« first day (863 days earlier)      last day (1186 days later) » 

Josh D
Josh D
12:20 AM
In conclusion I think the APL string interpolation is better than the other languages, if you build simple helpers functions like f←{v←⍕¨⍵ ⋄ ∊⍉↑⍺ v}

take a look at the interpolated string for an APL vs the non APL solution you posted:
APL :'<path d="M ' ' C ' ', ' ', ' '" stroke="black" fill="transparent"/>'
~APL:'<path d="M {W} C {X}, {Y}, {Z}" stroke="black" fill="transparent"/>'

full APL expression: '<path d="M '' C '', '', ''" stroke="black" fill="transparent"/>'f W X Y Z

So the APL string you need to construct is actually shorter, AND you do not need to hard reference the variable …
 
Adám
Adám
@JoshD Consider posting one message per paragraph (they'll be joined visually), pressing Ctrl+K for the code blocks.
 
Josh D
Josh D
noted, thanks
If you want i can try to reformat and send if you delete it
 
Adám
Adám
← 4 messages moved from The APL Orchard
 
 
3 hours later…
Makyen
Makyen
3:41 AM
!freeze
 
NautArch
NautArch
4:08 AM
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
 
NautArch
NautArch
4:19 AM
← 1 message moved from TRPG General Chat
 
 
3 hours later…
Manoj Ghosh
Manoj Ghosh
7:00 AM
 
John Rennie
John Rennie
← 1 message moved from Problem Solving Strategies
 
Manoj Ghosh
Manoj Ghosh
 
John Rennie
John Rennie
← 1 message moved from Problem Solving Strategies
 
 
5 hours later…
Adam L
Adam L
11:44 AM
I can develop my understanding to my utmost desire, and it will still mean nothing, I will still have to be concerned for my safety, acceptance in my own family the list will go on if i let it. But I am worthless here unless i continue to be a product
to summarize, all domains of the internet only serve the purpose of profit for a select few,m
I love collaboration with others of similar interest, but even in selecting the appropriate community for things like what i am talking about now, the questions are promptly closed
because there is little to none of the website that came from a place where no one encourages the pursuit, it's actually the opposite, it's expected that i lose all interest, all will to continue in anything
but who can blame them
everyone knows the planet cannot sustain our growth, larger population and computers that can make all of my conjectures for you, and further investigate them without pause,there is no need for any of us really, i know exactly what to post in the philosophy community to get a huge number of votes, and i know too well what will never be seen by anyone
 
Peter
Peter
12:11 PM
@Mathphile What the hell does AdamL talk about ?
 
Mathphile
Mathphile
@Peter I have no idea
@AdamL I would suggest a visit to the therapist
 
Peter
Peter
Shall we flag the posts as they are completely irrelevant for this room ?
 
Mathphile
Mathphile
@Peter I'm not sure what to do but there is a good chance that Adam L is trolling us
 
Peter
Peter
In this case, a flag would make even more sense.
 
Mathphile
Mathphile
yes
 
Adam L
Adam L
12:35 PM
therapists are the academic equivalent of the short bus, they have nothing to contribute so they tell other people how life ought to be
literally put them all in a mini van and see how much sense of the world they make, hey give them all a subset of the primes that will really make them feel special
 
Peter
Peter
12:54 PM
← 2 messages moved from Martin Hopf's prime numbers
← 6 messages moved from Martin Hopf's prime numbers
← 8 messages moved from Martin Hopf's prime numbers
← 1 message moved from Martin Hopf's prime numbers
 
Peter
Peter
1:16 PM
← 7 messages moved from Martin Hopf's prime numbers
 
 
2 hours later…
YouKnowMe
YouKnowMe
2:48 PM
← 1 message moved from The Turingers
 
 
7 hours later…
amWhy
amWhy
9:31 PM
 
amWhy
amWhy
10:13 PM
← 1 message moved from CURED
 
 
2 hours later…
amWhy
amWhy
11:43 PM
@XanderHenderson My point is, that if a question is already closed, a suggested edit may drastically improve the post by adding mathjax, fixing grammar. But the link I include below the answer specifically argues not to add context, or add effort that wasn't provided by the OP, and questions are more often closed for lack of context or effort, and will not be reopened until the OP improves the post. Editing appropriately, without the asker first editing to include context and/or effort...
sends the post to the reopen review queue, at which no how pretty the mathjax or links or grammar, if it lacks context/effort, it should not be reopened. Please do not encourage editors to add context, or otherwise put words in the asker's mouth. That is why I posted the link I posted, which cautions against adding context or effort not provided by the OP. Editors should not be adding whatever needs to be added to make the post good: they should limit themselves to improving formatting, etc.
So after a post has been closed, it is best for editors to give the asker space to improve their post for reevaluation in the reopen queue. Any time after they edit their own post, all other helpful edits are more than welcome. Editing cosmetically prior to post improvement by the asker dealing with the close reason, sends the post to premature re-evaluation, and any edit by the OP will never get a chance at such re-evaluation through the review queue.
If I haven't made myself clear by now, there's no point in continuing. And no, @Xander, I will not edit your post, because it would change a huge section of your current post. Just please don't encourage users to edit an asker's post to "pass muster" by adding some made up context, or some pretend effort to make it look like the asker's own words, which is expressly opposed in the link I provide below your answer.
We just have to get over this absurdity on this site that everything from editing to answering questions, should be about doing everything for an asker, including writing their question for them.
 

« first day (863 days earlier)      last day (1186 days later) »