« first day (1379 days earlier)      last day (1112 days later) » 

6:52 AM
morning
@lila i'm doing alright :)
both yesterday and now
 
7:03 AM
@lila Oh I have prepared lots of deep grunts after things go back to normal and I remind myself that I was sad about things not being normal
 
 
5 hours later…
11:48 AM
0
Q: Can committed, long-term relationships with little physical attraction last?

user369084I met someone over 2 years ago and she is almost everything that I want in a girl. I always feel happy and comfortable being with her and I admire her for the person that she is. However I have noticed that my physical attraction towards her has decreased substantially to the point where I don’t ...

 
 
2 hours later…
1:27 PM
This is good. I'd suggest being the one to make the first communication and explain rather than allowing the recruiter to make the first communication regarding a missed interview. — baldPrussian 2 mins ago
#26856 baldPrussian (31753 rep) | A: How do I regain rapport with a recruiter whose phone screen meeting I missed? (score: 1) | posted 33 days ago by Coach David Ades (274 rep) | edited 31 days ago by Coach David Ades (274 rep) | Toxicity 0.06670993 | Comment on inactive post |
 
2:15 PM
hi
 
3:02 PM
Morning.
 
 
2 hours later…
4:37 PM
0
Q: jokes on a girl has crush for my coworker

AnonysI am working over a year in the financial industry, big corporate in graduate scheme. I have a group of friends, I sometimes sit with them over a coffee at break times; not so close but good rapport I can say. I saw them outside and we were smoking and having chit chat. Then a girl from other dep...

 
4:54 PM
Whelp. By the time I finished editing that to try to figure out what the OP was actually saying, it was closed.
Pretty sure it'd be a better fit for law.se.
 
5:13 PM
It would need a lot of work to be even considered a question there.
 
Sure, but I think the core of the Question is "Is what I did considered harrassment", which is a legal issue, not an interpersonal one.
 
6:09 PM
@Sarov Major distraction over at MSE... but in essence, law.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic seems to me that 'is what I did harassment' would fall under legal advice which law doesn't do :)
 
6:19 PM
Huh. Well then. Probably just off-topic everywhere, then?
 
I'm afraid so, yeah. Reddit's 'am I the asshole' might work, but not on SE :P
 
6:54 PM
Do assholes harass? I'm afraid I get a feeling we're setting the bar low
Professionals have standards
 
Is it even allowed here to say this word? My first rejected edit suggestion ever was replacing this word with my super-well-thought-out alternative :D
 
@lila it's the name of the subreddit. In general, you use words like that at your own risk..
 
I am still traumatized for the rejection, just look at this pets.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/21664
 
Eh, yeah... Asshole works better there :P
 
Haha can you really blame me for suggesting this, I was a new user and didn't know any better :D
 
7:08 PM
I'm scared to follow that link.
 
oh why?
 
Who knows what sort of profane profanity I may find.
Fun fact-original meaning of 'profane' just meant 'not divine'. Like everything that wasn't explicitly holy.
 
I kind of already know this, that there are two spheres: sacrum and profanum.
Haha not that much, just two instances of a-word :D
But profanation is making something profane, and if there are only two spheres, then you could only profane something that is sacred, and this would be a huge disrespect to the sacred object, so profanation is a serious thing (I hope my reasoning makes sense).
 
Yeah, makes sense.
 
7:27 PM
It is like the word "unholy" that just means "not holy", but it is used to indicate something horrific, diabolical and evil. I think it is because the "un-" prefix indicates that the object is not simply not holy, but that it had once been holy, then it has been UN-done and the downgrading process itself made it much more disturbing. It is like the Devil who once was an angel named Lucifer, but fell from grace.
 
What you're describing is basically an Interpersonal Skills exercise :D
It's called "Polarization", or "either/or fallacy" in the book I'm still reading sometimes.
 
