« first day (1247 days earlier)      last day (57 days later) » 

8:00 AM
Morning!
 
I've extensively watched NVC training yesterday. And about a somewhat hot topic on meta, Marshall Rosenberg, father of NVC, said very clearly "If you want to stop hurting other with your words simply wait until you are flat and dead". He believes "nobody is responsible for your feelings" which IMHO make a lot of sense but that can be harsh to defend against someone arguing moderation against -isms and other hate speech.
 
Morning!
 
Morning also
 
i'm surprised no questions have been asked overnight (aka USA evening) :P
 
@ArthurHv It floats, as long as you're not dealing with people using words to evoke specific feelings ;)
@CaldeiraG I'm not, we got the batch of three in the afternoon.
 
8:03 AM
@Tinkeringbell that's true
 
Even if people do, you're still the one responsible for your feelings, but I think it makes it a lot harder to claim you were allowed circumstances where you could have full control.
 
@Tinkeringbell But how can you evaluate intent though. There have been for example historians working on revisionnist theories. This is afaik somewhat illegal now in France for the reason it's hate speech. How could you separate someone awkward and with ancient values for example, say a fine 1920 buddy, with someone being actively trolling
 
You can't. That's why I'm not responsible for people's feelings, but just for enforcing a set of rules/guidelines. Moderators in other places will have other guidelines to follow.
< insert one of those 'move to parler' memes >
 
If the set of rules is being so arbitrary there is probably no wonder it's so debated, because then it's about political power about who sets them and who's views it is going to win. Then you would have different churches with their advocates... everything i love (not) about politics
 
8:20 AM
I never said it was fun XD
 
8:30 AM
I have a book on the Trolley Problem... it makes an interesting argument: The court of public opinion is the highest court there can be. Without public opinion, there wouldn't be any laws or politics.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:34 AM
There were instances of law and politic contrary to public opinon
 
True.
Societies are just weird ;)
You can't capture all of it in a single statement.
 
there are few universals like money but you'd be wrong to only view society through that indeed
 
There are still bands of hunter-gatherers deep in the Amazon, that are very unlikely to be arranged around money ;) Are they not societies then? :P
I listened to an interesting podcast yesterday, about protests.
It mentioned counter-culture (from the 60s) as well: How people wanted all that they already had, but also more focus on individual self-determination, more of a 'right' to personal happiness and not just doing what your parents did, how they didn't want authoritarian teaching...
It's funny to see most protests of today in that light: how people are basically demanding rules forbidding this or that XD
It drew some good parallels, and the point I was making is kinda getting lost but to get back to it: societies are weird :P
 
thats a bit sad. I'm a bit anarchist on some principles, but many people see light only through the prism of law, state, and rules enforcement
 
Well, I would say they certainly help, but these days it's becoming more and more like those American warning labels you sometimes read about :D
It's no use having rules if there's no enforcement... but similarly, it's no use lobbying for rules that are basically not enforcable.
That last bit is getting close to "thought crimes" and autoritarian regimes where you can settle disputes by just calling in your neighbor for not screaming loud enough that he loves the government.
 
9:46 AM
Most of the laws are quite nonsensical. They are meant to preserve things stale and powerful people in powerful positions.
that's a bit controversial view, but imagine that
I've never had to face a policeman in my life except to control my vehicle papers that just happened to be outdated and he didn't care
yet most of the time i act reasonably and never killed anyone
even though i'm mentally unstable
I don't see any reason the law would prevent you from actually killing your neighbor. For one, they don't really, they just punish you afterwards. And for second if you come to want to kill your neighbor there is something really wrong that is to be searched outside of the scope of law and order
now anarchy have a large problem with money and ensuring their stability and value
but I don't really know if that is a real problem
 
10:10 AM
@ArthurHv I think the idea about law punishing afterwards is that it avoids people killing the people that killed?
sorta.
It gives people a way to get their 'revenge' without having to resort to playing their own judge and executioner
 
I don't think revenge is an essential human need. I would gladly opt this out if I could.
 
