@ThinkingTorus If you look up at the conversation just above your comment, you will see that I asked @MartinSleziak for some help finding a good duplicate target, since I could not find one myself. If you look at the comment directly above yours, you will see that I noted that it wasn't a perfect match, but that I felt that there were answers which got the job done.
The alternative was to vote to close your question for its complete lack of context.
It wasn't a good question. I was happy to close it for lacking context, but I was hoping that I could provide better context by finding a reasonable dupe target.
After the edits, I still don't think that it is a good question, as there is a lot of off-topic griping about how MSE works.
That being said, I am no longer interested in the question, and I would really appreciate it if you would stop pinging me from across the network.
@XanderHenderson What "off-topic griping about how MSE works" are you referring to?
@XanderHenderson Do you even understand my question and my edits? Sure I will stop pinging you after this. But refrain from messing with things you don't care about, OK? If you don't care, just stay off.
@ThinkingTorus It is disingenuous to edit your post, then pretend that the comments to which I was referring never existed. For the record, the previous version of the question is still on the website.
@ThinkingTorus I do understand the question. I just don't care anymore, and have had nothing to do with it since I voted to close it yesterday.
@XanderHenderson I know how edit history works. Thank you. By MSE you are referring to space filling curves right? Just another proof you have no idea what I am talking about. But let's stop here. ok?
