« first day (1761 days earlier)      last day (3160 days later) » 

12:02 AM
@HDE226868 How on Earth did you find that Xpost under a different name?
y'all high schoolers too smart for me
 
@0celo7 I saw it earlier on Mathematics and had commented on it. It rang a bell.
I actually answered questions on Mathematics today, so I paid attention to posts there.
 
hmm
does physics homework
damn kids these days...
 
@0celo7 I dunno. I'm an expert in the field and I have no idea what book to recommend you. I doubt your background is going to make a difference.
@0celo7 If you find one tell me about it.
 
Simple athithmetic can be used for adding vectors that are pointing in the same direction.
^^question on a timed quiz T/F
I have no idea what that means
 
That's not a question.
Oh.
 
12:12 AM
true/false
I have no clue what it means
 
That's the dumbest question I've ever seen.
 
all vector addition is simple arithmetic
 
Well, no it's not. Some questions on the site are worse.
 
wtf is this
 
I would answer T.
And then lose all respect for whoever wrote the quiz.
 
12:13 AM
T is correct
 
Implying there was some respect to begin with.
 
what the fuck
 
^^ That.
 
@0celo7 What class is this for?
 
I'm going to complain tomorrow
@HDE226868 physics 1
 
12:14 AM
@0celo7 Don't bother.
What's it going to get you?
 
user54412
^ that
 
Once you get out of your intro classes you can probably get more done with constructive criticism. In physics I forget it.
Actually, you know what: screw that.
 
I think they mean the vector lengths
 
Complain, but do it constructively.
 
@DanielSank Personal satisfaction at having raged against the idiocy of the system?
 
12:15 AM
like the lengths are additive if the vectors are parallel
 
@ACuriousMind Well, if that's all he's going for then definitely don't complain.
 
I remember from high school that people are literally retarded when it comes to vector addition
 
@0celo7 Yeah.
 
user54412
@0celo7 Remember: those same people are now in your intro courses. And they know no more.
 
@0celo7 Sounds like some folks I know.
 
12:16 AM
@ChrisWhite Right.
 
@ChrisWhite AP physics is a prereq for this class!!
 
@0celo7 Pffft.
That's cute. You think passing AP physics means people know things?
 
@0celo7 Wtf.
And the homework is that?
 
@HDE226868 it's a reading quiz
 
user54412
The (American) college system caters to the lowest common denominator, for better or for worse. If something is below your level, pass out of it, or skip lectures and just ace the exam, and move on with other things. It's less stressful that way.
 
12:17 AM
the homework itself is much more challenging
 
@0celo7 Okay, that makes more sense.
 
@ChrisWhite didn't we go over this? I asked to get out of it, they said "no, no exceptions"
 
...what's a "reading quiz", and why does it make sense that it has stupid questions?
 
@ACuriousMind it's like 3% of the grade, no clue why they do it
 
@0celo7 FWIW I broke a lot of "rules" about requirements and nobody really cared. The trick in a lot of cases is to just do it.
I skipped differential equations and mathematical methods.
 
12:19 AM
@DanielSank I asked my advisor and he would not even consider it
 
@0celo7 "it's like 3%" is not an answer to "what is it?" :D
 
@0celo7 That's stupid.
Is the rest of the course teaching you anything?
 
@DanielSank "AP physics does not teach you how to be an engineer, this class does"
so this class teaches me how to ask stupid questions?
 
user54412
@DanielSank where were you for undergrad again? I can see this being more difficult with more red tape, and bureaucracy scales with the cube of the school size I think.
 
hah
 
12:20 AM
"red tape"...why have you people started talking in riddles?
 
@ACuriousMind wat?
That's a standard English phrase.
 
@DanielSank no...there are some projects that go really in-depth
that's about it
the book is even the same one as I used in high school
 
@DanielSank Never heard it before
 
@ACuriousMind rot...uh...Tape
 
@ACuriousMind It means bureaucracy.
 
12:22 AM
@DanielSank diff eq is a graduation requirement
 
@0celo7 It's rotes (Klebe-)Band in German, but that's just...tape that is red :P
@DanielSank Ah, okay
 
@ChrisWhite Yale.
 
@ACuriousMind they give you 4 questions in 10 minutes that are based off of the reading. it's supposed to get you in the habit of reading the book before the lecture.
 
@0celo7 Are they all true/false?
 
@0celo7 Ah, I see.
 
