> This is ridiculous! You accepted a migration from ServerFault for a question that is off-topic on Unix.SE, then deleted my answer and put the question on hold. On top of that you tried to move it back to ServerFault even though I stated three times (answer, comment, flag) it is a question for StackOverflow. Is thinking before acting to much for Unix.SE moderators? – techraf 7

Hey, @macraf I would strongly urge you to control your tone better. Especially when you don't know how the system works and are throwing accusations around.

We don't have any say on what is migrated to here. SF sent us that question, we didn't "accept" it, it was sent to us. In fact, when you and 4 others voted to close it (correctly), that rejected the migration and sent it back where it came from. If you click on the "Server Fault" link on the question you will see it there along with your answer.

See, there's your answer. Nobody deleted anything. Everything here was done automatically by the system.

Hi, thanks for replying. Here's what information I had when I wrote:

One of Unix.SE moderators declines my flag "This should have been migrated to StackOverflow, not Unix.SE! This is a programming question, not related to Unix in any way." with a message "We can't do anything about that, I'm afraid."

And the post looked like this: i.imgur.com/i5C0ljW.jpg

You can clearly see the post was put on hold, the answer was deleted.

There is also a message "migration rejected from serverfault.com" which as the question was previously migrated to Unix.SE, I interpreted as "migration rejected"-message from "serverfault.com"; not "migration from serverfault.com rejected"

Seeing your current explanation, the moderator's message is untrue (they could do something about it - reject the migration).

And my comments were based on the reality as shown on my screen.