« first day (652 days earlier)      last day (1957 days later) » 

12:09 AM
@sammygerbil you still awake
 
@harambe hello early riser!
 
Needed some help with Doppler effect
@sammygerbil imgur.com/a/yyhSQJe
In Q 66 is it asking for me to calculate the frequency change before and after the bullet passes
In Q68,would not remaining in the straight line with source affect the frequency
 
@harambe Q66 is cut off.
 
Q67 *
 
@harambe Q 68. I don't understand what you mean.
@harambe Q 67. Yes it is asking for the difference between before and after the bullet passes.
 
12:17 AM
@sammygerbil Yeah. It came out slightly confused to me
So in Q68, I would use the formulae of apparent frequency for both trsins and add it?
 
@harambe It asks for the frequencies heard, not the sum or difference. Use the formula to get the frequency heard from each train. You need to find the velocity of the train in the direction of the observer.
 
Okay. Got it
@sammygerbil to be equidistant from the two trains he should be 1.2 km apart. How can he be equidistant with 500 m?
 
@harambe He is 500m from the track. Not on the track. Draw a diagram.
 
12:34 AM
I thought the trains we're not in same track.Interpreted it wrong lol
 
 
8 hours later…
8:39 AM
@JohnRennie hello. Good morning
 
@harambe morning :-)
 
I had a doubt about nuclear forces. Why is force stronger if spin of nucleons are parallel
 
That's a JEE question???!!!
 
Given in my textbook
Is it worth knowing at my level?
 
I don't think it's possible to answer that usefully at JEE level because you need to know about a property called isospin.
 
Anonymous
8:47 AM
@harambe I don't think so :P Which textbook are you using?
 
In nuclear physics and particle physics, isospin (I) is a quantum number related to the strong interaction. More specifically, isospin symmetry is a subset of the flavour symmetry seen more broadly in the interactions of baryons and mesons. The name of the concept contains the term spin because its quantum mechanical description is mathematically similar to that of angular momentum (in particular, in the way it couples; for example, a proton-neutron pair can be coupled either in a state of total isospin 1 or in one of 0.). Unlike angular momentum, however, it is a dimensionless quantity, and is...
 
HCV
 
1
Q: Does the strong force increase or decrease with aligned spins?

SørënThe deuterium exists only with the proton and neutron of aligned spin, which suggests that the residual strong force is greated with aligned spins, i.e. the binding energy is greater if the spins are aligned. On the other hand the mass of $\Delta^{+}$ is greater than the mass of proton $p$, even...

That explains it, though I suspect the answer will be largely incomprehensible
 
Anonymous
@harambe HCV theory questions are usually answerable using just the text given in the corresponding chapter. Pretty sure you just need to remember it as a fact (that nuclear force is spin dependent and that's it) and don't require a detailed explanation.
 
Anonymous
@EshaManideep Neamen and Boylestad are good books
 
8:51 AM
Yea. It's all too for me
 
@Blue Thanks, let me have a look, what sid mentioned yesterday were also nice :)
 
Anonymous
@EshaManideep Why do you need it though?
 
Anonymous
For the transistors chapter?
 
@Blue Yep, transistors mainly
 
Anonymous
I wouldn't spend too much time on it, if I were preparing for JEE (it's not in Advanced, and even in Mains they will at max ask only one question from the transistors chapter). Pradeep Kshetrapal and Physics Galaxy lectures should suffice. Read NCERT well. :)
 
8:55 AM
@Blue Even I am not spending, I will finish it off today in 2 hours maybe ;)
 
9:14 AM
I didn't understand the significance of this neutral atom in this derivation.. Why are they using it for here
Never mind. I got this
 
@JohnRennie you there ?
 
 
2 hours later…
10:54 AM
@JohnRennie are you here ?
 