12:24 AM
@HDE226868 no, one was "select all quantities that are scalars"
 
@0celo7 So was math methods for me. I wonder what would happen if you just skipped.
I'm not recommending skipping diff eq. though.
 
@DanielSank too late to skip, I'm taking it now!
 
@0celo7 ::brain melts::
 
and I like the professor, so
@DanielSank I just chat with you guys during lectures
 
@0celo7 Nice. That's usually the most important aspect of a course.
 
12:25 AM
I think we're doing vectors, at least based off of the homework
@DanielSank yeah, he explained to me why a nontrivial Jacobi field that vanishes at two points does not imply there are two distinct geodesics that connect the two points
 
@0celo7 What's a Jacobi field?
 
@DanielSank solution of the Jacobi equation :P
 
@0celo7 What's the Jacobi equation?
 
@DanielSank if you've done any GR, it's the solution to the "geodesic deviation" equation
 
@0celo7 That sounds familiar.
 
12:27 AM
infinitesimal separation vector of a geodesic congruence
 
How the crap have you done GR and you're a freshman in college?
2
 
I was bored in high school
 
o_O
 
@DanielSank I've stopped wondering about the weird path 0celo7 took through math/physics subjects a long time ago.
 
12:29 AM
this video was pretty interesting
although now it's cringe worthy
 
@ACuriousMind I... don't understand how someone could acquire the math needed without a teacher or colleagues.
 
@DanielSank That and "How the hell is he in Physics I?"
 
@HDE226868 Yes, this is disturbing.
 
@HDE226868 NO EXCEPTIONS
 
@0celo7 wtf? Go to the head of undergraduate affairs in the physics department and explain that you know wtf a vector is.
 
12:30 AM
although Dr. Hines said I had done some "quite impressive" work on my own
 
One does not simply take a physics class 30-odd levels below what one is capable of.
 
it's an engineering class
 
the class is physics for engineers 1
 
user54412
@HDE226868 You began "one does not simply" and didn't make a meme out of it?
 
12:31 AM
Whatever. You know the material.
 
@0celo7 Are you majoring in engineering of some kind?
 
@DanielSank ACM helped quite a bit, actually
@DanielSank yeah, nuclear engineering
 
@ChrisWhite Have you seen my meme attempts? My text clashed with the Daleks' colors last time around. It was next to unreadable.
 
@0celo7 ACM?
 
@DanielSank @ACuriousMind
 
12:31 AM
@0celo7 Oh.
Cheers to @ACuriousMind. clinky clinky
 
I got through Zee's GR book without ACM
ACM helped with some more advanced stuff
 
@0celo7 Were you not already capable of basic GR when you showed up here? I think we met because you couldn't deal with clopen sets ;)
 
@ACuriousMind yup
 
What's your deal? You some kind of genius or something?
 
We met because of a problem in Wald I think :D
@DanielSank Not even
 
12:33 AM
@0celo7 Then what the hell is going on?
 
Have you seen some of the people like jamal
 
I still don't understand Gaussian integrals.
@0celo7 I remember him sort of.
 
@ChrisWhite See this, the one I'm referring to. I turned someone else's quote into a meme at the request of another user:
Aug 27 at 21:00, by HDE 226868
user image
 
And I really don't understand $dz \wedge dz^*$.
How the hell did you figure that out by yourself?
 
I think I have a math SE question on that
 
12:35 AM
@0celo7 Link?
 
4
Q: How do we wedge the complex differentials $\mathrm{d}z^i$ and $\mathrm{d}\bar z^{\bar j}$?

0celo7By the standard definition of the wedge product as an alternated tensor product, I would think we have $$\tag{1}\mathrm{d}z^i\wedge\mathrm{d}\bar z^{\bar j}=\mathrm{d}z^i\otimes\mathrm{d}\bar z^{\bar j}-\mathrm{d}\bar z^{\bar j}\otimes\mathrm{d}z^i$$ As I understand it, the left side should be a ...

btw, how are you just now figuring out where I am in the math/physics world
 
user54412
 
ACM has had extended lectures trying to drill things into my head
cf. e.g. the whole clopen sets things
 
@0celo7 Uh, I guess I don't care that much...?
 
I wonder if the legacy of J. R. R. Tolkien will just be a sea of Boromir memes.
 
12:37 AM
@0celo7 That is not meant as any sort of insult.
 
