@Gao I recently watched an "Ethical AI" course. Among other things, the speaker made an interesting point.
AI answer bots have the potential to be abused into giving answers that promote certain products.
A bad actor could give their bot finetunig or even just some grounding to promote a product for a company that paid them to do so.
Suppose for example you have a bot on Steam that "suggests games based on your play list". Can you be sure the bot would work in your interest and give actual valid suggestions or would it try to get you to play whatever game they were "promoting" right now?
Noticing a site trying to show ads relevant to your profile is still easy. A bot has the potential of doing similar things in a far subtler way.
@Memor-X just wondering....
I assume I am the only one getting the reference in this image?
@Memor-X Funny thing, some even call this the SECOND death.
There was already a big drop in effort when the "web population" went from a few very invested nerds to thousands zero effort passerby.
you can partially see this in effect on sites like GameFAQS. When you compare older content to newer one, often the older content is by magnitudes far more in depth than recent content.
@SPArcheon-onstrike i don't see how that changes the status quo, unless it's masquerading as human users, but then again companies already buy fake reviews.
by now, even the Joe knows that "ads are targeted at you and evil" so they are wary about them. But "ChatGPT is your best friend" so everything ChatGPT says is good.
There is no "maybe ChatGPT answers are targeted to" in the picture. Average Joe won't question the accuracy of their best AI chatbot friend
true, but 1) Average Joe thinks ChatGPT actual understands what you say and what it outputs. Joe doesn't know it is just a probabilistic parrot, it actually thinks there is an "Intelligence" that generates new, original content based on actual reasoning. 2) you assume that the LLM is trained ethically, so that whatever biasis is will develop wasn't planned beforehand. What I said instead is that an ethical point I didn't consider is that a bad actor could plant those biasis by choice to promote its own agenda.
I don't remember the name of the manga, but the female lead travels back in time. In her past life, she was sacrificed for her brother because she didn't manifest water powers. After traveling back in time, she develops incredibly strong water magic and forms a pact with the Spirit King. She also...
In Dragon Ball Daima they mentioned all inhabitants from the Demon Realm have pointy ears. But Majin Buu is a demon from there and he doesnt have pointy ears, but "Freezer-like" ears.
Why doesnt Majin Buu have pointy ears if he's a demon?
In Dragon Ball Daima they mentioned all inhabitants from the Demon Realm have pointy ears. But Majin Buu is a demon from there and he doesnt have pointy ears, but "Freezer-like" ears.
Why doesnt Majin Buu have pointy ears if he's a demon?
