« first day (2185 days earlier)      last day (2730 days later) » 

2:05 AM
Wtf this place is dead
 
@0celo7, a bit, yeah
 
@heather Ok, should we do some analysis?
 
@0celo7, sure. I don't know how much time I have, though. I should have at least ten minutes, maybe a bit longer.
 
Hmm, ok.
So, supremum
 
@0celo7, actually, nevermind, I've got to go, my dad just said. Sorry! Maybe tomorrow. =)
 
2:12 AM
Tell him to hush
you're the boss
 
@0celo7, actually, nevermind on top of the nevermind, my dad has to get ready to go, so I do have 10 minutes. =P
geesh, I know
 
So, what's the sup of $(0,1)$?
Open interval!
 
It's 1, right?
 
Yes, do you know why?
 
Well, it's because the $\sup$ is the upper bound of the set, and 0.9 repeating is the largest number in the set, which is basically equivalent to 1 (and I know you said not to say that, but I don't know how else to word it).
 
2:15 AM
Ok, .999999... is nonsense. What does that number even mean?
Alright, looks like we need a theorem.
Let $A\subset\Bbb R$. Let $s$ be an upper bound for $A$. Then $s=\sup A$ if and only if $s-\epsilon$ fails to be an upper bound for any $\epsilon>0$.
In other words: the sup is an upper bound such that any smaller number is no longer an upper bound.
 
wait, isn't $\epsilon$ normally used in limits? (sidebar, I know, but it looked familiar)
 
$\epsilon$ is used universally in mathematics for a "small" number.
 
ah, okay.
hmm, I guess that makes sense.
but then how does this apply to $(0, 1)$?
 
So even if we make $s-\epsilon$ really close to $s$, it fails to be an upper bound.
Do you want to prove that?
Or apply it first?
 
probably apply it first.
 
2:20 AM
Right, so take $s=1$.
 
okay, got to go, see you tomorrow.
 
wtf
Ok bye
 
sorry for the suddenness, my dad is ready
 
ready?
 
user218912
hiiiiiii
 
2:25 AM
I'm gonna do some analysis exercises
 
user218912
k
 
user218912
i'm gonna do some qft exercises.
 
@obe wtf
oh my god you're obe
god dammit people change your avatars
 
user218912
what?
 
you look exactly like @Obliv and you have the same names basically.
 
user218912
2:31 AM
hmmm
 
@Obliv change your avatar to something not blue
 
user218912
nooo
 
user218912
hb everyone has a blue avatar.
 
hb?
I have lots of blue books you know
 
user218912
same
 
2:36 AM
is this too dark?
 
user218912
yes
 
what about GSM books?
I have...many
 
user218912
springer physics books are really blue
 
Lecture notes in physics?
 
user218912
yes.
 
user218912
2:39 AM
also I made blue avatars for you guys
 
user218912
@ACuriousMind
 
...
 
user218912
 
oh my god
 
user218912
@0celo7
 
user218912
2:40 AM
 
user218912
@SirCumference ???
 
user218912
 
...
 
user218912
:D
 
@obe Do this exercise and I'll change my avatar.
 
user218912
2:41 AM
I don't know analysis...
 
$\limsup a_n=\liminf a_n$ iff $(a_n)$ converges.
 
user218912
:(
 
requires basic calculus and algebra
 
user218912
I know.
 
user218912
we were doing stuff like this in analysis
 
2:44 AM
Ok, one direction is trivial.
And in the other direction you want $\liminf a_n\le \lim a_n\le \limsup a_n$.
Then apply Trichotomy
@DanielSank Evening.
 
user228700
2:59 AM
Hello :-)
 
3:11 AM
@0celo7 hi.
@Kaumudi hi.
 
How would one go about proving the Borel sets of $\Bbb R^n$ don't contain all susbsets of $\Bbb R^n$?
 
user116211
4:10 AM
@0celo7 Wouldn't you need Axiom of Choice for it?
 
Need?
I reject AoC, as should you.
 
user116211
I think Royden has the derivation with Axiom of choice but for $\mathbb R\,.$
 
user116211
@0celo7 :(
 
user116211
He uses the Axiom generously over most part of the book.
 
That's fairly nontrivial
wonder how one would prove such a thing
without using that god-awful "axiom."
More like, "literally Satan."
idk how to even morally defend it
it's just pure evil tbh
 
user116211
4:21 AM
Why do you have so much abhorrence for the AoC? It's used by, literally, all the books I'm using.
 
user116211
You can't avoid it.
 
user228700
4:54 AM
 
user228700
Huh?
 
What URL are you trying to open?
 
user228700
Oh, never mind :-) That's just something I found funny and took a screenshot of it.
 
user228700
Is anybody here very familiar w/ the terms reflexive relation and identity relation?
 