@HDE226868 Nope. There's also at least one with Gandalf.
 
@HDE226868 Nah. Most people probably don't know who Boromir is, despite the meme.
 
I've watched the movies
don't have time for the books
 
@DanielSank So the context is lost?
 
@0celo7 They're actually rather good.
 
12:38 AM
@0celo7 Read the books!
 
@HDE226868 Well, just guessing.
 
They're incredible
 
@HDE226868 Meh.
 
I have too much to read1!!!!!!1111
 
@HDE226868 There is zero character development.
 
12:38 AM
screw it all
I'm gonna play some video games
 
I've only read The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings; I've got The Silmarillion on my reading list.
 
@DanielSank what is there to understand
 
@HDE226868 There's maybe 1.5 female characters.
 
@DanielSank The world he made is just amazing, though.
 
Mar 18 at 2:44, by ACuriousMind
@StanShunpike No. While liking fantasy, I never got to like Tolkien, I find his writing style tedious and boring, and the black-and-white morality also gets on my nerves.
 
12:39 AM
@HDE226868 Yes it is.
 
@DanielSank Counting Tom Bombadil's wife?
 
Deja-vu, we've had this discussion half a year ago :D
 
user54412
@DanielSank Meh. Mythical sagas aren't really about character development, since the characters are supposed to be manifestations of abstract ideals more often than not.
 
@HDE226868 Ok, 1.75 female characters.
 
Arwen, Galadriel, Eowyn, whats-her-face.
 
12:39 AM
@ChrisWhite Sure.
 
The female Sackville-Baggins.
 
@HDE226868 Jeebus, ok fine, 2 female characters.
 
user54412
Lobelia?
 
^ That one
 
@ChrisWhite I can't believe you remembered that.
 
12:40 AM
@0celo7 all the things
 
was she in the movies
 
user54412
Ungoliant and Shelob were sorta female. Not sure if that helps this case, though.
 
@0celo7 For like two seconds.
@ChrisWhite Sigh. Ok, female characters with lines.
 
@DanielSank I had a mini debate with Duffield earlier when I was bored (I may have won; it was at least a draw), so I was in that sort of mood today. :-)
 
@HDE226868 ?
 
12:41 AM
@DanielSank Ah, that brings the count down sizably.
 
@HDE226868 :)
 
Most of Arwen and Eowyn's plots are about Aragorn. Except for Eowyn in battle.
Galadriel's the only cool one.
 
@HDE226868 Yeah, Eowyn is the only sort-of interesting female in the entire 1500 or whatever pages.
@HDE226868 And that.
She'd be a lot more awesome if there were more description of her rolling into Dol Guldur and wrecking the place.
 
@DanielSank I kinda had to admit defeat at trying to learn strings.
 
@0celo7 Oh... pobrecito.
 
12:43 AM
Anyway, I should most likely get going. Good night/evening/day/twilight/dawn/dusk/lunchtime/breakfast/dinnertime/suppertime/t‌​eatime/that-time-in-my-profile, everyone.
 
user54412
@DanielSank Did you watch the final Hobbit movie yet?
 
@DanielSank Oh, that would be awesome.
 
@HDE226868 I know, right?
 
Screw Gandalf, let Eowyn wreck the Necromancer.
 
@ChrisWhite I watched that one scene because it was all I cared about. It was super-duper less exciting than I hoped. I wanted to see her literally like tearing the fortress down to rubble.
 
12:45 AM
@DanielSank I'm just saying...I'm not a genius.
I don't even really know QFT.
 
@0celo7 You're a *@(%#^ freshman!
@0celo7 You know, with all your background you should go spend a summer in an experimental lab. You can come out of college more well rounded in theory and experiment than anyone I've ever met.
 
@DanielSank There are people who are published by age 15!
 
@ChrisWhite I was envisioning some primal rage style Elvish ass kicking and a lot of Emperor Palpatine style finger lightning.
 
user54412
Ha. Well, maybe one day we'll get a 12-part Silmarillion, and we can see her rebelling in Valinor.
 
@ChrisWhite Yes!
HBO miniseries?
Parts of the Silmarillion would lend well to film.
 
user54412
12:49 AM
the kinslaying is just what HBO needs
 
@ChrisWhite ha yeah.
gtg
 
 
1 hour later…
2:17 AM
What is the induced metric tensor on an n-sphere in (n+1)-dimensional Cartesian coordinates?
 
