« first day (971 days earlier)      last day (50 days later) » 
04:00 - 17:0017:00 - 18:00

4:32 AM
Good morning sir :-) @JohnRennie
 
@user8718165 morning :-)
 
@JohnRennie morning sir. :)
 
@yuvrajsingh morning :-)
 
4:49 AM
@JohnRennie hi
 
@Aladdin hi :-)
 
5:09 AM
@JohnRennie sir what happened? Is Yuvraj and everyone else fine :-)
 
psa
@JohnRennie hiya
hiya all
 
@psa hi :-)
 
psa
I have a question
My thinking was that the entirety of the system's photons is given by the area under the graph (I guess I was thinking of it like a probability distribution?) and so if you find the integral from about -3 to 3, that will give you the probability that the photon hits the screen in the central interference fringe. That's about 12%, so if you want two photons (I figured these are independent events) you'd have 0.12 x 0.12 = 0.0144 = 1.44%.
Seems somewhat unrealistically low though...
 
Yes, that's how I'd do it.
 
psa
5:24 AM
OK kewl
Thank you!
 
@JohnRennie hi
 
@yuvrajsingh hi
How are you this morning? Feeling better?
 
Yes,
 
Good :-)
 
I have a question
 
5:28 AM
Yes?
 
Sir if I need to accelerate the electron at the speed of light how much force should I need is it infinite.
@JohnRennie
 
If you apply a force $F$ for a time $t$ then the change in momentum is $\Delta p = Ft$. Yes?
 
So if your electron starts at rest, $p=0$, and ends up with some momentum $p$ then $Ft$ has to be equal to $p$.
This could be a large force for a short time or a small force for a long time, as long as the product $Ft$ is equal to the final momentum.
 
Have a doubt.
 
5:33 AM
Yes?
 
I think when I accelerate the electron
It velocity will change till it reaches the speed of light
 
It's a little more complicated than that.
 
@JohnRennie
 
The usual expression for momentum is $p=mv$ but this only applies at speeds much less than the speed of light.
For relativistic speeds the equation for the momentum is:
$$ p = \frac{mv}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}} $$
 
Can I use de broglie equation
 
5:37 AM
If you set $v=c$ you will find the denominator is zero and hence the momentum becomes infinite.
 
Lambda=h/mv
Will this hold for a particle, who is approaching at the speed of light.
@JohnRennie
 
No. The equation is $\lambda = h/p$ and for relativistic particles you need to use the relativistic equation for the momentum.
 
OK, I think it bit of more, complicated, sir I am asking this because previous year in interview exam they ask this question, @JohnRennie
 
@yuvrajsingh well as $v\to c$ the momentum goes to infinity. So that means $Ft \to \infty$ as well.
So to reach the speed of light you either need an infinite force or an infinite time.
 
Thanks, I got a some very interesting fact about my last night. Incident
 
5:43 AM
Yes?
 
Actually when I take the auto, auto driver changes the original root which goes to my home.
It old root which I have taken.
@JohnRennie
 
I'd guess he deliberately chose a route that went past the shop where his brother was.
 
Yes, today around 7A.M I went to the shop but it was closed.
Why would a shop be closed on day time. @JohnRennie
Till now I haven, t discuss about it with anyone.
 
Do shops normally open at 7 a.m.? In the UK shops usually open at 9 a.m.
 
It, s is village, so shop here journey open at 4A.m
 
5:53 AM
OK
It would be worth asking if anyone in the village has used the shop.
 
I am not sure I should discuss it or not,.
 
Talk to your parents and see what they think.
They will know everyone in the village better thn you do.
It could be that the driver was just hoping for some extra money i.e. you'd pay him to fix the the auto (even though it wasn't broken) and drive the last 5km.
 
Do you remember when I was at the shop, I said the were calling someone.
 
Yes?
 
But when I ask a shop owner, can make a call he denied
Saying he doesn't, t have balance. @JohnRennie
@user8718165 last night was a tragic night.
 
5:59 AM
To be fair it could have been he just didn't want you making a call on his phone that he would have to pay for.
But it does sound suspicious.
 
I can make a missed call, what was wrong in that.
 
After all, how likely is it that the auto would break down right outside his brother's shop? And 5km from your village.
But they may not have been intending to rob you. They might have just wanted extra money to go the last 5km.
 
That, s where my mind, goes, because before that auto work correctly, and we were smoothly moving, road was good before that.
 
