@egreg The ship will be delivered in April :-) So a long time but I'm not always here. Usually Monday until Friday. One week now, two weeks in December, January 2nd a week for sea trial.
@Werner it went, sorry:-) (@SeanAllred) we now ship the whole thing as a tds zip file in the current style and no one installs latex from sources anyway so the unpacked directory had served its time
@JosephWright @ChristianHupfer I like how the site is moderated so I don't feel any change is needed. So the question is, from my point of view: Do the mods feel that another folk in the team would be useful?
Regex (.NET), 122 bytes
^(?=((?=.*$(?<=^(?:\2+(.+.))((?(3)\3.+?|.*?)))).)+(.*))((?=.*(?=\4$)(?<=(?!(.+.)\6*(?=\4$)(?<=^\6+))((?(7)\7.+?|.+?)))).)+
Assuming input and output are in unary, and the output is taken from the main match of the regex.
Breakdown of the regex:
^(?=((?=.*$(?<=^(?:\2+...
@ChristianHupfer @PauloCereda: Oh joy ;-)). A real "Punktlandung". I got Paulo's christmas card yesterday and wanted to go today to the shop to make a new try ...
@EnthusiasticStudent strict SI does not allow mixing figure numbers and text units, like in 150 kilometres. So either 150\,km or hundred fifty kilometres (or alike). Certainly 150\,km is fine
I did something as follows:
\usepackage{xparse,fancyvrb}
\RenewDocumentEnvironment{verbatim}{o}{
\IfNoValueTF{#1}
{\Verbatim[frame=single]}
{\Verbatim[frame=single,label=#1] }
}
{\endVerbatim}
however, it's not ok, and I don't know why. Any help?
@JosephWright need to check if the current e@alloc allocator copes correctly with defining \newwrite to allocate 0-17 skip 18 then 19-255 if i put the right numbers in the e@alloc call... (or skip 16 17 18) if we have tp
@DavidCarlisle I'll also need to adjust the (currently not widely used) IniTeX mode allocator for expl3 (easier: we have a pool so there is sequence driving things)
@JosephWright the write allocator has policy issues again in what we support, presumably it has to have \IncludeInRelease guards so at the macro level you can back it out back to 0-16, but that's rather orthogonal to the issue of how many streams actually work in the engine. I'm tempted to ignore that at the format level and allow \newwrite to allocate up to 255 even if on older engines you get an error if you use that with \openout.
@JosephWright could have engine version conditionals inside the includeinrelease ones, but I think I'd rather not:-)
@DavidCarlisle In preprocessing the print for a printing press it is often expected that you provide the whole fonts by embedding it into the PDF or whatever. I don't know much about that. But I don't think the OP here discusses printing preprocess for a press.
@PauloCereda Well... this is my problem, I search for referencing inside my document and it's all ok. But (there is always a but), I searched about linking back to the hyperref but they say that it's program dependent.
@user2692669 You can have a table and refer to it multiple times in the document. There is no way to know where the link was coming from. Most pdf-viewers simply have a go Back button.
@Johannes_B But, using a label to go back should work, but it seems soooo counter productive, isn't there something equal to balance the hypperref and the label to act like a "seesaw"?
@PauloCereda let me google anchors to see what you mean :P
@Johannes_B Sorry, now I understand, unless we have a 1:1 relationship, we can't know who called with more than one caller with the same name. So I guess I should use "go_back_1" "go_back_2" "go_back_3" labels to hypperef back
@user2692669 Possibly, but if there are more than one, the reader has to guess or the Go-back message must be more descriptive. I think simply hitting the boBack button in the pdf-viewer is more simple.
@Johannes_B You are right, there isn't enough time for this luxury... I should place a big warning sign that says: "Your PDF reader supports a GO BACK function"
@user2692669 Mine doesn't or i am unaware of it. On the other hand, if you are talking about pdf-view alone and tables/pictures ... you can simply oavoid them floating.
@JasperLoy my picture here? can't remember actually when that was, a few years back, someone posted pictures of the uktug meeting a few weeks ago, so you can compare...
I am writing my thesis using Latex but I have one problem when cite websites.