 
1 hour later…
3:23 AM
@user1667423 there's a lot of math.SE posts for that
 
 
1 hour later…
4:30 AM
0
Q: Physically, what causes joint pain?

BobI wasn't sure if there was a better site to post on with regards to this- I wasn't sure if people on the physical fitness stackexchange would give a sufficiently mechanical description. When performing an exercise, such as a squat, one can incur joint pain if performing the exercise incorrectly....

off topic, I think, but I'd like to get at least a few community votes before closing it.
(well, ideally 4 :-P)
 
 
2 hours later…
7:01 AM
@user1667423 Just naively using the transformation law and the expression for each of the coordinates in terms of each other will work.
 
8:00 AM
hey
 
8:18 AM
back at work
such sorrow
 
8:30 AM
0
Q: What's the policy on ill-formed, laymen questions that have interesting answers?

Kevin ZhouI just bumped into this question, which was closed shortly after being posted. It was definitely a badly-written, super ambiguous question. But somebody provided a really nice answer: one that was practically useful, comprehensible to the layman, and nontrivial to nonlaymen. I feel like the comm...

 
 
3 hours later…
11:26 AM
@Qmechanic see my comment here
 
@HDE226868 : Pah, you lost hands down because you dismissed Einstein and said understanding gravity is mere philosophy.
 
You can never win a debate with a mod.
 
Course you can.
 
how?
 
I found it curious why of all physics phenomenon that the principle of superposition apply, we are so good at picking apart colors
 
11:32 AM
@skill patrol : How? Just refer to the hard scientific evidence and to the peer-reviewed papers.
 
refer all you want, if you get out of hand you get suspended
 
I don't get out of hand. I'm one of the good guys.
4
 
prove it pal
 
Let's talk about some physics issue and I'll demonstrate.
 
I believe division by 0 is a physics issue because that is how instantaneous speed is defined, no?
 
11:42 AM
No. Division by zero is undefined. We've talked about that. As for speed, when you appreciate what a clock really does you appreciate that speed is defined in terms of the speed of something else.
 
What does a clock really do?
8 mins ago, by John Duffield
Let's talk about some physics issue and I'll demonstrate.
 
A clock ticks and tocks.
 
A clock clocks up some kind of regular cyclical local motion and shows you some kind of count that you call "the time".
 
This "regular cyclical local motion" must be in the same location as the clock, correct?
 
Yes, it's typically inside the clock. The interior mechanism of a mechanical clock is called a movement.
A mechanical clocks is in essence just a set of gears which make the big hand and the little hand go round and round.
 
11:55 AM
Ok, so we have a space and we have a time within that space, now how do we define the instantaneous speed of an object in that spacetime?
 
Using the motion of light. You sit there and I send 9192631770 microwaves past you. You count them going by, and when you get to 9192631770 you jump up and say that's a second. Then you define the metre as the distance travelled by that light in 1/299792458th of a second.
Then you use your second and your metre to define the instantaneous speed of your object. You're expressing its speed in units derived from the motion of light.
 
I see.
 
Note that the definition of the second and the metre means the locally-measured speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s by definition. It's a tautology, Magueijo and Moffat talked about it here.
Also note that 299,792,458 m/s up by the ceiling is not the same as 299,792,458 m/s down by the floor. The seconds are different, so the speeds are different. That's what Don Koks was talking about in the GR section of this Baez article.
 
12:26 PM
@JohnDuffield (Sigh) No to the latter, yes to the former.
@skillpatrol "Out of hand" - yes. But just because @JohnDuffield disagrees with me (and vice versa) is not a valid reason for suspension.
Let me clear something up, and I'd like people to listen:
I will not suspend John Duffield - or any other user - unless he or she commits an offense that violates the Be Nice policy (the most relevant reason here), spams chat, post inappropriate messages, or goes against any other related Stack Exchange policy, and I would appreciate it if this would not be brought up again.
I'm going to remove the star on my second message above, but I will pin the fourth if there are more suspension requests (sorry to put it like that, @skillpatrol; that sounds a bit extreme).
 
@skillpatrol : anyway, Irwin Shapiro said much the same thing: "the speed of a light wave depends on the strength of the gravitational potential along its path". But for some strange reason this sort of thing is news to physics students and PhDs.
 
12:51 PM
@DanielSank I'm trying to do that...
@KyleKanos You're alive!
@DanielSank Is "topological quantum computing" a thing that actual researchers do or is that more for mathematical physicists?
@alarge I'm ordering the book you recommended from the library.
 
