« first day (2732 days earlier)      last day (2192 days later) » 

12:02 AM
@PauloCereda You seem to be very nervous. In fact, so nervous that you mistype "ooh" as "oh". ;-)
 
@marmot ooh :)
 
doesn't time fly when you're having fun
Apr 21 '16 at 22:40, by Paulo Cereda
@yo' Oh the examination was fine, I survived. Now it's time to work on the final version (for the thesis defence). :)
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh good times
Those were simpler times
 
Jan 23 '17 at 16:30, by David Carlisle
@PauloCereda just go to your thesis defence and say it's all Will's fault.
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh another one to blame
 
12:08 AM
@PauloCereda You mean before Brexit and the last US presidential election?
 
Nov 16 '13 at 21:28, by David Carlisle
@egreg It's always good to have someone to blame
 
@marmot :)
I also used to have a bowl full of cookies
Now the cookies are gone :(
 
@PauloCereda My browser has tons of cookies, I'll be happy to give you some ;-)
 
Mar 28 '16 at 15:18, by Christian Hupfer
@yo': \prg_replicate:nn{cookies}{Give to @PauloCereda} ;-)
 
vlg
woah, using xelatex and fontspec is blowing my miiiind
it's 3am, and I feel like I'm high it's so good
 
12:17 AM
@DavidCarlisle One reason to change to L3
@marmot Chocolate cookies :)
Portugal next week, I will miss you all.
 
@PauloCereda pode falar portugues?
 
@DavidCarlisle Podes falar português?
I think @PhelypeOleinik can vouch me when I say PT-BR and PT-PT are quite different. :D
 
@vlg :-)
@PauloCereda same thing:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle :)
Does anybody want to see the new arara logo?
 
 
5 hours later…
5:27 AM
Has anyone else tried looking at
0
Q: Package listings, set caption position, posotion top works fine, but option bottom not

davidI will that caption position is in center of page, like top in example. Here my code: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{color} \usepackage{listings} \usepackage[justification=centering]{caption} \lstdefinestyle{SC}{ language=erlang, xleftmargin=.2\textwidth, xrightmargin=.2\tex...

I haven't got anywhere.
 
@AndrewSwann Can't reproduce it here (TL2018). The caption is centered above the listing.
 
5:54 AM
@TeXnician Thanks. This issue is also whether that is still true when captionpos=b. I still get centering and can't reproduce the OPs problem.
That is if I delete the caption package line - with it it is left justified
 
Should I delete my answer here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/428202/…?
 
@AndrewSwann I took a quick look yesterday and could reproduce the problem (not centred with position b).
@AndrewSwann if I find some time I will look at it today.
 
@UlrikeFischer Very good - I have now posted what I run and its output
 
@AndrewSwann Sorry, I only read question bodies and not titles. I can reproduce it for the bottom position.
 
@CarLaTeX What makes you think you should?
 
6:02 AM
@HaraldHanche-Olsen The problem was the package incompatibility, my answer is trivial.
 
@CarLaTeX With such strict criteria, a major portion of answers on the site should probably be deleted. And if you delete it, the question will hang around as unanswered, coming back to haunt us in the future.
… unless you persuade the OP to delete the question, of course. I don't think it's worth the trouble.
 
@HaraldHanche-Olsen LOL, to tell the true I marked it as a duplicate
 
@CarLaTeX Um, well, I seconded your vote. If it gets closed, you might as well delete your answer, I suppose.
 
@HaraldHanche-Olsen Yes, I'll do :)
 
 
1 hour later…
7:10 AM
Is there a more elegant solution of illustrating result of tex code when asking a question other than printscreen and cutting a picture and uploading it? I haven't posted in this part of stack, before.
 
@AlvinLepik that is the thing to do (either uploading a file or in most browsers you can just cut and paste or drag and drop) (doesn't have to be print screen eg windows has a "snipping tool" that lets you select a region of the preview which you can paste to this site
 
That is fine, I was merely wondering if stack had some implemented method you can invoke to automatically display the output of your code.
 
yo'
7:51 AM
@AlvinLepik most active users here have some TeX/shell code to assistate with this.
 
8:07 AM
@AndrewSwann I added an answer and also added a comment to the existing bug report.
 
