@shulem I am actually more inclined to read a downvoted answer than an answer that has sat with no votes. If it's got no votes I assume it's pretty worthless. If it has downvotes, I assume it's at least interesting.
@Daniel Looks like kosher was created by accident. It ought to be merged into kashrut-kosher and retained as a synonym. @msh210 @DoubleAA @MonicaCellio
@IsaacMoses I think there's an unpredictable adjustment period for someone new to participating in internet forums, Q&A sites, or wikis. If someone has the passion and the ability to contribute positively, I'd be willing to be extra forbearing. (Contrast with Ali, for example).
@Fred some new users come in slowly, asking and answering a few questions and getting the lay of the land. Others dive in, and while the enthusiasm is great, if course-correction is needed it gets harder.
There's somebody on another site I frequent who has this problem too; answered something like ten questions a day for his first several days but didn't get it, and he's been hard to steer. (It's now been a couple months; the rate dropped off.) I'm seeing shades of that here, trying to learn from that and apply it here, and still struggling.
The Gemara in Megila 6b says that if someone tells you that they understood a piece of Torah and they didn't work hard for it you shouldn't believe them.
The Ramha"l says in the Hakdama to his magnum opus Mesilat Yesharim about the Pasuk (Mishlei 2:4) "אם תבקשנה ככסף וכמטמונים תחפשנה, אז תבין יר...
@IsaacMoses Yeah, I remember posting the source in the comments a couple of seconds after it was suggested that no source was forthcoming. That prediction was subsequently upvoted anyway, for some reason. :)
@Fred Oh, I see. Perhaps you should [edit] your source into the answer. :) The reason I brought this post up is that we were chatting earlier this week about finding a Q&A about "Yaga'ti/Matzati," and @msh210 went ahead and posted one today.
@IsaacMoses You are reading it in reverse. To be a rebbe someone must have that kind of soul - it doesn't mean that the rebbe is the only person in the world with that kind of soul.
@Ariel My confusion partially stemmed from this comment: "whereas in Lubavitch - very likely related to the נשמה כללית idea - there is the feeling that there is supposed to be strictly דבר אחד לדור ולא שני דברים לדור"
...as well as the language "being the נשמה כללית" in the answer.
@Ariel Yeah, that's what I don't get. If multiple people in one generation can have a נשמה כללית, how would that be related to דבר אחד לדור ולא שני דברים לדור?
I say it depends. You know the famous story about the Rabbi who said "you're both right!"? Well @DoubleAA and @ShmuelBrill are both right! (But the third guy, you know, the one who says "But Rabbi, they can't both be right!"? He's wrong.)
If someone asks a question like "How does Judaism or Jewi...
Unless someone has an objection, I'm going to Hebraicize everything. I think those unfamiliar with the Hebrew alphabet and numerology won't have much interest in this anyway...
@Daniel It's very common in the more intricate and complex pieces of (Chabad) chassidus (but appears even in the lesser). I can't comment on classical kabbalah, having never learned that in the originals.
The term tetragrammaton (from Greek ', meaning "four letters") refers to the Hebrew theonym () transliterated to the Latin letters YHWH. It may be derived from the verb that means "to be", and is considered in Judaism to be a proper name of the God of Israel used in the Hebrew Bible.
While YHWH is the usual transliteration of the tetragrammaton in English academic studies, the alternatives YHVH, JHVH and JHWH are also used.
The most widely accepted pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton (YHWH) is Yahweh, though Jehovah is used in many Bibles, but in few modern ones. The Samaritans under...