@IsaacMoses That's a shame. He's posted an addendum, though.

sites.google.com/site/mizrahijonathan/home/…

@SethJ Good for him!

@DoubleAA Picking up conversation from the comments on this (which you can feel free to delete): What in the About page can you edit? The "Get answers to practical, detailed questions" part?

Oh, I see this:

... It doesn't list the moderators anymore?

@msh210 Oh. That makes a lot of sense. Thanks

@DoubleAA @msh210, Why doesn't the new About page reference the FAQ anymore?

@IsaacMoses By design I suppose.

... but aha! I see that they gave you the ability to put links in the top paragraph (nice), and you linked "Mi Yodeya" to judaism.stackexchange.com/q/9/759 , so that takes care of making sure that those who want to know what the name means can discover as much on the About page

@IsaacMoses How do you know that was us?

Can you see the edit history on that paragraph?

@DoubleAA no.

@DoubleAA Oh. I just assumed it was, since it does a good job of representing the site, which you are particularly good at

Was it not?

@IsaacMoses Well, a mod did edited in that link last night, but the rest of everything on the page is currently what it came with.

@DoubleAA One can guess about which mod based on the "share" suffix in the link. :)

@IsaacMoses What share suffix?

@DoubleAA, you guys didn't do the "Get answers to practical, detailed questions" section?

@DoubleAA "/759"

@IsaacMoses Not seeing it :)

@DoubleAA I F5ed before you commented, guessing that there might - poof - be a change there :)

@IsaacMoses Still in factory packaging. If you have suggestions for edits I suppose meta is the place to bring it up.

@DoubleAA I guess the "do"s come straight from the FAQ section of the same purpose, and the "don't"s are boilerplate

@IsaacMoses Wait, the community team is not the same as the community user???

@DoubleAA The community user is a bot

@IsaacMoses Yes, and it was the community team that added the initial text. I'll still call that factory settings, even if they aren't a bot.

@DoubleAA Well, not bad, though I guess it would be good to get some of the sense of the FAQ's "don't" section into About's "don't" section, and it's a shame to lose the "examples" links

@DoubleAA Would you consider editing some form of the Disclaimer into the top paragraph

@IsaacMoses Certainly. Would you like to suggest a formulation?

@DoubleAA I would. Maybe later.

@DanO'Day, hi! Check out what our kindly mods put in as the first link on the About page.

@IsaacMoses wow! That's impressive and much easier to follow.

I'm glad to see they did that - better for newcomers'

@DanO'Day Indeed. SE did a nice job