You need to discuss it with your parents.
Does your village have a mayor or a head man?
If so discuss it with him.
 
And when I ask a auto man his name he said at station he says Ravi, and when I ask his name again on shop he said something else, I do not remover what he said but it was different because my brother friend had come
@JohnRennie
Yes we have a head man.
 
6:07 AM
@yuvrajsingh ask your parents if they think you should speak to the head man about it.
If the men at the shop are robbers then they may attempt to rob other people in the village as well, so the head man should know.
 
Should I explain them whole situation. @JohnRennie
 
Explain everything to your parents and see what they think.
 
But u do not have a conclusive proof @JohnRennie
OK I take your advice and I will have chat with them thanks.
 
You don't need proof. If you do speak to the head man just tell him what happened, not what you think about the men. The head man can decide for himself based on what you say.
But speak to your parents first and see what they say.
 
Yes, you correct let head man decide what he think about it. @JohnRennie
Sir I think when I was chatting with you do not thought that, the thing will goes like this do you. @JohnRennie
 
6:14 AM
I've heard stories before where taxi drivers will claim the car has broken down and you have to give them some money to repair it before they will continue the journey.
 
Seriously your advice in the night help me so much.
 
You're welcome :-)
 
and my father it self a policemen, he posted in metropolitan city.
 
In Bikaner?
 
No in jaipur.
I have a question just a small one. @JohnRennie
 
6:21 AM
@yuvrajsingh yes?
 
Sir I have two loud speaker who are facing each other, and I stand behind one of the speaker, will I hear the sound of the too speaker clearly, or the sound wave collides. @JohnRennie
 
Sound waves will interefe like light waves. You can even do a double slit experiment with sound waves.
 
Elaborate please
 
There isn't much to elabrate. If you Google "sound wave double slits" or something like that you'll find lots of articles and videos showing the double slit experiment with sound waves.
 
Sir if I hit a metal rod, it create same type of pressure wave.
 
6:32 AM
Yes, a sound wave in metal is a longitudinal wave just like a sound wave in air.
I need to answer a question in CodeClub now. I'll be a few minutes.
 
Sure.
 
psa
6:46 AM
@JohnRennie For this question, would the fact that the potential (0.5V) at which the photocurrent starts to decrease tell you that the least energetic electrons have an energy of $e(0.5V) = 0.5eV$?
 
I would guess that's what the question means, yes. The least energetic electrons would have come from the lowest energy part of the band i.e. 3eV below the vacuum energy. So their energy will be $hf - 3eV = 0.5eV$, immediately telling you that the photon energy is $3.5eV$.
For the record this is a crap question because photoelectrons are always emitted with a range of energies from zero up to $hf-\phi$. This is because the energy transfer from the photon to the photoelectron is not always 100% efficient.
But go with the question I guess.
 
psa
Wait, so why does that make it a bad question?
 
Because the question says the retarding potential has no effect as long as it is below 0.5V, and that implies the minimum photoelectron energy is 0.5eV i.e. no photoelectrons are emitted with energies in the range 0 to 0.5eV.
 
psa
Oh I see
That part isn't realistic then, yeah
 
And that's wrong. In a real experiment photoelectrons always have a continuous range of energies from zero up to $hf-\phi$.
 
psa
6:59 AM
Is there a point where it becomes significantly more noticeable?
Or I guess since it's continuous not really?
 
No. The photocurrent generally reduces smoothly with retarding voltage. If you Google you can find experimental data for this.
But you often find you have to go along with questions even when they're wrong :-)
 
psa
It would have been nice if it's clarified that it's wrong.
 
Oh well :-)
The point is obviously that the photon energy is 3.5eV so the most energetic electron has an energy of $3.5eV - \phi = 1.5eV$
 
psa
@JohnRennie so to completely stop the current we need the kinetic energy of the electron + the work function to be greater than or equal to the energy of the photon?
 
The kinetic energy of the electron (the maximum KE) is the photon energy minus the work function. Yes?
 
psa
7:08 AM
yeah
 
So in this case the maximum KE would be 1.5eV.
In this experiment you are stopping the electrons by using an external potential to apply a decelerating force to the electrons.
If you apply an external potential $V$ then the work done by the external potential is $eV$. And you'll stop the electron if the work done is equal to the initial KE of the electron.
 
psa
right, so $1.5eV = eV_{stop}$
 
Actually we've going to get mixed up between the unit eV and the work $e \times V$.
 
psa
no I know the difference
it's alright
 
@psa yes, so $V_{stop} = 1.5V$
 
psa
7:13 AM
so as soon as the voltage produced a field which produced a force on the electron such that the work done by the force = the initial KE of the electron, you've halted their travel between the plates?
 
