\sigma dx$. Equating this tells us that the surface tension $\gamma$ is simply the interfacial energy per unit area.
All interfaces have an interfacial energy, so all interfaces have an associated surface tension.
 
9:21 AM
@JohnRennie Thanks, I got that part. I am facing some more conceptual problems now. 1) Why is surface tension shown to act only the edges of the interface ? 2) We know that liquid-air surface tension acts tangentially to the surface. In that case also, the force can have two directions. Still, why does the tangential force always act towards the concave side?
 
@2017 All surface tensions always act in the plane of the interface ...
 
@JohnRennie Umm, but in the diagrams they are always shown to be acting at the edges of interface..isn't it?
Let's take this diagram for example ^
 
OK ... and?
 
$\gamma_{LG}$ is shown to be acting only at the edge, isn't it?
 
Ah OK.
Suppose we consider a line somewhere in the interface, not at the edge. Then the surface tension acts on both sides of this line so the net force on the line is zero. Is that OK or should I draw a diagram?
 
9:31 AM
@JohnRennie Oh oh, wow! I didn't think like that
So at the edge only force from one side exists
 
@2017 exactly
 
So did I take the direction of ST wrong that day? i.stack.imgur.com/w1q7o.jpg
The T should have been (tilted) upwards isn't it?
@JohnRennie
(but if it is tilted upwards then the excess pressure would have been greater outside....but that would be contradictory)
 
If $T$ is the liquid-air surface tension then it acts tangentially to the liquid-air interface at the edge of the meniscus. The surface tension always pulls the surface inwards i.e. it is always trying to shrink the interface. So as you've drawn it the force acts upwards and inwards - basically you've drawn the negative of the force.
 
@JohnRennie I had a quantum question: We knew that for an N electron system with wavefunction $\psi (\vec{x}_1,\vec{x}_2,\dots,\vec{x}_n)$, the probability of finding an electron is given by

$$\rho (\vec{x}_1)=\int \psi^* (\vec{x}_1,\vec{x}_2,\dots,\vec{x}_n)\psi (\vec{x}_1,\vec{x}_2,\dots,\vec{x}_n)d\vec{x}_2\cdots d\vec{x}_n$$

But what if I want to find the probability of all except one electron, is the following how to do it?

$$\rho (\vec{x}'_1)=\int \psi^* (\vec{x}_1,\vec{x}_2,\dots,\vec{x}_n)\psi (\vec{x}'_1,\vec{x}_2,\dots,\vec{x}_n)d\vec{x}_1\cdots d\vec{x}_n$$
 
@JohnRennie If the force acted upwards and inwards as you say then the pressure just inside the surface of the liquid would be lesser than the pressure outside the surface of the liquid. Won't that be contradictory? Because in a mercury like meniscus the pressure inside is greater than pressure just outside...
 
9:46 AM
You need to distinguish between the force the meniscus exerts on the walls of the capillary (upwards) and the force the walls of the capillary exert on the meniscus (downwards).
So the meniscus is pulling the capillary up and the capillary is pulling the meniscus down
 
@JohnRennie Eh? Isn't that $F_{ST}$ liquid air surface tension!? When you say capillary is pulling it down are you referring to solid-liquid surface tension?
 
No.
 
"No" is the reply to which question ? :P
 
Since the edge of the meniscus isn't moving, the forces at the edge must be equal and opposite.
 
@JohnRennie Agreed, then ? Which forces are you considering at the edge?
 
9:50 AM
The surface tension of the meniscus is trying to shrink the meniscus so it acts inwards and upwards. Therefore the equal and opposite force exerted by the walls of the capillary at the edge of the meniscus acts downwards and outwards.
Suppose the meniscus was a rubber sheet and you're stretching it. You have to exert an outwards force to keep the sheet stretched. The elasticity of the sheet produces an inwards force on your fingers.
 
Oh, so the force due to the walls on the meniscus is downwards and outwards! I see now. But so the Wikipedia diagram must be wrong! There they have shown the $\gamma_{LG}$ acting up and in!!! (Or did they mean to show the force due to the liquid meniscus on itself?)
@JohnRennie I think I got it. $\gamma_{LG}$, $\gamma_{SG}$, $\gamma_{SL}$ are the forces the liquid meniscus is exerting on the surrounding to collapse and minimize area. External forces would be acting in exactly opposite direction on the meniscus to keep it stretched (like the rubber sheet).
 
Yes.
 
 
How you draw the forces depends on what calculation you are trying to do.
 
