Is there any way to shorten this?

I don't know why o doesn't work in place of the parentheses. I also wanted to replace ↑ and N with a range of some sort, but afaict there's no [1..n] builtin, and incrementing would require another set of parentheses

@EsolangingFruit ḣ is the [1..n] built-in ;)

If you want to use d+d← without parentheses, you need to compose all four functions (o only composes two like (.)).. So either you use odo+od← which is longer or use the ö built-in to compose 4 functions in one go:

mSöd+d←dḣ

@BMO I think I misread the documentation and assumed o was overloaded for all types of composition ._.

No worries :)

Wait, the invisible operator between the first d and + is 2-argument composition, right?

@BMO

Not sure what you mean by 2-argument composition, but yes I guess.

@BMO 2-composition (github.com/barbuz/Husk/wiki/Syntax#expressions)

@EsolangingFruit yes

@EsolangingFruit: You should update the code in the post itself as well ;P

Should be fixed.

It's mS(d+d←)dḣ, no?

Should be fixed.