@Nobodyrecognizeable hi
 
@JohnRennie 11th.
@JohnRennie i suspect $c'= 2\pi R (1-\frac{R^2\omega^2}{c^2})$
 
That's a famous problem called the Ehrenfest paradox.
The Ehrenfest paradox concerns the rotation of a "rigid" disc in the theory of relativity. In its original formulation as presented by Paul Ehrenfest 1909 in relation to the concept of Born rigidity within special relativity, it discusses an ideally rigid cylinder that is made to rotate about its axis of symmetry. The radius R as seen in the laboratory frame is always perpendicular to its motion and should therefore be equal to its value R0 when stationary. However, the circumference (2πR) should appear Lorentz-contracted to a smaller value than at rest, by the usual factor γ. This leads to the...
 
@JohnRennie if the coordinates aren't euclidean then what are they (lorenz coordinates)?
 
In relativistic physics, the Born coordinate chart is a coordinate chart for (part of) Minkowski spacetime, the flat spacetime of special relativity. It is often used to analyze the physical experience of observers who ride on a ring or disk rigidly rotating at relativistic speeds, so called Langevin observers. This chart is often attributed to Max Born, due to his 1909 work on the relativistic physics of a rotating body. For overview of the application of accelerations in flat spacetime, see Acceleration (special relativity) and proper reference frame (flat spacetime). From experience by inertial...
But note that the spacetime is still flat. This is still special relativity not general relativity. It is the coordinates that are curved not the spacetime.
 
11:04 AM
@JohnRennie coordinates curved not spacetime?? Any related question on main site?
 
The Rindler coordinates are another example:
In relativistic physics, the coordinates of a hyperbolically accelerated reference frame constitute an important and useful coordinate chart representing part of flat Minkowski spacetime. In special relativity, a uniformly accelerating particle undergoes hyperbolic motion, for which a uniformly accelerating frame of reference in which it is at rest can be chosen as its proper reference frame. The phenomena in this hyperbolically accelerated frame can be compared to effects arising in a homogeneous gravitational field. For general overview of accelerations in flat spacetime, see Acceleration (special...
But to understand what it meant by curved coordinates you really to need to have a sound grasp of differential geometry (which is the maths that underlies general realtivity).
 
@JohnRennie ok. I will have that in the bucket list.
 
Without this I doubt the analysis of the Ehrenfest paradox will be easy for you to understand.
 
@JohnRennie yep. But sometimes questions need to show you a lot left to learn . Anyway are you staying for 1:30 today? If so ill have to discuss a doubt.
 
No, I'm only here for another hour or so, then I won't be back until Monday morning.
 
11:26 AM
@JohnRennie if my clock ticks slowly will i age less? Though clock will say that but what about me will i see aging effects?
@JohnRennie this is Sunday , professor. You are generally here in mornings . So monday morning is normal you get here at 5 o clock uk generally.
 
@Nobodyrecognizeable Yes, I'll be around from about 5 a.m. on Monday.
 
@JohnRennie yep you keep forgetting me. Anyway the previous one is the question.
 
When we talk about clocks in SR we don't mean some specific mechanical device. The clock records the proper time of the observer holding it, so the time recorded by the clock is the same as the time experienced by the observer. You will age by the time shown on the clock.
 
@JohnRennie i see. Thanks professor. Gotta go . Have a nice day professor, goodbye.
 
Bye
 
 
1 hour later…
ayc
1:03 PM
I have a problem!....anyone ?......just ping me
 
@ayc Please tell the problem
 
ayc
@EshaManideep I can't understand how they gave those potential values?..those (x-20),(-45) and others
 
@ayc He thought that the centre's potential is x, then KVL does it all
 
ayc
@EshaManideep I know,but...wait I'll upload the answer!
@EshaManideep Once check the answer!Could you explain briefly how they got (x-20)-10
 
1:20 PM
@ayc It's the potential difference across the 1 Ohm resistor
 
ayc
@EshaManideep I know that.I want to know how they came to the value:(x-20)-10 as the potential across the 1 ohm resistor
 
@ayc On one side of the resistor potential is 10 and the other side it is x-20
 
Anonymous
@ayc Potential at point A: xV. Potential at right side of the 1 ohm resistor is thus (x-20)V, since there's a 20 drop due to the cell. Potential at the left side of the 1 ohm resistor is 10V. You have the potentials at both ends of the resistor and now you can write the current through it as (x-20)-10.
 
