@TheDestroyer @Pandya @AnkitSharma Also what to do with those answers which quote WIKI as source?Since WIKI is not counted as a valid source how will u deal with those answers?There were a lot of such answers which were posted long back quote WIKI..
@Rickross Though Wikipedia provides useful information we can't consider it as reliable source simultaneously though Wikipedia is not reliable source, we can't disallow citing wikipedia I think. But we should recommend more authentic/reliable reference than (or in addition to) Wikipedia. The topic have been being discussed on meta:
Many answers are quoted from Wikipedia. Is that a good resource to depend on? In other words, are Wikipedia entries on Hinduism.SE without any distortions and biases? Would citing books and other material be better?
This question might look stupid to many but I am one of those people who are sk...
@Pandya Or @TheDestroyer can anyone among u unfreeze the Agama & Tantra room?..Rakesh Joshi asked me whether its possible..so i am asking u guys on his behalf..
@Pandya, in a way "super-sacred" means those websites which are like ('kind of') Wikipedia. They aren't blogs, but at the same times they aren't 'that' authentic as well. Hence we should list down the websites, from which it's allowed to cite sources. e.g. sacred-texts.com or the other one which you posted earlier.
Many answers are quoted from Wikipedia. Is that a good resource to depend on? In other words, are Wikipedia entries on Hinduism.SE without any distortions and biases? Would citing books and other material be better?
This question might look stupid to many but I am one of those people who are sk...
Moderation
Moderation