@AlvinLepik no other sites on the network eg the math site have mathjax running so you can use tex-like syntax to get math expressions displayed, but here we don't enable that as we need to see tex output not a javascript approximation
 
@DavidCarlisle Good morning David. Right now I'm at school and I'll be at 11:10. In the meantime, I dedicate myself to answering you and egreg.
@UlrikeFischer, @yo' Good morning to you!
@egreg Kind Enrico. It does not matter if it's ugly or not. I can not fill in here with mtpro2 because I'm not at home but in a computer lab. I'll see him at my house. In my opinion, but they are only personal tastes, my question made sense. I copied your code from the chat. Perhaps it was more appropriate to accompany it with an answer. Maybe if I lose the code I find it from my question. I send you my most sincere greetings from Sicily. Here is a hot that I do not like.
@AlexG Good morning also to you.
 
8:27 AM
Mmm, synctex is really helpful when editing.
 
@mickep unfortunately it links to the pdf output, who looks at that, don't most people use the \showoutput display in the log file?
2
 
@DavidCarlisle Hah!
 
@DavidCarlisle I guess you could code some support for that, too! I wonder if the publisher wants to publish your log file, though?
 
Does anyone know a good read about neural networks (introductory material preferred)?
 
8:46 AM
@Sebastiano Buongiorno!
 
9:09 AM
Hi all, I'm having some trouble with a tex file during compilation (it contains many pstricks pictures)
I've reached the original author and he says "I've succesfully compiled using TeXshop with option TeX to DVI"
Since I don't have a mac nor do I have access to one, I'm trying to find out what the exact command line settings are for this compile option
The website is mega obscure, does anyone happen to use this or know where I can find this piece of information
?
 
@user55789 just don't use pdflatex use latex to get a dvi file then dvips to get postscript then pstopdf to get pdf
 
@user55789 "tex to dvi" means you should run latex (instead of pdflatex) and then dvips + ps2pdf. Every latex editor has menus for this.
 
@UlrikeFischer "menus" wow you are so modern
 
@UlrikeFischer Every editor except TeXworks :-( but I suppose I'll run the command line thing instead then
Cheers
Btw was it obvious that this would reduce compilation times? Because I don't see how that could be
 
@user55789 Well in texworks you can add it through the preferences.
@user55789 What do you mean? the latex run will normally be faster than a pdflatex run, but as you have to run dvips and ps2pdf afterwards that's an unfair comparision.
 
9:16 AM
@user55789 nothing to do with time pstricks requires postscript so does not work with pdflatex.
 
The tex file contains some ~270 pstricks pictures and the compilation is about 3 hours on the machine I'm working on now
I've managed to reduce this time to some 45 minutes by using a machine with a top of the line Quadro graphics card, but this shouldn't be a requirement
I'm starting to believe I'm doing something fundamentally wrong
 
@user55789 if it is succeeding but slow then the answer that @UlrikeFischer and I gave is not relevant
 
@user55789 Wow, are the pictures very complicated??
 
It is relevant seeing as the original author recommends this compilation workflow
 
@user55789 tex is highly unlikely to be using the graphics card
 
9:18 AM
I don't know what it is and isn't using, but it's faster on that machine
 
@user55789 but the difference between using latex and pdflatex is not one of time, it is that one does not work. perhaps you are using the auto-pst package thing that calls latex in the background from pdflatex?
 
I am not, this auto pst pdf package will compile but doesn't produce pictures, the slowness comes from the XeLaTeX engine which is known to be slow
But I see no other way to get consistent output (with pictures mind you) with any other engine
 
@user55789 why are you just drip feeding information in riddles, you did not say you were using xetex:-) xetex (or rather xdvipdfmx) has some limited support for pstricks
 
@user55789 Is it an option to compile the figures once and then just include them later? If they are so heavy that it takes 3 hours to compile, it will be a mess to compile them every time.
 
@user55789 if the document is written for latex+dvips and you use xelatex with no changes, then all hyphenation in the document will be wrong.
 
