Discussion on answer by Ankit Sharma: What to do when OP refuses to approve (correct) edit suggestions

9:06 AM

1

A: What to do when OP refuses to approve (correct) edit suggestions

Because you are not editing a question, you are changing the meaning of question according to your own comfort and believes. And you are the being conservative here and censoring others what they can and can't say. If you have points to prove the question premises is wrong then challenge it by g...

pushpen.paul

Umm... What I understand, you are not allowing a correct edit according to your own comfort and believes. You are being conservative here.

Ankit Sharma

sabotaging a question != correct edit. You are changing the question not correcting.

pushpen.paul

I already gave reference to that: Your question description, where you (reluctantly) admitted they were co-wives and not a lesbian couple.

Ankit Sharma

@pushpen.paul I agreed to you? when did thAt happen :D

pushpen.paul

Read your question :D :D

You agreed to the whole world and it happened when you posted the question.

Ankit Sharma

9:06 AM

@pushpen.paul I wrote it, so I know what's there, it's you who want to force your ideologies here

pushpen.paul

Exactly opposite. You want to force your ideologies here, even though you know you are wrong.

The Destroyer

@pushpen.paul Don't suggest edits that conflict OP's intent. Post an answer if you think OP is wrong or you may even downvote his question if it is not proper as per you.

pushpen.paul

By the way, this was a generic question. There was no intention to target you. But you took it personally.

@TheDestroyer That is the point. There is no conflict with OP's intent. Just read the question description. I tried to match the title with the description.

@AnkitSharma Your last edit: That IS my point. You wrote in title they were lesbian couples, but they were co-wives. You actually supported me in this edit. :-) Thank you.

The Destroyer

@pushpen.paul " two co-widows, who made love together with divine blessing"..Looks like he meant lesbian couple only or this is what i understood. But it's still OP's wish to choose his words.

Ankit Sharma

"two co-widows, who made love together with divine blessing" sound fully sexual to me, co-wife don't do that normally.

pushpen.paul

9:06 AM

@TheDestroyer That's fine. My point is he is being stubborn and not open-minded.

Ankit Sharma

@pushpen.paul but it's getting proved again and again that you are being conservative here and forcing your edits wrongly

pushpen.paul

@AnkitSharma "two co-widows, ... ..." sounds fully co-wives to me. They were not married, nor that they declared themselves as lesbians.

@AnkitSharma Really! What I see is you are being proven again and again that you are taking things personally, and attacking me without being open-minded.

Ankit Sharma

@pushpen.paul then it's your ignorance that you can't read "who made love together with divine blessing"

Or you want me to explain to you how people make love? Anyway I gave you definition or lesbian and co-wife in my answer, please read if you can.

pushpen.paul

@AnkitSharma So, you mean you can't read, "two co-widows" who weren't married to themselves?

Ankit Sharma

@pushpen.paul do you have lack of attention spam? Can't you read whole sentence?

pushpen.paul

9:06 AM

@AnkitSharma Funny, because I can tell you the same. I got it, for whatever reason, you don't agree ... .... But this question is about what to do in such a situation!

Ankit Sharma

@pushpen.paul and my answer is stop sabotaging otter's question when you can't even read them full

The Destroyer

Guys! Can you stop this? Looks like this is going out of control. I will move all comments to chat and you may discuss in chat.

Ankit Sharma

@TheDestroyer But I can't help if some user don't want to read full sentence and want to censor me for his own ideologies even if he is killing original intent of the question.

co-wifes don't make love with each other

two female who make love is called lesbians

I even gave definition of this terms

The Destroyer

Looks like he's fine with it.

3 mins ago, by pushpen.paul

@TheDestroyer That's fine. My point is he is being stubborn and not open-minded.

Ankit Sharma

But he is being close-minded here

And he is repeatedly calling me stubborn for not agreeing with his wrong edit

@TheDestroyer comment purging needed here

Keshav Srinivasan

9:14 AM

@pushpen.paul To me the issue is abundantly clear. @AnkitSharma asked a question to find out if there's lesbianism in the story of Bhagiratha. Your edit conflicts with his intent.

Ankit Sharma

@TheDestroyer already moved to chat:

Let us continue this discussion in chat. — pushpen.paul 1 hour ago

The Destroyer

@AnkitSharma purged them.

pushpen.paul

9:48 AM

OK, great!

First, I don't understand @KeshavSrinivasan @AnkitSharma how does my edit suggestion conflicted with your content. I did not even touch your question description!

Second, they were sexually attracted after getting instruction from Shiva. How many times you heard people feel sexually attracted to each other after someone instructs them?

Third, no matter they were couple or not, there should be no doubt that they were co-wives. Right? So, how did I make anything wrong?

Ankit Sharma

10:14 AM

@pushpen.paul I told you 100 times before my question is not about polygamy, so why you forcing you's polygamy question here

Transcript for

Discussion on answer by Ankit Sharma:…