In what context?
 
user228700
5:04 AM
I have understood the difference b/w these two terms in two different ways and I'd like to know which is correct...
 
user228700
@JohnRennie When defining relations b/w sets.
 
Can't help, sorry.
 
user228700
Oh, NP :-) I will ask someone at MSE chat maybe.
 
user228700
Hey, how do I type a "belongs to" a set A in Latex?
 
1572
Q: MathJax basic tutorial and quick reference

MJD To see how any formula was written in any question or answer, including this one, right-click on the expression it and choose "Show Math As > TeX Commands". (When you do this, the '$' will not display. Make sure you add these. See the next point.) For inline formulas, enclose the formula in $......

2
\cup \cap \setminus \subset \subseteq \subsetneq \supset \in \notin \emptyset \varnothing gives $\cup\, \cap\, \setminus\, \subset\, \subseteq \,\subsetneq \,\supset\, \in\, \notin\, \emptyset\, \varnothing$
 
user116211
5:15 AM
What is your question @Kaumudi?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Oh, wow, thanks! :-)
 
user228700
@MAFIA36790 I've asked at the MSE chat...
 
would anyone be kind enough to see if my answer is understandable in terms of the language? I am having hard time figuring it out if my english was not too lousy there.
0
A: Energy stored in magnetic or electric field

ShingEnergy stored in fields = the total energy required to assemble the fields It takes energy bring the charges to specific positions to assemble the field, and when you let everything go, the charges will just fly apart (the energy you "stored" in field becoms K.E. of the charges once you let them...

 
user228700
6:16 AM
@Shing If you're only worried about ur English then it's safe to say that u did a fine job :-) The explanation could've been done better, I suppose...
 
user228700
Does anybody have any thoughts on whether or not the square root is a function?
 
user228700
I'm having a discussion st the MSE chat but it seems like it's not headed anywhere..
 
user228700
NVM!
 
user116211
@Shing I'm not seeing any problem with that; it is good when you are talking about statics.
 
6:37 AM
Thank you for the help!
 
user116211
6:57 AM
yo @0celo7; you are still alive in the dead of the night.
 
user116211
7:54 AM
What is actually plagiarism?
 
user116211
In the context of Phys.SE.
 
user116211
@johnR has a very good and valid point.
 
Gearing up to make more mead!
 
user116211
DavidZ has also posted his answer.
 
user116211
@DanielSank o/
 
7:55 AM
@ACuriousMind you expressed a liking for mead. If you like, I can ship you a bottle when it's done.
 
Aha, you've just read my answer to Emilio's meta post?
 
@MAFIA36790 \o
 
user116211
@JohnRennie yes; I liked it.
 
22 people read my question so far, and still tumbleweed and still getting monopoles
 
@Secret which question
 
8:04 AM
0
Q: Radial magnetisation cases and toroidal monopole?

SecretRecently when re-reading Griffth electromagnetism, where he explained about how if the magnetic system is cylindrical, solenodial, planar or toroidally symmetric, then $$\nabla \cdot \vec{M}=0$$ always and thus the $\vec{H}$ field can be obtained via the usual Ampere's Law However, on closer i...

 
hum ... not that I know the answer, but if I were you, I would add the section/page number from Griffiths book
 
ok
 
just for people to read up the statement
 
user116211
@Secret The post is not even a day old; wait.
 
ok
P.S. page no. for 4th and 1999 edition added
 
8:44 AM
@MAFIA36790 start with the help center
 
user116211
yes, I read that quite a long ago.
 
user116211
It mentions:
 
user116211
> Do not copy the complete text of external sources; instead, use their words and ideas to support your own.
 
user116211
The post concerned was using the words, not the exact words, the words and the idea of the other site.
 
user116211
The basic flaw was that OP didn't mention explicitly the source; didn't cite the link.
 
user116211
8:47 AM
This is unacceptable.
 
Yeah, exactly. So it counts as plagiarism.
 
user116211
Hmm; very well then.
 
8:59 AM
13
Q: Is it good to call someone "Nerd"?

Řazan ĎawudMy friends always use "nerd" to describe an intelligent person,but when I searched I found that it's not really a good word. "A foolish or contemptible person who lacks social skills or is boringly studious." I've become so confused with this word. Is it good or bad??

Yes! :-)
 
user116211
I never knew it meant some foolish stuff.
 
