« first day (1369 days earlier)      last day (1000 days later) » 

3:53 PM
So I was trying to implement zipWith, and I came up with þŒDḢ. I'm not sure if it's valid, though, because you have to paste the function at the start.
 
4:06 PM
This has the same problem.
 
4:22 PM
@user The typical way to input black-box functions in Jelly is by the use of Ç and ç
Hint: zipWith is doable in 4 bytes, not using the builtin
 
5:21 PM
@cairdcoinheringaahing Could you give me some more hints? :) I've been scratching my head for half an hour now, and I haven't been able to find any atoms or quicks to help me.
 
@user Jelly has a zip atom that might help you
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Yeah, I saw that, but couldn't figure out how it worked. It seemed to just give its first argument back, so I left it alone.
 
@user Which zip atom did you use? There's 2 dyads and one monad
 
I tried "Zip; transpose x with filler y" and "Zip; interleave x and y". The second gave me a 5 byte answer, the first I couldn't get to work.
Oh wait, there's a Z too. (edit: I just tried it, it seems to just return its first argument too)
 
@user The 4 byte answer uses the second dyad
 
5:27 PM
When I use that, I have to flatten before doing a pairwise reduce.
Is there a way to turn a dyad into a monad operating on a list of two elements, so you can use it with Each?
 
For example?
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Oh wait, is it żç/€?
 
@user Yep :P
 
Yay!
@cairdcoinheringaahing Thank you so much!
 
I think actually, it might be reducible, Imma gonna go play around with it
Yep, looks like there's a 2 byte alternative. Not sure if that counts as a builtin tho
 
5:32 PM
@cairdcoinheringaahing Wow
 
Because / reduces by columns, this works
 
Ah, it's like APL's reduce first. What do you do for row-wise reduction?
 
Ah, that makes sense
Could you just say it's one byte, like with the " answer?
 
I don't think the " answer is valid
None of the accepted methods for black-box input allow concatenation into the source code, and even so, it fails for anything longer than 1 link
 
5:37 PM
Oh, that's too bad.
 

« first day (1369 days earlier)      last day (1000 days later) »