The (American) college system caters to the lowest common denominator, for better or for worse. If something is below your level, pass out of it, or skip lectures and just ace the exam, and move on with other things. It's less stressful that way.
@DanielSank "AP physics does not teach you how to be an engineer, this class does"
so this class teaches me how to ask stupid questions?
user54412
@DanielSank where were you for undergrad again? I can see this being more difficult with more red tape, and bureaucracy scales with the cube of the school size I think.
@ACuriousMind they give you 4 questions in 10 minutes that are based off of the reading. it's supposed to get you in the habit of reading the book before the lecture.
I think we're doing vectors, at least based off of the homework
@DanielSank yeah, he explained to me why a nontrivial Jacobi field that vanishes at two points does not imply there are two distinct geodesics that connect the two points
By the standard definition of the wedge product as an alternated tensor product, I would think we have
$$\tag{1}\mathrm{d}z^i\wedge\mathrm{d}\bar z^{\bar j}=\mathrm{d}z^i\otimes\mathrm{d}\bar z^{\bar j}-\mathrm{d}\bar z^{\bar j}\otimes\mathrm{d}z^i$$
As I understand it, the left side should be a ...
@StanShunpike No. While liking fantasy, I never got to like Tolkien, I find his writing style tedious and boring, and the black-and-white morality also gets on my nerves.
Deja-vu, we've had this discussion half a year ago :D
user54412
@DanielSank Meh. Mythical sagas aren't really about character development, since the characters are supposed to be manifestations of abstract ideals more often than not.
@DanielSank I had a mini debate with Duffield earlier when I was bored (I may have won; it was at least a draw), so I was in that sort of mood today. :-)
Anyway, I should most likely get going. Good night/evening/day/twilight/dawn/dusk/lunchtime/breakfast/dinnertime/suppertime/teatime/that-time-in-my-profile, everyone.
user54412
@DanielSank Did you watch the final Hobbit movie yet?
@ChrisWhite I watched that one scene because it was all I cared about. It was super-duper less exciting than I hoped. I wanted to see her literally like tearing the fortress down to rubble.
@0celo7 You know, with all your background you should go spend a summer in an experimental lab. You can come out of college more well rounded in theory and experiment than anyone I've ever met.
I wasn't sure if there was a better site to post on with regards to this- I wasn't sure if people on the physical fitness stackexchange would give a sufficiently mechanical description.
When performing an exercise, such as a squat, one can incur joint pain if performing the exercise incorrectly....
I just bumped into this question, which was closed shortly after being posted.
It was definitely a badly-written, super ambiguous question. But somebody provided a really nice answer: one that was practically useful, comprehensible to the layman, and nontrivial to nonlaymen. I feel like the comm...
No. Division by zero is undefined. We've talked about that. As for speed, when you appreciate what a clock really does you appreciate that speed is defined in terms of the speed of something else.
Using the motion of light. You sit there and I send 9192631770 microwaves past you. You count them going by, and when you get to 9192631770 you jump up and say that's a second. Then you define the metre as the distance travelled by that light in 1/299792458th of a second.
Then you use your second and your metre to define the instantaneous speed of your object. You're expressing its speed in units derived from the motion of light.
Note that the definition of the second and the metre means the locally-measured speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s by definition. It's a tautology, Magueijo and Moffat talked about it here.
Also note that 299,792,458 m/s up by the ceiling is not the same as 299,792,458 m/s down by the floor. The seconds are different, so the speeds are different. That's what Don Koks was talking about in the GR section of this Baez article.
@JohnDuffield (Sigh) No to the latter, yes to the former.
@skillpatrol "Out of hand" - yes. But just because @JohnDuffield disagrees with me (and vice versa) is not a valid reason for suspension.
Let me clear something up, and I'd like people to listen:
I will not suspend John Duffield - or any other user - unless he or she commits an offense that violates the Be Nice policy (the most relevant reason here), spams chat, post inappropriate messages, or goes against any other related Stack Exchange policy, and I would appreciate it if this would not be brought up again.
I'm going to remove the star on my second message above, but I will pin the fourth if there are more suspension requests (sorry to put it like that, @skillpatrol; that sounds a bit extreme).
@skillpatrol : anyway, Irwin Shapiro said much the same thing: "the speed of a light wave depends on the strength of the gravitational potential along its path". But for some strange reason this sort of thing is news to physics students and PhDs.
"U.S. President Richard Nixon, when campaigning for a second term in office announced that the rate of increase of inflation was decreasing, which has been noted as "the first time a sitting president used the third derivative to advance his case for reelection.""
@0celo7 Hahaha nooo way! I've spent time in santa monica and even the really nice neighborhoods around there -- the water is gross, there's a huge homeless problem, stuff's dirty, and it takes an hour to travel five miles by car. Better beaches, better streets. In LA terms, there's no traffic :p
One of them has to do with topological states of matter.
That, so far, is not really even close to being a reality in the lab.
The other has to do with how you take imperfect physical qubits and combine them in a way, which uses topology, to create logical qubits of much higher quality.
Typically, when you do this the error rates of the logical qubits are exponentially suppressed by the number of physical qubits per logical qubit.
It's mostly theory, but some groups have actually started getting parts of it to work.
Look up papers by Austin Fowler, Roussendorf, or even the original "toric code" paper by Kitaev (at least I think it was Kitaev).