@JohnRennie Right, I am used to drawing free body diagrams which show only external forces. The wikipedia diagram thus confused me initially. I guess it is clear enough now. Thanks a lot :)
 
10:11 AM
@JohnRennie More generally, what does integrating all except m<n variables mean physically

$$\rho (\vec{x}'_1)=\int \psi^* (\vec{x}_1,\vec{x}_2,\dots,\vec{x}_n)\psi (\vec{x}'_1,\vec{x}'_2,\dots,\vec{x}_n)d\vec{x}_1\cdots d\vec{x}_n$$

where primed variables are not to be integrated
@JohnRennie If the above is not how one obtain the probability of finding m electrons out of all n electrons, what is the correct way to do it
 
10:26 AM
@JohnRennie Thank you for letting me know; you sir are a gentleman as well as a scholar.
2
 
(random thought) I wonder if I reduce the question to a 3 electron system, will it be physics enough to not fall into chemistry domain
 
Hello
 
user228700
11:01 AM
Hello :-)
 
user228700
@JohnR: Hi :-) Can u proof-read something for me real quick? Pls _/\_
 
@Kaumudi.H Yes, of course. Link? Mail?
 
user228700
I'm trying to craft an e-mail and I need to sound as fancy as possible :-P
 
user228700
@JohnRennie It's only 4-5 lines and not personal so I can post it right here...
 
user228700
11:05 AM
> I am not alone in feeling that of late, there's been an acute shortage of poems at the beginning of the pod. Here I present to you one of my favorite "short" (Alright, it's not that short) poems as a suggestion. Admittedly, this poem is about friendship and love, two topics about as far from the topic of death that one can get but I request you to please consider it all the same.
 
user228700
> I found this poem in a dusty old notebook from school and I haven't been able to trace the poet so I don't have that information but here's the poem I hope u'll both enjoy:
 
Very minor punctuation changes:
 
user228700
Yes! Punctuation!
 
I am not alone in feeling that of late, there's been either lose the comma or use an extra comma I am not alone in feeling that, of late, there's been
 
user228700
Whoa, two commas?
 
11:07 AM
The commas bracket the of late but I'm not sure they are needed at all
 
user228700
Alright, I'll lose it completely.
 
user228700
What about this:
 
user228700
> Admittedly, this poem is about friendship and love, two topics about as far from the topic of death that one can get but I request you to please consider it all the same.
 
The same in the line starting Admittedly
Ah, you beat me to it :-)
 
user228700
:-)
 
user228700
11:09 AM
Huh, so I guess I suck at punctuation.
 
user228700
So do I lose the comma there as well?
 
I would say Admittedly this poem is about friendship and love, two topics about as far from the topic of death that one can get, but I request you to please consider it all the same.
I don't think the comma after Admittedly contributes anything.
 
user228700
Wokay done. And there's nothing else wrong in that sentence?
 
> but here's the poem I hope u'll both enjoy
u'll ???
 
0
Q: Is Physics Stack Exchange even as active as before?

masterwarrior123I always get on physics.se in my free time. I've been doing this for around 2 years now. But I feel like, over the recent weeks, the site has slowed down dramatically. There are fewer people answering questions AND most importantly, most a lot of the questions are duplicates. Is it just me or are...

 
user228700
11:10 AM
@JohnRennie :-o I didn't even notice that!!
 
user228700
Geez. OK, I'll change that.
 
The dangers of getting so used to slang that you don't notice you are using it!! :-)
 
user228700
Are u sure there's nothing wrong with the "admittedly" sentence apart from the comma?
 
user228700
Am I cramming in too much in one sentence in those last few sentences?
 
It looks fine to me. Even the messing about with commas that I've suggested is really only a detail. It is quite formal phrasing but I assume that's what you want.
 
user228700
11:12 AM
Yep, formal is what I'm going for.
 
user228700
But does it feel like I'm cramming in too much into those sentences?
 
Alright shouldn't have a capital A
 
user228700
Why not?
 
Actually you have a slightly strange mix of formal and informal. The word alright feels very informal, almost casual speech.
But as I said above this is quibbling really.
@Kaumudi.H The work alright isn't the start of a sentence.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yeeah .__. I'd tell u what I'm trying to do but not here :-P So I dunno what to do about the tone--to make it completely formal or not.
 
user228700
11:15 AM
Does anything else sound informal..?
 
I am not alone in feeling that of late there's been an acute shortage of poems at the beginning of the pod.
Here I present to you one of my favorite "short" (alright, it's not that short) poems as a suggestion.
Admittedly this poem is about friendship and love, two topics about as far from the topic of death that one can get, but please consider it all the same.
I found this poem in a dusty old notebook from school and I haven't been able to trace the poet so I don't have that information but here's the poem I hope you will both enjoy:
 
@Kaumudi.H what is the email for?
nerd fighters?
 
user228700
@Kenshin Yeah :-P But that's all I'm saying right now. If my plan works, u'll hear about in some time, no doubt.
 
