I live in a shared house where one of the people living here is the lease holder. Things are going crazy. I am moving out soon. Along time ago I put a lock on my door with the lease holders permission. I agreed with him to hide the key in a common area. This is so I can check to see if the key ha...
I notice when the mother dies then the father just remarries and forgets about his kids in general.
When fathers die, the mother still look after the kids.
@dhein Relocating takes time, just take yours. I guess there's a bit more pressure though, as you went from one apartment to the other, instead of from parents to 'move out'?
@BananaMilkShake: Have you considered that due to your history with her, anything you say can be taken to be in relation to your relationship ending? You may simply not be a person who she'll listen to without dismissing your input as vindictive or spiteful. — Flater35 secs ago
Marked this comment as caught correctly (tp). Currently marked 1tps/0fps. beep boop My human overlords won't let me flag that, so you'll have to do it yourself.
But thats why I planed in 2 times 1 week for relocating. As I know myself I knew that would gonna happen and hence I had to mess up 2 weeks ago to figure what still had to be done last week.
Still a few things I just realized yesterday/today. But its handable now... '^.^
I just spend like 30 minutes wondering why my maven was running code that wasn't there anymore. And then I realize it's because I needed to do a mvn clean...
@Magisch I wouldn't be too afraid of it... Don't let Twitter rule SE and make people afraid to post anything. The thing with IPS was that question titles showed up in HNQ, and people went mad about those. These weren't the kind of people that would open such questions to read the answers, I guess...
I think a lot of HNQ people might just forego downvoting as 'it's anonymous/low rep and doesn't do anything', while that isn't entirely true: It still shows up in those tools. Further, a lot of people might see sites like Workplace as 'fun' instead of serious business, and don't recognize the harm in upvoting something 'just for lolz'. I wouldn't be too harsh, though having a 100 not-so-nice people around is still not that much considering the amount of people that see these questions/answers ;)
eh. The real harm here is we're still building a long term Q/A and people like to adapt answers for similar but not equal situations. So someone who got caught doing something crappy and inappropriate at work might happen upon this post and (since they can't see downvotes / upvotes breakdowns) think "Oh this is a good and recommended way of dealing with that"
I guess the advice of sabotaging someone's career and gaslighting / lying to their face just doesn't sit right with me on a visceral level, I know people who had the displeasure of being on the recieving end of that
@Magisch Then now, just wait? Your meta answer seemed to be doing well last time I checked... And if not, I think you can also try contact us before starting a hashtag ;) I remember someone doing that for an answer on IPS once, while we were discussing if it was okay to have. Eventually animuson helped us out.
yeah. I don't want to damage stack exchange as a company, or kick off another witch hunt in the current climate. Not worth it. Someone will deal with it sometime. Failing that, there's still contact us
Interesting. I've never seen this notice before "Thanks for the feedback! Votes cast by those with less than 125 reputation are recorded, but do not change the publicly displayed post score."
@Rainbacon They can be seen though, on 10k tools, so I advocate voting down everything you see that needs it, even if you don't have the reputation ;)
Perhaps you already have the necessary reputation for accessing interpersonal.stackexchange.com/tools/post-feedback on here, with the reduced reputation levels?
@Rainbacon Hmmm? So you can see the number of anonymous/low rep vote counts, but they're not visible in the actual score of the post? That's what it's supposed to do XD
You can do the math yourself, and then one of our most overrated/least helpful answers has a score of 6 instead of 70-something. That's... quite something, and shows that anonymous votes might actually be useful... perhaps... if people start arguing about HNQ inflating scores ;)
But only if people in HNQ without the rep to do so downvote ;)
@scohe001 My sight is overdeveloped, everything that's above 200 lumen is painful to me :p
I can't look at the sky on a cloudly day - can you imagine my optician's face when I asked if they could provide me with night-mode glasses so that I can drive without being blinded by the cars' headlights?
For the active page, there is an easy fix: just edit some open questions/answers which are still open. It will put them in the front page and "hide" the closed one
@Magisch it was deleted by the time I saw the conversation in here this morning, based on the description in the meta, definitely seemed like the right call
Me neither. They removed the question from HNQ asap and the answer is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. The author already accused them of censorship & the usual
I'm a bit surprised nobody on the meta has mentioned CoC (which I would probably cite when deleting such an answer here), but I suppose that could be opening a can of worms for them
I didn't want to dive into that. Of course it's also a pretty blatant violation of the CoC with regards to alienating a lot of people who have experienced unfair retaliation or witnessed inappropriate behavior and were intimidated out of reporting it
Don't need to open the CoC can when you can make a solid case for deletion on the merits of ethics
@Magisch heh that'd be great. it's probably alright, but I have a meeting in 10 so I don't want to open it yet
@Magisch that sucks too :\ my last job technically had reviews but it was all based on "self-evaluations", aka you didn't really get any feedback unless you were doing really bad
@Magisch Actually... I think it might have it's merits to say 'Sorry, CoC, this isn't in line with treating people respectfully' instead of 'was deleted because we disagreed with your ethics' :/
Okay, without bragging, I have noticed that I am more interesting, humble, captivating and impressive when I am texting than during face to face conversations.
Honestly, I don't fake myself when I am texting and this is 100% sure that I stay the real me no matter if I am talking f2f or texting.
A...
The team I'm on has 2 week sprints that end on Tuesdays. We've had complaints that stories are getting done too close to the end of the sprint, so we're experimenting with requiring stories to be dev complete with 2 days left in the sprint so there is time for QA/UAT. This seems like we're wasting 2 days of dev time to me
Has anyone else had any experiences with something like this?
@Rainbacon my team does the same thing (except we end on Wednesdays instead of Tuesdays), but we've kind of come to accept it
It's usually common for a dev to go into the bug queue if they've finished all of their sprint commitments though, so there's not really any wasted dev time
Oh dang. We have a "Dev of the Day" (DoD) that rotates through the teams. Basically every sprint you spend a day devoting your resources to the bug queue--dealing with any P0's that come in and making sure any bugs with a deadline of that day are done. So finishing sprint tasks early makes you a DoD helper lol
We plan out root cause fixes, but I couldn't imagine planning out bugs
@Rainbacon "My team" didn't do what you said, but then the demo was all buggy and the POs were unhappy. So know they do have to finish the story at least on day before the demo, so that everything can be merged, tested and debugged
Isn't the idea of finishing earlier a way for you to have more time to test/unit test? If you are not fixing bug, I don't see what else you are suppose to do appart for test?
I mean, we do developer testing on our stories, but the reasoning for having us finish early is so that there is time for the PO to do UAT during the sprint so that we can get the stories into "Accepted" before the sprint ends. We aren't supposed to pull in more stories because that makes the burndown chart look bad