@Daniil, it was not my intention to ban you. But I stand by my decisions which led to the ban. You have recently been told that redacts of deleted posts are hardly ever needed.
One week seems 'forever' but it is meant as a cool down period. I would have advised you to take such a break as you are doing a lot of flagging. Better not to try too much too early.
@Daniil It's worth mentioning that one reason why moderators (on average, network-wide, not necessarily here) often do edit really long spam/abusive posts, but that's mostly to reduce the annoyance of having to scroll. (Mods don't see spam masks.)
@Willeke As a mostly Meta Stack Exchange contributor, I have mostly learned to deal with downvotes for disagreement (which, unlike per-site metas, have a direct cost to rep).
I usually just chalk the occasional one to "Tim Post lost his keys", and only pay attention to the fact that it has an overall positive score.
@Daniil There is no point in redacting SPAM posts. The reason is simple: we have automated scripts running on SE which parse the posts and dynamically learn to detect, flag, and delete spam. If we start editing them we risk starving the scripts.
user381237
9:14 AM
@JonathanReez Ok thanks
user381237
@Willeke The only reason I flagged that for redaction is because you edited it removing the content
There's a big debate / kerfuffle going on over at
Stack Overflow is doing me ongoing harm; it's time to fix it!
and it's a real shame that it's gone on for over a month without a satisfactory conclusion, for everyone involved or observing.
I'll leave it up to the individual reader to decide ...
There's a big debate / kerfuffle going on over at
Stack Overflow is doing me ongoing harm; it's time to fix it!
and it's a real shame that it's gone on for over a month without a satisfactory conclusion, for everyone involved or observing.
I'll leave it up to the individual reader to decide ...
