@KamilaSzewczyk Thanks, I can see that, but now I wonder what the actual spec is (should be?)

@Adám the spec is the obvious one for a non-APL implementation - once there's /*, search until */ from after the end of the /*.

@dzaima ref - pdf page 93/doc page 75

@KamilaSzewczyk "… so we turn it into a vector of lines using grade down and tokenise each element of it:" → "… so we turn it into a vector of lines using split and tokenise each element of it:" but you could have used ⎕NR instead.

Do you want feedback on your actual extensions too?

Oh, and be aware that 60⌶ is unofficial and could change without notice. The official recommendation is to use dfns.tokens.

@Adám right..

@Adám sure, why not. some of these might be redundant (like the identity matrix / matrix multiplication builtin), but i'm still not settled on what i want and what i don't want

Others are overly limited in their domain, when they could easily be made more generally applicable.

@Adám does dfns.tokens work the exact same way like 60⌶?

@Adám yeah i'm aware of that... i'll try changing it eventually

@KamilaSzewczyk No, but fairly close.

okay. I'll revisit my thing soon when i'll have enough time on my hands, thanks a lot

Announcement: APL Campfire in one hour.

@dzaima in android-ide, with :g i'm trying to plot {395×⍵) but all I get is practically a vertical line where X=0... isn't {395×⍵} interpreted as "395*x" ?

@0xACE well, a practically vertical line is what 395*x is

i expected 395*x (where x == 1) would be 395, but it's practically infinity

well, if you zoom out and in to x=1 y=395, you would see the line crossing there

oh wait i just realized, since imzooming out so much, so is the x axis

yeah my bad sorry