@ArthurHv On the one hand, yes. On the other... if there are no rules governing 'revenge', who's to say the people that do find it an essential need don't go rampaging?
 
Nothing, and I don't believe a piece of law prevents that. We saw rampages happen in the US. We know quite well what's the problem...
OTOH I'm not saying an anarchy would be less violent. It could be more violent. But I'm questioning the power people give to law that it doesn't have IMHO.
 
Laws do only work as long as people believe they do ;) If you have a society that (mostly) agrees to abide to certain laws, those laws will work and hold power. Much like religion, actually, or anything else humans come up with.
As long as people believe a piece of cloth with a 10 printed on it is worth 10 euros, and that those cloths are the only way to get groceries from a supermarket... we're willing to work to have those pieces of cloth, and not steal from the supermarket.
 
10:25 AM
On anarchies, there was this guy that compiled the list of the 100 worst disasters in history, caused by humans.
He concluded that anarchies are worse than the most suppressive form of government.
AFAIK the historians agreed with his analyses.
So I'm just saying, don't underestimate what chaos can do
@Tinkeringbell two generations later, the teaching is still pretty authoritarian and the only change the 60's brought as far as I can see is more entitlement
That's why even the salvageable messages of the counterculture don't make me hate that era any less.
I guess I'm a commie shrug
I'm thinking, it must be pretty smelly and damp beneath the Mandalorian's helmet. Ew.
 
10:43 AM
(reading)
(so there's been an awkward silence here for a third of an hour?)
 
@M.A.R. I don't see a relationship between a disaster and a law system if you take for ex. Tchernobyl. That being said if you have source so I can understand better I would be glad.
 
This is not what i call an awkward silence. This is a philosophical discussion.
Awesome at that.
 
@humn Come back the weekends for more silence :D
 
I came here somewhat 3/4 years ago and left in a truly awkward way.
 
Note that I'm not a convinced anarchist either, I think it's an inspiring ideal and so is democracy. We can only live with imperfect implementations anyway.
 
10:50 AM
Please don't kick me out again. I understand philosophy. I love it!
And it ain't easy.
In fact it hurts, like all love.
As well as motivates. If anyone understands publicly it would be here.
Sorry to interrupt but . . .
 
@ArthurHv Well, if we take the corona pandemic and 'law system' (okay, more politics but still): I have read that a lot of this crap could've been prevented if local Chinese authorities hadn't tried so hard to suppress the seriousness of this pandemic just so the national government wouldn't hold them accountable.
 
@ArthurHv , thank you for the hint. Working on it. Listening for now. Signed, case study
 
I'm not sure how that proves the fact that most of the worst disasters were by absence of law though XD
But well, Chernobyl was kinda caused by humans just doing what they wanted, and not following safety protocols, if I understood the mini-series correctly :D
 
@Tinkeringbell To me this echoes a lot of NVC teachings that accountability and duty are poor motivations when it comes to making individuals do responsible choices.
 
I haven't really studied NVC much, but if you mean that shouting at people that they are irresponsible isn't going the help them be more responsible, sure XD
 
11:03 AM
@Tinkeringbell NVC says we all make choices in pure freedom. If you say "I had to" it's lying. You chose to.
 
Ah.
That's... I guess I can agree with the philosophical part of that, but not the pedantic consequences ;)
Yes, everything you do is a choice
But some things 'have to be done', in that 'the alternative choices are so much worse there's not really a choice left'.
What's NVCs stance on 'I felt I had to' then?
 
It's denying your own responsibility
 
Choice and freedom work on a good day. Panic and response on another. Forgiveness on the best of days. Consequences on the most days. Do you mind?
 
Rosenberg uses the example of a nazi that used "i had to" language to send jews to death
and didn't felt any remorse or guilt because of his choices, he just had to
 
I would never punish someone in the way they did. Their conscience is punishment enough.
 
11:07 AM
now if you change the wording, "i choose to send people to death" that sound a lot more different
 
But so does 'I felt I had to'. Because that already makes it clearer that it was a choice made under less than optimal circumstances.
 