[Philosophy musings] People have been arguing about whether maths is invented or discovered. We could have equally apply such argument on science vs technology, with the argument that technology is not constructed, but discovered in the sense on how we found a certain configuration of known things are realisable and the properties associated to this configuration of known physics known as technology
-Above is inspired from weeks of reading abstract algebra which give me a stronger impression on how there are at least 3 different roles mathematical objects play:
1. Intrinsic abstract entities which are like objects to be unravelled of its properties
2. Tooolboxes
3. Building blocks for more complicated objects and tooboxes
Maths have this curious property that any given mathematical object can have all 3 of the above properties at the same time, thus all mathematical objects are in a sense, of the same intrinsic nature
Contrast this with physics, where models are toolboxes to understood phenomenon and predict them (and usually written in maths as a language), while the physical phenomenon itself is not an abstract entity and can be interacted with
 
user116211
9:16 AM
I am very bad at kinematics.... what ever I know seems not to work....😞 — user134470 27 mins ago
 
user116211
9:30 AM
0
Q: Differential Equation in Complex Plane

Sachin KHow to Solve a Differential Equation in Complex Plane, Particularly On Stokes-Anti Stokes Wedges. OR How to Solve Schrödinger equation in complex plane having complex PT-symmetric Potential.

 
user116211
Homework?
 
user116211
WoW! Dilaton participates in review still.
 
9:47 AM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontryagin_duality This=fourier transform and convolution on groups
 
user116211
> Lemma: If an abelian group has subgroups of order $m$ and $n,$ then it has subgroup order equal to the least common multiple of $m$ and $n\,.$
 
9:59 AM
@MAFIA36790 : It seems too broad.
 
user116211
yes.
 
user116211
0
Q: Making the Tardis with Dark Energy?

Jonty MorrisI've got a sci-fi based Physics question that involved Dark Energy... So I've been watching a lot of Doctor Who recently, and I'm very interested on how his "Tardis" is bigger on the inside. Here you can see the Tardis looks small on the outside. But inside, it's much bigger. So I've been th...

 
user116211
Oh man; this Dr. Who mania ;P
 
user116211
Tardis is one of the things I literally wanted to have in my childhood ;)
 
10:29 AM
FYI: In a continuing effort to clean around here, the mods found some more socks behind the dryer. Please brace yourself for possible lost reputation points.
 
user116211
yeh; got the experience.
 
user116211
till now, + and - votes got nullified.
 
10:56 AM
-180 sock points. Not as bad as the several thousand I lost in the last outbreak :-)
As a side effect I now know one of the accounts involved. I had downvoted an answer by the puppet and I got +1 point back when the answer was deleted as part of the purge.
 
Hi people :)
 
user228700
Ah, this weekend is going to be terrible for me. Goddamn kids busting firecrackers outside my window. @MAFIA36790@SwapnilDas@Ramanujan: Happy Diwali! :-D
 
@Kaumudi Happy Diwali to you too :-)
I study upto 2 am and still sonic booms of crackers burst my ears.
 
user116211
@Kaumudi As I said earlier, use Bose or any other noise cancelling device.
 
@Kaumudi When is Diwali exactly?
@MAFIA36790 Bose?
 
user116211
11:11 AM
And yeh, happy Diwali to all too.
 
user116211
@SwapnilDas Google it.
 
Ohk. My first idea was SN Bose.
 
user116211
;P
 
@MAFIA36790 Actually, for completely unrelated premise, I do end up pondering about something similar: Consider at a playground, using chalk to draw a circular region. Next you place a ball at the centre of the circle. Now imagine the space within the circle started to expand radially at an accelerating pace. What will everyone outside of the circle see the ball had became?
 
user116211
ohh, lord, I don't know.
 
11:14 AM
I suspect due to the light from the ball need to travel longer and longer distance to reach us, and space is literally streched, the ball should become progressively more redshifted and shrunken to the outsiders...?
 
user116211
I don't know differential geometry yet.
 
Just deactivated my Quora account.
 
user116211
@SwapnilDas good.
 
me neither. But considering the above naive reasoning, eventually the expansion will be so quick that the circle will become an event hoizon as the ball redshifted into nonexistence from our view, and likewise everything in the outside world from the ball's frame. So some kind of "inverse black hole"
 
@MAFIA36790 Did you even?
 
user116211
11:15 AM
The question qualities are really bad.
 
user116211
@SwapnilDas I have an account; but I hardly contribute anything apart from upvoting some posts.
 
user116211
You need to filter tags a lot to get some really good feeds.
 
@MAFIA36790 I like some answers of Jack Fraser. I admire Victor Toth.
 
user116211
@SwapnilDas oh yeh; upvoted few of their posts too.
 
@MAFIA36790 It is remarkable how the latter has published 47 research papers, being employed as a software engineer and self studying GR.
 