9:33 AM
@DavidCarlisle Possibly, but I've never succesfully compiled with pdflatex, and now the author claims that this tex > dvi > ps > pdf workflow will produce the correct output
I'm just trying to go with what works best at this point
And one could argue that the support is limited indeed:-)
@mickep I've looked into that, but I cannot seem to automate it. Changing the document considerably is not allowed by the standards of the journal I'm working with (for obvious reasons)
 
@user55789 latex and pdflatex are different things. Run on a command line latex file then dvips file then ps2pdf file
 
I'd need to replace all "\begin{pspicture} ... \end{pspicture}" with some kind of "\includegraphics" some 270 times, including some inline math which will not look publication ready
Yeah I'm going to do that Ulrike, thanks
 
@user55789 as I say pdflatex will not work you need latex
 
10:05 AM
@DavidCarlisle Okay, I have done that
The error is essentially the same as that of the auto-pst-pdf package
I'm getting an "unrecoverable error -- exit code 1" from GPL ghostscript
This is reproducible on different operating systems and tex distributions
 
@user55789 well... pstricks allows the end user to inject literal postscript code into the output stream. If that code has an error then it will naturally kill ghostscript so without seeing the code (or at least ghostscript's log) not much can be said
 
@DavidCarlisle Hmm how do you reach that conclusion though? Since XeTeX has no trouble compiling it
 
@user55789 are you sure the xetex run is OK? (by default the log from xdvipdfmx is discarded) but ghostscript won't just stop with an error exit without giving some error log as to why it stopped
 
It compiles without halts which appears to suggest there is no "unrecoverable error" according to xetex
 
@user55789 not really. xelatex (like latex) does not see the postscript at all it just writes it out into the dvi file, then you (or xdvipdfmx acting on your behalf) calls ghostscript to convert the postscript to pdf after (xe)tex has finished
 
10:13 AM
Where should this error pop up then? Ghostscript does not write to the log file right?
 
@user55789 use xelatex --no-pdf so you get dvi (xdv) output then run xdvipdfmx by hand on that (easier to debug that way)
 
Ok
This may take a while
Like I said, 3 hours compilation time
 
@user55789 with the postscript that you got from dvips do you really get no message other than non zero error exit when you run ps2pdf?
 
@user55789 quite possible. If e.g. the document tries to insert a jpg you would get an error with latex-dvips-ps2pdf but not with xelatex. But if the author hasn't set up the document to work with xelatex it doesn't make sense to switch to it - as David already wrote, fonts and hyphenation can be wrong.
 
@DavidCarlisle I just get some technical information but no meaningful error. I did manage to compile the source so I can break down the journal template piece by piece to see where the error lies
(that is, with simply "latex" and not xetex)
Now it's just a big grind until I find the culprit, thanks both of you for your help up until now:-)
 
10:43 AM
@Sebastiano Sorry for the late reply, I had to leave in a hurry. I didn't express myself correctly; what I meant is that you have to change both those values according to the font you're using.
@Sebastiano Unfortunately I don't have this mtpro2 font so I cannot test, but try using 10, instead of 12, I think it will bet pretty close. Then you'll need just a little fine-tuning.
@Sebastiano What happens here is that you write the upper part of the T (\hT), then you have to go back to write the lower part of the J (\hJ) on top of it. These values, 10 or 12, are the amount you have to go back to make the half characters look as one.
@PauloCereda Indeed :)
@PauloCereda I think it's the same comparison for American and British English. The written language is almost the same. The pronunciation is totally different
 
11:00 AM
@PhelypeOleinik or "wrong" and "English" as we call it here:-)
5
 
@DavidCarlisle hahahaha
 
 
1 hour later…
12:20 PM
@DavidCarlisle Is there a way to look into intermediate *.xdv files, kind of dvitype for the output of xe(la)tex?
 
@AlexG not unless the japanese tex distributions have an extended dvitype google shows this:-) tug.org/pipermail/tex-k/2010-October/002218.html
@AlexG it's in texlive and works on an xdv file I tried:-)
 
1:03 PM
@DavidCarlisle Ah, I wish I had know dviasm before, Thanks!
 
@AlexG I don't think I knew of it before either:-) But google knows all.
 
1:25 PM
@PhelypeOleinik I beg to differ, even the written language is a lot different! I know this is jaw-dropping. :)
 
@PauloCereda I didn't really have much contact with European Portuguese, that's just my impression of the thing.
 
