Tryigng something crazy

This one works fine as a normal program here: Try it online!

but when I map it over a list, it just returns [] for some reason: Try it online!

@Zgarb is there any solution to it?

@Razetime Hmm, I thought r was the problem, but changing it to i fixes it only partially: Try it online!

oh my god

Try it online! Ok there's definitely something fishy here.

yep it's very strange lol

well this works I guess Try it online!

Ok I see what's up

¶ gets a string, which is a list of characters, and separates the elements by newlines

yes

Then mi gets the int corresponding to each char of the resulting string

ok

so the zeros come from empty lists in the splits?

So "2,3" -> "'2'\n','\n'3'" -> bunch of 0s with 2 and 3

interesting

so r sees \n, freaks out and gives 0

for everything

is this behaviour put up somewhere in the wiki?

would be a good idea to put that there

or the tips thread

Yeah, that's probably what happens

Try it online! Question: How do Icenter each matrix's columns?

What do you mean by center? Pad with 0s?

@Razetime It's because due to all the different types other functions can take, r knows it can return just about any concrete type at all; it defaults to TNum

@Zgarb Is that roughly correct?

yes, pad with 0's

@Zgarb padding with 0's is it

I'm thinking something and then T0 probably

Hmm, might be easier to build the padding by hand and join

Try it online!

Not sure if optimal

mm cool

Yay we got it

time goes fast eh

only two more days for LotM to end

Man, I really hate ?, it takes forever to infer and it never does what you want it to

well depends where you use it

It's pretty nice for recursive functions

@LegionMammal978 I recommend downloading ghci and running husk locally

@Razetime I do, still takes forever to infer though

After all, I could hardly have patched the string parsing without testing it offline

ah well

@Zgarb why use pairs when we can use two-element lists?

@Razetime Two-element lists are really annoying, you can't even apply a function over them easily

It makes things like ‰ almost useless in practice

well, applying a function over them, meaning?

you can use them as args?

Yeah, I asked about it earlier and it takes two bytes

(well, unless the result type is the same as the argument types, but that's rare in my experience)

gotta keep that in mind