Oh okay, interesting, tell me more please, which part do you mean? I am slow today, sorry if I am missing something.
oh ok
 
Lemme give you the excercise:
I'm going to give you 5 words. You're supposed to give me a word that means their opposite :D
tall, heavy, strong, happy, legal.
 
short, light, weak, sad, illegal
 
Yay! Good job :D Now, part b: Give me 5 words that are 'in the middle'. So something that's betwwn short and tall, something that's between heavy and light...
 
7:32 PM
average, medium, medium, neutral, suspicious
 
That took you a bit longer, didn't it?
(please don't say you were getting tea XD)
 
Haha yes, not only it took longer but the results are questionable :D
 
Precisely :)
The Interpersonal Skills thing is to realize that people often talk using these polarizations, or in terms of 'either for us or against us'. And to realize yourself that there may very well be a more moderate term to use at times :D
The holy/unholy shows the same polarization. Something is either holy or its opposite: unholy.
 
How whelming.
 
Haha no, I even took the time to open new tab in attempt to cheat a little :D that moment I think it clicked what you mean; I am looking more and it is also known as "fallacy of false dilemma".
@Sarov :D
 
7:35 PM
@Sarov Hahaha even though I learned about that word, I can't ever read it without some sarcasm meters going off :P
 
@Anonys Yeah, I've been on the wrong end of that and I think part of the complaint was someone being mad at me. Things that one person would take as a joke can be interpreted as harassment by someone else. And a third party who accidently hears the interaction can feel harassed as well. don't get me started... things needed to change (badly) but... — baldPrussian 2 mins ago
#26932 baldPrussian (31753 rep) | Q: Made a joke that a girl has a crush for my coworker, he got mad - was it harrasment? (score: -1) | posted 3 hours ago by Anonys (1 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by Anonys (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.2610495 | tps/fps: 0/0
Matched regex(es) ["possible-aic"]
 
@lila It's very likely it has a lot of names :P I've learned most fallacies are also known by 2/3 others ;)
 
We love standards. That's why we have so many of them.
 
@Sarov It's probably also the thing that leads to some of the polarization :P After all, something either meets your standard or it doesn't, right? :P
 
That's actually something I'm learning to get better at for code reviews. "That's not how I would do it but it's not an objectively bad approach" vs "That's not the correct way".
 
7:41 PM
@Tinkeringbell What I meant was also a little more than this: for example in fantasy you have a living being that dies and is then dead - but an entity usually known as necromancer could "undo" this state of being dead, but not really, and it is called undead - to indicate that the being had already died, but it's state of being dead has been undone.
However, it is not in between of alive and dead, but rather a different state, being alive is lost forever for this object, it could only come back to being dead.
 
@Sarov Yeah, that's one time those skills come in handy ;) I'm working on a code base with some coworkers, but we don't have any formal coding standards. Most of our reviews go that way.
 
'Course, sometimes it is an objectively bad way of doing it...
 
And undead beings are usually just empty shells without their own will, or are controlled by evil spirits; un-doing the state of being dead is unnatural and has a lot of implied side-effects: that undead beings are usually actively harmful for live beings.
 
@lila Ah! I never looked at holy/unholy that way.... It was mostly presented as an either/or thing when I grew up. I also can't easily thing of a thing that's between 'holy' and 'unholy'.... In the 'undead' example, you basically have 'alive', the opposite, 'dead', and something in between: something not alive, but also no longer dead (undead).
 
@lila In this case I would think the meaning of the prefix 'un' is specifically 'no longer'. You don't 'unfreeze' iron. You melt it. Because it was never frozen in the first place.
I would argue that the biblical Jesus is undead.
 
7:46 PM
@Sarov resurrected :P
 
Potato tomato.
 
@Tinkeringbell You can have "holy", "mundane", and "unholy".
 
Ooh, nice one.
 
Kind of an important concept in Judaism... or was, at any rate.
 