In .bib file, the website is formatted using @misc:
@misc{google,
key = {Google Inc.},
howpublished = {},
note = {[online] link}},
url = {http://www.google.com}
}
In the main body, it is like a...
@JosephWright that is, if you don't open a file on them they print to terminal, but if you do open a file they print to there.
@JosephWright oh I thought they were going the other way. Did i misread the thread. I can't see why 16/17 should be special. If they do make them reserved can of course change that test to if 16 jump to 19.
@JosephWright it's a bit of a hack putting the test there there is a pending \global before #3 so it does \global\allocationnumber19 and then you need \global before the \chardef fortunately two \global are OK. the alternative would be to rewrite \ee@alloc and \e@ch@ck to parameterise the jump so you can jump to 19 rather than 256, but that seems like a lot of change
@JosephWright I suspect for compat reasons even if primitive \write18 didn't work you might want to prevent it being allocated and/or hook \write to do a \directlua or \latelua call to os.whatever if passed 18.
@KeksDose @DavidCarlisle: I think you drifted a bit away from the question. It mentioned fonts loaded with \setmainfont, and before discussing legal questions, one should probably first check, if (and how) it is possible not to embed such a font.
@UlrikeFischer ah yes was thinking of map files for pdftex, mostly. But my comment under the question still stands I think, that OP should check the licence on the font first.
Where were you @egreg when I did start writing my document? :)). The showkeys is the cure for the labeling cancer. I have more than a hundred of equations, I always worry about remembering the labels of the equations, this is why I've chosen eq4.1. With showkeys , I will not to worry about memorizing the labels. THANK YOU SO MUCH. — CroCo11 mins ago
@FaheemMitha see the picture in egreg's answer it puts the symbolic label and cite names into the margin of your document so if you see the equation you want to reference it says eq:abc in the margin so you know to do \ref{eq:abc}
@DavidCarlisle Well, it would be nice to be able to automate a renaming of labels/cite names. Though most documents aren't large enough for that to be an issue.
@JosephWright Any plan to add an argument specifier to xparse, say q for “quine”: like o, but it takes the same value as the following m argument if absent? So \NewDocumentCommand{\foo}{qm}{\internal_function:nn{#1}{#2}} could be used instead of the clumsy \NewDocumentCommand{\foo}{om}{\IfNoValueTF{#1}{\internal_function:nn{#2}{#2}}{\internal_function:nn{#1}{#2}}}
@FaheemMitha it should be almost never required to rename the labels so why is doing a generic edit replace of {eq:abc} to {eq:xyz} a problem, what would a specific rename function do?
@ChristianHupfer Well, if it is an intelligent approach, it's pretty safe TO be clear, if you decide to change your eqn label from "this sucks" to "this really sucks", it would nice to not have to go and change all the refs too.
@FaheemMitha as i say that's what a simple replace of {eq:abc} does. (But how often do you need to do such a rename, should be never, to a good approximation)
@FaheemMitha what do you mean by "have to go and change" wouldn't your editor just change them all if that's what you wanted?
@egreg there's an open issue along those lines somewhere..
Regex (.NET), 122 bytes
^(?=((?=.*$(?<=^(?:\2+(.+.))((?(3)\3.+?|.*?)))).)+(.*))((?=.*(?=\4$)(?<=(?!(.+.)\6*(?=\4$)(?<=^\6+))((?(7)\7.+?|.+?)))).)+
Assuming input and output are in unary, and the output is taken from the main match of the regex.
Breakdown of the regex:
^(?=((?=.*$(?<=^(?:\2+...
I did something as follows:
\usepackage{xparse,fancyvrb}
\RenewDocumentEnvironment{verbatim}{o}{
\IfNoValueTF{#1}
{\Verbatim[frame=single]}
{\Verbatim[frame=single,label=#1] }
}
{\endVerbatim}
however, it's not ok, and I don't know why. Any help?
\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{Arnold period in different size images}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{8pt}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Size N & 4*4 & 8*8 & 32*32 & 64*64 & 128*128 & 256*256\\
\hline
Period M & 3 & 6 & 24 & 48 & 96 & ...