@Blue He got the first part, and second one he didn't ( I guess so).... happens sometimes :P
 
ayc
@EshaManideep @Blue Alright!..What was I thinking!?
 
Anonymous
1:29 PM
@ayc Is it clear now? :)
 
ayc
@Blue clear and sounds funny:the question I asked
 
Anonymous
Happens. Move on :P
 
ayc
@Blue @EshaManideep Thank you for your time!
 
1:53 PM
@sammygerbil please ping me ven you are free
 
 
2 hours later…
ayc
4:22 PM
anybody free?..I have a problem.
 
@ayc Yep, somehow I feel totally lazy to do my own work today :P
 
ayc
@EshaManideep Why is the upper limit taken as infinite?...........Why the number of solutions is equal to coefficient of t^5 .....It should be t^6 right?
 
@ayc Yeah,even am not sure about t^5. But as far as that infinite is concerned please give a 2 min thought about it. You should be able to figure out by yourself
 
ayc
@EshaManideep Take your time..no rush ..I'll be back in an hour or maybe sooner
 
Anonymous
4:43 PM
@ayc That doesn't seem right to me. You need to find the coefficient of $t^6$ from $(t+t^2+...)^4$.
 
Anonymous
$t^0$ shouldn't be there in that sum as a dice doesn't have a $0$ face.
 
Anonymous
Ideally, you'd just need to find the coefficient of $t^6$ from $(t+t^2+...+t^6)^4$. Using an infinite sum just makes it simpler.
 
ayc
5:06 PM
@sammygerbil Could you look at my question?
@Blue Lets forget t^6.Why infinite sum?
 
@ayc I think you can use the Stars and Bars Theorem.
 
ayc
@sammygerbil My book has stuff like this:It first talked about stars and bars theorem and then it used the multinomial theorem.After reading both of them I felt that stars and bars theorem is only a special case and multinomial theorem is general.In the multinomial theorem there are cases and the first case is the one in the picture.In the Illustration the answer (6+4-1)C(4-1) looks similar to what you would get if you used Stars and bars theorem.
@sammygerbil The book solved it taking upper limit as infinite.I dont know what that means......could you tell me How do I relate this case with stars and bars theorem
 
Anonymous
@ayc You can use a finite sum. It doesn't matter. You'll get the same answer.
 
Anonymous
You basically need to find the coefficient of $t^6$ in $(t+t^2+...+t^6)^4$
 
Anonymous
Coefficient of $t^6$ in $(t+t^2+...+t^6)^4$ = Coefficient of $t^6$ in $(t+t^2+...)^4$
 
Anonymous
5:21 PM
The latter has a nice form
 
ayc
@Blue Are you sure its t^6 ?...becoz I don't think this book(Cengage mathematics) has mistakes..I study from these books only and I haven't found even a single mistake until now.
 
Anonymous
1
Q: Number of ways to get 17 by rolling dice 4 times (with combinatorial argument)

anir123 A dice is rolled four times. In how many ways we can get total of 17? We can solve this by finding coefficient of $x^{17}$ in the ordinary enumerator $(x+x^2+x^3+x^4+x^5+x^6)^4$. But I feel this requires little bit more effort. We can directly solve similar problem like: In how many wa...

 
ayc
@Blue Yeah.I have checked that question already
 
Anonymous
@ayc Find out the correct answer using the formula true blue anil gave. Find the coefficient of $t^5$ and also find the coefficient of $t^6$. Check which one matches. Pretty sure you need $t^6$, as you need a sum total of $6$.
 
Anonymous
If you don't find it intuitive yet, think of it like this:
 
Anonymous
5:31 PM
You have $4$ bins consisting of all permissible power of $t$ ($t^0$ is not permissible because each $x_i$ needs to be at least $1$)
 
Anonymous
Also, $x_i$ can at max be $6$
 
Anonymous
So you have four bins, each consisting of powers of $t$ ranging from $1$ to $6$
 
Anonymous
Now you need to pick up $t^i$'s from the four bins such that $t^{\sum i}=t^6$
 
Anonymous
And in this method, you're basically finding the number of ways it's possible to do that
 
ayc
@Blue Ohk!..........I have to go now.......Thank you for your time!
 