Yes.
 
psa
sweet! finally have a conceptual understanding of what's going on in this experiment
wasn't fully understanding the photoelectric effect setup but I think I do now
 
7:34 AM
@JohnRennie hi
 
@yuvrajsingh hi
 
Can you come in this room for a while. Sir
Yesterday inertia chat room. @JohnRennie
 
 
3 hours later…
10:28 AM
@JohnRennie hello sir
 
@JohnRennie, Hi Sir. Are you free now?
 
@user8718165 @Intellex hi
 
@JohnRennie sir can you please have a look at my answer...?
 
@JohnRennie, Sir is fire plasma?
After @user8718165, I will as my doubt sir.
 
5
Q: Confused about fire?

mickIm confused about fire. The way I see it : Heat creates (kinetic) energy in mass and this creates stronger vibrations of atoms. When those vibrations are strong enough the electrons interact stronger due to electromagnetic forces. This causes the electrons to fly away. This is the creation of a...

 
10:32 AM
@Intellex I think it has ions...because it gets deflected due to E-field.
 
3
Q: To which state of matter does the flame belong to?

Akshay NagrajI had this question from the day(9 years old, now 16) that i learned about states of matter. I have asked so many of my teachers some of them told me gas some as plasma etc. can anyone answer my question? Recently I've learnt that plasma state is obtained when all the electrons from the atom are ...

 
@JohnRennie sir,will you please have a look?
 
@user8718165 at what?
 
@JohnRennie sir my answer...just once
 
@user8718165 which answer?
@user8718165 your answer looks fine.
 
10:37 AM
@JohnRennie yeah :)
@JohnRennie thank you very much sir...for telling
 
@JohnRennie, Thank you sir, I read that :)
 
@JohnRennie sir can I ask you a question?
 
I read an article on Medium on Why Is a Candle Flame in Zero Gravity So Different than One on Earth? but I cant understand why its spherical. Could you please explain why its spherical, sir?
Is that the same reason water bubbles are spherical there? I now know that fire is not plasma, so no surface tension right, sir?
 
On Earth flames have the shape they have because hot air rises.
 
Ok sir, convection.
 
10:46 AM
The flame heats the air, the heated air rises and cool air is pulled into the bottom of the flame.
So we get candle flames that are tall and thin.
OK so far?
 
Yes sir. I don't understand why its tear shaped on earth, I will refer PSE if you are busy now.
If cold air exerts more pressure at the bottom, I think it must be an inverted tear shape.
 
You don't need to know the exact shape of the candle flame. Just that the flame goes upwards from the burning part because hot air rises and the flame is basically hot air.
 
@JohnRennie I understand this sir, but not the shape. I think we can proceed.
 
@Intellex but in space hot air doesn't rise because there is no gravity. The air heated by the flame just forms a ball of hot air near the flame.
 
@JohnRennie Why should it be spherical sir? I understand all directions are equivalent. But for the flame, the candle side is different than the non-wax facing side, right sir?
This is what confusing me sir.
 
10:53 AM
Well OK, it won't be exactly spherical.
But it will be a lot closer to a sphere than it would be on Earth.
 
@JohnRennie Can we explain the distorted sphere as something analogous to surface tension sir?
@JohnRennie Understood this sir. I've seen them.
 
@Intellex there is no surface tension in gases. I suspect calculating the exact shape would be really hard. I certainly don't know how to do it.
 
@JohnRennie Sir, I don't need any quantitative study, just an intuition for the qualitative analysis is enough.
 
To be honest I don't know.
 
@JohnRennie I am surprised sir. How can you say like that? Are you lying to me :) ?
There is a question on PSE, but doesn't cover this aspect really well and I suspect asking the same will make my question get closed as duplicate :(
 
11:00 AM
I've never seen a candle burn in zero g so I have no idea what the shape is and how the presence of the candle affects it.
 
@JohnRennie,Thank you sir. No problem. I tried to upload an image. But I don't know what happened, everything in my comp. froze sir.
@JohnRennie, Bye sir :)
 
@Intellex bye :-)
 
11:41 AM
@JohnRennie hi
 
@yuvrajsingh hi :-)
 
Sir I have a small question
 
@yuvrajsingh yes?
@yuvrajsingh I need to go now. I'll be back later.
 
