vim 9.0 released!

@PauloCereda nice to know, my Manjaro will update and everything will stop working! ;-P

(joking...)

But yes, my experience with a rolling release is a bit bumpy for now.

@Rmano yaaay :)

ooh twitter.com/shouldhaveaduck/status/1541929565974458368

@PauloCereda Oh no, wasn't 1.0 perfect?

@mickep it adds to perfection :)

@PauloCereda Ohh, very good.

@PauloCereda but no NeoVim9 :(

@Skillmon oh no

@DavidCarlisle can I release mathtools 1.29? Or do we need to coordinate with others?

What is the world view of people who show us output and not a single line of code and expect us to know what's causing it?

@AlanMunn they believe in witches and wizards.

@UlrikeFischer It must be something like that. Nothing else makes much sense.

@AlanMunn well if you mean the biblatex question: that is due to an unknown language.

@UlrikeFischer So I guess they're justified, since you are, in fact, a wizard. :)

@UlrikeFischer And +1 for biblatex consistently using bold for undefined things.

@AlanMunn I sometimes use \usepackage[nil]{babel} to force biblatex to show the names of the strings.

@AlanMunn -- At the very most generous, oblivious to anything/anyone other than themselves.

@AlanMunn There are worse things than just a screenshot, the screenshot could be unreadable small :) stackoverflow.com/questions/72566880/…

@samcarter although there is a high probability that this is tex.stackexchange.com/questions/583092/…

@daleif release, I think

@Rmano Oh, a one more wizard! This is the final proof they do exist :)

twitter.com/jamesdoesastro/status/…

@LaTeXereXeTaL -- Ah, doggerel. A reliable antidote for terminal desperation