This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review — djsmiley2k 49 mins ago
#16531 djsmiley2k (1284 rep) | A: How to set boundaries to a younger sister who wants to live in my house? (score: -1) | posted 9 hours ago by Sascha (99 rep) | Toxicity
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review — djsmiley2k 54 mins ago
#16531 djsmiley2k (1284 rep) | A: How to set boundaries to a younger sister who wants to live in my house? (score: -1) | posted 9 hours ago by Sascha (99 rep) | Toxicity
The only possible answer to ‘how can I do something impossible’, is “you can’t”—exactly what I and others have said. And if I had put that in comments, someone would rightly have rebuked me for answering in a comment instead of requesting clarification. — WGroleau 1 hour ago
#16521 WGroleau (538 rep) | A: How to convince my wife that my best friend and I are just friends? (score: 2) | posted 20 hours ago by WGroleau (538 rep) | Toxicity
I don't believe high-level hypothetical discussion is on topic here. Is this question related to a real-world problem you're trying to deal with? If yes, it might be more appropriate to ask about that problem instead. — NotThatGuy 1 hour ago
#16536 NotThatGuy (2639 rep) | Q: "The sudden break of contact" tactic (score: -2) | posted 3 hours ago by Ramid (1 rep) | Toxicity
Okay... and if I understand correctly, you don't just want to be friendly at work, but actually be friends outside of work as well? — Tinkeringbell ♦ 9 hours ago
#16532 Tinkeringbell (18505 rep) | Q: How to be friendly with new team members (score: 2) | posted 9 hours ago by Artie Ladie (583 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Artie Ladie (583 rep)
I'm not sure I agree with your first paragraph. I doubt she will delete messages, I'm sure they communicate primarily through Facebook, and if I find it's true that they have had no contact for a year (which is what she's claiming), I have no reason to wonder the same thing in a few months. — user123 25 secs ago
#16530 user123 (6 rep) | A: Deciding whether to view a SO's private conversation given reasonable suspicion (score: 5) | posted 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep)
I'm not sure I agree with your first paragraph. I doubt she will delete messages, I'm sure they communicate primarily through Facebook, and if I find it's true that they have had no contact for a year (which is what she's claiming), I have no reason to wonder the same thing in a few months. — user123 1 min ago
#16530 user123 (6 rep) | A: Deciding whether to view a SO's private conversation given reasonable suspicion (score: 5) | posted 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep)
Can you edit this to include a synopsis of the text you are referencing so that people who are unfamiliar with it can still follow the question. — sphennings 4 mins ago
#16536 sphennings (6521 rep) | Q: "The sudden break of contact" tactic (score: -2) | posted 3 hours ago by Ramid (1 rep) | Toxicity
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review — djsmiley2k 1 hour ago
Also, do you think "knowing whether or not a SO is cheating" is "protecting [myself] from serious harm"? This was the justification I used to go through her personal emails in the first place, and she agreed that it was justified. I think I could have requested to view the Facebook conversation then and also be justified, but I didn't. So does it matter that I'm now asking to view the conversation a year later? — user123 1 min ago
#16530 user123 (6 rep) | A: Deciding whether to view a SO's private conversation given reasonable suspicion (score: 5) | posted 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep)
9:48 PM
@Mindwin I would say it sounds neutral; it sounds like you're standing up for yourself a little, but that's about it. Of course, it can sound different if you say it with a different tone. — Ovi 9 hours ago
#16488 Ovi (101 rep) | A: How can a girl ask a burly tall man who jumped the line, to get in line? (score: 73) | posted 36 hours ago by SomeoneElse (2352 rep) | Toxicity | edited 33 hours ago by David K (1186 rep)
Also, do you think "knowing whether or not a SO is cheating" is "protecting [myself] from serious harm"? This was the justification I used to go through her personal emails in the first place, and she agreed that it was justified. I think I could have requested to view the Facebook conversation then and also be justified, but I didn't. So does it matter that I'm now asking to view the conversation a year later? — user123 11 mins ago
#16530 user123 (6 rep) | A: Deciding whether to view a SO's private conversation given reasonable suspicion (score: 5) | posted 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep)
I'm not sure I agree with your first paragraph. I doubt she will delete messages, I'm sure they communicate primarily through Facebook, and if I find it's true that they have had no contact for a year (which is what she's claiming), I have no reason to wonder the same thing in a few months. — user123 15 mins ago
#16530 user123 (6 rep) | A: Deciding whether to view a SO's private conversation given reasonable suspicion (score: 5) | posted 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep)
Can you edit this to include a synopsis of the text you are referencing so that people who are unfamiliar with it can still follow the question. — sphennings 16 mins ago
#16536 sphennings (6521 rep) | Q: "The sudden break of contact" tactic (score: -2) | posted 4 hours ago by Ramid (1 rep) | Toxicity
Also, do you think "knowing whether or not a SO is cheating" is "protecting [myself] from serious harm"? This was the justification I used to go through her personal emails in the first place, and she agreed that it was justified. I think I could have requested to view the Facebook conversation then and also be justified, but I didn't. So does it matter that I'm now asking to view the conversation a year later? — user123 16 mins ago
#16530 user123 (6 rep) | A: Deciding whether to view a SO's private conversation given reasonable suspicion (score: 5) | posted 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep)
I'm not sure I agree with your first paragraph. I doubt she will delete messages, I'm sure they communicate primarily through Facebook, and if I find it's true that they have had no contact for a year (which is what she's claiming), I have no reason to wonder the same thing in a few months. — user123 19 mins ago
#16530 user123 (6 rep) | A: Deciding whether to view a SO's private conversation given reasonable suspicion (score: 5) | posted 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Matthew1471 (159 rep)
Can you edit this to include a synopsis of the text you are referencing so that people who are unfamiliar with it can still follow the question. — sphennings 21 mins ago
#16536 sphennings (6521 rep) | Q: "The sudden break of contact" tactic (score: -2) | posted 4 hours ago by Ramid (1 rep) | Toxicity
#16532 Artie Ladie (583 rep) | Q: How to be friendly with new team members (score: 2) | posted 9 hours ago by Artie Ladie (583 rep) | Toxicity | edited 9 hours ago by Artie Ladie (583 rep)
« first day (338 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (173 days later) »
Transcript for
Jul8
Jul '1814
Jul29
Under The Bed
Another testing room for Smelly. If you want to have an actual...