Yeah. I think Christiany would just lump all mundane things under unholy too.
(At least the brand I grew up with did)
 
7:48 PM
@Sarov Oh interesting point! But the important detail is, he was resurrected by a holy being: the God himself, so it is an actual change from dead to alive. A necromancer has a much lesser power, and could at most return a being from being dead into undead, which is wicked and wretched imitation of being alive.
 
When things get weird is when you try to apply the 'un' prefix to the middle-ground.
What does unmundane mean? It used to be mundane, and now it's either holy or unholy?
 
@Sarov unmundane to me would be the same as unearthly :P
So yeah, something unmundane could be something holy or unholy!
 
Y'all putting my one uni religion course to work.
 
I know that there is a concept in electronics (sorry for simplifying or butchering the idea, I am uneducated at this) that you have a signal that is either on (1) or off (0), and some components that are taking signals in and giving signals out based on these that went in. And sometimes you could get a prediction of signals out, even if one of the "in" signals was unknown or undefined.
So the "unknown" or "undefined" is like a third state.
 
Quantumcomputing?
 
7:55 PM
If you reverse the on (1) then you get off (0) and vice versa. But if you attempt to reverse the "unknown" signal, then it no longer makes sense; it doesn't create a fourth state, because ununknown is just either on or off: one of the initial two states.
@Tinkeringbell Hmm, maybe? I don't know, sorry, I know this from watching some simplified popular science video long ago.
 
All I know about it is that thats supposed to work with that 'third state'
 
And my point is, mundane is in between of holy and unholy, it is a "third" state in between, but unmundane makes no sense and isn't a "fourth" state, it just makes no sense.
 
That's a good reasoning :)
 
thanx :D
 
I've gotta run, or I'll miss bedtime. Night!
 
7:58 PM
good night :D
 
Night.
 
@lila 'you coccyx' flows better IMO
Sacrum is less accurate anyway
@Tinkeringbell don't run before bed
 
@M.A.R. "you coccyx", do you mean "you the final segment of the vertebral column in all apes, and analogous structures in certain other mammals such as horses; in tailless primates it is the remnant of a vestigial tail"? Haha I am impressed you know Latin names of bones that well to make this joke, I had to cheat with Wikipedia to get it :D
 
@lila 101 (or whatever they call it) anatomy course
 
@M.A.R. Only 101? Aren't there over 200 bones in human body? 101 anatomy course seems a bit incomplete.
 
8:08 PM
@lila Well pharmacist coccyges have other sorts of pain to endure than anatomy
I wish it was like learning 206 bones and 1000 muscles. It's a much worse hell than that from what I gather
(And yeah, it also does involve knowing more than 206 for pediatricians)
 
Haha you reminded me about a thing, there is a blog in Polish that tells anecdotes of a pharmacist. Many are confusion of medication names with Polish words so it would lose all meaning upon translation, but some are universal. My favourite is "good afternoon, one stool sample please" (the person wanted a container for stool sample) :D
 
0
Q: How to detect and counteract gaslighting

TheProseMixGaslighting is one of those things that becomes a logical trap for both the abused (they can look deluded, without physical evidence, which can lead to further manipulation) and also for a falsely-accused abuser (“I’m not gaslighting you!” is exactly the sort of thing a gaslighter would say!) Wha...

 
I had always been thinking that "gaslighting" comes from the act of pouring gasoline over something and then setting it on fire, but just a short time ago I learnt that "gaslighting" comes from gas lights, in other words gas-powered lamps. Husband was secretly tampering with gas lamps in home and artificially dimming them on purpose, then convincing his wife that they aren't dimmed and purposefully denying other things to slowly drive her insane.
 
 
3 hours later…
11:28 PM
0
Q: Appropriate parting email to a client

user369084I’m saying goodbye to a client contact that my colleague and I have been closely working with albeit only for several months. The client contact has been a tremendous inspiration to me as she is not only a great person but also very skilful. This is what I had written and keen to get your thought...

 

« first day (1379 days earlier)      last day (1112 days later) »