NVC is dedicated at eliminating power relationship between people
 
Like I said, I can agree with the philosophical principle, and I hold myself to at most times. But who knows what I'll ever do if I'm put in a position where I have to choose between my own life, or the life of someone I don't know?

I'm not going to pretend I'm a saint...
 
You'd maybe choose your own life, but there is no judgment of that
 
!
 
11:11 AM
@ArthurHv And I think that holds well, if both people are willing to eliminate. But as soon as you're dealing with someone that does not share that goal, that's when things will turn violent anyways.
I can choose to ignore someone on the internet because they've been nasty, and ignoring them is the kindest thing left to do that will avoid the most violence. But as long as that person doesn't choose to grant me the same favor, they'll see my ignoring as a slight and use it to try and get under my skin anyways.
 
Really?!? Cripplingly self-conscious persons like i are holding a philosophical conversation in detail as i would like, on a good day?
Please let me contribute as soon as i catch up a little more.
 
@ArthurHv Hmm. That's an interesting one, but it'll have to wait until after lunch and the next meeting, I'm afraid. :)
 
@Tinkeringbell, are you saying you want a break from here at the moment? If not, i have something to add to your last paragraph.
Someone being nasty is their problem, you know. as do they, as i on regretful occasion.
If we understand as much, as probably has been said here more than enough, we can continue somehow.
Now that we're contributing to the name of this site, please allow me to work through repeated brain injury as if that were an excuse.
The injuries are diagnostic, including one just a month ago, but somehow my typing persists.
Yet, knowing my relatives, the basic diagnosis is genetic.
And you would've enjoyed the follow-up comas as much is i up to those points.
, , ,
please, sorry to interrupt with a datum, please continue
(oooooo, no need to worry, persons who care and know about me more than present have left me to free range for half a century. Just tell me how to contribute, please.)
 
11:31 AM
There is no single way how to contribute. If you have something you want to say or respond to you can as long as it respects moderation guidelines.
 
Link to guidelines?
I'll try to follow by example otherwise. You must know that this room is an attractive nuisance.
Truly, i am both the most awkward and functional nuisance, hoping beyond hope to fit in somehow.
I look at what i just typed and agree in wonder that it resembles a coherent sentence.
Okay, signed, a reminder
Until my most recent self-inflicted neurological infarction i would've sweated a tsunami
but now i'm freaking out without basic physiological deluge.
 
\o humn
 
@Mithical ! Please translate
 
My dress uniform is now soaked
 
11:44 AM
!
@MattE.Эллен , working on it
@MattE.Эллен , don't you know if i knew that i woudn't be here
 
(okay, it's not technically dress uniform, it's the one that you wear when out of base or during a ceremony. Unfortunately, it happened to be raining when I left base.)
 
@humn I just came to pass along the information you requested.
 
@Mithical , you found both my sense of humo(u)r and so much deeper
@MattE.Эллен , much appreciated. when i calm down i'll proceed as if this weren't a real emergency
@Mithical, and anyone else. If you'd accompany me to The Troll chat room, i'll untangle.
 
12:23 PM
@Mithical ._.
No 3s?
We tended to just wear combat uniforms with the sleeves folded, unless you were a clerk or something
 
12:49 PM
@JourneymanGeek We've got A uniforms for off base and B uniforms for on base
 
Yess I'm back! Some people/meetings XD. So, if I understand correctly, if we're talking NVC, I could tell people I chose a certain thing, and those people I'm talking with would be expected to not judge me for it?

Yet if I tell them I had to do a certain thing, I'll be judged a liar?
@Mithical You need a C uniform for rainy weather ;)
 
I've got a coat... but that doesn't help the pants.
(and my beret got all wet also, being on the shoulder of the coat)
 
Ugh.
So, you're off base now? Going home? or?
 
At home eating late lunch :D
 
That sound good :D Hopefully, also in dry clothes? ;)
How are the military pants btw, I seem to remember you like lots of pockets?
 
