Anyone want a SE Data Mining challenge?

@YEZ Sure.

@MonicaCellio For the record, judaism.stackexchange.com/posts/45070/revisions and

@Daniel What YEZ said.

@msh210 Can you make a "How Socratic are you?" query that counts how many UCT days there are on which you asked a positively voted question?

Have fun! tzt

@YEZ I don't see why it's off-topic (that is to say: I think it's on-topic), but I don't think it's a great question. I mean, any question can have a "According to Jewish sources" appended to the beginning of it. (And we've had some other such IIRC. I'm pretty sure I've even asked some.) "According to Jewish sources, does fertilizing frequency affect crop quality?" "According to Jewish sources, is sleeping insufficiently detrimental to your health?" These don't really offer [cont'd]

[cont'd] any reason for a reader to think there should be a Jewish source on the topic, so they're fairly unmotivated. This also doesn't offer any reason to think there should be any source, actually: why are you asking at all? Hence my saying I don't think it's a great question.

@YEZ What do you mean by "a positively voted question"? A question that, as of today, has a net positive vote?

@msh210 @YEZ Ah, I see:

> Asked a well-received question on 100 separate days, and maintained a positive question record

> Any open question that is not deleted and has a of score >= 1 is considered well-received

> Only days where all questions asked have been well-received, count

> A positive question record means you don't have too many closed, downvoted or deleted questions, overall. The formula is (total questions - negative questions - closed - deleted)/total questions >= 0.5. Questions that have been downvoted and closed and deleted count three times in this calculation!

Hm.

A simpler query (corresponding to my first idea) is currently at data.stackexchange.com/judaism/query/222625 (but the query at that URL may yet change to include more of the criteria).

@YEZ What's wrong with data.stackexchange.com/judaism/query/206201/…

@DoubleAA That doesn't take closedness or deletedness into account. But it's still better than my current take.

... and therefore I'm not bothering to continue editing my current take.

@MonicaCellio Thanks!

@Daniel I do not.

@msh210 I wrote this before reading your messages here and see that I've said about the same thing as you have. @YEZ.