11:19 AM
So in a sense, if dark energy acts by expanding space, and expanded space can indeed be confined to a finite volume in such fashion (analogous to the half plate illustrations of the hyperbolic plane), then a tardis (or any transcendential space) should be a feasible thing
 
user116211
Quora has some weird policy; I never could get their behind the curtain moderation.
 
user116211
But anyway, I don't want to speak about another site here.
 
I even donno about it. Same.
 
user116211
Their formatting facility is really disgusting.
 
Lol! I could never type math there.
 
user116211
11:21 AM
Anyway, switch to other topic.
 
I've decided to stay only on SEs and Brilliant.org, these are worth the time.
 
user228700
@SwapnilDas I...dunno, since I am from Kerala and don't celebrate Diwali :-)
 
user116211
@Kaumudi WTH ;/
 
@Kaumudi Kerelians don't celebrate? You are damn lucky.
 
user116211
Do you celebrate Halloween?
 
user228700
11:22 AM
Yes, Mallus, unfortunately, don't celebrate anything other than Vishu and Onam.
 
What is Vishu?
 
user228700
@SwapnilDas No, but I live in TN, so I've got all the bad luck in the whole world.
 
Oh.
 
user228700
Oh, Vishu is like...hm, which state are you from?
 
I live in Bhubaneswar, damn noisy.
Odisha
 
user228700
11:24 AM
@MAFIA36790 Lol, do u?
 
user228700
@SwapnilDas Hm, OK, I'm g'na have to look it up but u know...Bihu, they celebrate in Assam? Or Pongal in TN?
 
user116211
No. But we used to generally distribute candies among the children in our locality.
 
Yes.
 
user228700
That's Vishu for Keralites.
 
Oh cool!
 
user228700
11:25 AM
@MAFIA36790 Wtf? O.o U live in Calcutta, India, right?
 
That's Nuakhai for Odisha :)
 
user228700
Oh, nice :-)
 
user116211
Anyways, I love Diwali; my mother and grandma would decorate the whole house with diyas; it's really some memorable moments.
 
Halloween. I tried to scare my mother one day and that very day my specs were in projectile motion.
Anyways, learnt that its trajectory is parabolic :P
 
user228700
@MAFIA36790 That is so cool :-) We light diyas but we don't have so many so we only light one/two. And I haven't burst a single firecracker in life :-P Yeah, sad story. Not really tho, I don't promote the use of firecrackers.
 
11:27 AM
hello
 
user116211
yo.
 
Yo.
 
yO.
 
user228700
:-P
 
user116211
@Kaumudi I never had lit a firecracker. Neither did any of my family members.
 
11:29 AM
Ooh hat-trick.
 
user116211
My dad had accidentally burnt his right hand when some burnt firecracker fell on it from nowhere. But that's a different story.
 
@Secret Aha, you've just seen the question about the Tardis. If you're interested I've just posted an answer to it.
 
user116211
@JohnRennie Oops, I voted to close it as non-mainstream physics.
 
Well it is non-mainstream really. I've just used the question as an excuse to rant about some spacetimes I find interesting, but none of them are really like a Tardis.
 
user116211
I love Tardis.
 
11:32 AM
If the question is closed I won't be lying awake tonight worrying about it :-)
 
user116211
In fact every nerd loves Tardis.
 
@Kaumudi November 5th is when we let off fireworks in the UK. It's always a pain for me since I have to be in bed by 9 to start work at 5 the next morning. One of the houses in my road always has a fireworks party that goes on until midnight.
 
well, a tardis's space is a type of space which has a finitely larger volume than as seen from the outside.

Therefore, theoretically, if we can construct a bag of gold spacetime, and then halt its expansion somehow, then you can have a space that as seen from the outside look like the size of a room, but inside is actually a football pitch
 
Still, it's only once a year and fireworks are fun. In the UK the fireworks you call crackers we call bangers. And as a boy I used to love playing with them.
 
user116211
@JohnRennie I loved the Mr. Bean animated episode on UK fireworks.
 
11:40 AM
does anyone here want to look at some python 3 code?
specifically, some code that uses numpy to multiply a matrix and a vector
 
@JohnRennie actually, in GR, when we said spacetime expands, does the volume of spacetime literally increase (as in spacetime was created between the two objects thus making them more far apart form each other), or the geometry curved in a way to give an impression of an increased distance between two points?
 
user228700
11:55 AM
@JohnRennie I see :-) Bangers is a funny word :-P
 
user228700
@MAFIA36790 Oh, yes, me too! :-D
 
user228700
To be absolutely clear tho, fireworks*=fire *crackers, right?
 
user228700
These are more like bombs, you see.
 
user228700
Fireworks and so much prettier to watch. Not the bloody firecrackers, no!
 

« first day (2185 days earlier)      last day (2730 days later) »