1:24 PM
@0celo7 re: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/203537/… angular velocity isn't proportional to angular momentum. b/c $I$ in general is a linear transformation
it actually gets really ugly. You know. ${\bf L}$ being conserved and all
 
@NeuroFuzzy For a single particle it is, cf. OP's question.
 
oh, kay, just checking!!
 
@NeuroFuzzy The +1 on your answer is from me
:)
 
Muchos gracias senor!
 
"U.S. President Richard Nixon, when campaigning for a second term in office announced that the rate of increase of inflation was decreasing, which has been noted as "the first time a sitting president used the third derivative to advance his case for reelection.""
3
 
1:31 PM
@Slereah How are you doing today?
 
back at work
Could be better
 
ooooh
what do you do again?
 
Well I have a degree in physics
So software engineering
 
Sounds boring tbh
I should spend some time and actually formulate a reading list.
Having a big file of PDFs is not very efficient.
 
what topics are you looking for
 
1:37 PM
I want to learn some mathy QM
But I can't do analysis
At all, I just can't do it
 
it is not much fun
Did you read chapter 14 of Wald
 
Tried
I "read" it, but didn't get much of the functional analysis
I have an analysis book sitting on my desk at home
but I can't do the exercises on the first pages :/
I also want to read Special Relativity in General Frames
also I want to get a feel for what quantum computing is about
 
what kind of analysis stuff is it
Is it like deltas and epsilon shit
 
real
 
Or is it mappings of open sets and whatnot
 
1:44 PM
dude I haven't even gotten to limits and I'm stuck
like "show every set bounded below has an infimum"
can't do it
 
Isn't the infimum just the lower bound
 
greatest lower bound, as they are called
 
@0celo7 it's just about translating english definitions into $\epsilon$ format
and then playing around with inequalities
I'll help you with it soon
 
There's a delta, for every epsilon
 
1:46 PM
if you get a hang of it a few times then it'll become 2nd nature
 
It's a fact that you can always count upon
There's a delta, for every epsilon
And now and again, there's also an N
But one condition I must give
The epislon must be positive
What a lonely live all the others live
In no theorem, a delta for them
 
@0celo7 Do you use the theorem that every set bounded above has a supremum? In which case consider the set of lower bounds of the set in question
 
@NeuroFuzzy uh there's a hint and I think it says that
don't have the book on me now, in LA
 
what book is it
 
@0celo7 oh cool, you should stop by SD ;o
 
1:50 PM
Also visit Venice Beach
It's a weird place
 
according to my sister (Studio City), your town is a shithole
no offense
or is that SF
 
The shithole I visited was Bakersfield
According to a friend living there, the meth capital of California
 
one of the Sans is a shithole ;D
@Slereah Carothers
it was the only analysis book the math students hadn't checked out
and two people here recommended it
 
There we go
 
@0celo7 Hahaha nooo way! I've spent time in santa monica and even the really nice neighborhoods around there -- the water is gross, there's a huge homeless problem, stuff's dirty, and it takes an hour to travel five miles by car. Better beaches, better streets. In LA terms, there's no traffic :p
 
1:53 PM
@Slereah Posting such links in the chat is frowned upon.
 
@Slereah @ACuriousMind :(
 
WHAT THING ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT
smokebomb
 
@0celo7 Posting racism in the chat is also frowned upon.
 
@ACuriousMind Greeks aren't a race.
 
Tell that to other europeans
 
1:55 PM
@0celo7 Your defense is seriously pulling out the dictionary?
So it's okay to generically insult groups of people as long as they are not a "race" (whatever that means)?
 
@0celo7 There are at least two different meanings of "topological quantum computing".
 
@0celo7 so which problem was it?
 
One of them has to do with topological states of matter.
That, so far, is not really even close to being a reality in the lab.
The other has to do with how you take imperfect physical qubits and combine them in a way, which uses topology, to create logical qubits of much higher quality.
Typically, when you do this the error rates of the logical qubits are exponentially suppressed by the number of physical qubits per logical qubit.
It's mostly theory, but some groups have actually started getting parts of it to work.
Look up papers by Austin Fowler, Roussendorf, or even the original "toric code" paper by Kitaev (at least I think it was Kitaev).
 

« first day (1761 days earlier)      last day (3160 days later) »