@PhelypeOleinik That was my first impression until I had real problems. :)
 
@PauloCereda I remember when I was younger, I played those Portuguese MMO, I could understand enough.
@PauloCereda But it's the same as learning English from playing Mario :P
 
@PhelypeOleinik Or Italian. It's-a me Paulo. :)
 
@PauloCereda hahahahhaha
 
2:28 PM
"What's your area of research?" "Fishing" "Oh- so you're a marine biologist?" "Well... not exaaaactly..." #bigdata
2
 
3:24 PM
I often find myself looking for a button to help me copy all the text from a source code box in a post without having to drag the mouse over the whole thing first. I wonder why this doesn't exist, and if there is a point in petitioning the SX folks to provide one.
2
 
yo'
@HaraldHanche-Olsen There are greasemonkey scripts for these things, AFAIK. FWIV, the Powers don't want to have to deal with this.
 
@HaraldHanche-Olsen This addon also works for pages like github etc. Very handy!
 
3:39 PM
@samcarter "Not compatible with Firefox Quantum" :(
 
@AlanMunn I was just about to say the same:(
 
@AlanMunn My main reason to stay with FF52 ESR
 
@samcarter ooh a long way back, I have FF61
 
@DavidCarlisle not even 10 major versions behind - no so bad :)
 
@samcarter Hmm, and I don't even run firefox. (I use Vivaldi these days.) I do have greasemonkey, though, so maybe I can look around and find one of those scripts. (@yo') Oh, this one for example.
 
3:53 PM
@HaraldHanche-Olsen Is it the same if I hear Vivaldi instead?
 
4:11 PM
@PauloCereda Hi, have you drawn something?
 
@egreg A bunch of my linguist-musician friends were having a discussion about why you can say "We're performing the Beethoven 5th" (in the context of an upcoming concert). This got into a discussion of the uniqueness presupposition of the definite article, to which someone replied "This explains why I can say 'I'm playing the Vivaldi', since every piece he wrote is the same." :D
 
What was the name of the beamer overlays for tikz library?
nevermind, found it
 
4:30 PM
@TeXnician Hi! Oh I had a couple of incidents yesterday... :( I will poke you soon. :)
 
@PauloCereda Oh, it's not that urgent. Take your time. I've just noticed another thing we will have to "worry" about: PDF controls (there are interesting solutions around...) which might get us to use ugly workarounds ;)
 
4:47 PM
@TeXnician ooh a challenge!
Boys and girls, arara is dead, long live arara:
user image
6
 
@PauloCereda Very nice logo!
 
@samcarter <3
 
This is the biggest fan of arara:
user image
3
 
@samcarter awwww
 
5:18 PM
@AlanMunn What such a mediocre musician as Stravinsky said is of no concern.
 
5:35 PM
@egreg Haha, I hadn't realized this was a Stravinsky quote.
 
@AlanMunn Have you ever listened to Vivaldi’s Gloria (RV 589)? And what about a lesser composer such as J. S. Bach copying and arranging several compositions by Vivaldi? ;-)
 
@egreg Yes, of course. But my favourite Vivaldi, which I play, is the Op. 13, Il pastor fido. Too bad it's not actually by him. :)
@egreg It's interesting that most of the recordings seem to still attribute it to him.
 
 
2 hours later…
GuM
7:38 PM
Hi everybody! I’m considering the idea of converting my answer to
7
Q: Extensible triple-bracket delimiter with a new symbol

user94293\DeclarePairedDelimiter allows one to define extensible delimiters (for example using the \big option). An example is provided below with double brackets. I need a similar delimiter with triple brackets. As I was unable to find one, I built it from the double bracket symbol found in stmaryd. ...

into a package. I’m seeking advice on how to adjust the horizontal space between the components of each delimiter. Is anybody willing to suggest improvements to the—admittedly poorly-chosen—spacing shown in the answer?
@egreg If I remember correctly, J. S. Bach was one of Vivaldi’s pupils.
 
@GuM you are as old as @egreg and remember J S Bach? what was he like?
4
 
@GuM No, Vivaldi was just seven years older than J. S. Bach. But it's very well documented that young Bach copied several compositions by Vivaldi in order to learn the Italian style.
 
@GuM oh excessively complete answer, I must have missed that at the time:-)
 
GuM
I must have inadvertently cliked somewhere, and my previous message got a star I didn’t mean to add: how can I remove it?
 
@GuM you can't star your own messages, someone else clicked on it.
 