5:47 PM
@ayc Am I looking at the right question 6.122? Simplest answer is that no die can show less than 1 so start with all 4 dice showing 1. Total so far is 4. We need a total of 6 so there are 2 more spots to distribute. Each spot can be placed on 4 dice so answer is 4x4 = 16.
I don't understand how they get 84.
Have I misunderstood the question?
 
6:05 PM
@ayc Stars and Bars solution : The total required is 6 so place 6 stars in a row. There are 4 dice so we need to place 3 bars in the gaps between the stars. No die can show less than 1 so bars cannot be placed in same gap. There are 5 gaps so the 3 bars can be placed in 5x4x3/3x2x1 = 10 ways. (Enumerating all the permutations, there are indeed 10. My first solution must be wrong.)
 
 
1 hour later…
ayc
7:27 PM
@sammygerbil Yes you are looking at the right question.Actually once you put one dot on each the rest two dots can be put in 4c2+4c1 ways..which is 10....You've understood the question in the way I did .So I can't tell if we got it right or wrong.
@sammygerbil Even I don't understand how they got 84...Maybe we could understand better if we look at the way they did....I have no idea what they did...could you look more closely in the way they did..do you understand their steps?
 
8:22 PM
@ayc Blue seems to understand the generating function method. Best to ask him about that method.
@Abcd Sorry I have guests on Sundays so usually not available until the evening.
 
8:35 PM
@sammygerbil Are you free now?
 
@Abcd yes
 
@sammygerbil Could you please tell me the IST equivalent of evening in UK
@ayc Please upload straight pics
 
@Abcd UK is 5.5 hours behind IST. Time is now 20:40 (Sunday evening) here.
 
@sammygerbil quite symmetric. IST is GMT + 5.5
@sammygerbil so Greenwich meridian must be passing through UK
I dont remember where Greenwich is
 
@Abcd Yes. Greenwich Observatory is in London.
Greenwich is a district of London.
Beside the Thames River. Long maritime history. Home of National Maritime Museum and Cutty Sark sailing ship.
 
8:43 PM
@sammygerbil Did you get the solution to yesterday's left problems?
 
@Abcd No I did not look at the one about two cars and the wind and a siren.
 
@sammygerbil pulley one?
 
@Abcd Can't find the link.
 
23 hours ago, by Abcd
user image
@sammygerbil please see my attempt also ^^^
 
@Abcd Didn't we solve this one? (No pulley here!) Answer B?
 
8:49 PM
@sammygerbil i told you that B is my answer but thats the wrong answer
 
@Abcd What is the right answer? I don't see what we did wrong.
 
23 hours ago, by Abcd
So $\omega^2 = 5k/m$
23 hours ago, by Abcd
So I got option D as the answer
This is a sleepy typo^
I meant option B there
@sammygerbil are you OK with my method as well?
 
Sorry I didn't check your method. You got same answer as me so I assumed the method is correct. Do you have a doubt about it?
 
@sammygerbil Answer is C
@sammygerbil I have never got right answers using wrong methods but you never know ...
 
@Abcd I have an idea!
 
8:52 PM
@sammygerbil ?
 
The question says the block touches the springs. It is not attached so the springs only act in compression.
In the diagram there are small gaps between the springs. They are trying to fool us!
 
@sammygerbil ohh
@sammygerbil for ayc's problem are you damn sure its 10? Because even I get 10 using my stars and bars with constraints method.
 
@Abcd We all get 10. I wrote out all the permutations and there are 10.
 
@sammygerbil how to proceed with the problem
 
@Abcd What do you mean?
 
8:58 PM
@sammygerbil textbook is surely wrong then. I think it would be really helpful if @Blue could point out the error in the textbook's method.
@sammygerbil wait
Energy conservation?
Push it to right by x.
Then conserve energy?
then differentiate?
wont work
 
@Abcd Simpler to calculate half-period on left side and right side, then add.
 
@sammygerbil how can we add half periods that way
 
Because when mass is on the left it is not affected by the spring on the right, and vice versa.
 
i think the point is that time period has nothing to do with amplitude
 
Yes. I haven't used amplitude.
 