11:59 AM
OK, sir actually connection was lost. I will wait sir.
 
 
3 hours later…
3:03 PM
@JohnRennie hi
 
@Aladdin hi :-)
 
Do u know about corrosion chemistry
 
@JohnRennie hi
 
@Aladdin a bit
@yuvrajsingh hi
 
I solve my problem by my own, it was a calculation error @JohnRennie
 
3:06 PM
@yuvrajsingh :-)
 
Yes sir @JohnRennie
 
@JohnRennie during Galvanic corrosion, why does metal with higher electrode potential is oxidized
 
The electrode potential is directly related to the energy of the reaction $M \to M^+ + e$
I'd have to look it up to be sure, but I think it's the Nernst equation that relates the EP to the free energy change.
So when you have two metals with different electrode potentials what this means is that they have different free energies for the reaction $M \to M^+ + e$.
OK so far?
 
Ok
@JohnRennie
 
Call our metals $M_1$ and $M_2$ and the free energies $\Delta G_1$ and $\Delta G_2$. Then the total free energy for the reaction $M_1 + M_2^+ \to M_1^+ + M_2$ is $\Delta G_1 - \Delta G_2$.
 
3:18 PM
Yes
 
And conversely the total free energy for the reaction $M_2 + M_1^+ \to M_2^+ + M_1$ is $\Delta G_2 - \Delta G_1$.
And the reaction that happens will be the one with the negative total free energy change.
 
Ok
 
Now I can't remember exactly how the SEP and free energy are related, but if you know the SEP then you know the free energy, and if you know the two free energies you can tell which way the reaction goes.
And now I'm afraid I'm starting lunch!
 
delta g =nfe @JohnRennie
 
@yuvrajsingh thanks :-)
 
3:32 PM
It, s OK
 
4:20 PM
hello sir :-) @JohnRennie
 
@user8718165 hi :-)
 
4:41 PM
@JohnRennie hi
 
@yuvrajsingh hi :-)
 
Thief are x posed
 
Aha!
What happened?
 
Now you will be surprised, what they are.
 
Go on ...
 
4:43 PM
They are, professional robber use to rob, in the near village
 
Was it the two men in the shop?
 
I have doubt in them from starting.
Yes
Gang is of three member.
 
So even though it was a scary experience you helped catch the robbers!
 
Yes let me tell you the whole incident what I did today, after I post something can you say OK so that I can confirm you are listening.
 
@yuvrajsingh @JohnRennie I've no idea what you people are talking 'bout. :-/
 
4:46 PM
@yuvrajsingh OK
 
@user8718165 rennie is will tell you.
 
@JohnRennie sir could you please tell me
 
Yuvrah nearly got robbed by a pair of dacoits last night.
 
So sir I went to the shop, today around 7 o clock till then.
 
@yuvrajsingh you caught a thief bro ?
 
4:47 PM
Yes
 
@yuvrajsingh OK
 
@JohnRennie sir, that's scary :(
 
Damn right!
 
@yuvrajsingh Did you fight them?
@JohnRennie I thought it was a ghost story
 
So I saw the shop men there, so I stop my bike near by the shop so that they can, t here, it was dark here, and road is as usual.
 
4:49 PM
@yuvrajsingh I'm very happy you're totally safe. I was worried from the morning... :-)
 
Silent.
 
Thanks @user8718165 @JohnRennie OK sir
 
@yuvrajsingh You're welcome 😊
 
So after few minutes auto man reached there, and with one more man and @JohnRennie you won, t believe they are talking about me.
 
4:51 PM
Wow. What did they say?
 
'auto man to shop owner:) We missed the chance last night that chap doesn't look hard to fight enough.
They are blaming each other.
 
Now it is clear to my why they are saying to me about. Coffee.
Sir that, s why I ask you what do at that time.
 
You think they had drugged the tea they offered you?
 
, otherwise why would they request me,
 
4:55 PM
So this was about three hours ago? What happened next?
 
OK
So I recorded I try to go close as I can to record their voice.
 
So I recorded the voice and won, t belive they are trying for same. Plan which does.n,t work for me. To rob someone
 
Like auto will break down, and then
 
04:00 - 17:0017:00 - 18:00

« first day (971 days earlier)      last day (50 days later) »