@Kenshin The you both have to be the Green bros :-)
 
user228700
@JohnRennie And u are correct! :-P
 
11:18 AM
what's the green bros
and why do you need to talk formally to them?
 
user228700
@Kenshin John and Hank Green.
 
user228700
@JohnR: OK, that sounds good but does the tone come off as strange?
 
@Kaumudi.H I don't like the bit where you say "short" (alrightit's not that short)
that doesn't seem formal to me
 
user228700
I dunno if I'm going for 100% formal.
 
yeah
that's cool then
 
11:20 AM
@Kaumudi.H it looks fine to me, but then your original version was fine too. It's the Green bros - they aren't grammar nazis.
 
I'd classify your email as smart casual
 
user228700
@JohnRennie John's a novelist :-P
 
lol
 
user228700
My #1 concern is if it looks like I've crammed too much into the last few sentences.
 
@Kaumudi.H he's unlikely ever to win the Man Booker prize though :-)
 
user228700
11:21 AM
Hey! (:-P)
 
user228700
To me, it definitely looks like I have crammed too much into those last sentences.
 
I think i need to see the peom to fully assess the email's suitability
 
user228700
@Kenshin :-P Nice try.
 
@Kaumudi.H That's just a statement of fact. John Green writes for a different audience.
 
:D
 
user228700
11:23 AM
@JohnRennie Yeah, I know :-) It is unlikely.
 
user228700
SOMEBODY tell me if it looks like I've crammed too much into those few sentences!!!
 
No, it looks fine.
 
yeah a little crammed
 
user228700
.__.
 
but that's ok
 
11:24 AM
I write stuff like that all the time.
 
user228700
I need them to read this one and that's why I'm trying so hard to get it just right.
 
Long sentences are nothing to be scared of
 
user228700
@JohnRennie :-D OK.
 
@Kaumudi.H they won't read it
They won't read it if you cannot trace the name of the poet
 
user228700
@Kenshin Why dyou think so?!
 
11:26 AM
Just my feeling
If you said that you wrote it then maybe they will read it
 
user228700
Hey, what's wrong with a good ol' poem from "anonymous"?
 
Or if it is by a famous poet
Because the author might not want the poem shared
 
user228700
Ohhh.
 
user228700
Dang it.
 
for example, the peom may be from someone at school who doesn't want it read
and you might be a bully trying to share it with the world
 
user228700
11:27 AM
OK, I'll slip in something about it being from a school textbook.
 
user228700
Argh, now how do I do that without sounding dumb?
 
yeah if you can provide the source your odds will skyrocket
 
user228700
Dude. There is no source.
 
What do you think @JohnRennie?
would a source be required?
@Kaumudi.H paste the poem here quickly, then delete it. I can then search for the source
did you see my message too?
 
user228700
Yep.
 
user228700
11:30 AM
But I dunno how likely that is.
 
user228700
I mean, if I told them someone else wrote it, they won't try to be nice.
 
but don't you want them to be nice?
 
user228700
Yeah, I do, but I don't want it to be biased.
 
Do you want them to critique the poem, or do you want them to read the poem?
if you want the later, I'd say you wrote it, if you want the former, I'd say anonymous source
 
user228700
John does both. He reads it and then they discuss it for a minute or two.
 
11:32 AM
oh
yeah be honest
and say that you wrote it
I"m sure they wont' be too biased, they should provide constructive feedback
 
@Kaumudi.H while you're here I have some new toys ...
 
user228700
:-( But why would they read my poem when they could be reading some other poem?
 
Because it's more fun if the poem is written by a listener than some random from a textbook
 
user228700
But I dunno how I'd even phrase that ._. Like "Here's a poem I wrote. Please read and respond. Thanks!" I don't think that's gonna happen.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie DID U BUY ANOTHER LAPTOP?!?!
 
11:34 AM
 
Here's a poem I found in some textbook won't be interesting to them
 
Google Nexus 9 tablets
 
user228700
WHY DO U HAVE TWO OF THEM?!
 
user228700
@Kenshin Yeah, but how could I possibly request them to read my poem when they could be reading other stuff?
 
@Kaumudi.H One is for my own use to the replace the one I gave away, and the second is because I might well be giving away another soon.
 
11:36 AM
@Kaumudi.H because your a person just like any other person who may have written a poem
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Did u get them off eBay?
 
user228700
@Kenshin Yeah, but I haven't published anything! :-|
 
@Kaumudi.H yeah but if your poem is good then it won't matter
 
user228700
But yeah, no, I get what you're saying. I could try it. Gimme a minute while I tweak that mail...
 