9:04 PM
and I am fretting over the amplitudes on both sides.
OK Got it
 
There is a lot of unnecessary information in the problem.
They are trying to fool us again!
(Confuse us.)
 
hmm tricky
some from today's exam
I had guessed $\lambda \propto \dfrac 1 {Z^2}$ in exam.
But that couldnt give the right answer.
What is screening constant?
In my attempt I assumed I/2 goes through P
So answer should be:
$\left(\dfrac{1+ \sqrt {1/2}}{1- \sqrt {1/2}}\right)^2$
doesnt match any option.
 
@Abcd Don't know. Moseley's Law came to mind but I don't see screening constant there. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moseley%27s_law
 
Official solution is very long and scary.
I mean moseley's law doesnt give that graph
it gives a staight line
and questions are quite direct from it
 
@Abcd That is correct.
 
9:12 PM
@sammygerbil why not giving the right answer then
 
@Abcd Don't know about the ration, that may be wrong. How did you arrive at this answer?
 
ohhhh
$\sqrt \nu = a(Z-b)$
I remember my teacher telling us that $b$ is generally one.
And we know that:
$a= \sqrt{\dfrac{3Rc}{4}} = \text{constant}$
 
@Abcd Is $a$ the screening constant?
 
So yes the problem is a moseley's law problem!!
@sammygerbil no b
 
Screening means that inner electrons shield an outer electron from the nucleus. So effective nuclear charge is lower for outer electrons.
 
9:17 PM
@sammygerbil Amplitude is $\sqrt I$
So sum is:
$\sqrt{I}+ \sqrt{I/2}$
And difference is $\sqrt{I}- \sqrt{I/2}$
Squaring and dividing gives desired ratio
 
@Abcd Yes I think I understand. That looks reasonable.
 
@sammygerbil y not correct answer then
@sammygerbil should I show you official solution
 
@Abcd Yes.
 
9:32 PM
@Abcd That looks a difficult solution to do in 3 minutes.
Which option do they say is correct?
C (5)?
 
@sammygerbil this was JEE Main Mock test. Questions are supposed to be solved in 2 minutes in it :P . 3 minutes are for JEE advanced questions.
@sammygerbil yes
 
@Abcd That does not seem logical. At lower level you get less time?
Are JEE Advanced questions really more difficult?
 
@sammygerbil yes.
@sammygerbil JEE advanced has 20+20+20 PCM questions for 3 hours. So 3 minutes per question. Also there are two Papers separated by a 2 hour break. (so total 6 hours and 120 questions)
@sammygerbil JEE Main has 30+30+30 PCM questions for 3 hours. SO 2 minutes per question. There is only 1 paper.
@sammygerbil well its not actual exam so people (exam setters) can keep difficult stuff in paper i guess....
 
I think there must be an easier solution.
 
yes....
 
9:42 PM
I am a little too tired to concentrate on it just now. Any other questions?
 
@sammygerbil no am doing maths
 
@Abcd ok. Goodnight then.
 
 
2 hours later…
11:30 PM
@ayc I am convinced 10 is the correct answer but still cannot see the mistake in my first attempt. I ought to have divided by 2, because the order in which the 2 extra spots are placed is irrelevant. But that gives 8 not 10. Can you explain why 4c2+4c1?
 
11:48 PM
@Abcd Q27 YDSE with Polarizer : Divide the electric field of light falling onto the slits into amplitudes parallel (p) and perpendicular (s) to the polarizer. Only p gets through the polariser and emerges from slit 2 whereas p+s emerges from slit 1. Max amplitude in the interference pattern is p+s+p (slits 1 & 2 in phasee) while min amplitude is p+s-p = s.
Now p and s are orthogonal, so for the max amplitude we have a p-component of 2 units and an s-component of 1 unit, which add to as vectors to give a magnitude of $\sqrt5$.
The min amplitude has only s-component so magnitude is 1.
Intensity is proportional to square of amplitude so ratio of max to min intensity is 5:1.
 

« first day (652 days earlier)      last day (1957 days later) »