7:52 PM
@DavidCarlisle WHO COULD HAVE BEEN
I starred the egreg quote, by the way. :)
 
GuM
@egreg Yes, 1678 Vivaldi, 1685 Bach; yet I think that Bach took lessons from Vivaldi about composition. This is not impossible, but maybe I’m just mistaking Bach for someone else.
Bach’s Violin Concert in E major, for example, begins with a typical “Vivaldian” opening, the triad on the tonic (E-G#-H).
@DavidCarlisle Seriously, I’m not looking for late upvotes, I really need advice on the spacing.
 
8:11 PM
@GuM yes I'll try to look later
 
@GuM They never met in person. As I said, Bach studied on his own Vivaldi's pieces and adapted a number of them for other instruments. Notably he transcribed a concert for violin in A for organ and a concert for four violins into one for four harpsichords.
They're essentially identical.
 
8:49 PM
@egreg Hi, and good evening. I have added a comment for you. the user @Jhor has been very good. My question, for my opinion, isn't not very bad. In fact he has obtained +11 and my approvation.
1
Q: Different \mathcal{J}

SebastianoFor my book I'm finding a symbol for "J" with a glyphs on the head. You can see the figures below: First picture: Second picture: Is there command or a strategy to obtain a similar shape with the known fonts? Now I'm using times + mtpro2[lite] and the classical calligraphic fonts: ...

 
@Sebastiano Sorry, but it's a bad idea nonetheless.
 
@egreg But I liked it a lot. In my opinion, you do not have to be rigid at least as I think it. If you see my profile rarely (or almost never) negative vote. I am always bombarded with negative votes :-). Always an esteemed greeting and thank you from the heart. Now I am at work with the document of May 15 for my fifth class of art school.
@egreg You are very good and I respect you very much. My most sincere greetings. Good work and always "grazie".
 
@Sebastiano if the document is only for you to read then it doesn't really matter what it looks like it is true, but if you want other people to read the document then you shouldn't make up symbols that look confusing and use constructs that destroy searching and accessibility of the PDF
 
9:17 PM
@DavidCarlisle I think there is some user who can use my question and answer. I can also make mistakes but as I told @egreg I do not care about the score. I liked the answer so much !!! David is 100% authorized to edit my application to make it understandable. My English and my idea of English are very likely to confuse users.
 
@Sebastiano the question is understandable, what makes you think people didn't understand it? you are asking about letter shapes that is font design so off topic (as I said before I wouldn't have voted it off topic myself and let it go, but others voted that way and it is hard to argue with their choice)
 
10:09 PM
@Sebastiano and going the other way I thought your pdf one (after you added the maxtract thing) was one of your better answers, but you deleted it:-)
@Sebastiano that question asks two things (which never works well on this site) it asks how the math is encoded internally in the pdf (which is what @HenriMenke and I focussed on) but it also asks how to extract the information. Pointing at a tool that does quite a good job of doing that extraction is a perfectly good answer. I would have voted for it but I was reading the maxtract doc and when I came back your answer had gone...
2
 
10:23 PM
hmpf rep capped 10 short of a palindrome. bad planning:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I see. That's why my upvote didn't have the desired effect.. :-(
 
@marmot :-) try again in an hour and a half:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I can only upvote once... but OK, I'm sure I'll find another answer that's worth being upvoted ...
 
@marmot pages of 0 score ones:-) tex.stackexchange.com/users/1090/…
 
10:59 PM
@DavidCarlisle I canceled it because I saw it voted I thought I have, for the umpteenth time, a mistake to understand what he meant. Now I put it back.
@DavidCarlisle In truth, I can not understand anything, at least for now. However, I added my answer again.
 
@Sebastiano I don't think it's the answer that the OP wants as I suspect he wanted a description of the internal format of pdf so he could write his own extraction tool but that's actually very hard as the mathematical structure is just not there, so pointing at a tool that is written to do the extraction seems like an answer to me.
 
@DavidCarlisle I think I know what you mean. A post which I consider one of my better ones has zero votes. (I'm not saying this to get votes, I'm rep capped, too ;-) Stay tuned for 40 minutes. ;-)
 
11:39 PM
@DavidCarlisle So sad. Someone must have accepted one of your answers. (It was not me!!). :-(
 

« first day (2732 days earlier)      last day (2192 days later) »