@Kaumudi.H BTW I don't think trying to conceal the fact you're the author of the poem is a good idea. In fact when you say I haven't been able to trace the poet you're actually lying to the Green's. I doubt that would go down well.
@Kaumudi.H yes, eBay.
 
user228700
11:38 AM
@JohnRennie I know :-( I just don't believe that they'd read it if I told them I wrote it.
 
user228700
But I'll try anyway.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I'm a bit confused. Didn't u say u have too many tablets already? Why did u buy two more?
 
@Kaumudi.H Well you know how much he likes laptops and tablets
 
"Let V denote a differentiable manifold of dimension $n \geq 2$ and class $C^2,\ 2 < p \leq \infty$."
I wonder how many time I read a variation on that sentence
 
user228700
So I just straight up tell them "Please consider reading this maybe. I wrote it and I wanna know what u think"?
 
11:41 AM
wanna?
 
@Kaumudi.H I have a pile of older tablets, but these Nexus 9s are the dogs doodads so I want to use them rather than the older ones.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Oh, OK :-) They look real nice! How much did u get 'em for?
 
user228700
@Kenshin Yeah, no, that's not what I'm gonna write :-P
 
lol good
 
@Kaumudi.H I try not to bother myself too much with tawdry considerations such as cost :-)
 
11:43 AM
Yeah I'd say something like you've written a poem and you'd be very grateful if they would please consider airing on their podcast and letting you know what they think and you hope they enjoy it or sometin
and say like ur their biggest fan and love them or something
 
user228700
Wait, when was mother's day?!
 
and end with like xx or something
 
user228700
Ohhh, May .__.
 
user228700
@Kenshin Yep, yeah, OK. I'm on it. Gimme a few minutes pls.
 
okyaz
 
user228700
11:45 AM
@JohnRennie .__. Right.
 
Mother's Day is a celebration honoring the mother of the family, as well as motherhood, maternal bonds, and the influence of mothers in society. It is celebrated on various days in many parts of the world, most commonly in the months of March or May. It complements similar celebrations honoring family members, such as Father's Day, Siblings Day, and Grandparents Day. In the United States, celebration of Mother's Day began in the early 20th century. It is not related to the many celebrations of mothers and motherhood that have occurred throughout the world over thousands of years, such as the Greek...
@Kaumudi.H It varies depends on which place you live
 
user228700
@Ken: Hang on. If I sent in a poem about my mother in May, u think the chances of them reading it would increase?
 
user228700
@Secret It's in May in the U.S .__.
 
Ok I see
 
@Kaumudi.H no
 
user228700
11:48 AM
Why not?
 
cos I think you have a higher chance now
 
user228700
Why?!
 
lol
hard to explain
 
user228700
Intuition?
 
yes
 
user228700
11:51 AM
...OK.
 
and I can use logic too
for example yous aid that there was a shortage of poems now
 
user228700
Riight.
 
but on mother's day there probably won't be because it is a theme where they will easily find lots of poems
 
user228700
Nah, the theme is always death :-P
 
but a suprise email from the reader randomly might spark their curiosity more than an eamil during mother's day period
 
user228700
11:52 AM
...which is why I mentioned death in the e-mail :-P
 
yeah that's good
I'm sure they won't mind a bit of variety so
it's good you mentioned that you acknowledge that is their usual theme but you would like it if they consider your poem
 
user228700
Yeah, John reads poems about hope as well, from time to time.
 
yeah poems of eeath would get pretty monotonous
 
user228700
...OK, I'm gonna go write an epic e-mail :-P Wish me luck! @JohnR: Would u mind proof-reading for me again? .__.
 
goodluck!
let me know how it goes and when ur on
 
11:53 AM
@Kaumudi.H Of course
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I could send u the e-mail and I'll send them the e-mail whenever u can get around to proof-reading it.
 
@Kaumudi.H OK
 
user228700
Thank you both!! :-D
 
You have my e-mail address don't you?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Whoa.
 
11:55 AM
@Kaumudi.H problem?
 
user228700
Did u happen to just forget that we exchanged e-mails about a freaking laptop?! :-o :-o :-o
 
Yes I remember :-) I was just making sure. You might have misplaced the e-mail address.
It was a polite formality of the sort to which we English are prone.
 
user228700
Ah, phew, I was suddenly super concerned about ur brain :-P Nope, I still have it :-) Thank you!!
 
I would like to have a poem where the theme is spacetime, but I am currently too busy in the quantum world
 
user228700
OK, I'm gonna go try to write it real quick. If it looks like it's taking too long, I'll postpone it for another time.
 
user228700
11:57 AM
Bye!
 
I had a little geodesic,
But the problems that it posed,
It gave me one almighty headache,
When I found the little bastard closed.
 
ok make sure to add pleases and thankyous and butter them up
 

« first day (2323 days earlier)      last day (2597 days later) »