@LdBeth Patch what kernel? The cause is just that CLI is in raw mode and doesn't do anything special with ctrl-z.

the APL kernel, of cause.

@LdBeth Hrm. I'd initially guess it's more of a CLI frontend patch. It's my understanding that the CLI isn't getting a lot of attention these days, anyway.

@Adám Got it, thanks @Adám @B.Wilson!

@Adám I have a very close one ⎕←{1=≡⍵:⍸⍵ ⋄ (⍳⍴⍵){(⊂⍺),⍵}¨(∇¨⍵)}2 2⍴(0 0 0)(1 0 0)(0 1 0)(0 1 0)

┌───────┬───────┐
│┌───┐  │┌───┬─┐│
││1 1│  ││1 2│1││
│└───┘  │└───┴─┘│
├───────┼───────┤
│┌───┬─┐│┌───┬─┐│
││2 1│2│││2 2│2││
│└───┴─┘│└───┴─┘│
└───────┴───────┘

Haven't tested for deeply nested masks yet, but the principle should work

like, change {(⊂⍺),⍵}¨ to a more conditional operation

Does anyone have any cool solutions to FizzBuzz? I was trying to come up with something as terse as I could, but didn't manage to get it under the 50 chars mark

@Adám How do you run a multifile program with the -script option? Do you do that, or does that not make sense?

@FredrikNiemelä You shouldn't really use -script any more. With the 18.2, you can simply use dyascript. Simply concatenating them together should work, although you'll have to remove any intermediate #! lines.

What is dyascript?

A new executable for scripts :-)

@vcoutasso Depends a bit on your exact spect, but {∨/d←4/0=3 5|⍵:d/'FizzBuzz'⋄⍵}¨⍳ generates the first n terms while keeping the unchanged numbers numeric.

@Adám Where can I find it?

Next to your normal dyalog executable.

.... ok .... we (@JoelNiemelä) are trying to find it...

See help.dyalog.com/latest/#UserGuide/…

"dyalogscript" got it!

Sorry.

How is it different from running dyalog with -script?

-script was an undocumented hack, and this works way better in many ways.

Thanks for the pointers. Much appreciated!

Does this mean there's hope for getting APL on Kattis?

I put my son on it, so there is hope :)

@Adám input limits might make it impossible

Huh?

iirc ⎕ and ⍞ have a limit on how much they can read?

I don't think so when scripting. That's an IDE limit.

huh, ok, cool

nope, there's definitely a limit, make a large file and run dyalogscript <file containing ⎕←≢⍞> < large.txt

there's a limit of 4096

uh oh. we should fix that

4096 lines?

chars per line

@Adám agreed ;)

(this is an example from the other day of APL 'rough corners')