> PORTSMOUTH, R.I. — A local member of a New England-based neo-Nazi group known for disrupting children’s “drag queen story hours” has been charged with possessing child pornography.
...
After getting a court-authorized warrant, detectives searched Farrea’s home at 37 Souza Way and seized multiple electronic devices. The police said that Farrea’s devices contained sexually explicit images of children.
> Its founder, Christopher Hood Jr., was arrested in 2022 when the group harassed people at a children’s “drag queen story hour” in Jamaica Plain, where the masked demonstrators chanted and held a banner that read, “PEDO SCUM OFF OUR STREETS.”
> Trump could benefit from the jury instruction requiring jurors to convict only if Trump “wilfully” or expressly knew he would violate contribution limits.
Naturally a law aimed only at politicians would have an exception like this
Normally ignorance of the law isn't a built in defense of it
@Wipqozn Yeah heard an analysis by Legal Eagle... would be hard to not make a case that she made sure the whole thing would not be in court before the election
Lots of Trump associates are doing that Hail Mary right now. Push everything back as much as possible so they can get a pardon when trump is elected
which I dont think will happen
People dont like biden sure but shit would need to be dumb AF to give this Trump guy a second try
I don't know if he's going to get prison time though. I think the expectation is that due to his age and his lack of a criminal record, he's just going to get a fine
r/Conservative is as insufferable as expected, but I just wanted to get a glimpse into how the side disconnected from reality was viewing this. SPoilers: They're disconnected from reality.
> Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is an American politician, media personality, businessman and convicted felon who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
2
The drama has started too, and it's already been reverted
> Classifying Donald Trump as a convicted felon in the very first sentence of this Wikipedia article will cause massive damage to the credibility of Wikipedia as a whole. It will also discourage readers from reading further if they are looking for a neutral article to read. I agree with Thebiguglyalien in that the first sentence of a biography should be very limited to the things that make the subject notable. I agree with it being mentioned in the lead, but not for the first sentence.
Consensus #43 indicates that for the lead section, "the mere fact that an edit has not been discussed is not a valid reason to revert it." With that in mind, Space4Time3Continuum2x, could you provide a rationale for this edit? The lead is well in excess of an appropriate length and level of detail. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
I still think that when your removal of longstanding content from the lead is challenged, you need to provide a rationale for the removal on the Talk page. (Your edit summary merely says "rework lead".) Per MOS:LEAD, the lead gives the basics in a nutshell,...
lol okay
yeah, being the first POTUS in history be convicted oof a crime isn't notable.