12:55 PM
@Tinkeringbell That's not exactly it. NVC identifies communication mode and not people using that. So you can judge people and still use the NVC to communicate. But if you express something then it's NVC if you do so without evaluation and judgement.
In a world of fluent nvc users, you could tell you had to do something, and NVC listeners would hmm hmm not believe you and just not point out you are a liar :D
 
Okay, that makes sense...
But does that mean NVC leaves no room for 'interpretative listening', where a statement like "I had to" is automatically interpreted as 'I felt there was no better option to choose'?
 
@Tinkeringbell pockets are great, but that's about it
 
@Mithical LOL
Or not, I'm not happy you're unhappy with your pants actually.
 
The ones they gave me are huge, I have to see about getting a smaller pair. Might be more comfortable then
 
@Tinkeringbell I know what you mean and i especially struggle with "improvements" and "we have to" in corporate setting but I think it's ok to hear them and use them as long as the frame is understood by interlocutors.
 
1:00 PM
@Mithical Ah, that sounds like something you could spend a few weeks being busy with :|
@ArthurHv The word improvements? Or 'we have to' as a reason for improvements?
 
the word improvements
and the we have to invoked for whatever change
 
Interesting. Can I guess? "It's not an improvement, it's just another way of doing the same thing"?
 
Yep. It's different. It takes less time. There are measures like that. Improvement is just not objective, it's the same as saying "the product is good".
but on what scale, on what value ? For corp, for users, for devs ?
 
True, unless you agree upon the metrics, you can't measure improvement ;)
And, even if you agree upon the metrics, how will you ever agree upon improving the metrics?
 
so the same for the we have to etc. as long as context is clear then it can be fine
 
1:05 PM
True, true.
 
@Tinkeringbell our varient is basically cargo pants :D
likewise on the tops
@Mithical our old pants were cotton and broke in well
the new ones are some quick drying itchy synthetic :(
 
@JourneymanGeek Yeah, that's ... basically what I assume every pair of military pants to look like XD
 
2:02 PM
0
Q: In self introduction, how can I avoid saying my name twice?

DevavrataLet's take the following conversation: John - Hey Mike, I am John how are you? Mike - Hi John, I am good. Thanks for asking. John - Let me introduce myself. I am John and I am working in ... Now here, John has said his name twice in the introduction. How can we avoid this or this is ok?

 
82
Q: MAINTENANCE WARNING: Possible downtime early morning Dec 2/4/9 UTC (8:30PM NYC-time on Dec 1/3/8, 2020)

Tom LimoncelliTL;DR: The SRE Team at Stack Overflow is announcing 3 maintenance windows. No downtime is planned but the work is classified as “risky” therefore this announcement. The maintenance is expected to take 10-20 minutes and will happen sometime during the 2-hour window beginning at 8:30PM ET (01:30 U...

the table looks hella good in this post
 
2:41 PM
Yeah, tables are nice :)
 
:D
it took too long for tables to reach SE
 
3:06 PM
Some days I love programming...
((boolean andif boolean andif boolean) andif (boolean andif boolean andif boolean)) orif ((boolean andif boolean andif boolean) andif (boolean andif boolean andif boolean))
With 'boolean' being the result of a comparison like "Tinkeringbell = Tinkeringbell"
 
3:36 PM
lol :P
 
 
1 hour later…
4:55 PM
As a "whatever" person, this was critical for me to learn. I thought I was being nice, if I had no preference, allowing the other person to choose what they liked. Having it explained that no, this was actually pushing more work on them, I now take the question and put some work into it. Frequently, it's still "This sounds good, but I don't have a strong preference" to compare against "I want to go here", and I hope that works better. However, another thing: as a true "whatever" person (and not a controller), if I do "whatever", I don't get to gripe about the choice - "whatever" was fine. — Mycroft 58 secs ago
#5031 Mycroft (115 rep) | A: How can I stop my friend from replying "anything" when asking them what they'd like to eat? (score: 54) | posted 1148 days ago by BradC (3045 rep) | edited 161 days ago by Community (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.09198442 | Comment on inactive p
 

« first day (1247 days earlier)      last day (57 days later) »